Ex Vivo CD34+-Selected T Cell-Depleted Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Is Associated with Low Incidence of Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease and High Treatment Response

Characterization of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease After Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation With Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide: A Study on Behalf of GETH-TC

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a cause of late morbidity and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although studies evaluating haploidentical allo-HSCT (haplo-HSCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) demonstrate lower cGVHD rates, comprehensive data describing the clinical profile, risk factors, or outcomes of cGVHD within this platform are scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 389 consecutive patients who underwent haplo-HSCT PTCy in 7 transplant centers of the Spanish Group Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) between 2008 and 2020 describing incidence, clinical profile, risk factors, and cGVHD outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients of 389 developed cGVHD. Our data revealed that the incidence and severity of cGVHD are lower than those reported for HLA-identical transplantation with conventional prophylaxis and that the strongest predictor for cGVHD was previous acute GVHD (P = 0.031). Also, recipient age ≥60 y (P = 0.044) was protective against cGVHD. Moreover, patients with moderate cGVHD had longer event-free survival at 3 y than other patients (P = 0.016) and a lower relapse rate at 3 y (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the fact that the incidence and severity of cGVHD are lower than those reported for HLA-identical transplantation with conventional prophylaxis. In this series, patients who develop moderate cGVHD after haplo-HSCT PTCy had a higher overall survival and event-free survival, and lower relapse, suggesting higher graft-versus-leukemia effect. Although this is the largest series focused on characterizing cGVHD in haplo-HSCT PTCy, further prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings.

Impact of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) exposure on outcomes after ex vivo T-cell-depleted hematopoietic cell transplantation in pediatric and young adult patients

BACKGROUND AIMS

Traditional weight-based dosing of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) used in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft rejection leads to variable exposures. High exposures induce delayed CD4+immune reconstitution (CD4+IR) and greater mortality. We sought to determine the impact of rATG exposure in children and young adults receiving various types of EX-VIVO T-cell-depleted (EX-VIVO-TCD) HCT.

METHODS

Patients receiving their first EX-VIVO-TCD HCT (CliniMACS CD34+, Isolex or soybean lectin agglutination), with removal of residual T cells by E-rosette depletion (E-) between 2008 and 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed. rATG exposure post-HCT was estimated (AU*d/L) using a validated population pharmacokinetic model. Previously defined rATG-exposures, <30, 30-55, ≥55 AU*d/L, were related with outcomes of interest. Cox proportional hazard and cause-specific models were used for analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 180 patients (median age 11 years; range 0.1-44 years) were included, malignant 124 (69%) and nonmalignant 56 (31%). Median post-HCT rATG exposure was 32 (0-104) AU*d/L. Exposure <30 AU*d/L was associated with a 3-fold greater probability of CD4+IR (P < 0.001); 2- to 4-fold lower risk of death (P = 0.002); and 3- to 4-fold lower risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) (P = 0.02). Cumulative incidence of NRM was 8-fold lower in patients who attained CD4+IR compared with those who did not (P < 0.0001). There was no relation between rATG exposure and aGVHD (P = 0.33) or relapse (P = 0.23). Effect of rATG exposure on outcomes was similar in three EX-VIVO-TCD methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualizing rATG dosing to target a low rATG exposure post-HCT while maintaining total cumulative exposure may better predict CD4+IR, reduce NRM and increase overall survival, independent of the EX-VIVO-TCD method.

Beyond current treatment of Fanconi Anemia: What do advances in cell and gene-based approaches offer?

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare inherited disorder that mainly affects the bone marrow. This condition causes decreased production of all types of blood cells. FA is caused by a defective repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks and to date, mutations in over 20 genes have been linked to the disease. Advances in science and molecular biology have provided new insight between FA gene mutations and the severity of clinical manifestations. Here, we will highlight the current and promising therapeutic options for this rare disease. The current standard treatment for FA patients is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a treatment associated to exposure to radiation or chemotherapy, immunological complications, plus opportunistic infections from prolonged immune incompetence or increased risk of morbidity. New arising treatments include gene addition therapy, genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease, and hematopoietic stem cell generation from induced pluripotent stem cells. Finally, we will also discuss the revolutionary developments in mRNA therapeutics as an opportunity for this disease.

Controversies and expectations for the prevention of GVHD: A biological and clinical perspective

Severe acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Historically, cord blood and matched sibling transplantation has been associated with the lowest rates of GVHD. Newer methods have modified the lymphocyte components to minimize alloimmunity, including: anti-thymocyte globulin, post-transplant cyclophosphamide, alpha/beta T cell depletion, and abatacept. These agents have shown promise in reducing severe GVHD, however, can be associated with increased risks of relapse, graft failure, infections, and delayed immune reconstitution. Nonetheless, these GVHD prophylaxis strategies have permitted expansion of donor sources, especially critical for those of non-Caucasian decent who previously lacked transplant options. This review will focus on the biologic mechanisms driving GVHD, the method by which each agent impacts these activated pathways, and the clinical consequences of these modern prophylaxis approaches. In addition, emerging novel targeted strategies will be described. These GVHD prophylaxis approaches have revolutionized our ability to increase access to transplant and have provided important insights into the biology of GVHD and immune reconstitution.

