Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Leukemic Transformation Preceded by Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Nationwide Survey by the Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Working Group of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Outcomes of intensive and nonintensive blast-reduction strategies in accelerated and blast-phase MPN

ABSTRACT

Transformation of BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) to an accelerated or blast phase is associated with poor outcomes. The efficacy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-type intensive and nonintensive hypomethylating agent-based regimens is not well studied. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of patients with MPN-AP/BP (N = 138) treated with intensive (N = 81) and nonintensive (N = 57) blast-reduction strategies. We used clinically relatable response criteria developed at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. The overall best response, comprising complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), and reversion to chronic phase MPN (cMPN), in the intensive and nonintensive groups was 77% (62 of 81) and 39% (21 of 54), respectively. Similar overall best response rates were observed in patients receiving induction with daunorubicin combined with cytarabine arabinoside (daunorubicin + ara-C) (74% [23 of 31]) or FLAG-IDA/NOVE-HiDAC (78% [39 of 50], P = .78). However, patients receiving daunorubicin + ara-C more often required second inductions (29% [9 of 31] vs 4% [2 of 50], P = .002). Most responses in the entire cohort were reversions to cMPN (55 of 83 [66%]). CR and CRi comprised 30% (25 of 83) and 4% (3 of 83) of responses, respectively. Mutations in TP53 (overall response [OR] 8.2 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01, 37.1], P = .004) and RAS pathway (OR 5.1 [95%CI 1.2, 23.7], P = .03) were associated with inferior treatment response for intensively treated patients, and poorer performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) was associated with inferior treatment response in both intensively (OR 10.4 [95% CI 2.0, 78.5], P = .009) and nonintensively treated groups (OR 12 [95% CI 2.04, 230.3], P = .02). In patients with paired samples before and after therapy (N = 26), there was a significant residual mutation burden remaining irrespective of response to blast-reduction therapy.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapies vs monotherapy of hypomethylating agents in accelerated or blast phase of Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of evidence regarding whether combination therapy of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) has better outcomes than HMA monotherapy in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative accelerated or blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-AP/BP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library databases were searched for studies from inception of each database until 31 December 2021. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted following the PRISMA reporting guideline.

RESULTS

It was found that HMAs plus venetoclax therapy yielded a higher CR/CRi rate than HMAs alone [36% vs 19%, p = .0204] and a higher CR rate than HMAs plus ruxolitinib [22% vs 8%, p = .0313]. HMAs plus ruxolitinib combination showed a higher ORR than HMA monotherapy [45% vs 30%, p = .0395], but there was no improvement in CR/CRi. The one-year and two-year OS rate for patients treated with HMAs plus venetoclx/ruxolitinib demonstrated a trend towards prolonged survival than HMAs alone [HMAs plus venetoclax: 24% vs 11%, p = .1295 and 12% vs 3%, p = .2357; HMAs plus ruxolitinib: 25% vs 11%, p = .0774 and 33% vs 3%, p = .051].

CONCLUSION

It was confirmed that HMA in combination with venetoclax is an effective and well-tolerated option in MPN-AP/BP patients in pre- as well as post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation settings. HMA plus ruxolitinib therapy was revealed to be effective in patients with MPN-AP.Key MessagesCombination therapy with HMAs and venetoclax/ruxolitinib was associated with improved outcomes than HMAs alone in MPN-AP/BP patients.Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm regarding to the optimal treatment for this patient population.

Updates on accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: Are we making progress?

Management approaches for accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms remain challenging for clinicians and patients alike. Despite many therapeutic advances, outcomes for those patients who are not allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant eligible remain, in general, very poor. Estimated survival rates for such blast phase patients is frequently reported as less than 6 months. No specific immunological, genomic or clinicopathological signature currently exists that accurately predicts the risk and timing of transformation, which frequently induces a high degree of anxiety among patients and clinicians alike. Within this review article, we provide an up-to-date summary of current understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of accelerated and blast phase disease and discuss current therapeutic approaches and realistic outcomes. Finally, we discuss how the horizon may look with the introduction of more novel agents into the clinical arena.

