Donor Immunization Against Human Leukocyte Class II Antigens is a Risk Factor for Graft-versus-Host Disease

Donor-derived anti-HLA antibodies in a haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant recipient shortly after transplant

A pediatric patient with acute myeloid leukemia was referred to our institution for investigational therapy after disease relapse following a mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Prior to second HCT, the patient's serum was negative for antibodies to class I and class II HLA. Eight days after receiving a maternal donor haploidentical transplant, the patient became platelet refractory and highly sensitized to multiple class I HLA. Serum from the patient's mother was positive for the strongest antibodies present in the patient, suggesting the antibodies were donor-derived. Patient sera showed magnified and expanded sensitization over time in the context of 100% donor chimerism and despite undetectable circulating B cells. Escalating sensitization suggests active transfer of rituximab-resistant antibody-producing passenger lymphocytes from a haploidentical donor to a transplant recipient at the time of progenitor cell infusion. Evaluation of donor sensitization status may be a consideration prior to HLA mismatched HCT.

The impact of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies in transplants from HLA-identical sibling donors: A multicenter study

Few studies have performed comparative analysis of the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors (ISD-HSCT) in patients with or without anti-HLA Abs. In this study we retrospectively collected data from a multicenter study to analyze the distribution and impact of the pre-existing anti-HLA Abs in ISD-HSCT. Among 402 recipients, 111 were positive for anti-HLA Abs. Gender, time from diagnosis to transplantation and distribution of primary disease might be risk factors for the occurrence of anti-HLA Abs. We found that patients with anti-HLA Abs had delayed neutrophil engraftment and were more vulnerable to experience Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation. The presence of anti-HLA Abs was proved to be an independent risk factor for neutrophil engraftment (HR 1.42 95% CI 1.13-1.80, p = 0.003) and CMV reactivation (HR 2.03 95% CI 1.19-3.46, p = 0.009). We found that anti-HLA Abs have a negative impact on the prognosis in the early period after transplantation from sibling donors and anti-HLA Abs was also an independent risk factor for the overall survival (OS) at 180 days (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.03-5.27, p = 0.042) among female recipients. In conclusion, anti-HLA Abs have a negative impact on the prognosis early after ISD-HSCT.

Double filtration plasmapheresis combined with rituximab for donor-specific antibody desensitization in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT). Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) avoids the unnecessary loss of plasma proteins and increases the efficiency of purification. To investigate the effectiveness of the desensitization protocol including DFPP and rituximab, we conducted a nested case-control study. Thirty-three patients who had positive DSA were desensitized by the protocol and 99 patients with negative DSA were randomly matched as control. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity values before and after DFPP treatment were 7505.88 ± 4424.38 versus 2013.29 ± 4067.22 (p < 0.001). All patients in DSA group achieved haematopoietic reconstitution and the median neutrophils and platelets engraftment times were 13 (10-21) and 13 (10-29) days respectively. Although the cumulative incidence of II-IV aGVHD (41.4% vs. 28.1%) and 3-year moderate to severe cGVHD (16.8% vs. 7.2%) were higher in DSA cohort than in the control, no statistical significance was observed. The 3-year non-relapse mortality and the overall survival were 6.39% and 72.0%, respectively, in the DSA cohort, which were comparable to the negative control. In conclusion, DFPP and rituximab could be effectively used for desensitization and overcome the negative effects of DSA in Haplo-HSCT.

High-Dose immunoglobulin Intervention as an effective and simple strategy for donor specific Anti-HLA antibody desensitization in haploidentical transplant

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) is a significant obstacle to successful haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) and is associated with poor engraftment rates. DSA strongly positive patients with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) over 5000 have a primary poor graft function (PGF) rate of over 60%. Currently, there is no consensus on the desensitization of DSA, and existing strategies are complex and have limited effectiveness. To address this issue, we conducted a retrospective study on 19 patients with strongly positive DSA (MFI over 5000) who underwent haplo-HSCT and were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)-based therapy. We also included 38 baseline-matched patients with DSA-negative as controls. Our findings revealed that the cumulative incidence of engraftment, PGF, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), virus infection, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in the DSA strongly positive group after desensitization were comparable to those in the DSA negative group (P > 0.05). Our multivariable analysis showed that disease remission was a protective factor against PGF (P = 0.005, OR = 0.019, 95% CI 0.001-0.312). Subgroup analysis revealed that the desensitization efficacy was equal regardless of DSA type against HLA-I or II, and MFI value over 5000 or not. In conclusion, we propose a simple and effective DSA desensitization strategy based on immunoglobulin to ensure successful engraftment and improve patient prognosis.

