Low-Dose Foscarnet Preemptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus Viremia after Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation

Outcomes of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplant Recipients With HHV-6B Reactivation

Background

Human herpesvirus 6B (HHV-6B) frequently reactivates following allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloHCT). Consensus guidelines note that haploidentical alloHCT may represent a high-risk population for which there is little evidence; this warrants further investigation.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated 188 consecutive adult patients receiving haploidentical alloHCT between 11/2014 and 11/2020 and compared outcomes between patients with HHV-6B reactivation receiving targeted antiviral therapy and those who were clinically observed.

Results

Of the 58 included patients, 21 (36.2%) received antiviral therapy for HHV-6B reactivation with foscarnet (n = 19) or ganciclovir (n = 2). There were no differences in patient or disease characteristics between treated and observed patients. Treated patients were more likely to have high-level DNAemia (85.7% vs 40.5%; P < .001) and had higher peak viral quantitative measurements (median log10, 4.65 vs 3.84; P < .001). The median time to clearance from plasma (interquartile range) was 13 (7.25-20.00) days for all patients and was not significantly different between groups. There were no differences in episodes of encephalitis, grade III/IV acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), or time to neutrophil or platelet engraftment among treated vs observed patients. Day 100 nonrelapse mortality was not significantly different in the multivariate analysis; however, the presence of central nervous system symptoms was strongly associated with worse survival (hazard ratio, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.27-13.34; P = .018).

Conclusions

We did not observe a difference in clinical outcomes between the treated and observed groups of patients with HHV-6B reactivation following haploidentical alloHCT. With the rising use of haploidentical transplant and post-transplant cyclophosphamide GVHD prevention platforms, prospective studies are needed to further characterize the risk and outcomes associated with HHV-6B reactivation and therapy.

Human Herpes Virus-6 (HHV-6) Reactivation after Hematopoietic Cell Transplant and Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)- T Cell Therapy: A Shifting Landscape

HHV-6B reactivation affects approximately half of all allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. HHV-6B is the most frequent infectious cause of encephalitis following HCT and is associated with pleiotropic manifestations in this setting, including graft-versus-host disease, myelosuppression, pneumonitis, and CMV reactivation, although the causal link is not always clear. When the virus inserts its genome in chromosomes of germ cells, the chromosomally integrated form (ciHHV6) is inherited by offspring. The condition of ciHHV6 is characterized by the persistent detection of HHV-6 DNA, often confounding diagnosis of reactivation and disease-this has also been associated with adverse outcomes. Recent changes in clinical practice in the field of cellular therapies, including a wider use of post-HCT cyclophosphamide, the advent of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis, and the rapid expansion of novel cellular therapies require contemporary epidemiological studies to determine the pathogenic role and spectrum of disease of HHV-6B in the current era. Research into the epidemiology and clinical significance of HHV-6B in chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T cell) therapy recipients is in its infancy. No controlled trials have determined the optimal treatment for HHV-6B. Treatment is reserved for end-organ disease, and the choice of antiviral agent is influenced by expected toxicities. Virus-specific T cells may provide a novel, less toxic therapeutic modality but is more logistically challenging. Preventive strategies are hindered by the high toxicity of current antivirals. Ongoing study is needed to keep up with the evolving epidemiology and impact of HHV-6 in diverse and expanding immunocompromised patient populations.

Current Role of Prospective Monitoring, Pre-emptive and Prophylactic Therapy for Human Herpesvirus-6 after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) frequently reactivates after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Most patients are asymptomatic and viremia often resolves without therapy; however, transplant-related complications may be associated with reactivation. Multiple presentations have been attributed to HHV-6 reactivation after SCT including encephalitis. Several strategies have been trialed to reduce such risks or complications. Challenges exist with prospective monitoring strategies, and established thresholds of high-level reactivation may be limited. Three published guidelines and extensive trials focusing on preemptive and prophylactic strategies are reviewed. Future areas of investigation and high-risk populations are described. Existing trials and testing platforms have significant limitations, and to date no clear benefit for a preemptive or prophylactic intervention has been demonstrated.

Foscarnet in the management of cytomegalovirus infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients

Despite significant advances in the day-to-day management of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantations, including the introduction of new antiviral drugs, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this article is to undertake a literature-based review of foscarnet in this therapeutic setting and to align current best-published evidence with recent recommendations presented at the European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia. Ganciclovir remains the mainstay of CMV infection/disease antiviral management protocols. However, approximately a third of patients develop severe neutropenia and others become resistant to ganciclovir, and thus, a reasonably large proportion of patients are not able to receive and/or continue with this medication. Foscarnet is a suitable option as both pre-emptive therapy or for the treatment of active disease in these patients. Randomized trials have demonstrated that foscarnet is equally effective when compared with ganciclovir for pre-emptive treatment of CMV infections: the outcome was comparable with ganciclovir in terms of control of antigenemia and survival rates. There is a paucity of information for its use in the prophylaxis of CMV, although preliminary data show that it was effective in some patients at high risk of CMV reactivation. The main adverse events associated with foscarnet are renal impairment, serum electrolyte and hemoglobin disturbances, seizures and local genital irritation/ulceration. Foscarnet is a well-established antiviral option in immunocompromised patients, and it is usually administered as a second-line option to ganciclovir. In patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, it has proven efficacy when used pre-emptively to treat CMV reactivation, as an alternative to and also in combination with ganciclovir.

Use of foscarnet for cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a related donor

Foscarnet is an active agent against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), as well as ganciclovir. We investigated the usefulness of foscarnet in patients who underwent related allogeneic HSCT. Foscarnet was used in 320 patients with a median age of 45 years (range 15-72). The purpose of administration was CMV disease in 65, preemptive use in 248 and prophylaxis in 7. Totally, 194 patients had a history of prior ganciclovir treatment. The reason for foscarnet use was insufficient therapeutic effect of prior ganciclovir in 99, and adverse event including myelosuppression in 95. The response rate in symptom was 52% for the CMV disease patients. Antigenemia disappeared in 77% of the preemptive treatment and improved in 13% of the patients. No outbreak of CMV disease was recognized. The total effectiveness of therapeutic and preemptive use was significantly higher for patients without prior ganciclovir (91 vs. 76%, P = 0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were recognized in 24%, including electrolyte abnormalities in 11%, neutropenia in 8%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Renal damage was only observed in 3% of patients. Foscarnet was concluded to be a safe and effective anti-CMV agent and to be a suitable alternative to ganciclovir.