Comparison of Conditioning with Fludarabine/Busulfan and Fludarabine/Melphalan in Allogeneic Transplantation Recipients 50 Years or Older

A network meta-analysis of the effectiveness of different basic preconditioning regiments in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate and compare the effects of basic preconditioning regimens Bu/Cy, Cy/TBI and Flu/Bu for the treatment of patients in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

METHODS

It comprised exploring the published literature in the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, using suitable keywords pertaining to various basic pretreatments Bu/Cy, Cy/TBI, and Flu/Bu, prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and then extracting the searched outcome indicators of Overall Survival (OS) and survival (herein represented as OS and survival). Further, the results were estimated with meta-analysis using R, where the incidence of GVHD was reported in odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (95%CI).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 14 papers were included in this study, including 1436 cases were treated with Bu/Cy, 1816 cases with Cy/TBI, and 549 cases with Flu/Bu in the preconditioning regimen. After OS was the outcome pooled, compared with Flu/Bu in the preconditioning group, the results (Cy/TBI HR = 1.12 (95% Cl:1.04,1.61), Bu/Cy HR = 1.24 (95% Cl. 1.13,2.06)) showed that Flu/Bu preconditioning regimen significantly improved the overall survival rate of allogeneic HSCT patients. With the incidence of GVHD as the outcome summary, compared with Flu/Bu in the pretreatment group, the results (Cy/TBI HR = 1.24 (95% Cl:1.12, 1.82), Bu/Cy HR = 1.14 (95% Cl. 1.03, 2.12)) indicated that Flu/Bu in the pretreatment regimen group also significantly reduced the incidence of GVHD after allogeneic HSCT.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received the basal preconditioning regimen Flu/Bu before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation had the lowest hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) development. This indicates that the use of the basal preconditioning regimen Flu/Bu for the treatment of patients was the most effective, although the quality of the studies included needs to be confirmed by high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Melphalan Dose in Combination with Fludarabine Affects GI Toxicity and GVHD after Allogeneic Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Fludarabine (Flu) and melphalan (Mel) reduced-intensity conditioning is frequently used for allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, there is limited evidence on the impact of Mel dosing on toxicities and clinical outcomes of allo-HCT. We retrospectively compared 8/8 HLA matched donor allo-HCT outcomes of 345 patients with AML or MDS receiving total Mel dose of 100 mg/m2 (Mel-100, n=62) versus 140 mg/m2 (Mel-140, n=283) in combination with Flu. Median age at allo-HCT was 66 years and median follow-up was 36.5 months. For Mel-100 versus Mel-140 groups, any grade gastrointestinal toxicity rates were 40.3% vs. 67.8% (p<0.001), day 100 grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) rates were 21.0% vs. 43.1% (p=0.001) and 2-year chronic GVHD rates were 17.4% vs. 27.1% (p=0.033). In multivariable analysis, Mel-140 resulted in higher risks of gastrointestinal toxicity (HR=1.83, p=0.013), grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR=2.35, p=0.003), and moderate/severe chronic GVHD (HR=3.13, p=0.007). Total Mel dose had no independent impact on oral mucositis, non-relapse mortality, relapse, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. While independent validation of our observation is warranted, our findings support using Mel-100 in combination with Flu to minimize allo-HCT toxicities and morbidities related to GVHD.

Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine/busulfan versus fludarabine/low-dose melphalan in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens are commonly used in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); however, the optimal regimen remains unknown. In this study, the outcomes of adult patients with NHL who received fludarabine plus reduced-dose busulfan (6.4 mg/kg; Flu/Bu2) (n = 286) and fludarabine plus low-dose melphalan (80 or 100 mg/m2; Flu/Mel80-100) (n = 283) between January 2009 and December 2020 were compared using Japanese registry data. The primary end-point was the 5-year overall survival (OS). The 5-year OS was 53.8% (95% CI, 47.6-59.6) and 42.4% (95% CI, 35.6-49.0) in the Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Mel80-100 groups respectively (p = 0.030). After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the adjusted HR of Flu/Bu2 compared with Flu/Mel80-100 group for 5-year OS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.99, p = 0.046), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.78-1.21, p = 0.798) for 5-year progression-free survival, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94, p = 0.022) for 5-year cumulative risk of non-relapse mortality and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.95-1.64, p = 0.115) for 5-year cumulative risk of relapse. In this study, patients with NHL who received Flu/Bu2 were associated with better OS and lower non-relapse mortality than those who received Flu/Mel80-100.