Graft-Versus-Host-Disease and Health-Related Quality of Life in Young Long-term Survivors of Cancer and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Purpose: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an established treatment predominantly for malignancies. Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the leading long-term complication after allo-HSCT, but knowledge on cGVHD and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in long-term survivors of allo-HSCT performed in childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood (CAYA) is scarce. Therefore, we aimed to (1) assess prevalence and risk factors of active cGVHD using the 2014 National Institutes of Health-Consensus criteria, (2) investigate associations between cGVHD severity, patient-reported symptom burden, and HRQOL, and (3) compare HRQOL of survivors to population norms. Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study in long-term survivors of CAYA allo-HSCT combining clinical examinations and patient-reported outcome measures. Results: We included 103 survivors, 55 (53%) females, median age of 19.6 years [range 0.3-29.9] at HSCT, 16.8 years [6.0-32.0] from HSCT, and 77 (75%) with underlying malignancy. Overall, 32 (31%) survivors were diagnosed with active cGVHD. The risk of active cGVHD was increased with prior acute GVHD and reduced with in vivo T cell depletion. cGVHD severity was associated with increased symptom burden, but not with adverse HRQOL. Compared to Norwegian population norms, allo-HSCT survivors reported significantly lower HRQOL. Conclusion: These results indicate a high prevalence of cGVHD in long-term survivors of CAYA allo-HSCT. Although we did not find an association between cGVHD severity and HRQOL, survivors reported significantly poorer HRQOL compared to population norms. Knowledge on the long-term consequences of cGVHD will be important for optimizing treatment and long-term follow-up care after CAYA allo-HSCT.

Posttransplant de novo DSA and NDSA affect GvHD, OS, and DFS after haplo-HSCT in patients without pre-existing HLA antibodies of hematological malignancies

To examine the production time, type, and MFI of post-transplantation de novo HLA antibodies, and their effects on haplo-HSCT outcomes, we retrospectively included 116 patients who were negative for pre-existing HLA antibodies. In total, 322 serum samples from pre-transplantation to post-transplantation were dynamically tested by Luminex and single-antigen bead reagents. Patients were divided into: HLA antibody persistently negative group (group 1), the de novo HLA antibody transiently positive group (group 2), the de novo HLA antibody non-persistently positive group (group 3), and the de novo HLA antibody persistently positive group (group 4). Group 4 included DSA+non-DSA (NDSA) (group 4a) and NDSA (group 4b) groups. The detection rate of de novo HLA antibodies was 75.9% (88/116). The median MFI for de novo HLA antibodies was 2439 (1033-20162). The incidence of II-IV aGvHD was higher in group 2 than in group 1 (52.6% vs 17.9%, P < 0.01); in group 4a than in group 1 (87.5% vs 17.9%, P < 0.001); and in group 4a than in group 4b (87.5% vs 40.0%, P = 0.001). The DFS (37.5% vs 85.7%, P < 0.01) and OS (37.5% vs 85.7%, P < 0.01) of group 4a were lower than those of group 1. The DFS (48.0% vs 85.7%, P < 0.01) and OS (56.0% vs 85.7%, P = 0.03) of group 4b were lower than those of group 1. Multivariate analysis showed that de novo HLA antibody being transiently positive (HR: 5.30; 95% CI: 1.71-16.42, P = 0.01) and persistently positive (HR: 5.67; 95% CI: 2.00-16.08, P < 0.01) were both associated with a higher incidence of II-IV aGvHD. Persistently positive de novo HLA antibodies were a risk factor for reduced DFS (HR: 6.57; 95% CI: 2.08-20.70, P < 0.01) and OS (HR: 5.51; 95% CI: 1.73-17.53, P < 0.01). DSA and NDSA can be detected since 15 days after haplo-HSCT in patients without pre-existing HLA antibodies, and affect aGvHD, DFS, and OS. Haplo-HSCT patients must be monitored for HLA antibodies changes for appropriate preventive clinical management, and we recommend that 1-month post-transplantation is the best test time point.