ENABLE: treatment combination including decitabine and venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms

The management of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (blast phase) secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) is extremely challenging and the outcome dismal, with a median overall survival of about 3-6 months. Effective therapeutic approaches are lacking, especially when intensive strategies followed by allogeneic transplantation are not feasible. The combination of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents has recently been established as standard for newly diagnosed, unfit patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia, but the application of this therapeutic modality has not been tested prospectively in the specific context of blast-phase MPNs. ENABLE is an open, phase II clinical trial aimed at verifying the efficacy and safety of the combination of venetoclax and decitabine in patients with post-MPN blast phase.

Comparison of Different Treatment Strategies for Blast-Phase Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Up to 20% of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) will progress to blast phase (MPN-BP). Outcomes are dismal, with intensive chemotherapy providing little benefit. Low-intensity therapy is preferred due to better tolerability, but the prognosis remains poor. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is still the only potential for long term survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To better evaluate the initial treatment approach in MPN-BP, we performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of 75 patients with MPN-BP treated at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2001 and 2021. Patients were stratified by initial treatment: best supportive care (BSC), hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based therapy or intensive chemotherapy (IC).

RESULTS

Median overall survival (mOS) for the entire cohort was 4.8 months (BSC 0.8 months, HMA 4.7 months, and IC 11.4 months). Among IC patients, improved survival was evident in those that received AHSCT (mOS 40.8 months vs. 4.9 months, p < .01). Most patients that underwent AHSCT were initially treated with IC (p < .01). All patients that underwent AHSCT had achieved complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with improved survival were receipt of therapy (HMA or IC) (P = .017), CR/CRi (P = .037) and receipt of AHSCT (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

We show that active treatment with IC improves survival, but it is mostly tied to receipt of AHSCT. IC is a reasonable approach in appropriate patients as it can provide an effective bridge to AHSCT. Other treatment strategies such as molecularly targeted therapy and novel agents are desperately needed.

Mutational landscape of blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-BP) and antecedent MPN

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have an inherent tendency to evolve to the blast phase (BP), characterized by ≥20% myeloblasts in the blood or bone marrow. MPN-BP portends a dismal prognosis and currently, effective treatment modalities are scarce, except for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in selected patients, particularly those who achieve complete/partial remission. The mutational landscape of MPN-BP differs from de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in several key aspects, such as significantly lower frequencies of FLT3 and DNMT3A mutations, and higher incidence of IDH1/2 and TP53 in MPN-BP. Herein, we comprehensively review the impact of the three signaling driver mutations (JAK2 V617F, CALR exon 9 indels, MPL W515K/L) that constitutively activate the JAK/STAT pathway, and of the other somatic non-driver mutations (epigenetic, mRNA splicing, transcriptional regulators, and mutations in signal transduction genes) that cooperatively or independently promote MPN progression and leukemic transformation. The MPN subtype, harboring two or more high-molecular risk (HMR) mutations (epigenetic regulators and mRNA splicing factors) and "triple-negative" PMF are among the critical factors that increase risk of leukemic transformation and shorten survival. Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most aggressive MPN; and polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are relatively indolent subtypes. In PV and ET, mutations in splicing factor genes are associated with progression to myelofibrosis (MF), and in ET, TP53 mutations predict risk for leukemic transformation. The advent of targeted next-generation sequencing and improved prognostic scoring systems for PMF inform decisions regarding allo-HSCT. The emergence of treatments targeting mutant enzymes (e.g., IDH1/2 inhibitors) or epigenetic pathways (BET and LSD1 inhibitors) along with new insights into the mechanisms of leukemogenesis will hopefully lead the way to superior management strategies and outcomes of MPN-BP patients.

