Second autologous stem cell transplant: an effective therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma

Trends in utilization of stored cryopreserved autologous peripheral hematopoietic cells intended for a second (or beyond) autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a single center experience

Due to the advent of effective novel therapies for multiple myeloma (MM), the use of cryopreserved autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic cells (APBHC) for a salvage autologous transplant (auto-HCT) is in decline. We evaluated utilization trends and costs associated with cryopreserved APBHC in patients with MM. We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathologic data from 440 patients with MM who underwent APBHC mobilization and collection at Mayo Clinic Florida between 2010 and 2019. Based on institution-specific charges as of May 2021, the cost of 1 session of APBHC collection/apheresis was $4,680 and the cost of 1 year of APBHC cryopreservation was $4,790 per patient. Out of 347 patients who had APBHC in cryopreservation, 5 (1.4%) underwent a salvage auto-HCT and 61% of patients had ≥1 excess collection sessions for APBHC that ultimately went unused. The median cost of excess collection sessions was $4,680 per patient (range, $4,680-$32,760) and the median total cost for excess collection sessions plus costs for storage was $23,840 per patient (range, $4,680-$85,450). The sum of costs of excess collection sessions was $2,077,920 and the sum of costs of cryopreservation was $5,812,665. Institutional policies regarding universal APBHC collection and long-term storage should be reevaluated in the era of novel therapeutics.

Outcomes After Salvage Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

The role of salvage autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (sAHCT2) for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the era of modern therapeutics is unclear. As prospective data is limited, we conducted a retrospective analysis to determine the outcomes of sAHCT2.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-institution, retrospective analysis of patients who received sAHCT2 at The Ohio State University from 2000 to 2018. Patients who received a second transplant as part of a planned tandem or autologous-allogeneic transplant were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were treated with sAHCT2. Patients had a median of 2 lines of therapy after AHCT1 prior to their sAHCT2; 70% had prior immunomodulatory imide drugs, 82% had prior proteasome inhibitor, and 20% had prior anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies as part of re-induction therapy. Forty-two percent of patients attained ≥VGPR prior to sAHCT2. Seventy-four were treated with melphalan 200 mg/m² as conditioning regimen before infusion of a median of 3.8 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg. Fifty-eight percent patients had maintenance therapy and 81% patients attained CR/VGPR as the best response after sAHCT2. The median PFS and OS after sAHCT2 were 1.6 and 3.6 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, high-risk cytogenetics, not having attained CR/VGPR, and having more than 2 lines of therapy post-AHCT1 were associated with inferior PFS. Melphalan 140 mg/m² compared to melphalan 200 mg/m² and no maintenance therapy compared to maintenance therapy were not associated with inferior PFS. There was no transplant-related mortality in this patient cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

For MM patients deriving durable remission after their AHCT1, sAHCT2 was safe and resulted in deep and durable remissions.

Post Salvage Therapy Autologous Transplant for Relapsed Myeloma, Ongoing Relevance within Modern Treatment Paradigms?

BACKGROUND

Salvage transplant has been historically considered effective therapy for myeloma patients relapsing after first transplant, if they achieved adequate remission duration. However, the efficacy of novel agent combinations has called this paradigm into question.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis in a homogeneously treated cohort of 106 patients undergoing ASCT2 at our institution, all of whom received novel agent-based chemotherapy (immunomodulatory agent [IMiD] and/or proteasome inhibitor [PI]) for both induction and relapse. As an exploratory objective we assessed whether predictive thresholds of progression free survival post first transplant (ASCT1) for benefit post ASCT2 vary with use of IMiD maintenance post ASCT1.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) was 98% post-ASCT2 and treatment-related mortality (TRM) was low at 1.8%. With a median follow-up of 26 months (range 0.5-85) from ASCT2, median overall survival (OS) is estimated at 80 months (95% CI: ≥ 49-months) and median progression-free survival after ASCT2 (PFS2) at 24 months (95% CI 19-39). PFS post first transplant (PFS1) at >/= 50 months was associated with improved OS. Predictors of PFS2 included PFS1 ≤42 months and progression on IMiD-based maintenance post- ASCT1.

CONCLUSION

ASCT2 continues to offer acceptable outcomes for most patients treated within modern day treatment paradigms, with longer PFS after ASCT1 and IMiD non-refractory disease being associated with improved outcomes.

