1
|
Farhan S, Holtan SG. Graft-versus-host disease: teaching old drugs new tricks at less cost. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1225748. [PMID: 37600820 PMCID: PMC10435076 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1225748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Currently, more patients can receive SCT. This is attributed to the use of reduced intensity regimens and the use of different GVHD prophylaxis that breaks the barrier of human leukocyte antigen, allowing an increase in the donor pool. Once an area with relatively few clinical trial options, there has been an increase in interest in GVHD prophylaxis and treatment, which has led to many US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals. Although there is considerable excitement over novel therapies, many patients may not have access to them due to geographical or other resource constraints. In this review article, we summarize the latest evidence on how we can continue to repurpose drugs for GVHD prophylaxis and treatment. Drugs covered by our review include those that have been FDA approved for other uses for at least 15 years (since 2008); thus, they are likely to have generic equivalents available now or in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shatha Farhan
- Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Shernan G. Holtan
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bourgeois AL, Jullien M, Garnier A, Peterlin P, Béné MC, Guillaume T, Chevallier P. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide as sole GHVD prophylaxis after matched reduced-intensity conditioning allotransplant. Clin Transl Med 2023; 13:e1242. [PMID: 37140099 PMCID: PMC10131294 DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.1242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) alone as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis may avoid/reduce short- and mid-term toxicities of drugs commonly used for GVHD prophylaxis, accelerate immune reconstitution after the graft to decrease infections and facilitate the early integration of adjunct maintenance therapies to prevent relapse. OBJECTIVE A prospective phase 2 study was designed in order to assess the feasibility and safety of PTCY as a sole GVHD prophylaxis in adult patients receiving a Baltimore-based reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) peripheral blood (PB) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) with a matched donor. STUDY DESIGN Patients were planned to be included stepwise up to 59 evaluable PTCY recipients, in order to be able to stop the protocol in case of excessive corticosteroid resistant grade 3-4 severe acute GVHD (aGVHD). Because a high incidence of grade 2-4 aGVHD was observed after analysis of the first 27 patients, the protocol was amended to test the addition of 1 day of anti-thymoglobulin to PTCY. In spite of this, the trial had to be stopped after 38 treated patients, because of an unacceptable rate of grade 3-4 aGVHD. Donors were matched related to 12 patients and unrelated to 26. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 29.6 months, 2-year overall, disease-free and GVHD-free relapse-free (GRFS) survivals were respectively 65.4%, 62.1% and 46.9%. Cumulative incidences of grade 2-4 and 3-4 aGVHD at day 100 were 52.6% and 21.1%, respectively, while that of moderate/severe chronic(c) GVHD was 15.7% at 2 years. Addition of ATG to PTCY did influence neither aGVHD, cGVHD nor GRFS. CONCLUSION Despite paradoxically good survivals, especially GRFS, this study failed to demonstrate that PTCY (± ATG) alone can be used for Baltimore-based RIC PB Allo-HSCT with matched donors. Other combinations should be tested to try and avoid long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs following Allo-HSCT in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maxime Jullien
- Hematology DepartmentNantes University HospitalNantesFrance
| | - Alice Garnier
- Hematology DepartmentNantes University HospitalNantesFrance
| | | | - Marie C. Béné
- INSERM UMR1232CRCINA IRS‐UNUniversity of NantesNantesFrance
- Hematology BiologyNantes University HospitalNantesFrance
| | - Thierry Guillaume
- Hematology DepartmentNantes University HospitalNantesFrance
- INSERM UMR1232CRCINA IRS‐UNUniversity of NantesNantesFrance