A case of a primary myelofibrosis with progression and related literature review of progression phase genetics

Philadelphia (BCR-ABL)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). MPN can transform into an accelerated or a blast phase, which is associated with poor response to standard therapy and low overall median survival. We present an interesting case of a patient with a history of PMF and progression and summarize the current studies on genetic features of myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase (MPN-BP) with an emphasis on PMF. Although MPN-BP show ≥20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow, it is not considered as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) according to the WHO classification. While MPNs-BP typically lack genetic mutations seen in de novo AML, they commonly harbor IDH1/2, SRSF2, ASXL1, and TP53 mutations, similar to the genetic profiles of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC).

Venetoclax with azacitidine or decitabine in blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: A multicenter series of 32 consecutive cases

Venetoclax (Ven) combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) has now emerged as an effective treatment regimen for acute myeloid leukemia, in both de novo and relapsed/refractory setting. The current multicenter study retrospectively examined Ven + HMA treatment outcome among 32 patients (median age 69 years; 59% males) with blast‐phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN‐BP). Pre‐leukemic phenotype included essential thrombocythemia (ET)/post‐ET myelofibrosis (34%), polycythemia vera (PV)/post‐PV myelofibrosis (38%) and primary myelofibrosis (28%). Twenty‐nine study patients were fully annotated cytogenetically and molecularly (NGS): 69% harbored complex karyotype and/or mutations, including TP53 (41%), IDH1/2 (21%), ASXL1 (21%), N/KRAS (14%), SRSF2 (10%), EZH2 (10%) and U2AF1 (7%). All patients received Ven combined with either azacitidine (n = 12) or decitabine (n = 20); either up front (n = 23) or after failing another induction therapy (n = 9). Complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery was achieved in 14 (44%) patients and was more likely to occur in the absence of pre‐leukemic PV/post‐PV myelofibrosis phenotype (p < .01), complex karyotype (p < .01) or K/NRAS (p = .03) mutations; seven of eight patients (88%) without vs four of 21 (19%) with complex karyotype or K/NRAS mutation achieved CR/CRi (p < .01); all 11 informative patients with pre‐leukemic PV/post‐PV myelofibrosis phenotype displayed complex karyotype (p < .01). In contrast, neither TP53 (p = .45) nor IDH1/2 (p = .63) mutations affected response. Compared to historical controls treated with HMA alone (n = 26), the CR/CRi rate (44% vs 4%) and median survival (8 vs 5.5 months) were more favorable with Ven + HMA, but without significant difference in overall survival. Importantly, six patients with CR/CRi subsequently received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). Note, Ven + HMA produces robust CR/CRi rates in MPN‐BP, especially in the absence of RAS mutations and complex karyotype, thus enabling AHSCT, in some patients.

Comparison of outcomes of HCT in blast phase of BCR-ABL1- MPN with de novo AML and with AML following MDS

Comparative outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for BCR-ABL1- myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in blast phase (MPN-BP) vs de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and AML with prior myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs; post-MDS AML), are unknown. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we compared HCT outcomes in 177 MPN-BP patients with 4749 patients with de novo AML, and 1104 patients with post-MDS AML, using multivariate regression analysis in 2 separate comparisons. In a multivariate Cox model, no difference in overall survival (OS) or relapse was observed in patients with MPN-BP vs de novo AML with active leukemia at HCT. Patients with MPN-BP in remission had inferior OS in comparison with de novo AML in remission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.76]) due to higher relapse rate (HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.69-2.80]). MPN-BP patients had inferior OS (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.00-1.43]) and increased relapse (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.31-1.96]) compared with post-MDS AML. Poor-risk cytogenetics were associated with increased relapse in both comparisons. Peripheral blood grafts were associated with decreased relapse in MPN-BP and post-MDS AML (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57-0.86]). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was similar between MPN-BP vs de novo AML, and MPN-BP vs post-MDS AML. Total-body irradiation-based myeloablative conditioning was associated with higher NRM in both comparisons. Survival of MPN-BP after HCT is inferior to de novo AML in remission and post-MDS AML due to increased relapse. Relapse-prevention strategies are required to optimize HCT outcomes in MPN-BP.