The first relapse in multiple myeloma: how to pick the next best thing

The choice of treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at first relapse/progression is based on many factors: (1) treatment-related factors, which include the regimen used during first induction, the quality and duration of first response achieved, toxicities from the first treatment, whether the patient underwent autologous stem cell transplant, and whether the patient was on maintenance at the time of relapse/progression; (2) disease-related factors, including disease presentation and pace of progression; and (3) patient-related factors, including functional age and performance status. The learning objectives are to present the treatment options for patients with MM upon their first relapse and to learn about various strategies for selecting an optimal treatment regimen.

The changing landscape of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): fundamentals and controversies

The increase in the number of therapeutic alternatives for both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients has widened the clinical scenario, leading to a level of complexity that no algorithm has been able to cover up to date. At present, this complexity increases due to the wide variety of clinical situations found in MM patients before they reach the status of relapsed/refractory disease. These different backgrounds may include primary refractoriness, early relapse after completion of first-line therapy with latest-generation agents, or very late relapse after chemotherapy or autologous transplantation. It is also important to bear in mind that many patient profiles are not fully represented in the main randomized clinical trials (RCT), and this further complicates treatment decision-making. In RRMM patients, the choice of previously unused drugs and the number and duration of previous therapeutic regimens until progression has a greater impact on treatment efficacy than the adverse biological characteristics of MM itself. In addition to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 antibodies and corticosteroids, a new generation of drugs such as XPO inhibitors, BCL-2 inhibitors, new alkylators and, above all, immunotherapy based on conjugated anti-BCMA antibodies and CAR-T cells, have been developed to fight RRMM. This comprehensive review addresses the fundamentals and controversies regarding RRMM, and discusses the main aspects of management and treatment. The basis for the clinical management of RRMM (complexity of clinical scenarios, key factors to consider before choosing an appropriate treatment, or when to treat), the arsenal of new drugs with no cross resistance with previously administered standard first line regimens (main phase 3 clinical trials), the future outlook including the usefulness of abandoned resources, together with the controversies surrounding the clinical management of RRMM patients will be reviewed in detail.

Carfilzomib and dexamethasone maintenance following salvage ASCT in multiple myeloma: A randomised phase 2 trial by the Nordic Myeloma Study Group

Objective

We investigated the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib‐containing induction before salvage high‐dose melphalan with autologous stem‐cell transplantation (salvage ASCT) and maintenance with carfilzomib and dexamethasone after salvage ASCT in multiple myeloma.

Methods

This randomised, open‐label, phase 2 trial included patients with first relapse of multiple myeloma after upfront ASCT who were re‐induced with four cycles of carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Two months after salvage, ASCT patients were randomised to either observation or maintenance therapy with iv carfilzomib 27 → 56 mg/sqm and p.o. dexamethasone 20 mg every second week. The study enrolled 200 patients of which 168 were randomised to either maintenance with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (n = 82) or observation (n = 86).

Results

Median time to progression (TTP) after randomisation was 25.1 months (22.5‐NR) in the carfilzomib‐dexamethasone maintenance group and 16.7 months (14.4–21.8) in the control group (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30–0.71; P = .0004). The most common adverse events during maintenance were thrombocytopenia, anaemia, hypertension, dyspnoea and bacterial infections.

Conclusion

In summary, maintenance therapy with carfilzomib and dexamethasone after salvage ASCT prolonged TTP with 8 months. The maintenance treatment was in general well‐tolerated with manageable toxicity.

Outcomes after delayed and second autologous stem cell transplant in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma

We evaluated the outcomes of 168 patients undergoing delayed or second autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) from 2010 to 2019. Overall, 21% (n = 35) patients had received a prior transplant and 69% (n = 116) underwent transplant at first relapse. Overall, 27% patients had high-risk cytogenetics and 15% had ISS stage III disease. Stem cell collection was performed after relapse in 72% and 35% of patients received maintenance therapy. Median PFS from salvage treatment and transplant were 28 and 19 months, respectively. Median OS from salvage treatment and transplant was 69 and 55 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that ASCT in first relapse was associated with superior PFS (HR 0.63, p = 0.03) and OS (HR 0.59, p = 0.04) compared to later lines of therapy. In addition, PFS of ≥36 months with prior therapy was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.62, p = 0.04) and OS (HR 0.41, p = 0.01). Ninety-five patients underwent delayed transplant at first relapse, median PFS and OS from start of therapy was 30 and 69 months, and median OS from diagnosis was 106 months. These data may serve as a guide when counseling patients undergoing ASCT for relapsed MM and provide a benchmark in designing clinical trials of transplantation/comparative treatments for relapsed MM.

