Advancement of pediatric blood and marrow transplantation research in North America: priorities of the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium

Race and socioeconomic status in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for nonmalignant conditions

BACKGROUND

Survival disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) are observed in a wide range of pediatric treatment settings including oncology and solid organ transplantation. To date, few studies have examined the effects of race and SES on outcomes in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We explored whether survival differed by race/ethnicity or SES in children receiving HCT for nonmalignant conditions at a single institution serving a diverse patient population.

PROCEDURES

The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) with the log-rank test for between-group comparisons. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors for OS, adjusting for treatment- and disease-related factors.

RESULTS

Of 133 subjects, 0 to 21 years, 19% were non-Hispanic (NH) white, 34% were NH black, 40% were Hispanic, and 7% were Asian. Sixty-seven percent of the subjects had public insurance; 49% lived in neighborhoods with poverty rate ≥20%. Primary diagnoses included hemoglobinopathies (56%), bone marrow failure (22%), and other conditions (22%). Median follow-up was 5.8 years (range 0.1-14.5). Analysis revealed no difference in OS by race, insurance type, or neighborhood SES.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this single-institution study suggest that in pediatric patients undergoing HCT for nonmalignant conditions, treatment at a tertiary care center with a multidisciplinary approach may mitigate drivers of disparities observed in other settings. Additional studies are now needed to further elucidate the complex interrelationships among race, SES, and clinical outcomes for children undergoing HCT.

Research priority setting in childhood chronic disease: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate research priority setting approaches in childhood chronic diseases and to describe the priorities of stakeholders including patients, caregivers/families and health professionals.

DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from inception to 16 October 2016. Studies that elicited stakeholder priorities for paediatric chronic disease research were eligible for inclusion. Data on the prioritisation process were extracted using an appraisal checklist. Generated priorities were collated into common topic areas.

RESULTS

We identified 83 studies (n=15 722). Twenty (24%) studies involved parents/caregivers and four (5%) children. The top three health areas were cancer (11%), neurology (8%) and endocrine/metabolism (8%). Priority topic areas were treatment (78%), disease trajectory (48%), quality of life/psychosocial impact (48%), disease onset/prevention (43%), knowledge/self-management (33%), prevalence (30%), diagnostic methods (28%), access to healthcare (25%) and transition to adulthood (12%). The methods included workshops, Delphi techniques, surveys and focus groups/interviews. Specific methods for collecting and prioritising research topics were described in only 60% of studies. Most reviewed studies were conducted in high-income nations.

CONCLUSIONS

Research priority setting activities in paediatric chronic disease cover many discipline areas and have elicited a broad range of topics. However, child/caregiver involvement is uncommon, and the methods often lack clarity. A systematic and explicit process that involves patients and families in partnership may help to inform a more patient and family-relevant research agenda in paediatric chronic disease.

Themes reported by families as important when proceeding with pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an accepted treatment for pediatric malignant and non-malignant conditions. Agreeing to HSCT can be challenging for families. This study explored themes reported by family members as influencing their acceptance of HSCT as a necessary treatment intervention.

PROCEDURE

In a four-site study, 107 individuals within 30 families pursuing HSCT for a pediatric malignancy, and 25 individuals within 6 families pursuing HSCT for a pediatric non-malignancy were interviewed pre-HSCT. Semantic content analysis was used in this secondary analysis to identify relevant themes.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight parents (and surrogates) 19 patients, 16 donor siblings, and 39 non-donor siblings, half-siblings and cousins, participated. Thirteen themes were identified as influencing the acceptance of HSCT. The most frequently reported were: "recommendation by the child's physician," viewing HSCT as the "best chance for cure," and "desiring a more normal and better quality of life for the patient and family." Seven themes were reported by all categories of family members, though at different frequencies. Two themes ("HSCT being part of the upfront treatment plan": "hearing of HSCT success in others") were only reported by the malignancy group, and one theme ("worrying about disease progression and losing a window of HSCT opportunity") was only reported by the non-malignancy group.

CONCLUSION

Parents, patients, and other family members can articulate multiple themes that influence their considerations of HSCT. Understanding these themes may guide discussions between families and healthcare teams.