Comparative analysis of reduced toxicity conditioning regimens between fludarabine plus melphalan and fludarabine plus busulfex in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Reduced-toxicity conditioning (RTC) regimens aim to mitigate regimen-related toxicity while maintaining anti-leukemic efficacy in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We assessed outcomes of RTC regimens utilizing melphalan versus intravenous busulfan combined with fludarabine in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted with 149 consecutive adult ALL patients (median age 51, range 18-60) in remission undergoing allo-HSCT. Patients received either fludarabine 150 mg/BSA plus 2 days of melphalan 70 mg/BSA (FM140, n = 76) from 2009 to 2015 or fludarabine plus 3 days of busulfan 3.2 mg/kg (FB9.6, n = 73) from 2016 to 2021. At 5 years post-HSCT, FM140 demonstrated superior disease-free survival (53.4% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.007) and lower cumulative relapse (27.4% vs. 46.8%, p = 0.026) than FB9.6. Five-year overall survival and non-relapse mortality did not significantly differ. FM140 exhibited a higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV (49.3% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.016), though rates of acute GVHD grades III-IV and chronic GVHD were similar. Multivariate analysis identified Philadelphia chromosome and minimal residual disease positive status, and FB9.6 conditioning as predictors of increased relapse and poorer disease-free survival. FM140 RTC regimen displayed significantly reduced relapse and superior disease-free survival compared to FB9.6 in ALL patients undergoing allo-HSCT, highlighting its current clinical utility.

Fludarabine-treosulfan versus fludarabine-melphalan or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning in older AML or MDS patients - A clinical trial to registry data comparison

A randomized study (acronym: MC-FludT.14/L Trial II) demonstrated that fludarabine plus treosulfan (30 g/m²) was an effective and well tolerated conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). To further evaluate this regimen, all 252 study patients aged 50 to 70 years were compared with similar patients, who underwent allo-HCT after fludarabine/melphalan (140 mg/m²) (FluMel) or busulfan (12.8 mg/kg)/cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) (BuCy) regimens and whose data was provided by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. In 1:1 propensity-score matched-paired analysis (PSA) of AML patients, there was no difference in 2-year-relapse-incidence after FluTreo compared with either FluMel (n = 110, p = 0.28) or BuCy (n = 78, p = 0.98). However, 2-year-non-relapse-mortality (NRM) was lower compared with FluMel (p = 0.019) and BuCy (p < 0.001). Consequently, 2-year-overall-survival (OS) after FluTreo was higher compared with FluMel (p = 0.04) and BuCy (p < 0.001). For MDS patients, no endpoint differences between FluTreo and FluMel (n = 30) were evident, whereas 2-year-OS after FluTreo was higher compared with BuCy (n = 25, p = 0.01) due to lower 2-year-NRM. Multivariate sensitivity analysis confirmed all significant results of PSA. Consequently, FluTreo (30 g/m²) seems to retain efficacy compared with FluMel and BuCy, but is better tolerated by older patients.

Comparison of fludarabine-based conditioning regimens in adult cord blood transplantation for myeloid malignancy: A retrospective, registry-based study

Fludarabine/busulfan and fludarabine/melphalan are viable options as conditioning regimens. However, the optimal fludarabine-based conditioning in cord blood transplantation (CBT) remains unclear. Therefore, this retrospective, registry-based study aimed to analyze the impact of five fludarabine-containing conditioning regimens on 1395 adult patients (median age, 61 years) with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and chronic myeloid leukemia who underwent their first CBT. Treatment outcomes of fludarabine combined with melphalan (100-140 mg/m2 ) and low-dose total body irradiation (TBI; FM140T); melphalan (80-99 mg/m2 ) and TBI (FM80T); busulfan (12.8 mg/kg) and melphalan (FB4M); busulfan (12.8 mg/kg) and TBI (FB4T); and busulfan (6.4 mg/kg) and TBI (FB2T) were compared. The 3-year survival rate was 67%, 53%, 44%, 36%, and 39%, respectively (p < .0001). The FM140T survival rate was the most favorable after adjusting for confounders, and the hazard ratios (vs. FM140T) for overall mortality were as follows: FM80T, 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.2); FB4M, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.6-2.8); FB4T, 2.7 (95% CI, 2.0-3.7); and FB2T, 2.2 (95% CI, 1.6-3.1). The better survival observed with FM140T, regardless of the disease, disease risk, age, or transplant year, was attributed to the lower relapse rate and lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) associated with fewer infectious deaths. Conversely, FB4T was associated with a higher relapse rate and higher NRM. The findings indicate that the outcomes of CBT in myeloid malignancies were highly dependent on both the alkylating agent and its dose in combination with fludarabine. Therefore, compared with fludarabine/busulfan-based conditioning, FM140T may be the preferred regimen.