Utilization and Cost Implications of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells Stored for a Future Salvage Autologous Transplantation or Stem Cell Boost in Myeloma Patients

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) is a standard initial treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). Consensus guidelines recommend collecting sufficient hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) for 2 autoHCTs in all eligible patients. Despite a lack of published data on the utilization of HPCs stored for future use, it is common practice across transplantation programs to collect enough HPCs for 2 autoHCTs in MM patients. In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed the utilization of HPCs collected and stored at the time of first autoHCT in patients with MM, along with the cost implications of HPC collection targets sufficient for 2 transplantations. In a cohort of 400 patients (median age, 63 years; range, 22 to 79 years), after a median follow-up of 50.4 months, 197 patients had relapsed and 36 had received HPC infusion as salvage autoHCT (n = 29) and/or HPC boost (n = 8). In this cohort, a median CD34⁺ cell dose of 4.3 × 10⁶/kg (range, 1.1 to 12.94.3 × 10⁶/kg) was used for first autoHCT, and a median of 4.4 × 10⁶/kg (range, 1.0 to 20.2× 10⁶/kg) CD34⁺ cells were stored for future use. At 6 years after the first autoHCT, the estimated cumulative incidence of salvage autoHCT was 12.0% without HPC boost and 13.9% with HPC boost. HPC utilization was significantly higher in the 60- to 64-year age group, whereas no patients who were age ≥70 years at the time of first autoHCT received salvage autoHCT. Using the CD34⁺ cell dose infused during the first autoHCT as the cutoff for individual patients, the estimated mean additional cost of HPC collection intended for subsequent use (over and above the HPCs used for first autoHCT) was $10,795 ($4.32 million for the entire cohort), an estimated 14% of which (ie, $583,600) was actually used up in salvage autoHCT by 6 years from first autoHCT. In conclusion, our results suggest the need for reappraisal of HPC collection targets for salvage autoHCT and argue against HPC collection and storage for salvage autoHCT in patients age ≥70 years at the time of first autoHCT.

Lenalidomide maintenance after second autologous stem cell transplant improves overall survival in multiple myeloma

Maintenance therapy after first autologous transplant (autoSCT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM). However, efficacy of maintenance therapy after second autoSCT is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 111 adult MM patients who underwent second autoSCT between January 2000 and December 2018. Lenalidomide up to 15 mg daily or subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² every 2 weeks was considered maintenance therapy. Outcomes were compared among three groups: no-maintenance (n = 73), lenalidomide (n = 23), and bortezomib maintenance (n = 15). At a median follow-up of 58 months from second autoSCT for survival, 3-year PFS and OS for no-maintenance, lenalidomide, and bortezomib maintenance were 11.2%, 29.9%, and 0%, respectively; and 58.5%, 83.3%, and 67.5% respectively. Lenalidomide maintenance was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.46, p = 0.009) and OS (HR 0.25, p = 0.009) compared to no-maintenance. Lenalidomide maintenance therapy after second autoSCT appears to prolong PFS and OS.

A phase I/II study of escalating doses of thalidomide in conjunction with bortezomib and high-dose melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

A regimen of escalating doses of thalidomide, in combination with bortezomib and high-dose melphalan (mel/vel/thal), was evaluated as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with a prior transplant who had relapsed or achieved less than a complete remission following a prior ASCT. Thalidomide was dose escalated starting from 600 mg to 1000 mg on days -5 to -1 in a 3 × 3 design, bortezomib was administered at 1.6 mg/m² intravenously on days -4 and -1 and melphalan 200 mg/m² was administered on day -2. No dose-limiting toxicity was seen in the phase I portion of the trial. An additional 20 patients were enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose of thalidomide of 1000 mg daily. The overall response rate was 69% with 38% complete remission. Median PFS and OS were 9.3 and 65.4 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 17.8 months. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenic fever (58.6%), mucositis (6.9%), and diarrhea (6.9%). Serious AEs included somnolence (13.8%) and tumor lysis syndrome (3.4%). The addition of high-dose thalidomide to bortezomib and melphalan as conditioning for salvage ASCT was well tolerated and was an effective conditioning regimen.

Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when?

