Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome

The clinical outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) for patients with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome: comparable to de novo myelodysplastic syndrome

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS) is defined as a complication in patients with cancer following exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and has an inferior outcome compared with de novo myelodysplastic syndrome (de novo MDS). This study aimed to estimate and compare the clinical outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) for t-MDS and de novo MDS. We retrospectively analyzed 96 patients with MDS who received haplo-HSCT between January 2015 and December 2021. Eleven patients with t-MDS and 85 patients with de novo MDS were matched using the case-pair method in a 1:8 ratio with the following pairing criteria: (1) sex, (2) age (± 5 years), (3) year of haplo-HSCT (± 2 years), and (4) blast cell counts (≥ 5% or not). The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival after haplo-HSCT for t-MDS versus de novo MDS patients were 72.7% versus 75.1% (P = 0.99) and 54.5% versus 67.0% (P = 0.50), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 36.4% versus 15.5% (P = 0.08), respectively. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in relapse between t-MDS and de novo MDS. The 3-year cumulative non-relapse mortality rates were 9.1% versus 17.6% (P = 0.45), respectively. This study confirmed the comparable clinical outcomes of haplo-HSCT on the prognosis of t-MDS and de novo MDS.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndrome: An Evidence-Based Review from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines

The sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Here this therapeutic modality is reviewed and critically evaluated in the context of the evidence. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. A panel of MDS experts comprising transplantation and nontransplantation physicians developed consensus treatment recommendations. This review summarizes the standard MDS indications for HCT and addresses areas of controversy. Recent prospective trials have confirmed that allogeneic HCT confers survival benefits in patients with advanced or high-risk MDS compared with nontransplantation approaches, and the use of HCT is increasing in older patients with good performance status. However, patients with high-risk cytogenetic or molecular mutations remain at high risk for relapse. It is unknown whether administration of novel therapies before or after transplantation may decrease the risk of disease relapse in selected populations. Ongoing and future studies will investigate revised approaches to disease risk stratification, patient selection, and post-transplantation approaches to optimize allogeneic HCT outcomes for patients with MDS.

Unrelated umbilical cord blood can improve the prognosis of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Background

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is widely used as a curative treatment strategy for most types of hematological diseases. However, strategies for enhancing the graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect without aggravating the graft versus host disease (GVHD) effect are still being pursued.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the outcomes between combined unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB-haplo HSCT) and haplo HSCT.

Results

The results showed that neither acute GVHD (aGVHD) nor chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was increased in the UCB-haplo HSCT group, and the engraftment and infection rates were similar between the two groups. However, overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly improved, while transplantation-related mortality and relapse were significantly decreased in the UCB-haplo HSCT group by both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Conclusion

Our results indicated that the addition of a UCB unit could improve the prognosis of haplo-HSCT and enhance the GVL effect without increasing the incidence of GVHD.

Trial registration

The cohort study was retrospectively registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn as ChiCTR2100046681.

Moderate to Severe Marrow Fibrosis As a More Advanced Risk Factor for MDS and MDS-AML Patients With Excess of Blasts Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Marrow fibrosis (MF) is usually accompanied with primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and no consensus has been reached on the relationship between MF and prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed 239 MDS and MDS derived acute myeloid leukemia patients with known grade of MF who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Of these, it included 121 (50.6%) without fibrosis (MF-0), 81 (33.9%) with mild fibrosis (MF-1), 37 (15.5%) with moderate to severe fibrosis (MF-2/3). MF-2/3 was associated with more pronounced dysmegakaryopoiesis (P =.002), more frequent karyotype abnormality (P = .039) and increased leukemic transformation. Spliceosome and ras pathway mutation occurred more frequently in patients with MF-2/3. After allo-HSCT, neutrophil and platelet engraftment was significantly delayed in patients with MF-2/3 than those with MF-1 and MF-0 (P = .031, P = .05, respectively). The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) rates and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were significantly lower in patients with MF-2/3 than in those with MF-0 or MF-1 (P = .018, P = .018, respectively). Notably, in the subgroup of patients with more than 10% bone marrow blasts, MF-2/3 was independently associated with shorter OS and DFS (P = .012, P = .012, respectively) and has improved outcomes for these patients who achieved complete remission (CR) before allo-HSCT. Overall, MF-2/3 as an additional risk factor have the inferior prognosis for MDS and MDS-AML patients with bone marrow blasts ≥10%. Using pretransplantation cytoreductive therapy to obtain CR for these patients may benefit from allo-HSCT.