Genetic factors rather than blast reduction determine outcomes of allogeneic HCT in BCR-ABL-negative MPN in blast phase

There is a limited understanding of the clinical and molecular factors associated with outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase (MPN-BP). Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we evaluated HCT outcomes in 177 patients with MPN-BP. Ninety-five (54%) had sufficient DNA for targeted next-generation sequencing of 49 genes clinically relevant in hematologic malignancies. At 5 years, overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse, and nonrelapse mortality of the study cohort was 18%, 61%, and 25%, respectively. In a multivariable model, poor-risk cytogenetics was associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.21-2.41) due to increased relapse (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.32-2.82). Transplants using mobilized peripheral blood (PB) were associated with better OS (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.96). No difference in outcomes was observed in patients undergoing HCT with PB/BM blasts <5% vs those with active leukemia. Among the 95 patients with molecular data, mutation of TP53, present in 23%, was the only genetic alteration associated with outcomes. In a multivariate model, TP53-mutant patients had inferior OS (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.14-3.49) and increased incidence of relapse (HR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.41-4.74). There were no differences in the spectrum of gene mutations, number of mutations, or variant allele frequency between patients undergoing HCT with PB/BM blasts <5% vs those with active leukemia. Genetic factors, namely cytogenetic alterations and TP53 mutation status, rather than degree of cytoreduction predict outcomes of HCT in MPN-BP. No meaningful benefit of conventional HCT was observed in patients with MPN-BP and mutated TP53.

Outcome of patients with IDH1/2-mutated post-myeloproliferative neoplasm AML in the era of IDH inhibitors

IDH1/2-inhibitor–based combinations conferred significant clinical responses in patients with IDH1/2-mutated post–MPN AML. Complete remission was achieved in 3/7 patients (1 attaining MRD–) with new IDH1/2-mutated post–MPN AML treated with IDH1/2-i combinations.

Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) can transform into blast phase MPN (leukemic transformation; MPN-BP), typically via accelerated phase MPN (MPN-AP), in ∼20-25% of the cases. MPN-AP and MPN-BP are characterized by 10-19% and ≥20% blasts, respectively. MPN-AP/BP portend a dismal prognosis with no established conventional treatment. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the sole modality associated with long-term survival.

SUMMARY

MPN-AP/BP has a markedly different mutational profile from de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In MPN-AP/BP, TP53 and IDH1/2 are more frequent, whereas FLT3 and DNMT3A are rare. Higher incidence of leukemic transformation has been associated with the most aggressive MPN subtype, myelofibrosis (MF); other risk factors for leukemic transformation include rising blast counts above 3-5%, advanced age, severe anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, increasing bone marrow fibrosis, type 1 CALR-unmutated status, lack of driver mutations (negative for JAK2, CALR, or MPL genes), adverse cytogenetics, and acquisition of ≥2 high-molecular risk mutations (ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2, SRSF2, and U2AF1Q157). The aforementioned factors have been incorporated in several novel prognostic scoring systems for MF. Currently, elderly/unfit patients with MPN-AP/BP are treated with hypomethylating agents with/without ruxolitinib; these regimens appear to confer comparable benefit to intensive chemotherapy but with lower toxicity. Retrospective studies in patients who acquired actionable mutations during MPN-AP/BP showed positive outcomes with targeted AML treatments, such as IDH1/2 inhibitors, and require further evaluation in clinical trials. Key Messages: Therapy for MPN-AP patients represents an unmet medical need. MF patients, in particular, should be appropriately stratified regarding their prognosis and the risk for transformation. Higher-risk patients should be monitored regularly and treated prior to progression to MPN-BP. MPN-AP patients may be treated with hypomethylating agents alone or in combination with ruxolitinib; also, patients can be provided with the option to enroll in rationally designed clinical trials exploring combination regimens, including novel targeted drugs, with an ultimate goal to transition to transplant.