| | - Patrice Chevallier
- Hematology DepartmentNantes University HospitalNantesFrance
- INSERM UMR1232CRCINA IRS‐UNUniversity of NantesNantesFrance
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakamae H. Systematic overview of HLA-matched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. Int J Hematol 2022; 116:465-481. [PMID: 35930118 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-022-03428-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
The successful application of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in HLA-haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) led to the expansion of its application to HLA-matched related and unrelated allo-HCT. Notably, single-agent PTCy was found to be feasible for GVHD prevention in HLA-matched bone marrow transplantation. Single-agent PTCy prophylaxis was later attempted to control GVHD in HLA-matched peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), but this approach was inadequate to alleviate GVHD as evidenced by the high incidence of severe GVHD and/or non-relapse mortality. Therefore, various combinations of immunosuppressants with PTCy have been explored to identify the optimal drug combination that would efficiently prevent GVHD in HLA-matched PBSCT. A recent murine study helped clarify the putative mechanism underlying the activity of PTCy, demonstrating that PTCy impairs the proliferation and function of alloreactive T cells from the donor, but does not eliminate alloreactive T cells altogether. In addition, imbalanced reconstitution of NK cell as well as T cells has been observed in HLA-haploidentical allo-HCT. Therefore, it remains unclear whether or not PTCy-containing GVHD prophylaxis should replace the classical GVHD prophylaxis regimen in the HLA-matched setting, and convincing evidence supporting the benefits of PTCy is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirohisa Nakamae
- Hematology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
PTCY and Tacrolimus for GVHD Prevention for Older Adults Undergoing HLA-Matched Sibling and Unrelated Donor AlloHCT. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:489.e1-489.e9. [PMID: 35577323 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of PTCY for graft-versus-host disease (GHVD) prevention is becoming prevalent in the transplant community when HLA-identical sibling (MSD) and 10/10 HLA-matched (MUD) and 9/10 mismatched (MMUD) unrelated donors are selected for alloHSCT. However, reported evidence on outcomes from elderly receiving PTCY-containing GVHD prophylaxis remains limited. OBJECTIVES This study aims to compare the outcomes of PTCY-TK prophylaxis and conventional GVHD prophylaxis in patients aged >50 years undergoing peripheral blood alloHSCT from a single institution. STUDY DESIGN A total of 161 consecutive patients aged >50 years undergoing alloHSCT between Jan-2014 and Feb-2021 were included. Data was collected retrospectively and updated in December 2021. Patients received grafts from HLA-identical sibling (MSD), and from 10/10 and 9/10 HLA matched and mismatched unrelated donors (UD). RESULTS Overall, median age was 60 years and 91 (54.8%) received PTCY-TK for GVHD prevention. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was longer in the PTCY-TK group (20 vs. 16 days and 19 vs. 11 days, P< 0.001). The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD at day +100 and moderate/severe cGVHD at 2 years were 18.2%, 5.7% and 9.5% for patients receiving PTCY-TK, and 26.0%, 9.6% and 39.5% for those that did not. The multivariate analysis showed that PTCY-TK reduced the probability of grade II-IV aGVHD (HR 0.41, p=0.035), of cGVHD [any grade: HR 0.43 (p=0.014), and of moderate/severe cGVHD (HR 0.15 (p<0.001)]. At 2-years, the overall survival (65.4% vs. 65.6%, p=0.472), non-relapse mortality (17.4% vs. 13.7%, p=0.967), and cumulative incidence of relapse rates (24.2% vs. 27.5%, p=0.712) were comparable between both cohorts; GVHD-Free/Relapse-free survival (GRFS) was higher in the PTCY-TK group (2-years: 50.2% vs. 21.8%; HR 0.42, p=0.001). In patients aged ≥50 years, Conclusion: PTCY-TK was safe and a more effective drug combination than non-PTCY containing GVHD prophylaxis, even with the use of matched and mismatched UD, and resulted in comparable relapse rates and better GRFS.
