No Evidence of a Drug-Drug Interaction Between Letermovir (MK-8228) and Mycophenolate Mofetil

An update on the treatment of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Introduction: Human Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Standard treatment options have for long been limited to a small number of effective drugs with significant toxicities.Areas covered: In this manuscript, the authors update a previous review summarizing recent developments in the virology lab and their possible implications for treatment strategies at bedside. In particular, the authors focused on new antiviral drugs already available and under investigation in clinical trials and innovative immunotherapeutic approaches, including adoptive T-cell therapy and vaccines.Expert opinion: Broader knowledge of CMV biology and its relationship with the host immune system is greatly contributing to the development of novel therapeutic approaches. The availability of new drugs, the improved techniques for virological testing and the more accurate patient risk stratification allow to better individualize treatment, limiting toxicity while sparing antiviral effects. The role of immunotherapy is clearly emerging and will further expand our treatment armamentarium.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Letermovir Coadministered With Cyclosporine A or Tacrolimus in Healthy Subjects

Letermovir is being developed for human cytomegalovirus infection treatment and prophylaxis. In patients receiving transplants, antivirals are coadministered with cyclosporine A (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC) immunosuppressants. Therefore, we investigated the potential for letermovir-immunosuppressant interactions. In 2 phase 1 clinical trials either CsA 50 mg or TAC 5 mg was administered to healthy males. Following washout, letermovir 80 mg was dosed twice daily for 7 and 11 days in the CsA and TAC trials, respectively, with a second dose of immunosuppressant coadministered with letermovir at steady state. In addition, letermovir 40 mg twice daily was administered for 14 days, and either CsA 50 or 200 mg administered on days 7 and 14. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability were assessed. Letermovir increased CsA and TAC C_max by 37% and 70%, respectively, and exposure by 70% and 78%, respectively, compared with immunosuppressant alone; t_½ was also increased from 10.7 to 17.9 hours for CsA. CsA (50/200 mg) increased letermovir C_max,ss (109%/167%) and AUC_ss,τ (126%/237%) and decreased t_½ (4.33 to 3.68/3.04 hours) versus letermovir alone. TAC did not significantly affect letermovir pharmacokinetics. All treatments were well tolerated. Concomitant letermovir increased TAC and CsA exposure. CsA altered letermovir pharmacokinetics, whereas TAC did not.