Novel risk assessment for the intensity of conditioning regimen in older patients

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have long-term outcomes that are generally comparable with those of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) because of a lower risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) but a higher risk of relapse. However, it is unclear how we should select the conditioning intensity in individual cases. We propose the risk assessment for the intensity of conditioning regimen in elderly patients (RICE) score. We retrospectively analyzed 6147 recipients aged 50 to 69 years using a Japanese registry database. Based on the interaction analyses, advanced age (≥60 years), hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (≥2), and umbilical cord blood were used to design a scoring system to predict the difference in an individual patient's risk of NRM between MAC and RIC: the RICE score, which is the sum of the 3 factors. Zero or 1 implies low RICE score and 2 or 3, high RICE score. In multivariate analyses, RIC was significantly associated with a decreased risk of NRM in patients with a high RICE score (training cohort: hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.90; P = .003; validation cohort: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.77; P < .001). In contrast, we found no significant differences in NRM between MAC and RIC in patients with a low RICE score (training cohort: HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.15; P = .860; validation cohort: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-1.01; P = .061). In summary, a new and simple scoring system, the RICE score, appears to be useful for personalizing the conditioning intensity and could improve transplant outcomes in older patients.

Advantages of Higher Busulfan Dose Intensity in Fludarabine-Combined Conditioning for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Cord Blood Transplantation

The alkylating agent busulfan is commonly used as conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, a consensus has not yet been reached regarding the optimal busulfan dose in cord blood transplantation (CBT). Therefore, we conducted this large nationwide cohort study to retrospectively analyze the outcomes of CBT in patients with AML receiving busulfan at intermediate (6.4 mg/kg i.v.; BU2) or higher (12.8 mg/kg i.v.; BU4) doses within a fludarabine/i.v. busulfan (FLU/BU) regimen. Among 475 patients who underwent their first CBT following FLU/BU conditioning between 2007 and 2018, 162 received BU2 and 313 received BU4. Multivariate analysis identified BU4 as a significant factor for longer disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], .85; 95% confidence interval [CI], .75 to .97; P = .014) and a lower relapse rate (HR, .84; 95% CI, .72 to .98; P = .030). No significant differences were observed in non-relapse mortality between BU4 and BU2 (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, .88-1.26; P = .57). Subgroup analyses showed that BU4 provided significant benefits for patients who underwent transplantation while not in complete remission (CR) and those age <60 years. Our present results suggest that higher busulfan doses are preferable in patients undergoing CBT, particularly those not in CR and younger patients.

Day 4 vs. day 12 G-CSF administration following reduced intensity peripheral blood allogeneic stem cell transplant

INTRODUCTION

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) hastens neutrophil engraftment and reduces infections after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT), yet the optimal start date is unknown. Additionally, concurrent G-CSF and methotrexate for graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis may potentiate myelosuppression, and prolonged G-CSF is costly. Our institution changed from day + 4 to day + 12 G-CSF initiation following reduced intensity (RIC) alloHCT with methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared day + 4 and day + 12 G-CSF initiation after RIC alloHCT from 2017-2021. The primary endpoint was the time to neutrophil engraftment. Secondary endpoints included length of stay (LOS) and the time to platelet engraftment as well as the incidence of infectious events, acute GVHD (aGVHD), and mucositis.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included in each group with similar baseline characteristics. We observed faster neutrophil engraftment (median 12 vs. 15 days, p = 0.01) and platelet engraftment (median 13 vs. 15 days, p = 0.026) with day + 4 vs. day + 12 G-CSF initiation. Median LOS was 23 days (range, 19-32) with day + 4 initiation vs. 24 days (21-30) with day + 12 (p = 0.046). The incidence of culture-negative febrile neutropenia (p = 0.12), any grade aGVHD (p = 0.58), and grade 2-4 mucositis (p = 0.8) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared to day + 4, day + 12 G-CSF initiation following RIC alloHCT had a longer time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Day + 12 initiation also resulted in longer LOS, which while statistically significant, was potentially of limited clinical significance. These findings are hypothesis generating.