G-CSF-Primed Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Haploidentical Transplantation Could Achieve Satisfactory Clinical Outcomes for Acute Leukemia Patients in the First Complete Remission: A Registered Study

G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood (G-PB) harvest is the predominant graft for identical sibling donor and unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, but it was controversial in haploidentical related donor (HID) HSCT. In this registry study, we aimed to identify the efficacy of HID G-PB HSCT (HID-PBSCT) for acute leukemia (AL) patients in first complete remission (CR1). Also, we reported the outcomes for the use of G-PB grafts in comparison with the combination of G-BM and G-PB grafts in HID HSCT recipients. Sixty-seven AL patients in CR1 who received HID-PBSCT were recruited at Institute of Hematology, Peking University. Patients who received haploidentical HSCT using the combination of G-BM and G-PB harvests in the same period were enrolled as controls (n=392). The median time from HSCT to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days (range, 9-19 days) and 12 days (range, 8-171 days), respectively. The 28-day cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet engraftment after HSCT was 98.5% and 95.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 29.9% (95%CI 18.8-40.9%) and 7.5% (95%CI 1.1-13.8%), respectively. The cumulative incidences of total and moderate-severe chronic GVHD were 54.9% (95%CI 40.9-68.8%) and 17.4% (95%CI 6.7-28.0%), respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 13.9% (95%CI 5.4-22.5%) and 3.4% (95%CI 0-8.1%), respectively. The probabilities of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 84.7% (95%CI 74.7-94.7%) and 82.7% (95%CI 73.3-92.1%) respectively. Compared with the HID HSCT recipients using the combination of G-BM and G-PB grafts, the engraftments of neutrophil and platelet were both significantly faster for the G-PB group, and the other clinical outcomes were all comparable between the groups. In multivariate analysis, graft types did not influence the clinical outcomes. Overall, for the patients with AL CR1, G-PB graft could be considered an acceptable graft for HID HSCT recipients. This study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03756675.

Pre-transplantation cytoreduction does not benefit advanced myelodysplastic syndrome patients after myeloablative transplantation with grafts from family donors

BACKGROUND

The role of pre-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) cytoreduction with either induction chemotherapy (IC) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in treating advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains debatable. We aimed to evaluate pre-HSCT strategies by comparing the endpoints related to disease control between advanced MDS patients with pre-HSCT cytoreduction and those with best supportive care.

METHODS

We described 228 consecutive advanced MDS patients who received HSCT from a haploidentical donor (HID, n = 162) or matched related donor (MSD, n = 66) with uniform myeloablative conditioning regimens between January 2015 and December 2018. Of these 228 patients, 131 (57.5%) were treated exclusively with pre-HSCT best supportive care (BSC), 49 (22.5%) were given HMA, and 48 (21.1%) received both IC and HMA. Propensity score-matching analysis, multivariate analyses, and subgroup analyses were performed to elucidate the impact of pre-HSCT strategies on transplant outcomes.

RESULTS

The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 78.2% and 70.0% for the BSC and cytoreduction cohorts (P = 0.189) and were 78.2%, 66.7%, and 73.2% for the BSC, HMA, and HMA+IC groups, respectively (P = 0.269). A propensity score-matching analysis confirmed that the 3-year RFS rates were 81.9%, 87.5%, and 66.9% for BSC, cytoreduction complete remission (CR), and cytoreduction non-CR groups, respectively (P = 0.051). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that pre-HSCT cytoreduction, older patient age, monosomal karyotype, and interval between diagnosis and HSCT were poor prognostic factors for RFS. In the subgroup analyses, BSC was associated with longer RFS compared to cytoreduction among the younger patients, those with international prognostic scoring system intermediate-2/high risk at diagnosis, and those with intermediate/poor cytogenetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Different pre-HSCT therapies did not yield discrepant post-HSCT outcomes. No benefit in terms of post-HSCT outcomes were correlated with pre-HSCT cytoreduction in advanced MDS even for cytoreduction CR patients. Early referral to HSCT is essential for advanced MDS patients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia in the first remission: outcomes using haploidentical donors are similar to those using matched siblings