Current donor selection strategies for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Since the first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) was performed by Dr. E. Donnall Thomas in 1957, the field has advanced with new stem cell sources, immune suppressive regimens, and transplant protocols. Stem cells may be collected from bone marrow, peripheral or cord blood from an identical twin, a sibling, or a related or unrelated donor, which can be human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched, mismatched, or haploidentical. Although HLA matching is one of the most important criteria for successful allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) to minimize graft vs host disease (GVHD), prevent relapse, and improve overall survival, the novel immunosuppressive protocols for GVHD prophylaxis offered improved outcomes in haploidentical HCT (haplo-HCT), expanding donor availability for the majority of HCT candidates. These immunosuppressive protocols are currently being tested with the HLA-matched and mismatched donors to improve HCT outcomes further. In addition, fine-tuning the DPB1 mismatching and discovering the B leader genotype and mismatching may offer further optimization of donor selection and transplant outcomes. While the decision about a donor type largely depends on the patient's characteristics, disease status, and the transplant protocols utilized by an individual transplant center, there are general approaches to donor selection dictated by donor-recipient histocompatibility and the urgency for HCT. This review highlights recent advances in understanding critical factors in donor selection strategies for allo-HCT. It uses clinical vignettes to demonstrate the importance of making timely decisions for HCT candidates.

CD34+ -selected hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioned with a myeloablative regimen in patients with advanced myelofibrosis

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HCT) remains the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF). Transplantation in patients with MF is mostly done using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen with calcineurin inhibitors for graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Here we sought to evaluate outcomes of patients who underwent an ex vivo CD34+ -selected allo-HCT using myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Twenty-seven patients were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients were conditioned with busulfan, melphalan and fludarabine and antithymocyte globulin to prevent graft rejection. G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cell grafts were depleted of T-cells using immunomagnetic CD34+ selection by CliniMACS device. Median follow-up among survivors was 50.6 months. The estimated 3-year overall survival, relapse free survival and the combined endpoint of GVHD/relapse free survival were 88% (95% CI, 75-100%), 80% (95% CI, 66-98%) and 74% (95% CI, 59-93%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 33.3% (95% CI 16.4-51.3%), and two patients suffered chronic GVHD. There were no cases of primary graft failure. However, delayed graft failure occurred in two patients. We conclude that CD34+ selected allo-HCT with a MAC resulted in high survival rates in this cohort of patients with MF.

The Role of γδ T Cells as a Line of Defense in Viral Infections after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Opportunities and Challenges

In the complex interplay between inflammation and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), viral reactivations are often observed and cause substantial morbidity and mortality. As toxicity after allo-HSCT within the context of viral reactivations is mainly driven by αβ T cells, we describe that by delaying αβ T cell reconstitution through defined transplantation techniques, we can harvest the full potential of early reconstituting γδ T cells to control viral reactivations. We summarize evidence of how the γδ T cell repertoire is shaped by CMV and EBV reactivations after allo-HSCT, and their potential role in controlling the most important, but not all, viral reactivations. As most γδ T cells recognize their targets in an MHC-independent manner, γδ T cells not only have the potential to control viral reactivations but also to impact the underlying hematological malignancies. We also highlight the recently re-discovered ability to recognize classical HLA-molecules through a γδ T cell receptor, which also surprisingly do not associate with GVHD. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of γδ T cells and their receptors within and outside the context of allo-HSCT, as well as the opportunities and challenges for developers and for payers.

Antithymocyte globulin exposure in CD34+ T-cell depleted allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

In CD34⁺ TCD allogeneic-HCT, optimum post-HCT rATG exposure decreases NRM driven by faster CD4⁺ IR and improves survival.

Personalized rATG exposure using a PK-directed strategy may improve survival after allogeneic CD34⁺ TCD HCT.

Traditional weight-based dosing results in variable rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) clearance that can delay CD4⁺ T-cell immune reconstitution (CD4⁺ IR) leading to higher mortality. In a retrospective pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of patients undergoing their first CD34⁺ T-cell–depleted (TCD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) after myeloablative conditioning with rATG, we estimated post-HCT rATG exposure as area under the curve (arbitrary unit per day/milliliter [AU × day/mL]) using a validated population PK model. We related rATG exposure to nonrelapse mortality (NRM), CD4⁺ IR (CD4⁺ ≥50 cells per µL at 2 consecutive measures within 100 days after HCT), overall survival, relapse, and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) to define an optimal rATG exposure. We used Cox proportional hazard models and multistate competing risk models for analysis. In all, 554 patients were included (age range, 0.1-73 years). Median post-HCT rATG exposure was 47 AU × day/mL (range, 0-101 AU × day/mL). Low post-HCT area under the curve (<30 AU × day/mL) was associated with lower risk of NRM (P < .01) and higher probability of achieving CD4⁺ IR (P < .001). Patients who attained CD4⁺ IR had a sevenfold lower 5-year NRM (P < .0001). The probability of achieving CD4⁺ IR was 2.5-fold higher in the <30 AU × day/mL group compared with 30-55 AU × day/mL and threefold higher in the <30 AU × day/mL group compared with the ≥55 AU × day/mL group. In multivariable analyses, post-HCT rATG exposure ≥55 AU × day/mL was associated with an increased risk of NRM (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-9.30). In the malignancy subgroup (n = 515), a tenfold increased NRM was observed in the ≥55 AU × day/mL group, and a sevenfold increased NRM was observed in the 30-55 AU × day/mL group compared with the <30 AU × day/mL group. Post-HCT rATG exposure ≥55 AU × day/mL was associated with higher risk of a GVHD (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-5.16). High post-HCT rATG exposure is associated with higher NRM secondary to poor CD4⁺ IR after TCD HCT. Using personalized PK-directed rATG dosing to achieve optimal exposure may improve survival after HCT.

The Simplified Comorbidity Index (SCI) - a new tool for prediction of non-relapse mortality in allogeneic HCT

Cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, and renal dysfunction were predictive of allo-HCT mortality and combined to form the SCI.