Multiple myeloma is one of the most common hematological malignancies, affecting mainly elderly patients. The treatment landscape for the management of this disease has evolved significantly over the past 15 years, and a vast array of therapeutics is now available, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. As a result, deciding which drugs to use and when, and whether these should be used in a particular order or combination, can be challenging. Although combination regimens are often associated with deeper responses and better long-term outcomes than monotherapy, and are becoming the standard of care, they may result in significant incremental toxicity; hence, a sequential approach may be more appropriate for some patients. In particular, treatment choices can vary depending on whether the patient has newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, is eligible for transplant, has relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, or is considered to have high-risk disease. In this review, we discuss factors to be taken into account when making treatment decisions in each of these settings. We also briefly discuss possible therapeutic strategies involving agents that may become available in the future.

Is long term storage of cryopreserved stem cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation a worthwhile exercise in developing countries?

Background

Stem cell units (SCUs) that are cryopreserved prior to both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (for donor lymphocyte infusion) remain unused or partially used several times, and become an increased burden to blood banks/SCU repositories. Because of the scarcity of data regarding the duration for which the storage is useful, there is no general consensus regarding disposal of SCUs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective audit of SCU utilization in 435 patients who planned to undergo either autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) (N=239) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) (N=196) at a tertiary cancer care center between November 2007 to January 2015.

Results

Our cohort consisted of 1,728 SCUs stored for conducting auto-SCT and 729 SCUs stored for conducting donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) after allo-SCT. Stem cells were not infused in 12.5% of patients who had planned to undergo auto-SCT, and 80% of patients who underwent allo-SCT never received DLI. Forty-one percent of SCUs intended for use in auto-SCT remained unutilized, with a second auto-SCT being performed only in 4 patients. Ninety-four percent of SCUs intended for carrying out DLIs remained unused, with only minimal usage observed one year after undergoing allo-SCT.

Conclusion

The duration of storage of unused SCUs needs to be debated upon, so that a consensus can be reached regarding the ethical disposal of SCU.

Novel agent-based salvage autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed multiple myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard frontline therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). Therapeutic options for patients with relapsed MM after ASCT include novel agents in different combos, salvage ASCT (sASCT), and allogeneic transplant, with no unique standard of care. We retrospectively analyzed 66 MM patients who relapsed after up-front single or double ASCT(s) and received novel agent-based sASCT at five Italian centers. Median event-free survival from up-front ASCT(s) to first relapse (EFS1) was 44 months. Seventy-three percent of patients received sASCT at first disease progression. Re-induction regimens were bortezomib based in 87% of patients. Response to re-induction therapy included complete response (CR) 18%, ≥ very good partial response (VGPR) 48%, and overall response rate (ORR) 83%. Response to sASCT included CR 44%, ≥ VGPR 77%, and ORR 94%. With a median follow-up of 24 months after sASCT, 39 patients experienced disease progression. Median EFS from sASCT (EFS2) was 17 months. Median overall survival from ASCT (OS1) and sASCT (OS2) was 166 and 43 months, respectively. EFS2 and OS2 were significantly shorter in patients with EFS1 ≤ 24 months, in patients who did not receive sASCT at first disease progression and in patients with extramedullary disease (EMD). In multivariate analysis, EFS1 ≤ 24 months was associated with shorter EFS2 and OS2, EMD was associated with shorter EFS2, and < CR after sASCT was associated with shorter OS2. Novel agent-based sASCT is a safe and effective procedure for relapsed MM.

Managing multiple myeloma in elderly patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm that affects elderly individuals with two-thirds of patients over 65 years at diagnosis. However, data available are derived from clinical trials conducted in younger patients. Fewer studies investigated treatment options in the elderly. This review summarizes the clinical outcomes and toxicities associated with therapeutic regimens in older patients including doublet, triplet and high dose therapyin newly diagnosed patients and relapsed patients with MM. We highlight the importance of an approach tailored to individuals, incorporates the geriatric frailty assessment, considers comorbiditiess and commits to early recognition and management of toxicities ranging from myelosuppression to polypharmacy. To date, no trial has prospectively investigated a tailored treatment paradigm in older patients based on frailty and/or comorbidities. As the population ages, the proportion of MM patients with advanced age will grow. Studies are indicated to determine optimal treatment approaches in this increasingly heterogeneous geriatric population.

When to recommend a second autograft in patients with relapsed myeloma?

In the current evolving landscape of myeloma therapies, no recommended salvage strategy exists for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) after initial successful autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and therapeutic options extend from conventional chemotherapy and novel agents to second autologous and allogeneic transplants. In this article, we summarize the documented evidence about the utilization of second ASCT in patients with relapsed MM after a primary auto-graft and discuss the correct timing for such a salvage approach, the individual characteristics of patients who will benefit more, as well as the therapeutic role of second ASCT in the modern era of forthcoming anti-myeloma treatments.

