Concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate is not "stem cell" therapy in the repair of nonunions and bone defects

Bone marrow aspirate and bone marrow aspirate concentrate: Does the literature support use in long-bone nonunion and provide new insights into mechanism of action?

PURPOSE

To assess the use of bone marrow aspirate (BM) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in the treatment of long-bone nonunion and to understand mechanism of action.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed and EBSCOHost was completed to identify studies that investigated the use of BM or BMAC for the diagnosis of delayed union and/or nonunion of long-bone fractures. Studies of isolated bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) and use in non-long-bone fractures were excluded. Statistical analysis was confounded by heterogeneous fracture fixation methods, treatment history, and scaffold use.

RESULTS

Our initial search yielded 430 publications, which was screened down to 25 studies. Successful treatment in aseptic nonunion was reported at 79-100% (BM) and 50-100% (BMAC). Septic nonunion rates were slightly better at 73-100% (BM) and 83.3-100% (BMAC). 18/24 studies report union rates > 80%. One study reports successful treatment of septic nonunion with BMAC and no antibiotics. A separate study reported a significant reduction in autograft reinfection rate when combined with BMAC (P = 0.009). Major adverse events include two deep infections at injection site and one case of heterotopic ossification. Most studies note transient mild donor site discomfort and potential injection site discomfort attributed to needle size.

CONCLUSION

The current literature pertaining to use of BM/BMAC for nonunion is extremely heterogeneous in terms of patient population and concomitant treatment modalities. While results are promising for use of BM/BMAC with other gold standard treatment methodologies, the literature requires additional Level I data to clarify the impact of role BM/BMAC in treating nonunion when used alone and in combination with other modalities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for Treatment of Primary Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Single-Center, Non-randomized Study with 2-Year Follow-Up

Introduction

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a widespread, disabling condition with no intervention to fully restore cartilage or halt progression. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), an autologous product from bone marrow aspiration, has shown promise as a regenerative therapy due to its cell composition and chondrogenic effects. Our study aims to assess the functional outcomes, including pain, function, satisfaction, and complications post-BMAC injection in knee OA patients.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective, single-center study, 63 patients with grade II-III knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) scale) unresponsive to conservative management underwent BMAC injection. The procedure involved bone marrow aspiration from the anterior iliac crest, processing to obtain a concentrate, followed by intra-articular injection. Patients were followed for 24 months, assessing outcomes using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and MOCART 2.0 score.

Results

The cohort, with a slight female predominance and predominantly aged 41-50 years, majorly comprised K-L grade III OA patients. BMAC treatment resulted in significant improvements in VAS pain scores, IKDC functional scores, and MOCART 2.0 scores over the 24-month follow-up.

Conclusion

BMAC injection provides significant improvement in both pain and functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up in patients with mild-to-moderate OA of the knee. Further high-quality, adequately powered, multi-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are necessary to justify the routine clinical use of BMAC for treatment of patients suffering with knee OA.

Graphical Abstract

Skin and Bone Regeneration of Solid Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin

Solid bone marrow aspirate concentrate (sBMAC) is harvested from bone marrow aspirate without anticoagulants by a centrifugation protocol similar to that for platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) prepared from peripheral blood. It was hypothesized that sBMAC could accelerate not only wound healing but also bone regeneration because of the abundant growth factor (GF) releases from enriched bone marrow cells. The purpose of the present study was to investigate skin wound healing and bone regenerative potential of sBMAC compared with arterial blood-derived PRF (Ar-PRF) and venous blood-derived PRF (Ve-PRF) in a skin defect and calvarial bone defect model in rabbits. GF release assays revealed significantly higher release of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and osteocalcin (OCN) from sBMAC compared with PRFs for 24 h. In the skin defect animal model, sBMAC and PRFs promoted wound bed angiogenesis and re-epithelization in skin defect sites with higher collagen 1 synthesis, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expressions on week 1. Furthermore, a calvarial defect assay revealed that sBMAC promoted new bone formation with a sufficient bone marrow structure similar to that of intact bone in the bone defects. Ar-PRF achieved the second highest bone closure and new bone volume but yielded new bone that was thinner than the intact bone. In conclusion, sBMAC treatment might be a good option instead of PRF as an adjuvant therapy for both skin and bone tissue regeneration therapies in certain clinical situations. Impact statement Solid bone marrow aspirate concentrate (sBMAC) is new type of clot material prepared from bone marrow aspirate. The present study for the first time showed that sBMAC significantly accelerated both skin wound healing and bone formation in the defects, compared with conventional platelet-rich fibrin in rabbit experiment models.