The new index stratified patients into distinct NRM risk groups and was valid in 2 cohorts.

Individual comorbidities have distinct contributions to nonrelapse mortality (NRM) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We studied the impact of comorbidities individually and in combination in a single-center cohort of 573 adult patients who underwent CD34-selected allo-HCT following myeloablative conditioning. Pulmonary disease, moderate to severe hepatic comorbidity, cardiac disease of any type, and renal dysfunction were associated with increased NRM in multivariable Cox regression models. A Simplified Comorbidity Index (SCI) composed of the 4 comorbidities predictive of NRM, as well as age >60 years, stratified patients into 5 groups with a stepwise increase in NRM. NRM rates ranged from 11.4% to 49.9% by stratum, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.84, 2.59, 3.57, and 5.38. The SCI was also applicable in an external cohort of 230 patients who underwent allo-HCT with unmanipulated grafts following intermediate-intensity conditioning. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the SCI for 1-year NRM was 70.3 and 72.0 over the development and external-validation cohorts, respectively; corresponding AUCs of the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation–specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) were 61.7 and 65.7. In summary, a small set of comorbidities, aggregated into the SCI, is highly predictive of NRM. The new index stratifies patients into distinct risk groups, was validated in an external cohort, and provides higher discrimination than does the HCT-CI.

The post-transplant scoring system (PTSS) is associated with outcomes in patients with MDS after CD34+selected allogeneic stem cell transplant

The post-transplant scoring system (PTSS), developed by the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, is based on three independent post-transplant risk factors: grade of acute graft-versus-host disease, lack of platelet recovery before day 100, and relapse before day 100; discriminating low- (0), intermediate- (1–3), and high-risk (4–8) patients. We investigated the prognostic value of the PTSS in a cohort of patients with MDS who underwent myeloablative CD34-selected TCD transplants. From 2008 to 2018, 109 patients underwent a first TCD-HCT for MDS at our center. We used Cox proportional hazards models and different landmark analyses to evaluate the association of categorized PTSS score risk groups with overall survival (OS). Patients with an intermediate/ high risk PTSS score had decreased OS at day 180 (univariate HR 3.25 [95% CI 1.60, 6.60], p = 0.001) and at day 365 (univariate HR 5.42 [95% CI 2.21, 13.3], p < 0.001) compared to low risk PTSS scores. This association remained significant after adjusting for HCT-CI. PTSS score calculated at day 100 was not associated with OS, even after adjusting for HCT-CI subgroups. In summary, the PTSS predicted survival at day 180 and day 365 in recipients of T-cell-depleted allografts for myelodysplastic syndrome.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Platforms With Ex Vivo and In Vivo Immune Manipulations: Count and Adjust

Various allogeneic (allo) stem cell transplantation platforms have been developed over the last 2 decades. In this review we focus on the impact of in vivo and ex vivo graft manipulation on immune reconstitution and clinical outcome. Strategies include anti-thymocyte globulin- and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based regimens, as well as graft engineering, such as CD34 selection and CD19/αβT cell depletion. Differences in duration of immune suppression, reconstituting immune repertoires, and associated graft-versus-leukemia effects and toxicities mediated through viral reactivations are highlighted. In addition, we discuss the impact of different reconstituting repertoires on donor lymphocyte infusions and post allo pharmacological interventions to enhance tumor control. We advocate for precisely counting all graft ingredients and therapeutic drug monitoring during conditioning in the peripheral blood, and for adjusting dosing accordingly on an individual basis. In addition, we propose novel trial designs to better assess the impact of variations in transplantation platforms in order to better learn from our diversity of “counts” and potential “adjustments.” This will, in the future, allow daily clinical practice, strategic choices, and future trial designs to be based on data guided decisions, rather than relying on dogma and habits.

Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome and the Importance of Second Cellular Therapy

Patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) generally have poor overall survival (OS). Interventions that result in improved OS after relapse are not well established. The efficacy of second cellular therapy and specific indications are matters of debate. This study was conducted to evaluate factors associated with postrelapse survival and the efficacy of a second course of cellular therapy. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with AML and MDS who underwent a first allo-HCT between 2010 and 2017 at our center but subsequently relapsed. One hundred and four patients with AML and 44 patients with MDS were included (total n = 148). Bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood stem cell grafts were either unmodified or T cell-depleted (TCD) by CD34⁺ selection ex vivo. Forty-five patients (30.4%) received a second cellular therapy after relapse, either a second allo-HCT (n = 28; 18.9%) or donor leukocyte infusion (DLI) (n = 17; 11.5%). The median age at transplantation was 60 years (range, 24 to 78 years). The median time to relapse (TTR) after transplantation was 6.5 months (range, 1 to 60.9 months), and the ensuing median OS was 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8 to 8.9 months). In univariable analysis, longer TTR, relapse type (measurable residual disease versus morphologic), relapse occurring in the most recent years, and receipt of cellular therapy after relapse were associated with better outcomes, whereas adverse cytogenetics and/or abnormality of TP53, as well as NPM1 mutation in patients with AML, were associated with adverse outcomes. Relapse type, year of relapse, and a variable resulting from the combination of TTR and receipt of second cellular therapy remained significantly associated with postrelapse survival in multivariable analysis. In a separate multivariable model, adjusted only for TTR, relapse type, and receipt of second cellular therapy, an adverse effect of NPM1 mutation on survival was confirmed. We could not show an effect of post-transplantation maintenance on survival after relapse. In both univariable and multivariable analysis, we found a positive association for second cellular therapy with survival after relapse in patients who relapsed early (<6 months) after allo-HCT and a similar trend in patients who relapsed late (>12 months) after transplantation. Two-year OS after a second cellular therapy was 44.9% (95% CI, 28.5% to 61.4%), and it was significantly better in patients with <5% BM blasts before cell infusion. We could not show different effects on survival after second cellular therapy for DLI versus second allo-HCT in univariable analysis. Survival after relapse is improving over time, but this remains a challenging event, especially for patients who relapse early after transplantation. We found that a second cellular therapy could offer a benefit even in these cases. Nonetheless, more research is needed to clarify the most appropriate treatment choices after relapse. These are probably driven by underlying genetic and immunologic conditions, which should be the focus of future studies.

