Mendelian randomization of cytokines in schizophrenia and depression: What does this tell us about causal chains in these illnesses?

Applications of Mendelian randomization in psychiatry: a comprehensive systematic review

Psychiatric diseases exact a heavy socioeconomic toll, and it is particularly difficult to identify their risk factors and causative mechanisms due to their multifactorial nature, the limited physiopathological insight, the many confounding factors, and the potential reverse causality between the risk factors and psychiatric diseases. These characteristics make Mendelian randomization (MR) a precious tool for studying these disorders. MR is an analytical method that employs genetic variants linked to a certain risk factor, to assess if an observational association between that risk factor and a health outcome is compatible with a causal relationship. We report the first systematic review of all existing applications and findings of MR in psychiatric disorders, aiming at facilitating the identification of risk factors that may be common to different psychiatric diseases, and paving the way to transdiagnostic MR studies in psychiatry, which are currently lacking. We searched Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and Pubmed databases (until 3 May 2022) for articles on MR in psychiatry. The protocol was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42021285647). We included methodological details and results from 50 articles, mainly on schizophrenia, major depression, autism spectrum disorders, and bipolar disorder. While this review shows how MR can offer unique opportunities for unraveling causal links in risk factors and etiological elements of specific psychiatric diseases and transdiagnostically, some methodological flaws in the existing literature limit reliability of results and probably underlie their heterogeneity. We highlight perspectives and recommendations for future works on MR in psychiatry.

Effects of Hyperthyroidism on Venous Thromboembolism: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Objective

Observational studies show the correlation between thyroid dysfunction and risk of venous thromboembolism. However, the causal effects remain uncertain. Our study was conducted to evaluate whether thyroid function and dysfunction were causally linked to the risk of venous thromboembolism.

Methods

Publicly available summary data of thyrotropin (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4), hypothyroidism, and hyperthyroidism were obtained from the ThyroidOmics Consortium and the UK Biobank. With single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables, the casual effects of genetically predicted TSH and FT4 and hypo- and hyperthyroidism on venous thromboembolism outcome were estimated through Mendelian randomization analysis methods (inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode). Cochran's Q test was performed to evaluate the heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy.

Results

Our study selected 15 FT4-, 36 TSH-, 3 hyperthyroidism-, and 79 hypothyroidism-associated SNPs as instrumental variables. The IVW analysis results showed that the odds ratio of venous thromboembolism for hyperthyroidism was 1.124 (95% confidence interval: 1.019-1.240; p = 0.019), demonstrating the casual effect of hyperthyroidism not FT4, TSH, and hypothyroidism on venous thromboembolism. No heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was observed according to Cochran's Q test.

Conclusion

Our Mendelian randomization analysis supports the causal effect of hypothyroidism on risk of venous thromboembolism. There is no evidence that genetically predicted TSH, FT4, and hypothyroidism have casual effects on venous thromboembolism. Future studies should be conducted to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.