OUP accepted manuscript

As in younger patients, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) offers the best chance for durable remission in older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, defining the best treatment strategy (and in particular, whether or not to proceed to alloHSCT) for elderly patients with AML remains a difficult decision for the hematologist, since potential toxicity of conditioning regimens, risks of graft-versus-host disease, impaired immune reconstitution and the need for prolonged immunosuppression may be of major concern in these vulnerable patients with complex needs. Hopefully, significant progress has been made over the past decade in alloHSCT for elderly patients and current evidence suggests that chronological age per se (between 60 and 75) is not a reliable predictor of outcome after alloHSCT. Here, we review the current state of alloHSCT in elderly patients with AML and also discuss the different approaches currently being investigated to improve both accessibility to as well as success of alloHSCT in these patients.

Anti-thymocyte globulin could potentially overcome an adverse effect of acute GVHD in matched-related PBSCT

BACKGROUND

Previous Japanese studies have shown that bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is associated with a better survival compared with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from matched related donors (MRDs). PBSCT recipients showed a higher incidence of severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) than BMT recipients. In recent years, the efficacy and safety of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) for PBSCT recipients has been reported from around the world.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare BMT and PBSCT to identify current improvements and unmet needs among PBSCT recipients from MRDs. Moreover, we evaluated the impact of ATG administration on the outcomes for PBSCT recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed patients aged 16 years or older with acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myeloid leukemia who received their first BMT or PBSCT from MRDs between 2009 and 2018 in Japan.

RESULTS

In total, 3599 transplantations were performed (BMT, 1218; PBSCT without ATG [PBSCT-ATG(-)], 2288; and PBSCT with ATG [PBSCT-ATG(+)], 93). The PBSCT-ATG(-) group had a higher NRM rate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.57; p = 0.005) and lower overall survival (OS) rate (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30; p = 0.011) than the BMT group. Furthermore, the PBSCT-ATG(-) group had a higher incidence of grade III-IV, stage 2-4 gut, high-risk, and steroid-refractory acute GVHD than the BMT group. Acute GVHDs had a negative impact on NRM and OS rates. PBSCT-ATG(-) was also associated with a higher risk of chronic GVHD (HR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.24-1.57; p < 0.001) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.23-1.68; p < 0.001). The incidence of acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and NRM and chronic GVHD-free relapse-free survival rates were comparable between the PBSCT-ATG(+) and BMT groups. The OS rate of patients with acute GVHD in the three donor groups was similar. Patients treated with reduced-intensity conditioning in the PBSCT-ATG(+) group had a higher relapse rate and lower OS rate than those in the BMT group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Japanese cohort, standard calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis was not sufficient for PBSCT recipients from MRDs because of the high incidence of severe acute GVHD. Moreover, prophylactic ATG was found to be a promising strategy against GVHD.

Retrospective comparison of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine/low-dose melphalan plus 4 Gy TBI versus fludarabine/ busulfan plus 4 Gy TBI

Fludarabine with intravenous busulfan (6.4 mg/kg; FB2) and fludarabine with intermediate-dose melphalan (140 mg/m²; FM140) are the most widely used reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. FM140 generally has a lower relapse rate and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM), resulting in overall survival (OS) comparable to that seen with FB2. To evaluate the effect of reducing the melphalan dose, we retrospectively compared transplant outcomes in 156 patients who received FB2 (n = 103) or FM80 (n = 53) at our center (median age: 63 years; range 27-72 years). All patients received 4-Gy total body irradiation. Three-year OS, the cumulative incidence of relapse, and NRM were comparable between groups (FB2 vs. FM80, 58% vs. 47%, p = 0.24; 30% vs. 36%, p = 0.57; 17% vs. 21%, p = 0.44, respectively). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day 100, chronic GVHD at 3 years, or the 3-year GVHD-free/relapse-free survival rate. In the high-risk disease group, patients receiving FM80 tended to have lower 3-year OS (FB2 vs. FM80, 48% vs. 17%, p = 0.06). In summary, transplant outcomes following FB2 or FM80 were comparable except in patients with high-risk disease.

Hand-foot syndrome and risk factors for occurrence in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients

PURPOSE

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a typical skin disorder caused by the use of cytotoxic anticancer drugs and molecular targets. Similarly, various anticancer drugs have been used as a conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and skin disorders such as HFS have been reported. The aim of this study was to determine retrospectively the frequency of HFS in recipients who have received a first allogeneic HSCT and the risk factors for HFS occurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the medical records of recipients who received their first allogeneic HSCT and neutrophil engraftment at Shizuoka Cancer Center from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019.