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective and curative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We explored the outcome of haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation for intermediate-risk AML and compared to that of matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants. One hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients with intermediate-risk AML in the first complete remission (CR1) who underwent allo-HSCT between January 1, 2015, and August 1, 2016, were enrolled. Thirty-seven patients received MSD grafts, and 90 received HID grafts. The 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) of the HID group was comparable to that of the MSD group: 82.0% ± 4.1% versus 82.7% ± 6.4%, P = 0.457. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) were comparable between the HID and MSD groups (relapse, 4.5% ± 0.1%, versus 11.5% ± 0.3%, P = 0.550; TRM, 13.4% ± 0.1% vs. 5.8% ± 0.2%, P = 0.154). The HID recipients had a trend of a lower 2-year cumulative incidence of positive posttransplant flow cytometry (FCM+) and relapse than the MSD recipients (5.6% ± 0.1% vs. 19.9% ± 0.5%, P = 0.092). These results suggest that the outcomes of allo-HSCT with HIDs are comparable to those with MSDs in terms of LFS, TRM, and relapse for intermediate-risk AML in CR1. HIDs could be an alternative to MSDs for intermediate-risk AML.

Unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of clonal disorders and is rare in children. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is commonly used in children with MDS with excess blasts and in patients with refractory cytopenia of childhood (RCC) associated with monosomy 7, complex karyotype, severe neutropenia, or transfusion dependence. We recruited 27 children with MDS who received haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). At transplantation, 10 patients had RCC, 12 patients had advanced MDS (RAEB and RAEB-T), and 5 patients had myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia (MDR-AML). All patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized bone marrow cells and peripheral blood stem cells. At a median follow-up of 24.1 months (range: 2.0-74.5 months) after HSCT, the estimated probabilities of 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were both 81.9% (95% CI, 66.8-100.0%). The estimated 3-year incidences of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were both 7.4% (95% CI, 1.2%-21.4%). The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD was 52.6% (95% CI, 42.9-62.3%), while that of grade III-IV aGVHD was 11.1% (95% CI, 5.1-17.1%). The 3-year cumulative incidences of overall and extensive cGVHD were 42.3% (95% CI, 19.8%-57.5%) and 21.1% (95% CI, 2.5%-63.2%), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that chronic GVHD significantly affected OS and DFS. Haploidentical HSCT may be an effective treatment option with easier donor availability for pediatric patients with MDS.

Overexpression of WT1 and PRAME predicts poor outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with thrombocytopenia

Thrombocytopenia is associated with life-threatening bleeding and is common in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Robust molecular prognostic biomarkers need to be developed to improve clinical decision making for patients with MDS with thrombocytopenia. Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) are promising immunogenic antigen candidates for immunotherapy, and their clinical effects on patients with MDS with thrombocytopenia are still not well understood. We performed a multicenter observational study of adult patients with MDS with thrombocytopenia from 7 different tertiary medical centers in China. We examined bone marrow samples collected at diagnosis for WT1 and PRAME transcript levels and then analyzed their prognostic effect for patients with MDS with thrombocytopenia. In total, we enrolled 1110 patients diagnosed with MDS with thrombocytopenia. Overexpression of WT1 and PRAME was associated with elevated blast percentage, worse cytogenetics, and higher Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) risk. Further, both WT1 and PRAME overexpression were independent poor prognostic factors for acute myeloid leukemia evolution, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Together, the 2 genes overexpression identified a population of patients with MDS with substantially worse survival. On the basis of WT1 and PRAME transcript levels, patients with MDS with IPSS-R low risk were classified into 2 significantly divergent prognostic risk groups: a low-favorable group and a low-adverse group. The low-adverse group had survival similar to that of patients in the intermediate-risk group. Our study demonstrates that the evaluation of WT1/PRAME transcript analysis may improve the prognostication precision and better risk-stratify the patients.

Outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome

The prognosis of patients with hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome (hMDS) after receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with hMDS after allo-HSCT. Between September 2013 and October 2019, a total of 20 consecutive patients with hMDS and 1 patient with clonal cytopenia of undermined significance (CCUS) who underwent allo-HSCT, which included procedures with 9 matched sibling donors, 2 matched unrelated donors, 4 mismatched unrelated donors and 6 haploidentical donors, were enrolled in this study. The median time for myeloid engraftment was 11 days (range 9-17 days), and that for platelet engraftment was 10 days (range 7-17 days). The cumulative incidence (CI) of myeloid and platelet recovery was 95.2 ± 6.0% and 90.5 ± 7.3%, respectively. The CI rates were 40.0 ± 11.3% for grades II-III acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), 36.8 ± 11.5% for chronic GVHD and 23.8 ± 9.6% for nonrelapse mortality. No patients experienced relapse. Sixteen surviving patients were followed up for a median of 1113 days (range 110-2305 days), and the overall survival and relapse-free survival rates were both 72.7 ± 10.6%. This limited retrospective analysis suggests that patients with hMDS had a favorable survival after allo-HSCT.

Haploidentical related donor vs matched sibling donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome aged over 50 years: A single-center retrospective study

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) is a potentially curative therapeutic option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Increasing data suggest that haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation achieve comparable outcomes with HLA‐matched sibling donor (MSD) in adult AML/MDS. This retrospective study compared the outcomes of AML or MDS patients age ≥50 years underwent HID and MSD transplantation. One hundred and fifty‐six patients were enrolled in this study, including 75 HID and 81 MSD transplantation. The 100‐day cumulative incidence of II‐IV° acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) was 33.3 ± 5.4% vs 22.2 ± 4.6%, respectively, in HID and MSD groups (P = .066), and III‐IV° acute GVHD was not significantly different between two groups (5.3%±2.6% vs 6.2%±2.7%, respectively, P = .823). The 2‐year cumulative incidence of limited and extensive chronic GVHD was not statistically different in HID and MSD groups (20.9 ± 5.5% vs 18.9 ± 4.8% and 13.0 ± 4.7% vs 19.7 ± 5.0%, P = .889 and P = .269, respectively). The 2‐year cumulative incidences of relapse (27.0 ± 5.6% vs 22.7 ± 5.1%, P = .509), 2‐year overall survival (63.0 ± 5.8% vs 66.7 ± 5.4%, P = .454), 2‐year transplant‐related mortality (17.2 ± 4.6% vs 17.4 ± 4.4%, P = .847), 2‐year progression‐free survival (59.3 ± 5.8% vs 64.5 ± 5.4%, P = .437), 2‐year GVHD‐free relapse‐free survival (42.6 ± 5.9% vs 40.9 ± 5.6%, P = .964) were not significantly different in the two groups. The present data showed equivalent outcomes in AML or MDS patients age ≥50 years underwent HID and MSD transplantation.

[Risk factors analysis for steroid-resistant acute graft versus host disease after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

目的

分析单倍型造血干细胞移植（haplo-HSCT）后糖皮质激素耐药急性移植物抗宿主病（GVHD）的危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2011年12月在北京大学血液病研究所接受haplo-HSCT后并发急性GVHD的成人急性髓系白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征患者的临床资料。

结果

共有85例急性GVHD患者纳入研究，男55例，女30例，中位年龄30（19~67）岁。糖皮质激素治疗后达到完全缓解（CR）53例（62.4%），部分缓解（PR）6例（7.1%），未缓解（NR）26例（30.6%）。Ⅰ/Ⅱ、Ⅲ/Ⅳ度急性GVHD组糖皮质激素治疗的CR率分别为66.2%（51/77）、25.0%（2/8）（χ²=3.639，P=0.048）；累及1个、2个靶器官急性GVHD组糖皮质激素治疗的CR率分别为77.4%（48/62）、21.7%（5/23）（χ²=22.157，P<0.001）；明尼苏达危险度积分标危、高危组糖皮质激素治疗的CR率分别为67.5%（52/77）、12.5%（1/8）（χ²=7.153，P=0.004）。单因素和多因素分析均显示明尼苏达危险度积分高危和移植物单个核细胞量≥8.33×10⁸/kg是发生糖皮质激素耐药急性GVHD的独立危险因素。明尼苏达积分标危组（77例）、高危组（8例）移植后22个月总生存率分别为（90.3±3.8）%、（75.0±15.3）%（χ²=2.831，P=0.092）；糖皮质激素治疗CR组（53例）、非CR组（32例）移植后22个月总生存率分别为（95.2±3.4）%、（78.6±7.9）%（χ²=5.287，P=0.021）。