Successful desensitization of high level donor-specific anti-HLA antibody in patients with hematological diseases receiving haploidentical allografts

Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (DSA) is associated with a higher incidence of graft failure and mortality in HLA-mismatched allograft settings. However, the optimal protocol of desensitization for patients with positive DSA remains uncertain. We investigated the effectiveness of a desensitization protocol, including rituximab, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and a single session of plasma exchange (PE), for haploidentical allograft recipients with a high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) level of DSA (≥ 5,000). Eleven patients with hematological disease who had positive DSA (median, 11,676, range 5387-20,435) were desensitized by the protocol. All of the patients achieved hematopoietic recovery. The median times for neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 13 (range, 11-26) days and 19 (range, 11-90) days, respectively. Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was seen in one patient and was controlled completely. Chronic cutaneous GVHD was seen in eight patients. Nine patients are alive with good performance so far. One patient suffered extramedullary relapse, and one patient died of transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. The 1-year probability of overall survival was 81.8%. These results suggest that successful desensitization could be obtained by a combination of rituximab, high-dose IVIG, and PE for haploidentical allograft recipients with high MFI levels of DSA.

Impact of HLA Epitope Matching on Outcomes After Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation

The significance of antibody-identified epitopes stimulating humoral alloimmunity is not well understood in the identification of non-permissive human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching patterns in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This was a retrospective study in a cohort of 9,991 patients who underwent their first HSCT for hematologic malignancies from unrelated bone marrow donors in the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program (TRUMP). HLA eplet mismatches (EMM) were quantified using HLAMatchmaker (HLAMM). The median age of patients was 48 years (range, 16 to 77). The number of EMM in recipient-donor pairs in our study population ranged from 0 to 37 in HLA class I (median, 0) and 0 to 60 in HLA class II (median, 1). In addition to the known high-risk mismatch patterns in the Japanese cohort, HLA-C EMM in the GVH direction was associated with a significantly higher risk for grade III-IV aGVHD, leading to a higher risk of non-relapse mortality and lower overall survival (compared with HLA-C matched patients, HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.44–1.95; HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.25–1.54; HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10–1.30, respectively). HLAMM-based epitope matching might be useful for identifying patients who are at high risk for serious complications after HSCT from HLA mismatched unrelated donors.

The Impact of Panel Reactive Antibodies and Different Desensitization Methods on Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

In highly sensitized patients who have panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, primary graft failure risk may increase. In this study, we aimed to determine the association of PRA with engraftment, and graft versus host disease (GVHD) in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three PRA-positive and 42 PRA-negative patients were taken into study. Both groups were compared in terms of graft failure, acute GVHD, viral infection and survival rates. PRA-positive group was also divided into 2 according to treatment modality (steroid-only group/combination therapy) and compared for the same parameters.

RESULTS

There was no difference in PRA-positive and negative patients in terms of graft failure, acute GVHD and viral infections. Analysis of the PRA-positive group in itself showed that there was also no difference in terms of graft failure and viral infection frequency. The only difference is that acute grade 3 to 4 GVHD was higher in the steroid-only group. The 100-day overall survival was 90.2% and 90.4% for the PRA-positive and negative groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Different treatment strategies like plasmapheresis, steroid, rituximab, or combination therapies can be used for the desensitization of PRA-positive patients before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Patient-specific treatment modality for sensitized patients before transplant can increase the success rate.

[Definition and standardization of histocompatibility requests depending on patient course and donor type: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) and the Francophone Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (SFHI)]

Standardization of histocompatibility tests for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants, harmonization of information transmitted to clinicians are part of quality improvement and optimization of human and economic resources. New HLA typing technologies provide high-resolution information within a reasonable time frame. Knowledge of high-resolution HLA typing for the patient and their relatives is essential for a better interpretation of compatibilities. HLA-DPB1 typing must be considered in transplant field regardless of the donor type. The benefits of using search and match programs are considerable. It saves time and reduces additional typing costs by providing rapid information about the likelihood to identify a matched unrelated donor. A backup therapy considering alternative cell sources or treatment can therefore be quickly implemented. The importance of knowledge and consideration of patient immunization for donor choice was explored in previous workshops of the SFGM-TC (2018 and 2019). The published recommendations remain applicable. The routine follow-up protocol and in case of desensitization will be detailed here. This harmonization must be accompanied by the standardization of information to be returned to the clinician regarding the donor finding possibilities for the patient. This will guarantee a similar quality level in every center.