Collapse
|
5
|
Chang YJ, Zhao XY, Huang XJ. Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Therapies, Challenges and Future Prospective. Front Oncol 2021; 11:758512. [PMID: 34778077 PMCID: PMC8581046 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.758512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT), an alternative donor source, offers a curative therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are transplant candidates. Advances in transplantation techniques, such as donor selection, conditioning regimen modification, and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, have successfully improved the outcomes of AML patients receiving haplo-SCT and extended the haploidentical transplant indictions for AML. Presently, treating de novo AML, secondary AML, therapy-related AML and refractory and relapsed AML with haplo-SCT can achieve comparable outcomes to those of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT), unrelated donor transplantation or umbilical cord blood transplantation. For some subgroups of AML subjects, such as patients with positive pretransplantation minimal/measurable residual disease, recent studies suggest that haplo-SCT might be superior to MSDT in decreasing relapse and improving survival. Unfortunately, for patients with AML after haplo-SCT, relapse and infections remain the causes of death that restrict further improvement in clinical outcomes. In this review, we discuss the recent advances and challenges in haplo-SCT for AML treatment, mainly focusing on unmanipulated haplo-SCT protocols. We provide an outlook on future prospects and suggest that relapse prophylaxis, intervention, and treatment, as well as infection prevention and therapy, are areas of active research in AML patients who receive haploidentical allografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Jun Chang
- Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang-Yu Zhao
- Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Huang
- Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Farhadfar N, Dias A, Wang T, Fretham C, Chhabra S, Murthy HS, Broglie L, D'Souza A, Gadalla SM, Gale RP, Hashmi S, Al-Homsi AS, Hildebrandt GC, Hematti P, Rizzieri D, Chee L, Lazarus HM, Bredeson C, Jaimes EA, Beitinjaneh A, Bashey A, Prestidge T, Krem MM, Marks DI, Benoit S, Yared JA, Nishihori T, Olsson RF, Freytes CO, Stadtmauer E, Savani BN, Sorror ML, Ganguly S, Wingard JR, Pasquini M. Impact of Pretransplantation Renal Dysfunction on Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:410-422. [PMID: 33775617 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Renal dysfunction is a recognized risk factor for mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), yet our understanding of the effect of different levels of renal dysfunction at time of transplantation on outcomes remains limited. This study explores the impact of different degrees of renal dysfunction on HCT outcomes and examines whether the utilization of incremental degrees of renal dysfunction based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improve the predictability of the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI). The study population included 2 cohorts: cohort 1, comprising patients age ≥40 years who underwent alloHCT for treatment of hematologic malignancies between 2008 and 2016 (n = 13,505; cohort selected given a very low incidence of renal dysfunction in individuals age <40 years), and cohort 2, comprising patients on dialysis at the time of HCT (n = 46). eGFR was measured using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) method. The patients in cohort 1 were assigned into 4 categories-eGFR ≥90 mL/min (n = 7062), eGFR 60 to 89 mL/min (n = 5264), eGFR 45 to 59 mL/min (n = 897), and eGFR <45 mL/min (n=282)-to assess the impact of degree of renal dysfunction on transplantation outcomes. Transplantation outcomes in patients on dialysis at the time of alloHCT were analyzed separately. eGFR <60 mL/min was associated with an increased risk for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and requirement for dialysis post-HCT. Compared with the eGFR ≥90 group, the hazard ratio (HR) for NRM was 1.46 (P = .0001) for the eGFR 45 to 59 mL/min group and 1.74 (P = .004) for the eGFR <45 mL/min group. Compared with the eGFR ≥90 mL/min group, the eGFR 45 to 59 mL/min group (HR, 2.45; P < .0001) and the eGFR <45 mL/min group (HR, 3.09; P < .0001) had a higher risk of renal failure necessitating dialysis after alloHCT. In addition, eGFR <45 mL/min was associated with an increased overall mortality (HR, 1.63; P < .0001). An eGFR-based revised HCT-CI was also developed and shown to be predictive of overall survival (OS) and NRM, with predictive performance similar to the original HCT-CI. Among 46 patients on dialysis at alloHCT, the 1-year probability of OS was 20%, and that of NRM was 67%. The degree of pretransplantation renal dysfunction is an independent predictor of OS, NRM, and probability of needing dialysis after alloHCT. An eGFR-based HCT-CI is a validated index for predicting outcomes in adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing alloHCT. The outcomes of alloHCT recipients on dialysis are dismal; therefore, one should strongly weigh the significant risks of being on hemodialysis as a factor in determining alloHCT candidacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nosha Farhadfar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ajoy Dias
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tao Wang
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Caitrin Fretham
- CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), National marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Saurabh Chhabra
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
| | - Hemant S Murthy
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Larisa Broglie
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Anita D'Souza
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Shahinaz M Gadalla
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, NIH-NCI Clinical Genetics Branch, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Robert Peter Gale
- Haematology Research Centre, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shahrukh Hashmi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | | | - Peiman Hematti
- Division of Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - David Rizzieri