"Ex-vivo" T-cell depletion in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: New clinical approaches for old challenges

Allogeneic transplantation still remains as standard of care for patients with high-risk hematological malignancies at diagnosis or after relapse. However, GvHD remains yet as the most relevant clinical complication in the early post-transplant period. TCD allogeneic transplant is now considered a valid option to reduce severe GvHD and to provide a platform for cellular therapy to prevent relapse disease or to treat opportunistic infections.

αβ T-cell graft depletion for allogeneic HSCT in adults with hematological malignancies

We conducted a multicenter prospective single-arm phase 1/2 study that assesses the outcome of αβ T-cell depleted allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) of peripheral blood derived stem cells from matched related, or unrelated donors (10/10 and 9/10) in adults, with the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) as the primary end point at day 100. Thirty-five adults (median age, 59; range, 19-69 years) were enrolled. Conditioning consisted of antithymocyte globulin, busulfan, and fludarabine, followed by 28 days of mycophenolic acid after allo-HSCT. The minimal follow-up time was 24 months. The median number of infused CD34+ cells and αβ T cells were 6.1 × 106 and 16.3 × 103 cells per kg, respectively. The cumulative incidence (CI) of aGVHD grades 2-4 and 3-4 at day 100 was 26% and 14%. One secondary graft failure was observed. A prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) (1 × 105 CD3+ T cells per kg) was administered to 54% of the subjects, resulting in a CI of aGVHD grades 2-4 and 3-4 to 37% and 17% at 2 years. Immune monitoring revealed an early reconstitution of natural killer (NK) and γδ T cells. Cytomegalovirus reactivation associated with expansion of memory-like NK cells. The CI of relapse was 29%, and the nonrelapse mortality 32% at 2 years. The 2-year CI of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 23%, of which 17% was moderate. We conclude that only 26% of patients developed aGVHD 2-4 after αβ T-cell-depleted allo-HSCT within 100 days and was associated with a low incidence of cGVHD after 2 years. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl as #NL4767.

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: I. The 2020 Etiology and Prevention Working Group Report

Preventing chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains challenging because the unique cellular and molecular pathways that incite chronic GVHD are poorly understood. One major point of intervention for potential prevention of chronic GVHD occurs at the time of transplantation when acute donor anti-recipient immune responses first set the events in motion that result in chronic GVHD. After transplantation, additional insults causing tissue injury can incite aberrant immune responses and loss of tolerance, further contributing to chronic GVHD. Points of intervention are actively being identified so that chronic GVHD initiation pathways can be targeted without affecting immune function. The major objective in the field is to continue basic studies and to translate what is learned about etiopathology to develop targeted prevention strategies that decrease the risk of morbid chronic GVHD without increasing the risks of cancer relapse or infection. Development of strategies to predict the risk of developing debilitating or deadly chronic GVHD is a high research priority. This working group recommends further interrogation into the mechanisms underpinning chronic GVHD development, and we highlight considerations for future trial design in prevention trials.

CD34+ Stem Cell Selection and CD3+ T Cell Add-Back from Matched Unrelated Adult Donors in Children with Primary Immunodeficiencies and Hematological Diseases

Less than 25% of children who require hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) or genetic hematological diseases have an HLA-identical sibling. For them, a matched unrelated donor (MUD), although baring a greater risk of graft failure, delayed engraftment and immune reconstitution, and severe graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), represents a valid alternative. The stem cell source is also important, as unprocessed peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) contain 5 to 10 times more T cells than bone marrow (BM)-derived grafts, a major risk especially for small children with PID. A CD34+ positive selection can mitigate HLA compatibility issues, but the resulting CD3+ T cell depletion hampers engraftment and facilitates infections. To mitigate those problems, we decided to add back a certain number of T cells (30 × 10⁶ cells/kg body weight [BW]) to the positive CD34+ selection derived from MUD BM or PBSCs and report the results in terms of time to engraftment and immune reconstitution, GvHD incidence, infections, and survival. Our aim was to show not only the feasibility and clinical efficacy of this addback but also that PBSC-derived CD34+ selected grafts with calibrated T cell addback would be equivalent to BM-derived grafts. We analyzed retrospectively our single-center cohort of 76 children (median age, 1.9 years) affected by PID (61) and hematological diseases (15) who received a total of 79 MUD HSCTs with CD34+ selection and addback of 30 × 10⁶ CD3+ cells/kg BW between 2001 and 2019. We used descriptive and analytic statistics (chi-square, Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate) and constructed Kaplan-Meier curves using the log-rank test to compare patients grafted with BM or PBSC-derived inocula. The two groups showed no statistically significant differences in terms of age, sex, HLA-mismatch, or amount of CD3+ cells/kg BW added back to the CD34+ selection. However, the latter being higher in the PBSC group (P = .0001). Overall engraftment rate was 96% (73/76) and occurred faster in the PBSC group than in BM recipients: polymorphonuclear cells, 16 versus 21 days (P = .006); platelets, 15 versus 22 days (P = .001). GvHD incidence was low. No acute GvHD was diagnosed in 24 children, whereas grades I, II, III, and IV occurred in 19, 28, five, and three children, respectively (P not significant). Chronic GvHD was seen in only two children. The CD4+ count at six months after HSCT was higher in PBSC recipients as compared to those receiving BM (184 versus 88 CD4+ cells; P = .003). Overall survival for the whole cohort was 80% at 10 years, with no significant difference between the two stem cell sources (P not significant). Viral infections occurred among five of the PBSC grafted children and 14 in the BM group (P not significant), and no patient suffered from post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The results we present show that an addback of 30 × 10⁶ donor CD3+ cells/kg recipient BW to a MUD BM or PBSC-derived CD34+ selection gives promising results in infants and young children undergoing HSCT for PID or hematological diseases. Furthermore, with this manipulation the inherent limits of PBSC-derived grafts can be overcome, allowing both swift engraftment and immune reconstitution without an increase in GvHD, infections, or PTLD.