BSHI guideline: HLA matching and donor selection for haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation

A review of the British Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (BSHI) Guideline 'HLA matching and donor selection for haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation' published in 2016 was undertaken by a BSHI appointed writing committee. Literature searches were performed and the data extracted were presented as recommendations according to the GRADE nomenclature.

Potential Novel Biomarkers in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Prognostic, diagnostic or predictive biomarkers are urgently needed for assessment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD), a major risk for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The main goal of this review generated within the COST Action EUROGRAFT "Integrated European Network on Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease" was to identify potential novel biomarkers for cGvHD besides the widely accepted molecular and cellular biomarkers. Thus, the focus was on cellular biomarkers, alloantibodies, glycomics, endothelial derived particles, extracellular vesicles, microbiome, epigenetic and neurologic changes in cGvHD patients. Both host-reactive antibodies in general, and particularly alloantibodies have been associated with cGvHD and require further consideration. Glycans attached to IgG modulate its activity and represent a promising predictive and/or stratification biomarker for cGVHD. Furthermore, epigenetic changes such as microRNAs and DNA methylation represent potential biomarkers for monitoring cGvHD patients and novel targets for developing new treatment approaches. Finally, the microbiome likely affects the pathophysiology of cGvHD; bacterial strains as well as microbial metabolites could display potential biomarkers for dysbiosis and risk for the development of cGvHD. In summary, although there are no validated biomarkers currently available for clinical use to better inform on the diagnosis, prognosis or prediction of outcome for cGvHD, many novel sources of potential markers have shown promise and warrant further investigation using well characterized, multi-center patient cohorts.

[Relevance of antibodies in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Antibodies anti-HLA, anti-platelets, anti-granulocytes, anti-erythrocytes and anti-MICA. Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

The presence of allo-antibodies in the serum of a recipient awaiting hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may have an impact on transfusion efficiency and/or donor choice, especially in the absence of an identical sibling donor. Prior to transplantation, donor specific anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) antibodies (DSA) have a recognized effect on transplant outcome, correlated with the increasing MFI value and with the ability of such antibody to fix the complement fraction. Anti-platelet antibodies (anti-HLA class I and anti-HPA [Human Platelet Antigen]) are better involved in transfusion inefficiency and can be responsible for refractory status. ABO incompatibilities require a specific treatment of the graft in presence of high titer to avoid hemolytic adverse effects. Investigations of these antibodies should be carried out on a regular basis in order to establish appropriate transfusion recommendation, select an alternative donor when possible or adapt the source of cells. After transplantation, in case of delayed recovery or graft rejection, long term aplasia, persistent mixed chimerism or late release, and after elimination of the main clinical causes, a biological assessment targeted on the different type of antibodies will have to be performed in order to orient towards the cause or the appropriate therapy. Further studies should be carried out to determine the impact of anti-MICA antibodies and recipient specific anti-HLA antibodies, on the outcome of the transplantation.

HLA antibodies in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The negative impact of donor specific HLA alloantibodies in solid organ transplantation is well known and understood within the histocompatibility and immunogenetics community. However the influence of donor-specific antibodies in the outcome of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is less well regarded. As donor choices have evolved from HLA matched siblings and extremely well matched unrelated donors to mismatched cord blood and haplo-identical-related donors, we are now identifying more patients with antibodies reactive against their donor mismatches. The clinical significance of the antibodies that can be detected has not yet been fully elucidated.

Rituximab for desensitization during HLA-mismatched stem cell transplantation in patients with a positive donor-specific anti-HLA antibody

To define the efficacy of a single dose of 375 mg/m² rituximab for DSA-positive patients with 2000 ≤ MFI < 10,000, we enrolled a prospective clinical cohort including patients with positive DSA treated with rituximab (n = 55, cohort A), a matched-pair cohort including cases with negative DSA (n = 110, cohort B) and a historical cohort including subjects with 2000 ≤ MFI < 10,000 without receiving any treatment for DSA (n = 22, cohort C). The incidences of primary poor graft function (PGF) in cohort A and cohort B were 5% and 1% (P = 0.076), respectively, both of which were lower than that in cohort C (27%, P < 0.001, for all). Rituximab was associated with a reduced incidence of primary PGF (HR 0.200, P = 0.023). The 3-year nonrelapse mortality of patients in cohort A and cohort B were 23% and 24%, respectively, both of which were lower than that in the cohort C (37%), although no statistical significance was observed. These results led to a low 3-year overall survival in patients in the cohort C (58%) compared with those in the cohort A (71%) and the cohort B (73%). We suggest that a single dose of rituximab could be effectively used to prevent the onset of primary PGF. The prospective cohort of this study is registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn/ChiCTR-OPC-15006672.

