Polymorphisms in Genes That Regulate Cyclosporine Metabolism Affect Cyclosporine Blood Levels and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Who Receive Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The role of candidate genetic polymorphisms in the interaction between voriconazole and cyclosporine in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: An explorative study

PURPOSE

To evaluate polymorphisms in genes of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters involved in cyclosporine and/or voriconazole disposition among patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT).

METHODS

DNA from forty patients was genotyped using the DMETPlus array. The average ratio of cyclosporine concentration/dose (C/D in (ng/mL)/(mg/kg)) per participant's weight was computed using available trough levels and daily doses.

RESULTS

The C/D cyclosporine ratio was significantly higher when it was administered with voriconazole as compared to when it was administered alone: median: 116.75 vs. 25.40 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg) with and without voriconazole respectively, (P < 0.001). There was also a significant association between the C/D cyclosporine ratio combined with voriconazole and the ABCB1 2677 G > T > A (rs2032582) genetic polymorphism (P = 0.05). In parallel, ABCB1 variant allele carriers had higher creatinine in combination therapy with a median creatinine (mg/dL) of 0.74 vs. 0.56 for variant allele carriers vs. reference; P = 0.003. Interestingly, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A5 extensive metabolizers tended to be associated with lower cyclosporine C/D ratio when combined with voriconazole, but the results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first pharmacogenetic study on the interaction between voriconazole and cyclosporine in patients undergoing allo-HCT. Results suggest that the ABCB1 2677 G > T > A genetic polymorphism plays a role in this interaction with cyclosporine related nephrotoxicity. Pre-emptive genotyping for this genetic variant may be warranted for cyclosporine dose optimization. Larger studies are needed to potentially show significant associations with more candidate genes such as CYP3A4/5, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19, among others.

[Effect of MDR1 and CYP3A5 gene polymorphisms on outcomes of patients receiving imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia]

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of MDR1 and CYP3A5 gene polymorphisms on the outcomes of imatinib treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with CML treated with imatinib were enrolled in this study, including 50 patients with cytogenetic relapse (study group) and 50 without cytogenetic relapse (control group) during the follow-up for 45 months. For all the patients, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of C1236T, C3435T, and G2677T/A loci in the MDR1 gene and A6986G locus in CYP3A5 gene were genotyped and the trough levels of imatinib was measured using LC-MS/MS. The relationship between SNPs of the loci and the risk of cytogenetic relapse were analyzed.

RESULTS

The risk of cytogenetic recurrence was significantly higher in patients with CC genotypes of MDR1-C1236T and MDR1-C3435T than in those with CT + TT genotypes (P < 0.05). The median survival time of the patients with TT genotypes of MDR1-C3435T and MDR1-C1236T was significantly higher than that of patients with CC genotypes and CT genotypes (P < 0.05). The incidences of hematologic toxicity and neutropenia were significantly higher in patients with cytogenetic relapse than in those without cytogenetic relapse (P < 0.05). MDR1-C3435T genotype and imatinib concentration were independent predictors of cytogenetic relapse of CML.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of cytogenetic relapse of CML was significantly affected by SNPs of C1236T and C3435T loci of MDR1 gene and blood imatinib concentration. MDR1-C3435T genotype can be used as a potential biomarker for predicting cytogenetic relapse in CML patients.

Replication and validation of genetic polymorphisms associated with survival after allogeneic blood or marrow transplant

Multiple candidate gene-association studies of non-HLA single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and outcomes after blood or marrow transplant (BMT) have been conducted. We identified 70 publications reporting 45 SNPs in 36 genes significantly associated with disease-related mortality, progression-free survival, transplant-related mortality, and/or overall survival after BMT. Replication and validation of these SNP associations were performed using DISCOVeRY-BMT (Determining the Influence of Susceptibility COnveying Variants Related to one-Year mortality after BMT), a well-powered genome-wide association study consisting of 2 cohorts, totaling 2888 BMT recipients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome, and their HLA-matched unrelated donors, reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Gene-based tests were used to assess the aggregate effect of SNPs on outcome. None of the previously reported significant SNPs replicated at P < .05 in DISCOVeRY-BMT. Validation analyses showed association with one previously reported donor SNP at P < .05 and survival; more associations would be anticipated by chance alone. No gene-based tests were significant at P < .05. Functional annotation with publicly available data shows these candidate SNPs most likely do not have biochemical function; only 13% of candidate SNPs correlate with gene expression or are predicted to impact transcription factor binding. Of these, half do not impact the candidate gene of interest; the other half correlate with expression of multiple genes. These findings emphasize the peril of pursing candidate approaches and the importance of adequately powered tests of unbiased genome-wide associations with BMT clinical outcomes given the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part II