Accelerated and Blast Phase Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms are advanced stages of the disease with historically a poor prognosis and little improvement in outcomes thus far. The lack of responses to standard treatments likely results from the more aggressive biology reflected by the higher incidence of complex karyotype and high-risk somatic mutations, which are enriched at the time of transformation. Treatment options include induction chemotherapy (7 + 3) as that used on de novo acute myeloid leukemia or hypomethylating agent-based therapy, which has shown similar outcomes. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only potential for cure.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Evolving from Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Many Sides of a Challenging Disease

The evolution to blast phase is a frequently unpredictable and almost invariably fatal event in the course of myeloproliferative neoplasms. The molecular mechanisms underlying blast transformation have not been elucidated and the specific genetic and epigenetic events governing leukemogenesis remain unclear. The result of the long-lasting dynamics, passing through progressive genetic steps, is the emergence of one or more clones often characterized by complex genetics, either at conventional karyotyping or at modern high-throughput sequencing analyses, with all clinical and prognostic correlates. The current therapeutic approaches are largely inadequate and incapable of modifying the inherent unfavorable outcome. In this perspective, the application of targeted strategies should aim to prevent the occurrence of leukemic evolution. At transformation, the crucial target of treatment should be the allocation to allogeneic transplant for eligible patients. With this in mind, novel combination treatments may provide useful bridging strategies, beyond potentially improving outcomes for patients who are not candidates for intensive approaches.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Evolving from Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Many Sides of a Challenging Disease

The evolution to blast phase is a frequently unpredictable and almost invariably fatal event in the course of myeloproliferative neoplasms. The molecular mechanisms underlying blast transformation have not been elucidated and the specific genetic and epigenetic events governing leukemogenesis remain unclear. The result of the long-lasting dynamics, passing through progressive genetic steps, is the emergence of one or more clones often characterized by complex genetics, either at conventional karyotyping or at modern high-throughput sequencing analyses, with all clinical and prognostic correlates. The current therapeutic approaches are largely inadequate and incapable of modifying the inherent unfavorable outcome. In this perspective, the application of targeted strategies should aim to prevent the occurrence of leukemic evolution. At transformation, the crucial target of treatment should be the allocation to allogeneic transplant for eligible patients. With this in mind, novel combination treatments may provide useful bridging strategies, beyond potentially improving outcomes for patients who are not candidates for intensive approaches.

Current clinical strategies and emergent treatment landscapes in leukemic transformation of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Introduction: Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) represents a challenging medical concern and an unmet clinical need, since it charts a very poor outcome and a low rate of response to standard treatments with the exception of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Recent novel insights into the molecular disease pathways and the genomic features characterizing the transformation of Ph-MPN have led to new therapeutic individualized approaches with the potential to modify the clinical management of these difficult-to-treat patients. Areas covered: Literature review (MeSH headings/PubMed) of risk factors of MPNs progression and treatment options for transformed disease with traditional standard approaches, and novel and investigational agents was performed. One or combinations of related subject headings like transformed MPN, epigenetics, molecular alterations, HSCT, ruxolitinib, azacytidine, decitabine, gliterinib, novel agents, personalized therapy was screened. Informative papers were selected by the appropriate actual evidence and suggesting strategies for improving outcomes in the future. Expert opinion: Current and emerging treatments for transformed Ph-MPN, are presented. Novel targeted or experimental agents to be used both before HSCT, to induce blast-free state, or to modify the disease prognosis and improve survival and quality of life are critically reviewed.

Leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms

Secondary acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) evolving from an antecedent myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) are characterized by a unique set of cytogenetic and molecular features distinct from de novo AML. Given the high frequency of poor-risk cytogenetic and molecular features, malignant clones are frequently insensitive to traditional AML chemotherapeutic agents. Allogeneic stem cell transplant, the only treatment modality shown to have any beneficial long-term outcome, is often not possible given the advanced age of patients at time of diagnosis and frequent presence of competing comorbidities. Even in this setting, relapse rates remain high. As a result, outcomes are generally poor and there remains a significant unmet need for novel therapeutic strategies. Although advances in cancer genomics have dramatically enhanced our understanding of the molecular events governing clonal evolution in MPNs, the cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms driving leukemic transformation at this level remain poorly understood. Here, we review known risk factors for the development of leukemic transformation in MPNs, recent progress made in our understanding of the molecular features associated with leukemic transformation, current treatment strategies, and emerging therapeutic options for this high-risk myeloid malignancy.

Comparison of Outcomes of Allogeneic Transplantation for Primary Myelofibrosis among Hematopoietic Stem Cell Source Groups

The choice of alternative donor is a major issue in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) without an HLA-matched related donor. We conducted this retrospective study using the Japanese national registry data for 224 PMF patients to compare the outcomes of first allogeneic HSCT from HLA-matched related donor bone marrow (Rtd-BM), HLA-matched related donor peripheral blood stem cells (Rtd-PB), HLA-matched unrelated donor bone marrow (UR-BM), unrelated umbilical cord blood (UR-UCB), and other hematopoietic stem cell grafts. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rates at 1 year after Rtd-BM, Rtd-PB, UR-BM, UR-UCB, and other transplantations were 16%, 36%, 30%, 41%, and 48%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified UR-UCB transplantation, other transplantation, frequent RBC transfusion before transplantation, and frequent platelet (PLT) transfusion before transplantation as predictive of higher NRM. Relapse rates at 1 year after Rtd-BM, Rtd-PB, UR-BM, UR-UCB, and other transplantation were 14%, 17%, 11%, 14%, and 15%, respectively. No specific factor was associated with the incidence of relapse. Overall survival (OS) at 1 and 4 years after Rtd-BM, Rtd-PB, UR-BM, UR-UCB, and other transplantation were 81% and 71%, 58% and 52%, 61% and 46%, 48% and 27%, and 48% and 41%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified older patient age, frequent RBC transfusion before transplantation, and frequent PLT transfusion before transplantation as predictive of lower OS. In conclusion, UR-UCB transplantation, as well as UR-BM transplantation, can be selected for PMF patients without an HLA-identical related donor. However, careful management is required for patients after UR-UCB transplantation because of the high NRM. Further studies including more patients after HLA-haploidentical related donor and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplantation would provide more valuable information for patients with PMF when making decisions regarding the choice of alternative donor.

[Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia with primary thrombocytosis: three cases report and literatures review]

目的

探讨原发性血小板增多症（ET）转化急性髓系白血病（AML）的病情变化特点及异基因造血干细胞移植（allo-HSCT）的治疗价值。

方法

回顾性分析3例ET转AML患者的临床特征、实验室检查结果及诊治经过，复习相关文献。

结果

例1，男，44岁，初诊ET时PLT 500×10⁹/L，3年后疾病转变为骨髓增生异常综合征时WT1基因由初诊时77拷贝/10 000 ABL拷贝升至13 171拷贝/10 000 ABL拷贝，染色体核型发生异常改变，在地西他滨治疗过程中快速进展为AML。例2，男，58岁，诊断ET时PLT 2 100×10⁹/L，9年后疾病进展为AML，WT1基因由初诊时130拷贝/10 000 ABL拷贝升至3 222拷贝/10 000 ABL拷贝，在化疗期间短期内复发。例3，男，60岁，初诊ET时PLT 900×10⁹/L，5年后疾病转化为AML，WT1基因由初诊时56拷贝/10 000 ABL拷贝升至3 696拷贝/10 000 ABL拷贝，化疗期间出现中枢神经系统侵犯。例1移植前未缓解，例2缓解后短期内复发，例3出现髓外侵犯。3例患者均顺利完成allo-HSCT，移植后骨髓缓解，染色体核型正常，例3中枢神经系统病灶消失，JAK2基因突变均转阴，WT1基因表达均<200拷贝/10 000 ABL拷贝，未发生严重并发症。