HLA Matching in Unrelated Stem Cell Transplantation up to Date

Unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has evolved from an experimental protocol to a potentially curative first-line treatment in certain disease instances. Factors enabling this transformation were the optimization of treatment protocols and supportive care as well as the availability of a large number of donors worldwide along with the higher quality and reliability of HLA typing. The main criterion for donor selection is HLA compatibility. In this review we discuss the current clinical evidence of HLA matching in unrelated HSCT. In this context, we address methodical aspects of transplantation immunobiology research and discuss the impact of locus and resolution of HLA differences. Furthermore, we address special constellations such as unidirectional mismatches or the presence of nonexpressed alleles as well as HLA alloimmunization and describe the perspective for HLA typing and matching strategies in the future, given the implementation of novel complete or near-complete gene typing approaches using next-generation sequencing short read technology, which are now entering the standard of clinical care.

Frequency of Finding Family Donors: A Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is a curative treatment option for many hematologic diseases. The existence of a fully compatible donor for recipients is the first condition for minimized transplant-related mortality and morbidity. The best donor for hematopoietic stem cell transplant is an HLA-matched sibling donor. The possibility of finding an HLA-matched sibling is less than 30% worldwide. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is needed for an increasing number of patients every year, but the ability to find a fully compatible donor has limited its use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From August 2012 to May 2017, we screened 412 adult patients who required AHSCT and their families for HLA tissue groups who were seen at our center (Baskent University Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Medical Center Hematology Unit). To screen tissue groups at our center, we perform lowresolution typing for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB. If an HLA genotype cannot be identified, verification typing is done using highresolution testing.

RESULTS

We found matched family donors in 227 (55%) of 412 patients screened at our center. The ratio of HLAmatched related donors was 83% for 279 patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood of finding eligible unrelated donors has been gradually increasing, in part due to the development of the National Bone Marrow Bank. However, a careful screening for related donors is still important. Our findings indicate the importance of careful examination of family genealogy and of careful family screening in our region.

Major Histocompatibility Complex and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Beyond the Classical HLA Polymorphism

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a curative treatment for many patients with hematological malignant or non-malignant disorders. Evaluation of potential donors for HSCT includes a rigorous assessment of the human leukocyte antigens (HLA) match status of family members, and the identification of suitable unrelated donors. Genes encoding transplantation antigens are placed both within and outside the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). The human MHC is located on the short arm of chromosome 6 and contains a series of genes encoding two distinct types of highly polymorphic cell surface glycoproteins. Donors for HSCT are routinely selected based on the level of matching for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 loci. However, disease relapse, graft-versus-host-disease, and infection remain significant risk factors of morbidity and mortality. In the same breath, in high-risk patients, graft-versus-leukemia effects inherent in HLA mismatching play a substantial immunological role to limit the recurrence of post-transplant disease. The definition of a suitable donor is ever changing, shaped not only by current typing technology, but also by the specific transplant procedure. Indeed, a more complete understanding of permissible HLA mismatches and the role of Killer Immunoglobulin-like receptors' genes increases the availability of HLA-haploidentical and unrelated donors.

Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a curative treatment for a wide variety of hematological diseases. In 30% of the cases, a geno-identical donor is available. Any other situation displays some level of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) incompatibility between donor and recipient. Deleterious effects of anti-HLA immunization have long been recognized in solid organ transplant recipients. More recently, anti-HLA immunization was shown to increase the risk of primary graft failure (PGF), a severe complication of AHSCT that occurs in 3-4% of matched unrelated donor transplantation and up to 15% in cord blood transplantation and T-cell depleted haplo-identical stem cell transplantation. Rates of PGF in patients with DSA were reported to be between 24 and 83% with the highest rates in haplo-identical and cord blood transplantation recipients. This led to the recommendation of anti-HLA antibody screening to detect donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in recipients prior to AHSCT. In this review, we highlight the role of anti-HLA antibodies in AHSCT and the mechanisms that may lead to PGF in patients with DSA, and discuss current issues in the field.