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lynette Chee
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital City Campus and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hillard M Lazarus
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Christopher Bredeson
- The Ottawa Hospital Blood and Marrow Transplant Program and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Edgar A Jaimes
- Renal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amer Beitinjaneh
- Division of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Asad Bashey
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program at Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tim Prestidge
- Blood and Cancer Centre, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Maxwell M Krem
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - David I Marks
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Stefanie Benoit
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jean A Yared
- Blood & Marrow Transplantation Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Taiga Nishihori
- Department of Blood & Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy (BMT CI), Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Richard F Olsson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Clinical Research Sormland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Edward Stadtmauer
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Bipin N Savani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Mohamed L Sorror
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Siddhartha Ganguly
- Division of Hematological Malignancy and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - John R Wingard
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Marcelo Pasquini
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kunacheewa C, Owattanapanish W, Jirabanditsakul C, Issaragrisil S. Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide and Thymoglobulin, a Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Matched Sibling Donor Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantations. Cell Transplant 2020; 29:963689720965900. [PMID: 33035116 PMCID: PMC7784589 DOI: 10.1177/0963689720965900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been explored in several types of stem cell transplantations (SCTs) and it proved highly effective in controlling graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) without aggravating relapsed disease. However, PTCy alone has resulted in inferior outcomes in matched sibling donor (MSD) employing peripheral blood (PB) SCTs. We hypothesized that adding thymoglobulin to PTCy would be able to control GvHD effectively. We retrospectively compared the use of standard GvHD prophylaxis encompassing a combination of PTCy and thymoglobulin (ATG) in patients with myeloid malignancies in a myeloablative conditioning MSD PBSCT. Forty-two patients underwent PBSCT using either methotrexate and cyclosporine (MTX/CSA, 21 patients) or PTCy and ATG (21 patients) as a GvHD prophylaxis. With median follow-ups of 71 months, the 1-year GvHD-free, relapse-free survival rates and chronic GvHD-free survival rate of the standard and PTCy/ATG groups were similar: 24% versus 37% (P = 0.251) and 29% versus 43% (P = 0.095), respectively. When focusing on chronic GvHD we observed that 17/35 patients (48.6%) suffered from this, 5/18 (27.8%) treated with MTX/CSA had extensive chronic GvHD, but 0/17 PTCy/ATG did. Twenty-one patients required additional GvHD treatment; 7/21 in the PTCy/ATG received only corticosteroid, while 8/14 MTX/CSA required at least 2 drugs. The 5-year overall survival rates were 52% and 52% (P = 0.859), and the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 52% and 52% (P = 0.862) for the MTX/CSA and PTCy/ATG groups, respectively. We conclude that PTCy in combination with ATG without immunosuppression of a calcineurin inhibitor can effectively control GvHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chutima Kunacheewa
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Weerapat Owattanapanish
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chutirat Jirabanditsakul
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Surapol Issaragrisil
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prospective phase 2 trial of ixazomib after nonmyeloablative haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplant. Blood Adv 2020; 4:3669-3676. [PMID: 32777064 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Proteasome inhibition results in extensive immunomodulatory effects that augment natural killer cell cytotoxicity and inhibit aspects of T-cell, B-cell, and dendritic cell function. We performed a phase 2 study that examined the effects of ixazomib for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (up to 12 cycles) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus after standard nonmyeloablative haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT). Ixazomib was started on day +5 (4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle), with dose reductions allowed in future cycles for toxicity. All patients received peripheral blood stem cells. Twenty-five patients were enrolled with a median age of 62 years (range, 35-77 years) who had acute leukemia (4), myelodysplastic syndrome (7), non-Hodgkin lymphoma/Hodgkin lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (8), and myeloma (6). The hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index was ≥3 in 68% of the patients. After a median follow-up of 33.5 months, the cumulative incidence of relapse/progression at 1 year was 24% and 44% at 3 years, which failed to meet the statistically predefined goal of decreasing 1-year risk of relapse. Engraftment occurred in all patients with no secondary graft failure, and 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 12%. Cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD was 8%, whereas moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD occurred in 19%. Nineteen patients survive with an estimated 1-year overall survival (OS) of 84% and 3-year OS of 74%. Hematologic and cutaneous toxicities were common but manageable. The substitution of ixazomib for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) post-HIDT results in reliable engraftment, comparable rates of clinically significant GVHD, relapse and NRM, and favorable OS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT02169791.