Combining the Disease Risk Index and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Co-Morbidity Index provides a comprehensive prognostic model for CD34+-selected allogeneic transplantation

T cell depletion by CD34⁺ cell selection of hematopoietic stem cell allografts ex vivo reduces the incidence and severity of GvHD, without increased risk of relapse in patients with acute leukemia in remission or MDS. The optimal candidate for CD34⁺-selected HCT remains unknown, however.

OBJECTIVE

To determine outcomes based on both disease- and patient-specific factors, we evaluated a prognostic model combining the Disease Risk Index (DRI) and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI), an approach recently shown to predicted overall survival in a broad population of allograft recipients (1).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 506 adult recipients of first allogeneic HCT with CD34+ selected PBSCs from 7/8- or 8/8-matched donors for AML (n = 290), ALL (n = 72), or MDS (n = 144). The Kaplan-Meier method estimated OS and RFS. The cumulative incidence method for competing risks estimated relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM). We evaluated the univariate association between variables of interest and OS and RFS using the log-rank test. Cox regression models assessed the adjusted effect of covariates on OS/RFS.

RESULTS

Stratification of patients based on a composite of DRI (low/intermediate vs. high/very high) and HCT-CI (0-2 vs. ≥ 3) revealed differences in OS and RFS between the 4 groups. Compared with reference groups of patients with low/intermediate DRI and low or high HCT-CI, those with high DRI had a greater risk of death (HR 2.30; 95% CI 1.39, 3.81) and relapse or death (HR 2.50; 95% CI 1.55, 4.05) than patients with any HCT-CI but low/intermediate DRI (HR death 1.80; 95% CI 1.34, 2.43; HR relapse/death 1.68; 95% CI 1.26, 2.24).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A model combining DRI and HCT-CI predicted survival after CD34⁺ cell-selected HCT. Application of this combined model to other cohorts, both in retrospective analyses and prospective trials, will enhance clinical decision making and patient selection for different transplant approaches.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, C Cho. In order to protect the privacy of research participants, the data are not publicly available.

Steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease: treatment options and patient management

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is one of the major causes of late mortality after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Moderate-to-severe cGVHD is associated with poor health-related quality of life and substantial disease burden. While corticosteroids with or without calcineurin inhibitors comprise the first-line treatment option, the prognosis for patients with steroid-refractory cGVHD (SR-cGVHD) remains poor. The mechanisms underlying steroid resistance are unclear, and there are no standard second-line treatment guidelines for patients with SR-cGVHD. In this review, we provide an overview on current treatment options of cGVHD and use a series of theoretical case studies to elucidate the rationale of choices of second- and third-line treatment options for patients with SR-cGVHD based on individual patient profiles.

Current Preventions and Treatments of aGVHD: From Pharmacological Prophylaxis to Innovative Therapies

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is one of the main causes of mortality and the reason for up to 50% of morbidity after hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) which is the treatment of choice for many blood malignancies. Thanks to years of research and exploration, we have acquired a profound understanding of the pathophysiology and immunopathology of these disorders. This led to the proposition and development of many therapeutic approaches during the last decades, some of them with very promising results. In this review, we have focused on the recent GVHD treatments from classical chemical and pharmacological prophylaxis to more innovative treatments including gene therapy and cell therapy, most commonly based on the application of a variety of immunomodulatory cells. Furthermore, we have discussed the advantages and potentials of cell-free therapy as a newly emerging approach to treat GVHD. Among them, we have particularly focused on the implication of the TNFα-TNFR2 axis as a new immune checkpoint signaling pathway controlling different aspects of many immunoregulatory cells.

Ex vivo T-cell depletion vs post-transplant cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil as graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of CD34+ selected ex vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) vs post-transplant cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (PTCy-Sir-MMF) as graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with either TCD (n = 38) or PTCy-Sir-MMF (n = 91).

RESULTS

Cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet recovery was 92% vs 99% (P = .06) and 89% vs 97% (P = .3) in TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. Cumulative incidences of aGHVD grade II-IV, III-IV, and moderate to severe cGVHD were 11% vs 19% (P = .2), 3% vs 2% (P = .9), and 3% vs 36% (P < .001) in TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. The 2-year non-relapse mortality, relapse, disease-free and overall survival were 25% vs 8% (P = .01), 20% vs 16% (P = .2), 55% vs 76% (P = .004), 57% vs 83% (P = .004) for TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. Cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr infection requiring therapy was 76% vs 40% (P < .001) and 32% vs 0% (P < .001) in TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. PTCy-Sir-MMF platform showed faster T-cell reconstitution.

CONCLUSIONS

PTCy-Sir-MMF provides better survival outcomes but is associated with higher risk of cGVHD compared to TCD.