结论

ET转化的AML病情凶险，allo-HSCT是目前唯一可能治愈此疾病的方法。

Targeted next-generation sequencing in blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms

Among 248 consecutive patients with blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-BP), DNA collected at the time of blast transformation was available in 75 patients (median age, 66 years; 64% men). MPN-BP followed primary myelofibrosis in 39 patients, essential thrombocythemia in 20 patients, and polycythemia vera in 16 patients. A myeloid neoplasm-relevant 33-gene panel was used for next-generation sequencing. Driver mutation distribution was JAK2 57%, CALR 20%, MPL 9%, and triple-negative 13%. Sixty-four patients (85%) harbored other mutations/variants, including 37% with ≥3 mutations; most frequent were ASXL1 47%, TET2 19%, RUNX1 17%, TP53 16%, EZH2 15%, and SRSF2 13%; relative mutual exclusivity was expressed by TP53, EZH2, LNK, RUNX1, SRSF2, and NRAS/KRAS mutations. Paired chronic-blast phase sample analysis was possible in 19 patients and revealed more frequent blast phase acquisition of ASXL1, EZH2, LNK, TET2, TP53, and PTPN11 mutations/variants. In multivariable analysis, RUNX1 and PTPN11 mutations/variants were associated with shorter survival duration; respective hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1-3.8) and 3.0 (95% CI, 1.1-6.6). An all-inclusive multivariable analysis confirmed the prognostic relevance of RUNX1 mutations (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-5.5) and also showed additional contribution from a treatment strategy that includes transplant or induction of complete or near-complete remission (HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.5). The current study points to specific mutations that might bear pathogenetic relevance for leukemic transformation in MPN and also suggest an adverse survival effect of RUNX1 mutations.

How I treat the blast phase of Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

The classic Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)–negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem-cell diseases, characterized by activated JAK/STAT signaling and significant phenotypic mimicry, including a propensity for evolution to myeloid blast phase disease. Effective therapeutic options are limited for patients with Ph− MPNs in the blast phase (MPN-BP), and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation is the only known cure. Our increasing understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of this group of diseases, coupled with the increasing availability of targeted agents, has the potential to inform new subset-specific therapeutic approaches. Ultimately, progress in MPN-BP will hinge on prospective clinical and translational investigations with the goal of generating more effective treatment interventions. This case-based review highlights the molecular and clinical heterogeneities of MPN-BP and incorporates a treatment algorithm that underscores the importance of a personalized approach to this challenging group of diseases.

Outcomes and predictors of survival in blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms

We retrospectively reviewed treatment outcomes for 57 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase (MPN-BP). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 5.8 months. For patients receiving induction therapy, 67% achieved a complete response (CR) and 75% received stem cell transplantation (SCT). Median OS for all transplanted patients (n = 19) was not reached after a median follow-up of 19.2 months compared with 3.8 months in non-transplanted patients (p < 0.0001); patients who did not receive SCT after induction chemotherapy survived a median of 4.9 months. OS was not improved in patients transplanted after CR (OS not reached after median follow-up of 26.7 months) compared with those transplanted upfront or after suboptimal response to initial therapy (9.0 months; p = .097). Those who were transfusion-dependent during their MPN course and received SCT had a median OS of 4.4 months, with all patients dying from SCT complications. Patients receiving hypomethylating agents (HMA) survived 6.7 months, while those receiving supportive care survived 1.1 months. Although outcomes for MPN-BP remain poor, long-term survival can be achieved in appropriately selected patients utilizing SCT, optimally after attaining a complete response with induction therapy. For patients ineligible for SCT, HMAs can offer similar survival to induction chemotherapy with less toxicity.