RESULTS

The occurrence of HFS was confirmed in 78 cases (48.1%), and no grade 3 HFS was confirmed. The median occurrence of HFS was 8 (- 3 to 19) days. In recipients with and without confirmed HFS, the median neutrophil engraftment day was 16.5 (10-33) and 15.0 (11-26) days, respectively (p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis indicated that the frequency of HFS was statistically significantly higher in women (p = 0.032), recipients administered busulfan (Bu) four times daily (p = 0.011), and recipients previously treated with anthracycline (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Attention should be paid to HFS that occurs due to the conditioning regimen for HSCT in women, recipients who received 0.8 mg/kg of Bu four times a day, and recipients with a history of anthracycline administration, as HFS may affect the duration to neutrophil engraftment.

Fludarabine and Melphalan Compared with Reduced Doses of Busulfan and Fludarabine Improve Transplantation Outcomes in Older Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens developed to extend the use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to older patients have resulted in encouraging outcomes. We aimed to compare the 2 most commonly used RIC regimens, i.v. fludarabine with busulfan (FluBu) and fludarabine with melphalan (FluMel), in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), we identified 1045 MDS patients age ≥60 years who underwent first HSCT with a matched related or matched (8/8) unrelated donor using an RIC regimen. The CIBMTR's definition of RIC was used: a regimen that incorporated an i.v. busulfan total dose ≤7.2 mg/kg or a low-dose melphalan total dose ≤150 mg/m². The 2 groups, recipients of FluBu (n = 697) and recipients of FluMel (n = 448), were comparable in terms of disease- and transplantation-related characteristics except for the more frequent use of antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab in the FluBu group (39% versus 31%). The median age was 67 years in both groups. FluMel was associated with a reduced relapse incidence (RI) compared with FluBu, with a 1-year adjusted incidence of 26% versus 44% (P ≤ .0001). Transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was higher in the FluMel group (26% versus 16%; P ≤ .0001). Because the magnitude of improvement with FluMel in RI was greater than the improvement in TRM with FluBu, disease-free survival (DFS) was better at 1 year and beyond with FluMel compared with FluBu (48% versus 40% at 1 year [P = .02] and 35% versus 27% at 3 years [P = .01]). Overall survival (OS) was comparable in the 2 groups at 1 year (63% versus 61%; P = .4) but was significantly improved with FluMel compared with FluBu at 3 years (46% versus 39%; P = .03). Our results suggest that FluMel is associated with superior DFS compared with FluBu owing to reduced RI in older patients with MDS patients. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Myeloablative Fractionated Busulfan With Fludarabine in Older Patients: Long Term Disease-Specific Outcomes of a Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial

Compared to reduced-intensity conditioning regimen, myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) reduces relapse but is avoided in older patients because of higher non-relapse mortality (NRM). To meet the need for a myeloablative regimen for older patients, we developed a novel fludarabine and busulfan MAC regimen. We fractionated the dose of busulfan and gave it for 6 days over a 2-week period and demonstrated the feasibility and safety of this approach. However, the disease-specific efficacy of this regimen is not known. The purpose of this study was to estimate the efficacy of fractionated busulfan regimen by estimating diseases specific survival outcomes. The conditioning regimen consisted of busulfan and fludarabine. On days -13 and -12 before HCT, patients received 80 mg/m² busulfan intravenously (IV) daily in an outpatient clinic. Additional chemotherapy was administered during inpatient treatment from day -6 through day -3, including fludarabine 40 mg/m² and busulfan IV once daily. The dosing of busulfan was determined from pharmacokinetic analyses to achieve for the course a target area under the curve of 20,000 ± 12% μmol/min, which is close to the average exposure of myeloablative dose of busulfan. One hundred fifty patients with high-risk hematological malignancies up to 75 years were enrolled in this prospective phase II study. The objective was to evaluate NRM, relapse, survival, the rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and long-term complications. The median age of the patient population was 61 years (interquartile range, 55-67). The most common diagnoses were acute myeloid leukemia (AML; N = 59 [39.3%]), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n = 29 [19.3%]), and myelofibrosis (MF; N = 22 [14.7%]). Most had an unrelated donor (n = 93 [62%]) and received peripheral blood graft (n = 110 [73.3%]). Over half had an HCT-specific comorbidity index of ≥3 (n = 79 [52.7%]). The median follow-up among survivors was 43.4 months (interquartile range, 38.9-50.4). In patients with AML in complete remission, MDS, and myelofibrosis, 3-year overall survival was 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.2-88.5%), 43.6% (95% CI, 28.6-66.4%), and 59.1% (95% CI, 41.7-83.7%) respectively. The cumulative incidence of NRM was 22% (15.3%-28.7%), extensive chronic GVHD was 27% (95% CI, 20-34%), bronchiolitis obliterans was 4.7% (95% CI, 1.3-8.1%), and secondary malignancy was 8.7% (95% CI, 4.1-13.2%) at 3 years. Lengthening the duration of busulfan (fractionation) permits safe delivery of myeloablative conditioning in older patients, leading to prolonged survival. © 2021 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using fludarabine plus myeloablative busulfan and melphalan confers promising survival in high-risk hematopoietic neoplasms: a single-center retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