Alternative mechanisms that mediate graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) benefits increasing numbers of patients with otherwise lethal diseases. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), however, remains one of the most potentially life-threatening complications due to its own comorbidities and the side effects of its treatment. In this issue of the JCI, two groups have turned dogma on its head by providing evidence for alternative mechanisms of acute GVHD (aGVHD) in humans. The principle of donor T cell reactivity elicited by host antigen-presenting cells (APCs) expressing MHC-encoded major HLA disparities or expressing minor histocompatibility antigen (miHA) differences presented by identical HLA molecules remains intact. These reports, however, demonstrate that GVHD can additionally result from peripheral host T cells resident in skin and gut being stimulated against donor APCs in the form of monocyte-derived macrophages. Moreover, these donor monocyte-derived macrophages can themselves mediate cytopathic effects against resident host T cells in skin explants and against a keratinocyte-derived cell line.

Checkpoint inhibitors in AML: are we there yet?

Immunotherapy is distinct from traditional chemotherapy in that it acts on immune cells rather than cancer cells themselves. Monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints on T cells - CTLA-4 and PD-1 - and PD-L1 on the cells of immune microenvironment are now approved for clinical use in several solid tumors and hematological malignancies. This article provides a general overview of the use of checkpoint inhibitors in hematologic malignancies with a special focus in acute myeloid leukemia.

Ex Vivo T Cell-Depleted Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia in First and Second Remission: Long-Term Disease-Free Survival with a Significantly Reduced Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease

Large series of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) after ex vivo T cell-depleted (TCD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) have not been reported previously. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 266 patients (median age, 54 years) with AML who received CD34-selected TCD allo-HSCTs while in first (75%) or second (25%) complete remission (CR1/CR2) at a single institution. The conditioning regimens were all myeloablative, and no additional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was given. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD at 180 days were 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 18%) and 3% (95% CI, 1% to 5%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 3 years was 3% (95% CI, 1% to 6%). The 3-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 21% (95% CI, 16% to 26%) and that of relapse was 21% (95% CI, 17% to 27%). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 75%, 61%, and 56% and 68%, 57%, and 53%, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS, DFS, and relapse rates for patients who underwent transplantation in CR1 and those who did so in CR2. However, patients with high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis had significantly poorer outcomes. The OS and DFS rates compare favorably with those for unmodified allo-HSCT, but with considerably lower rates of GVHD.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with CD34+ Cell Selection

The success of allogeneic stem cell transplant is hampered by the development of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) which has direct impact on treatment-related mortality and morbidity. As a result, T cell depletion through positive selection of CD34+ cells has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce acute and chronic GvHD in these patients.

In this review, we summarize the main characteristics of allogeneic stem cell transplant with CD34+ cell selection including risks of graft failure, GvHD, infection, organ toxicity, and long-term survival. Moreover, we highlight future strategies to improve the results of this platform and to consolidate its use in clinical practice.

Drugs as a Frequent Cause of Acute Rash in Patients after CD34+-Selected Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Although histopathological differences have been reported between acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) rash and non-aGVHD rash in CD34⁺-selected peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) recipients, skin biopsy alone is usually insufficient to determine rash etiology. As such, distinguishing inflammatory non-aGVHD rashes, such as drug eruptions, from cutaneous aGVHD after CD34⁺-selected PBSCT remains challenging and relies on clinical presentation. This study aimed to identify etiologies of skin rash in the first year after CD34⁺-selected PBSCT and to assess whether laboratory serologic markers, transplant characteristics, and rash morphology and symptomatology aid in differentiation of cutaneous aGVHD rash versus non-aGVHD rash. We conducted a retrospective study of 243 adult patients who underwent CD34⁺-selected PBSCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2008 and 2011. Among this cohort of transplant recipients, only 43 patients (17.7%) developed cutaneous aGVHD. A total of 152 patients (63%) were identified with rash within 1 year after PBSCT. The proportion of patients who experienced peripheral eosinophilia was not different between those with an aGVHD versus non-aGVHD rash (P ≥ .90), nor when stratified by CD34⁺ selection method (Isolex, P = .70; CliniMACS, P≥ .90). The proportion of patients with pruritus was also not different between those with an aGVHD rash versus non-aGVHD rash (P= .20), or when stratified by CD34⁺ selection modality (Isolex, P = .20; CliniMACS, P = .50). The most common cause of non-aGVHD rash among those with a clear etiology was drug (39% of Isolex; 26% of CliniMACS). Single drug culprits were identified in 51% of drug rashes. The most commonly reported offending agents included antibiotics, keratinocyte growth factor, chemotherapy, and recombinant glycosylated human IL-7.

Establishing a standardized system for review and adjudication of chronic graft-vs-host disease data in accordance with the National Institutes Consensus criteria

GVHD is a frequent complication following allo-HCT. The NIH consensus group established new guidelines for the evaluation of chronic GVHD. However, GVHD assessment remains challenging due its complexity and requirement for laborious evaluation. We, therefore, established a standardized approach for the assessment of chronic GVHD in accordance with the NCC guidelines. At a single institution, all allograft recipients were evaluated for GVHD within the first-year post allo-HCT following a 3-step workflow (real-time assessment, consensus review, and documentation). A GVHD adjudication committee was created and a dynamic electronic GVHD data capture form was developed guiding the clinician through a comprehensive review of systems following the NCC guidelines. We found that the assessment and reporting of GVHD reached 100% compliance. The establishment of an institutional GVHD adjudication committee enabled standardized assessment of GVHD. Our workflow can be adopted by other centers to create a similar framework for dedicated GVHD evaluation.