Part I of this article included a pertinent review of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), the role of postgraft immunosuppression in alloHCT, and the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenomics of the calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate. In this article (Part II), we review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenomics of mycophenolic acid (MPA), sirolimus, and the antithymocyte globulins (ATG). We then discuss target concentration intervention (TCI) of these postgraft immunosuppressants in alloHCT patients, with a focus on current evidence for TCI and on how TCI may improve clinical management in these patients. Currently, TCI using trough concentrations is conducted for sirolimus in alloHCT patients. Several studies demonstrate that MPA plasma exposure is associated with clinical outcomes, with an increasing number of alloHCT patients needing TCI of MPA. Compared with MPA, there are fewer pharmacokinetic/dynamic studies of rabbit ATG and horse ATG in alloHCT patients. Future pharmacokinetic/dynamic research of postgraft immunosuppressants should include '-omics'-based tools: pharmacogenomics may be used to gain an improved understanding of the covariates influencing pharmacokinetics as well as proteomics and metabolomics as novel methods to elucidate pharmacodynamic responses.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part I

Although immunosuppressive treatments and target concentration intervention (TCI) have significantly contributed to the success of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), there is currently no consensus on the best immunosuppressive strategies. Compared with solid organ transplantation, alloHCT is unique because of the potential for bidirectional reactions (i.e. host-versus-graft and graft-versus-host). Postgraft immunosuppression typically includes a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and a short course of methotrexate after high-dose myeloablative conditioning, or a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil after reduced-intensity conditioning. There are evolving roles for the antithymyocyte globulins (ATGs) and sirolimus as postgraft immunosuppression. A review of the pharmacokinetics and TCI of the main postgraft immunosuppressants is presented in this two-part review. All immunosuppressants are characterized by large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and by narrow therapeutic indices. It is essential to understand immunosuppressants' pharmacokinetic properties and how to use them for individualized treatment incorporating TCI to improve outcomes. TCI, which is mandatory for the calcineurin inhibitors and sirolimus, has become an integral part of postgraft immunosuppression. TCI is usually based on trough concentration monitoring, but other approaches include measurement of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the dosing interval or limited sampling schedules with maximum a posteriori Bayesian personalization approaches. Interpretation of pharmacodynamic results is hindered by the prevalence of studies enrolling only a small number of patients, variability in the allogeneic graft source and variability in postgraft immunosuppression. Given the curative potential of alloHCT, the pharmacodynamics of these immunosuppressants deserves to be explored in depth. Development of sophisticated systems pharmacology models and improved TCI tools are needed to accurately evaluate patients' exposure to drugs in general and to immunosuppressants in particular. Sequential studies, first without and then with TCI, should be conducted to validate the clinical benefit of TCI in homogenous populations; randomized trials are not feasible, because there are higher-priority research questions in alloHCT. In Part I of this article, we review the alloHCT process to facilitate optimal design of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies. We also review the pharmacokinetics and TCI of calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate.

Identification and utilization of donor and recipient genetic variants to predict survival after HCT: are we ready for primetime?

Overall survival following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has improved over the past two decades through better patient selection and advances in HLA typing, supportive care, and infection prophylaxis. Nonetheless, mortality rates are still unsatisfactory and transplant-related mortality remains a major cause of death after unrelated allogeneic HCT. Since there are no known pre-HCT, non-HLA biologic predictors of survival following transplant, for over a decade, scientists have been investigating the role of non-HLA germline genetic variation in survival and treatment-related mortality after HCT. Variation in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) has the potential to impact chemotherapy, radiation, and immune responses, leading to different post-HCT survival outcomes. In this paper, we address the current knowledge of the contribution of genetic variation to survival following HCT and discuss study design and methodology for investigating HCT survival on a genomic scale.

Cyclosporine and methotrexate-related pharmacogenomic predictors of acute graft-versus-host disease

Effective immunosuppression is mandatory to prevent graft-versus-host disease and to achieve a successful clinical outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Here we tested whether germline single nucleotide polymorphisms in 20 candidate genes related to methotrexate and cyclosporine metabolism and activity influence the incidence of graft-versus-host disease in patients who undergo stem cell transplantation for hematologic disorders. Recipient genetic status of the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette sub-family C1 and adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette sub-family C2 transporters, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase/ inosine monophosphate cyclohydrolase within the methotrexate pathway, and nuclear factor of activated T cells (cytoplasmic 1) loci exhibit a remarkable influence on severe acute graft-versus-host disease prevalence. Indeed, an increased risk of acute graft-versus-host disease was observed in association with single nucleotide polymorphisms located in 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase/inosine monophosphate cyclohydrolase (hazard ratio=3.04; P=0.002), nuclear factor of activated T cells (cytoplasmic 1) (hazard ratio=2.69; P=0.004), adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette sub-family C2 (hazard ratio=3.53; P=0.0018) and adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette sub-family C1 (hazard ratio=3.67; P=0.0005). While donor single nucleotide polymorphisms of dihydrofolate reductase and solute carrier family 19 (member 1) genes are associated with a reduced risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (hazard ratio=0.32-0.41; P=0.0009-0.008), those of nuclear factor of activated T cells (cytoplasmic 2) are found to increase such risk (hazard ratio=3.85; P=0.0004). None of the tested single nucleotide polymorphisms was associated with the occurrence of chronic graft-versus-host disease. In conclusion, by targeting drug-related biologically relevant genes, this work emphasizes the potential role of germline biomarkers in predicting acute graft-versus-host disease. Further investigations are warranted to improve our understanding of these relationships to personalize immunosuppressive therapy and optimize outcomes.