Collapse
|
9
|
Al Malki MM, Gendzekhadze K, Yang D, Mokhtari S, Parker P, Karanes C, Palmer J, Snyder D, Forman SJ, Nademanee A, Nakamura R. Long-term Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation From Unrelated Donor Using Tacrolimus/Sirolimus-based GvHD Prophylaxis: Impact of HLA Mismatch. Transplantation 2020; 104:1070-1080. [PMID: 31449184 PMCID: PMC9071270 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While tacrolimus and sirolimus (T/S)-based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis has been effective in preventing acute GvHD post hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), its efficacy and long-term outcome in matched (MUD) and mismatched unrelated donor (mMUD) setting is not well defined. METHODS Herein, we evaluated a consecutive case-series of 482 patients who underwent unrelated donor HCT (2005-2013) with T/S-based GvHD prophylaxis. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range = 2.4-11.3), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse/progression-free survival were 47.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.0-52.0) and 43.6% (95% CI: 39.1-48.1), respectively; and the 5-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse were 24.9%, and 31.5%, respectively. In this cohort, mMUD was associated with worse OS (39.0% versus 50.7% at 5 y; P = 0.034), primarily due to greater risk of NRM (33.5% versus 21.7%; P = 0.038). While rates of relapse, acute (II-IV or III-IV) or chronic GvHD (limited or extensive) were not different, death caused by chronic GvHD (20.8% versus 12.8%; P = 0.022) and infection (33.0% versus 18.1%; P < 0.01) were significantly greater in mMUD. In multivariable analysis, high-risk disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.16-4.23; P < 0.01) and mMUD (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.15-2.08; P = 0.004) were independent predictive factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS T/S-based GvHD prophylaxis is an effective and acceptable GvHD prophylactic regimen. However, survival after mMUD remained poor, possibly related to the severity of chronic GvHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monzr M Al Malki
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | | | - Dongyun Yang
- Department of Information Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Sally Mokhtari
- Department of Clinical Translational Program Development, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Pablo Parker
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Chatchada Karanes
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Joycelynne Palmer
- Department of Information Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - David Snyder
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Stephen J Forman
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Auayporn Nademanee
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Ryotaro Nakamura
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Williams L, Cirrone F, Cole K, Abdul-Hay M, Luznik L, Al-Homsi AS. Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide: From HLA-Haploidentical to Matched-Related and Matched-Unrelated Donor Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Front Immunol 2020; 11:636. [PMID: 32373119 PMCID: PMC7177152 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Following allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (BMT), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) continues to represent a significant cause of treatment failure, despite the routine use of conventional, mainly calcineurin inhibitor-based prophylaxis. Recently, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has emerged as a safe and efficacious alternative. First, omitting the need for ex vivo T-cell depletion in the setting of haploidentical transplantation, growing evidence supports PTCy role in GvHD prevention in matched-related and matched-unrelated transplants. Through improved understanding of GvHD pathophysiology and advancements in drug development, PTCy emerges as a unique opportunity to design calcineurin inhibitor-free strategies by integrating agents that target different stages of GvHD development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Williams
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Frank Cirrone
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kelli Cole
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Maher Abdul-Hay
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Leo Luznik
- Division of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ahmad Samer Al-Homsi
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shekhovtsova Z, Shelikhova L, Balashov D, Zakharova V, Ilushina M, Voronin K, Kurnikova E, Muzalevskii Y, Kazachenok A, Pershin D, Novichkova G, Maschan A, Maschan M. Control of graft-versus-host disease with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, rituximab, and bortezomib in TCRαβ/CD19-depleted graft transplantation for leukemia in children: a single-center retrospective analysis of two GVHD-prophylaxis regimens. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13594. [PMID: 31680369 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Both acute GVHD and chronic GVHD remain the leading cause of morbidity and death after allogeneic HSCT. We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing two GVHD-prophylaxis regimens: 35 patients received "Regimen 1" (horse ATG, tacrolimus, and methotrexate) and 46 "Regimen 2" (rabbit ATG, rituximab, and peritransplant bortezomib). All 81 patients with a median age of 9 (0.6-23) years with ALL (n = 31) or AML (n = 50) in complete remission received TCRαβ/CD19-depleted transplants between May 2012 and October 2016, from 40 HLA-matched unrelated and 41 haploidentical donors. After a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the CI of acute GVHD II-IV was 15% (95% CI: 7-30) in the "Regimen 2" group and 34% (95% CI: -54) in the "Regimen 1" group, P = .05. "Regimen 2" was also more effective in the prevention of chronic GVHD; the CI at 1 year after HSCT was 7% (95% CI: 2-19) vs 31% (95% CI: 19-51), P = .005. The CI of relapse at 3 years adjusted for the GVHD-prophylaxis regimen groups 31% (95% CI: 19-51) for the "Regimen 1" vs 21% (95% CI: 11-37) for the "Regimen 2", P = .3. The retrospective observation suggests that the use of the rATG, rituximab, and bortezomib was associated with significantly lower rate of GVHD without the loss of anti-leukemic activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhanna Shekhovtsova
- Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.,Clinical Trials Unit, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Larisa Shelikhova
- Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry Balashov
- Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Viktoria Zakharova
- Molecular Biology Laboratory, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Ilushina
- Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kirill Voronin
- Clinical Trials Unit, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena Kurnikova
- Transfusion Medicine Service, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yakov Muzalevskii
- Transfusion Medicine Service, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexey Kazachenok
- Transfusion Medicine Service, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry Pershin
- Transplantation Immunology and Immunotherapy Laboratory, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Galina Novichkova
- Administration, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexey Maschan
- Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Michael Maschan
- Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Dmitriy Rogachev National Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tegla C, Choi J, Abdul-Hay M, Cirrone F, Cole K, Al-Homsi AS. Current Status and Future Directions in Graft- Versus-Host Disease Prevention Following Allogeneic Blood and Marrow Transplantation in Adults. Clin Hematol Int 2020; 2:5-12. [PMID: 34595437 PMCID: PMC8432335 DOI: 10.2991/chi.d.200115.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in its acute and chronic forms continues to represent a significant barrier to the success and wide-applicability of blood and marrow transplantation as a potentially curative treatment modality for a number of benign and malignant blood conditions. Presently, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimens remain the most commonly used prevention strategy, although post-transplant cyclophosphamide is emerging as an alternative approach, and is providing a backbone for innovative CNI-free combinations. In this paper, we review the current strategies used for the prevention of GvHD, and highlight some of the developing and promising combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosmin Tegla
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jun Choi
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maher Abdul-Hay
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frank Cirrone
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kelli Cole
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Samer Al-Homsi
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
On the role of the immunoproteasome in transplant rejection. Immunogenetics 2018; 71:263-271. [PMID: 30220008 DOI: 10.1007/s00251-018-1084-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The immunoproteasome is expressed in cells of hematopoietic origin and is induced during inflammation by IFN-γ. Targeting the immunoproteasome with selective inhibitors has been shown to be therapeutically effective in pre-clinical models for autoimmune diseases, colitis-associated cancer formation, and transplantation. Immunoproteasome inhibition prevents activation and proliferation of lymphocytes, lowers MHC class I cell surface expression, reduces the expression of cytokines of activated immune cells, and curtails T helper 1 and 17 cell differentiation. This might explain the in vivo efficacy of immunoproteasome inhibition in different pre-clinical disease models for autoimmunity, cancer, and transplantation. In this review, we summarize the effect of immunoproteasome inhibition in different animal models for transplantation.
Collapse
|
14
|
Moiseev IS, Pirogova OV, Alyanski AL, Babenko EV, Gindina TL, Darskaya EI, Slesarchuk OA, Bykova TA, Chukhlovin AB, Pevtcov DE, Bondarenko SN, Afanasyev BV. Risk-adapted GVHD prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in adults after related, unrelated, and haploidentical transplantations. Eur J Haematol 2018; 100:395-402. [DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan S. Moiseev
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Olga V. Pirogova
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Alexandr L. Alyanski
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Elena V. Babenko
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Tatyana L. Gindina
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Elena I. Darskaya
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Olga A. Slesarchuk
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Tatyana A. Bykova
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Alexei B. Chukhlovin
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Dmitrii E. Pevtcov
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Sergey N. Bondarenko
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| | - Boris V. Afanasyev
- R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|