Standard Antithymocyte Globulin Dosing Results in Poorer Outcomes in Overexposed Patients after Ex Vivo CD34+ Selected Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) use mitigates the risk of graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), but ATG overexposure in the setting of lymphopenia negatively affects immune recovery. We hypothesized that standard empiric weight-based dosing of ATG, used to prevent graft rejection in ex vivo CD34-selected allo-HCT, may lead to serious adverse consequences on outcomes in certain patients. We evaluated 304 patients undergoing myeloablative-conditioned ex vivo CD34-selected allo-HCT with HLA-matched donors for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Patients received rabbit ATG at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day i.v. on days -3 and/or -2. An ATG dosing cutoff of 450 mg was used for statistical analyses to assess the relationship between ATG and overall survival (OS). Among all patients, median total ATG dose was 360 mg (range, 130 to 510 mg); 279 (92%) received a total dose of ATG ≤450 mg, and 25 (8%) received a total dose >450 mg. On the first day of ATG administration (day -3), the median absolute lymphocyte count was .0 K/µL. For patients who received a total dose of ATG >450 mg or ≤450 mg, the incidences of acute and late-acute GVHD grade II-IV were statistically similar. At 3 years post-HCT, for patients who received a total dose of ATG >450 mg or ≤450 mg, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rates were 35% and 18%, respectively (P = .029), disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 37% and 61%, respectively (P = .003), and OS rates were 40% and 67%, respectively (P = .001). Among all patient and HCT characteristics in multivariable analyses, receipt of a total dose of ATG >450 mg was associated with an increased risk of NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; P = .01), shorter DFS (HR, 2.0; P = .03), and inferior OS (HR, 2.1; P = .01). In summary, the use of weight-based ATG at a time of relative lymphopenia before ex vivo CD34-selected allo-HCT results in overdosing in heavier patients, leading to higher NRM and lower DFS and OS. Further pharmacokinetic investigation in this setting is critical to determining the optimal dosing strategy for ATG.

Outcomes following second allogeneic stem cell transplant for disease relapse after T cell depleted transplant correlate with remission status and remission duration after the first transplant

Background

Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) remains as an option for disease relapse after initial HCT.

Methods

We analyzed retrospectively the outcomes of 65 consecutive patients who underwent a second HCT for disease relapse at the University of Chicago. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted, and a scoring system was generated to select the patients who would benefit second HCT.

Results

All except four patients received T cell depleted (TCD) first HCT. The majority of patients had AML (n = 47) and high risk MDS (n = 5). The median age at second HCT was 45 years (11–73). 13 patients (20%) achieved CR before second HCT. 98% (n = 64) and 72% (n = 47) patients achieved neutrophil and platelet engraftment at a median interval of 10 and 18 days, respectively, following the second HCT. With a median follow up of 23 (5.5–140) months for survivors after second HCT, the estimated 2 years PFS was 17.5% and the 2 years OS was 22.6%. The day 100 cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality rate was 23.6%, and the cumulative incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD were 16.9% and 7.7% respectively at 1 year after second HCT. In univariate analysis, patients with remission duration after first HCT of > 12 months and those in CR before second HCT had significantly better PFS and OS. A scoring system using disease status before second HCT (CR = 0 vs. non-CR = 1), and remission duration after first HCT (< 6 = 2, 6–12 = 1 and > 12 months = 0) was generated as an approach to classify patients into different risk categories in the purpose to provide guidance to the transplant physician to inform the outcomes to potential patients undergoing 2nd HCT. A score of < 2 (n = 26) identified a group with PFS and OS of 31.6% and 36.2% at 2 years after second HCT.

Conclusion

In conclusion, second HCT is a viable option for disease relapse after TCD HCT for patients entering second HCT in remission and/or remission duration > 12 months after first HCT with acceptable rates of GVHD and donor engraftment.

Advances in Ex Vivo T Cell Depletion - Where Do We Stand?

Graft-versus-host (GVHD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). As donor T cells are recognized as key drivers of GVHD, some approaches to prevent GVHD have focused on T cell depletion of the allograft. In this review we summarize methods and outcomes of ex vivo T cell depleted (TCD) HCT with a focus on CD34+ selection. This platform is efficacious in preventing acute and chronic GVHD across a wide range of hematologic malignancies, and with the exception of chronic myeloid leukemia, is not associated with adverse relapse or survival outcomes compared to conventional GVHD prophylaxis platforms. In retrospective comparisons recipients of CD34+ selected HCT have higher rates of GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) than conventional HCT counterparts. Although CD34+ selected allografts require myeloablative and antithymocyte-globulin based conditioning to support engraftment, abrogation of calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate in this approach reduces its toxicity such that it can be considered in select older and more comorbid patients who could benefit from ablative HCT. A trial comparing GVHD prophylaxis regimens (BMT CTN 1301, NCT02345850) has completed accrual and will be the first to compare CD34+ selected HCT with conventional HCT in a randomized prospective setting. Its findings have potential to establish CD34+ selected HCT as a new standard-of-care platform for GVHD prevention.