结论

明尼苏达危险度积分和移植物单个核细胞数可以预测haplo-HSCT后糖皮质激素耐药的急性GVHD。

Management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are the standard of care for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, only around 50% of patients respond to these agents, and responses tend to be transient, with loss of response frequently happening within 2 years and being associated with very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Identification of patients who will respond to HMAs is challenging. Mechanisms underlying resistance to HMAs are not clear yet. Recently, absence of response has been associated with increased cell-cycle quiescence among the hematopoietic progenitor cells. There are no standard-of-care options for patients after HMA failure. However, the increasing knowledge of MDS pathogenesis has led to the development of new potential therapies, including HMAs with longer half-life and exposure, inhibition of the antiapoptotic BCL2 protein with venetoclax or inhibition of immune-checkpoint regulatory proteins such as PD-1 or CTLA-4, innate immunity and targeting of CD33/CD3 with multiple monoclonal antibodies. In addition, multiple targeted agents are opening opportunities to treat subgroups of patients whose disease harbors mutations in TP53, IDH, FLT3, and genes involved in splicing machinery. Newer formulations of intensive chemotherapy and its different combinations may be considered a valid option in selected patients after HMA failure. Finally, decision making at the time of failure of response to HMAs should be personalized, taking into account that allogenic stem-cell transplantation remains the only therapeutic approach with curative potential in these patients. In the current review, we will focus on all the above aspects.

Prognostic significance of monosomal karyotype in myelodysplastic syndrome: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

In myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the prognostic role of monosomal karyotype (MK), defined as at least two autosomal monosomies or a single monosomy associated with at least one additional structural abnormality, remained controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to address this issue.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were retrieved. We extracted hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidential intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) on patients with MK versus those without, as well as on MK patients with monosomies of chromosome 7 and/or 5 versus those without from the available studies.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies covering 7500 patients were included this meta-analysis. The pooled HRs indicated MK had a negative impact on OS in MDS (pooled HR: 2.484, 95%CI: 2.033-3.036, P < .001), in MDS patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (pooled HR: 2.150, 95%CI: 1.861-2.48, P < .001), and in MDS with complex karyotype (CK) (pooled HR: 2.56, 95%CI: 2.032-3.036, P = .01). However, monosomies of chromosome 5 and/or 7 had no impact on OS in MDS with MK (pooled HR: 1.330, 95%CI: 0.827-2.139, P = .240). Meta-regression indicated that therapy was the origin of the heterogeneity (P = .012).

DISCUSSION

Our meta-analysis indicated that MK has a negative impact on OS in MDS, in MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT, and MDS with CK, but monosomies of chromosome 5 and/or 7 have no impact on OS in MDS with MK. The heterogeneity reflected the biologic and therapeutic heterogeneity of MDS.

CONCLUSION

MK is associated with poor prognosis in MDS, the underlying mechanism needs further exploring.

Comparison of transplant-specific prognostic scoring systems in haploidentical transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome

OBJECTIVES

We intended to identify the predictive abilities of recently published transplant-specific prognostic scoring systems in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving haploidentical transplantation.

METHODS

The outcomes of 73 patients with MDS receiving haploidentical transplantation were analyzed, according to the MTPSS, the TRI, and the CIBMTR scoring systems.

RESULTS

The median age of patients at transplantation was 50 (range, 19-69) years. The IPSS-R cytogenetic risks of very good/good, intermediate, and poor/very poor were, respectively, observed in 35 (48.0%), 25 (34.2%), and 13 (17.8%) patients, including 4 (5.5%) with a monosomal karyotype. Pretransplant treatment failure and high (≥3) HCT-CI were observed in 30 (41.1%) and 35 (48.0%) patients, respectively. With survivor's median follow-up of 42.3 months, the overall survival rate at 4 years of all patients was 65.5% (95% CI, 52.4-75.9). The MTPSS (100%, 77.3%, 62.5%, and 42.0% at 4 years; P = .02) and the TRI (100%, 79.9%, 76.0%, and 17.1% at 4 years; P < .01) differentiate proportionally overall survival rates according to their 4 risk groups, whereas the CIBMTR scoring system did not (P = .17).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the potential ability of the MPTSS and the TRI as prognostic tools for patients with MDS receiving haploidentical transplantation.