Outcome of Ph negative myeloproliferative neoplasms transforming to accelerated or leukemic phase

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are chronic disorders that can sometimes evolve into accelerated or leukemic phases. We retrospectively identified 122 patients with such blastic phases. The overall median survival was four months: 10.2 months for patients treated with intensive treatments compared to three months for best supportive care (p = .005). Azacytidine, intensive chemotherapies, or allogeneic stem cell transplantation gave the highest median survivals with 9, 10.2, and 19.4 months, respectively. Accelerated phases (AP) had a longer median survival compared to acute leukemia (4.8 months vs. 3.1 months; p = .02). In this retrospective and observational study, we observe that the longest survivals are seen in patients eligible for intensive treatments. Azacytidine shows interesting results in patients non-fit for intensive chemotherapy. Supportive care should probably be restricted to elderly patients and those with unfavorable karyotype. An early diagnosis of AP could also result in a better survival rate.

Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: Mayo-AGIMM study of 410 patients from two separate cohorts

A total of 410 patients with blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-BP) were retrospectively reviewed: 248 from the Mayo Clinic and 162 from Italy. Median survival was 3.6 months, with no improvement over the last 15 years. Multivariable analysis performed on the Mayo cohort identified high risk karyotype, platelet count < 100 × 10⁹/L, age > 65 years and transfusion need as independent risk factors for survival. Also in the Mayo cohort, intensive chemotherapy resulted in complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rates of 35 and 24%, respectively; treatment-specified 3-year/5-year survival rates were 32/10% for patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (AlloSCT) (n = 24), 19/13% for patients achieving CR/CRi but were not transplanted (n = 24), and 1/1% in the absence of both AlloSCT and CR/CRi (n = 200) (p < 0.01). The survival impact of AlloSCT (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.3), CR/CRi without AlloSCT (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2–0.5), high risk karyotype (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.2) and platelet count < 100 × 10⁹/L (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.2) were confirmed to be inter-independent. Similar observations were made in the Italian cohort. The current study identifies the setting for improved short-term survival in MPN-BP, but also highlights the limited value of current therapy, including AlloSCT, in securing long-term survival.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) yields a high rate of curability for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), it is also associated with transplant-related morbidity and mortality (TRM). The risk and severity of TRM increase with the use of an alternative donor graft in the absence of an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD). With the declining birthrate and aging of the population, the numbers of patients with an MSD are decreasing, and alternative donor transplants, including the post-transplant cyclophosphamide method using haplo-identical donors, are increasing. Autologous (auto)-HSCT, which enables the intensification of chemotherapy, has the advantage of high availability of a transplant graft, and is associated with a lower TRM, but these benefits may be offset by a higher rate of relapse due to the lack of a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Although allo-HSCT remains the first-line treatment for poor and very-poor-risk patients, auto-HSCT is again gaining increased attention. It has also recently been suggested that cord blood grafts may induce a stronger GVL effect than other grafts; as such, the positioning of cord blood transplantation should also be reconsidered for AML patients.

Therapeutic options for leukemic transformation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

Approximately 5-10% of patients with Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) comprising of essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera and primary myelofibrosis) experience transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML, ≥20% blasts). Treatment options for post-MPN AML patients are limited, as conventional approaches like standard chemotherapy, fail to offer long-term benefit. Median survival for secondary AML is ∼2.4 months. Post-MPN AML therefore represents an area of urgent clinical need. At present, allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) following induction therapy is the best therapeutic option. Patients ineligible for ASCT are treated with hypomethylating agents. New agents under investigation include histone deacetylase inhibitors, JAKinhibitors and agents targeting the BRD4 protein. Combined treatment strategies involving these novel agents are being tested. In this review we present the current evidence regarding treatment options for post-MPN AML patients.