How to Integrate Elotuzumab and Daratumumab Into Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

Purpose Treatment options and outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma have dramatically improved over the past decade with new agents and drug targets for patients at all stages of disease. Incorporation of newly approved monoclonal antibodies is a clinical challenge because the trials used to gain approval are relatively limited in scope and may be less helpful for patients treated in the United States. This article will review data on the use of elotuzumab and daratumumab and provide a foundation for their use in current clinical practice. Methods We performed a review of current published articles and abstract data from clinical trials as well as data on managing adverse events. Results Single-agent activity was seen when using daratumumab in refractory myeloma, and trials for both elotuzumab and daratumumab have demonstrated significant activity when combined with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents. Unique antibody-related adverse events and challenges are reviewed and discussed. Conclusion These antibodies already have had and will continue to have a dramatic impact on myeloma treatment. Combination therapy likely represents the best approach for their use, and trials that evaluate optimal timing and duration of therapy are in progress as part of induction, salvage, and maintenance therapy.

A Phase I/II Study of Escalating Doses of Bortezomib in Conjunction with High-Dose Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen for Salvage Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Escalating doses of bortezomib with high-dose melphalan was evaluated as as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). MM patients with less than a partial remission (PR) (or 50% reduction) compared to their pretransplantation paraprotein parameters after a prior ASCT with melphalan conditioning, or who were in relapse after a prior autologous transplantation, were eligible for study. Bortezomib was dose escalated in steps of 1, 1.3, and 1.6 mg/m² (3 × 3 design) on days -4 and -1 before transplantation with melphalan 200 mg/m² given on day -2. Thirty-two patients were enrolled: 12 in the phase I dose escalation phase and an additional 20 in phase II to gain additional experience with the regimen. Twenty-four (75%) patients were Durie Salmon stage III, and 12 (37.5%) had >2 prior lines of therapy. The overall response rate (≥PR) was 44% with 22% complete remission. Two-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 76% and 39%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 31.7 months. The most common grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic adverse events were neutropenic fever (25%), nausea (18.8%), and mucositis (9.4%). Serious adverse events included intensive care unit admission (9.4%), seizure (3.1%), prolonged diarrhea (3.1%), and Guillain-Barre syndrome (3.1%). Two patients (6%) died of sepsis. There was no emergent peripheral neuropathy nor increase in any pre-existing peripheral neuropathy. The addition of bortezomib to melphalan as conditioning for salvage ASCT was well tolerated. More importantly, it can provide durable remission for patients who have a suboptimal response to prior single-agent melphalan conditioning for ASCT, without requiring a reduction in the dose of melphalan. Larger randomized prospective studies to determine the effect of combination conditioning are being conducted.

Rationale and design of the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG) trial ReLApsE: a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial of lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone plus subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Despite novel therapeutic agents, most multiple myeloma (MM) patients eventually relapse. Two large phase III trials have shown significantly improved response rates (RR) of lenalidomide/dexamethasone compared with placebo/dexamethasone in relapsed MM (RMM) patients. These results have led to the approval of lenalidomide for RMM patients and lenalidomide/dexamethasone has since become a widely accepted second-line treatment. Furthermore, in RMM patients consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown to significantly increase progression free survival (PFS) as compared to cyclophosphamide in a phase III trial. The randomized prospective ReLApsE trial is designed to evaluate PFS after lenalidomide/dexamethasone induction, high-dose chemotherapy consolidation plus autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance compared with the well-established lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen in RMM patients.

METHODS/DESIGN

ReLApsE is a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial in a planned study population of 282 RMM patients. All patients receive three lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycles and--in absence of available stem cells from earlier harvesting--undergo peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and harvesting. Subsequently, patients in arm A continue on consecutive lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycles, patients in arm B undergo high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by lenalidomide maintenance until discontinuation criteria are met. Therapeutic response is evaluated after the 3(rd) (arm A + B) and the 5(th) lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycle (arm A) or 2 months after autologous stem cell transplantation (arm B) and every 3 months thereafter (arm A + B). After finishing the study treatment, patients are followed up for survival and subsequent myeloma therapies. The expected trial duration is 6.25 years from first patient in to last patient out. The primary endpoint is PFS, secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), RR, time to best response and the influence of early versus late salvage high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation on OS.

DISCUSSION

This phase III trial is designed to evaluate whether high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance after lenalidomide/dexamethasone induction improves PFS compared with the well-established continued lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen in RMM patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN16345835 (date of registration 2010-08-24).