Selected biological issues affecting relapse after stem cell transplantation: role of T-cell impairment, NK cells and intrinsic tumor resistance

The graft vs. leukemia (GvL) effect as a method of preventing relapse is well described after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but the mechanisms to this effect and how tumor sometimes develops resistance to GvL are just beginning to be understood. This article reviews and expands upon data presented at the Third International Workshop on Biology, Prevention and Treatment of Relapse after Stem Cell Transplantation held in Hamburg, Germany, in November 2016. We first discuss in detail the role that T-cell impairment early after HCT plays in relapse by looking at data from T cell-depleted approaches as well as the clear role that early T-cell recovery has shown in improving outcomes. We then review key findings regarding the role of specific KIR donor/recipient pairings that contribute to relapse prevention after HCT for several tumor types. Finally, we discuss a unique mouse model following the development of tumor resistance to GvL. Detailed molecular characterization of events marking the development of tumor resistance to the immunotherapy of GvL may help in developing future strategies to overcome immune escape.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Comparison of Outcomes between CD34+ Selected and Unmodified Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

In this study, we compared transplantation outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who received a CD34⁺ cell-selected and those who received an unmodified allograft. This analysis initially included 181 patients, 60 who received a CD34⁺ cell-selected transplant and 121 who received an unmodified transplant. Owing to significant differences in disease characteristics, the analysis was limited to patients with <10% blasts before HSCT (n = 145). Two groups were defined: low risk, with low- and intermediate-risk cytogenetics (CD34⁺, n = 39; unmodified, n = 46), and high risk: poor and very poor risk cytogenetics (CD34⁺, n = 19; unmodified, n = 41). In the low-risk group, the incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at 1 year post-transplantation was 18% in the CD34⁺ subgroup versus 41.3% in the unmodified subgroup (P = .015). There were no differences between the subgroups in the incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD. The incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) at 3 years in the 2 subgroups was 5.3% and 56%, respectively (P < .001). At 3 years post-transplantation, relapse, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were similar in the CD34⁺ and unmodified subgroups: 8.1% versus 19.4% (P = .187), 58.5% versus 53.7% (P = .51), and 59.5% versus 52.4% (P = .448). However, the composite outcome combining extensive cGVHD-free status and relapse-free status (CRFS) at 3 years was 59.5% in the CD34⁺ group versus 19.2% in the unmodified group (P < .001). In the high-risk group, grade II-IV aGVHD at 1 year was 31.6% in the CD34⁺ subgroup versus 24.4% in the unmodified subgroup (P = .752). There were no differences between the subgroups in the incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD. The incidence of cGVHD at 3 years in the 2 subgroups was 0% versus 27.6% (P = .013). At 3 years post-transplantation, relapse, OS, RFS, and CRFS in the 2 subgroups were 31.6% versus 69.3% (P = .007), 35.5% versus 14.5% (P = .068), 31.6% versus 10.7% (P = .045), and 31.6% versus 6.1% (P = .001), respectively. Cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis and transplant type had significant univariate associations with RFS in the high-risk cohort. Only cytogenetics (P = .03) remained associated with this outcome in a multivariate model. OS was similar in the 2 transplant groups; however, CRFS was superior in the CD34⁺ cell-selected transplant group.

Effects of Late Toxicities on Outcomes in Long-Term Survivors of Ex-Vivo CD34+-Selected Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The late adverse events in long-term survivors after myeloablative-conditioned allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with ex vivo CD34⁺ cell selection are not well characterized. Using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, we assessed all grade ≥3 toxicities from the start of conditioning to the date of death, relapse, or last contact in 131 patients who survived >1 year post-HCT, identifying 285 individual toxicities among 17 organ-based toxicity groups. Pretransplantation absolute lymphocyte count >.5 K/µL and serum albumin >4.0 g/dL were associated with a reduced risk of toxicities, death, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), whereas serum ferritin >1000 ng/mL was associated with an increased risk of toxicities and NRM after 1 year. An HCT Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score ≥3 was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death and NRM, but was not associated with a specific increased toxicity risk after 1 year. Patients who incurred more than the median number of toxicities (n = 7) among all patients within the first year subsequently had an increased risk of hematologic, infectious, and metabolic toxicities, as well as an increased risk of NRM and inferior 4-year overall survival (OS) (67% versus 86%; P = .003) after the 1-year landmark. The development of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) within the first year was associated with incurring >7 toxicities within the first year (P = .016), and also with an increased risk of all-cause death and NRM after 1 year. In multivariate models, cardiovascular, hematologic, hepatic, infectious, metabolic, neurologic, and pulmonary toxicities incurred after 1 year were independently associated with increased risk of death and NRM when adjusting for both HCT-CI and grade II-IV acute GVHD within the first year. One-year survivors of ex vivo CD34⁺ selection had a favorable 4-year OS of 77%, although the development of grade ≥3 toxicities after the first year was associated with poorer outcomes, emphasizing the fundamental importance of improving survivorship efforts that may improve long-term toxicity burden and outcome.

The Impact of Toxicities on First-Year Outcomes after Ex Vivo CD34+-Selected Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with Hematologic Malignancies

Factors that impact first-year morbidity and mortality in adults undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with ex vivo CD34⁺ selection have not been previously reported. We assessed all toxicities ≥ grade 3 from the start of conditioning to date of death, relapse, or last contact in 200 patients during the first year after transplantation, identifying 1885 individual toxicities among 17 organ-based toxicity groups. The most prevalent toxicities in the first year were of infectious, metabolic, hematologic, oral/gastrointestinal, hepatic, cardiac, and pulmonary etiologies. Renal complications were minimal. Grades II to IV and III and IV acute GVHD at day 100 were 11.5% and 3%, respectively. In separate multivariate models, cardiovascular, hematologic, hepatic, neurologic, pulmonary, and renal toxicities negatively impacted nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival during the first year. A higher-than-targeted busulfan level, patient cytomegalovirus seropositivity, and an Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index of ≥3 were associated with increased risk of NRM and all-cause death. Ex vivo CD34⁺ selection had a favorable 1-year OS of 75% and NRM of 17% and a low incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. These data establish a benchmark to focus efforts in reducing toxicity burden while improving patient outcomes.