Assessment of health-related quality of life in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: progress, challenges and future directions

This article provides an overview of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessments in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplants, focusing on the relationship between child and parent proxy ratings of the child's HRQoL and how measurement of HRQoL may be incorporated into clinical decision-making. Parent and child ratings of the child's health may be affected differently by unequal access to and incongruent understanding of available information, as well as the effect of age difference on interpretation. In particular, parents and children may experience the impact of clinical events on HRQoL very differently. The recent US Federal emphasis on 'patient-centeredness' has helped fuel the development and application of more clinically functional and low-burden HRQoL measures. Future work in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplants must seek to capture the experiences and perceptions of all those involved.

Challenges and opportunities for international cooperative studies in pediatric hematopoeitic cell transplantation: priorities of the Westhafen Intercontinental Group

More than 20% of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantations (HCTs) are performed in children and adolescents at a large number of relatively small centers. Unlike adults, at least one-third of HCTs in children are performed for rare, nonmalignant indications. Clinical trials to improve HCT outcomes in children have been limited by small numbers and these pediatric-specific features. The need for a larger number of pediatric HCT centers to participate in trials has led to the involvement of international collaborative groups. Representatives of the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium, European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation's Pediatric Working Group, International Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (iBFm) Stem Cell Transplantation Committee, and Children's Oncology Group's Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Discipline Committee met on October 3, 2012, in Frankfurt, Germany to develop a consensus on the highest priorities in pediatric HCT. In addition, it explored the creation of an international consortium to develop studies focused on HCT in children and adolescents. This meeting led to the creation of an international HCT network, dubbed the Westhafen Intercontinental Group, to develop worldwide priorities and strategies to address pediatric HCT issues. This review outlines the priorities of need as identified by this consensus group.

Clinical practice implications of immunizations after pediatric bone marrow transplant: a literature review

The number of pediatric bone marrow transplants is increasing for malignant and nonmalignant diseases. The number of survivors is also increasing, and their long-term health and protection from infection is increasingly important. To prevent infections, it is standard practice to re-immunize pediatric patients after bone marrow transplant (BMT) using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention immunization guidelines; however, surveys in the United States and other parts of the world indicate that many BMT patients do not receive all the recommended immunizations. A literature review was conducted to identify research based on evidence for immunization following BMT and to recognize barriers to the process. Also, the immunization clinical guidelines from 2000 and 2011 for patients following BMT were compared and an updated clinical protocol and immunization schedule was developed to reflect the current evidence, encourage a change in practice, and discourage fragmented care.

Relationship between pediatric blood and marrow transplant center volume and day +100 mortality: Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium experience

The number of patients receiving a BMT is currently being used as a factor in the accreditation process in determining whether a center can provide a high-quality BMT. Such criteria particularly impact pediatric BMT centers as most of them perform a relatively small number of BMTs. To determine whether patient volume is a valid marker of pediatric BMT center's capabilities, the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) evaluated data from its registry to define the relationship between a pediatric transplant center's patient volume and day +100 mortality. The analyses evaluated 2575 transplants from 60 centers reporting to the PBMTC between the years 2002 and 2004. The volume-outcome relationship was evaluated while adjusting for 46 independent data categories divided between nine variables that were known- or suspected-mortality risk factors. We found no association between transplant center volume and day +100 mortality in several analyses. A calculated intraclass correlation coefficient also indicated that differences in individual transplant center volume contributed to only 1% of the variance in day +100 mortality within the PBMTC. The results of this study suggest that factors other than transplant center volume contribute to variation in day +100 mortality among pediatric patients.

Emerging uses for pediatric hematopoietic stem cells

Many new therapies are emerging that use hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. In this review, we focus on five promising emerging trends that are altering stem cell usage in pediatrics: (i) The use of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation, autologous or allogeneic, in the treatment of autoimmune disorders is one. (ii) The use of cord blood transplantation in patients with inherited metabolic disorders such as Hurler syndrome shows great benefit, even more so than replacement enzyme therapy. (iii) Experience with the delivery of gene therapy through stem cells is increasing, redefining the potential and limitations of this therapy. (iv) It has recently been shown that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection can be cured by the use of selected stem cells. (v) Finally, it has long been postulated that HSC-transplantation can be used to induce tolerance in solid-organ transplant recipients. A new approach to tolerance induction using myeloid progenitor cells will be described.