Optimal selection of pretransplant conditioning is crucially vital for improving survival and quality-of-life of patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), particularly in those with high-risk diseases. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of recently-developed reduced-toxicity myeloablative regimen that combines fludarabine, intravenous busulfan, and melphalan (FBM).

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 39 patients (23 with myeloid neoplasms and 16 with lymphoid neoplasms), with a median age of 50 (range, 17-68) years, who underwent their first allo-HCT using the FBM regimen. Graft types were bone marrow in 11, peripheral blood in 11, and cord blood in 17 patients. Cyclosporine- or tacrolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was administered. The primary end point of the study was the overall survival rate at 2-year after transplantation.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 910 days for the surviving patients, 2-year overall survival was 62% for the entire cohort; 73% in the low-to-intermediate-risk group and 44% in the high-to-very high-risk group classified by the refined CIBMTR Disease Risk Index. Cumulative incidences of engraftment, grade II-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, relapse, and non-relapse mortality were 95%, 56%, 56%, 31%, and 17%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that our FBM regimen can be applied to allo-HCT using various graft types and yields acceptable outcomes with relatively low non-relapse mortality in both myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms. Also, we observed a promising survival in the group of patients with high-risk diseases, warranting more accumulation of patients and longer follow-up.

Reduced intensity conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia using melphalan- vs busulfan-based regimens: a CIBMTR report

There is a lack of large comparative study on the outcomes of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transplantation using fludarabine/busulfan (FB) and fludarabine/melphalan (FM) regimens. Adult AML patients from Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research who received first RIC allo-transplant between 2001 and 2015 were studied. Patients were excluded if they received cord blood or identical twin transplant, total body irradiation in conditioning, or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with in vitro T-cell depletion. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), secondary end points were leukemia-free survival (LFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and GVHD. Multivariate survival model was used with adjustment for patient, leukemia, and transplant-related factors. A total of 622 patients received FM and 791 received FB RIC. Compared with FB, the FM group had fewer transplant in complete remission (CR), fewer matched sibling donors, and less usage of anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab. More patients in the FM group received marrow grafts and had transplantation before 2005. OS was significantly lower within the first 3 months posttransplant in the FM group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.82, P < .001), but was marginally superior beyond 3 months (HR = 0.87, P = .05). LFS was better with FM compared with FB (HR = 0.89, P = .05). NRM was significantly increased in the FM group during the first 3 months of posttransplant (HR = 3.85, P < .001). Long-term relapse was lower with FM (HR = 0.65, P < .001). Analysis restricted to patients with CR showed comparable results. In conclusion, compared with FB, the FM RIC showed a marginally superior long-term OS and LFS and a lower relapse rate. A lower OS early posttransplant within 3 months was largely the result of a higher early NRM.

Predictors of increased melphalan exposure correlate with overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and toxicities in patients undergoing reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation with fludarabine and melphalan

The reduced-intensity conditioning regimen, fludarabine and melphalan 140 mg/m² (FM140), is widely adopted in practice. Pharmacokinetic studies report 10-fold interpatient variability in melphalan exposure. We identified low hemoglobin (Hb) and/or creatinine clearance (CrCl), determinants of melphalan pharmacokinetic, as strong predictors of outcomes after high-dose melphalan and autologous transplant. We hypothesized that these variables could predict for outcomes after FM140. Overall survival was shorter in patients with a lower Hb (113 vs. 2536 days; p = 0.004), due to an increased rate of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (p = 0.0005). Overall survival was also worse in patients with lower CrCl (75 vs. 317 days; p = 0.003), with a significantly worse nonrelapse mortality (p = 0.0023). In a multivariate analysis, a higher Hb and CrCl predicted for better overall survival (p = 0.017). In patients with a lower Hb, the median duration of hospitalization (p = 0.02) and the mean duration of diarrhea (p = 0.008) were longer. In patients with a lower CrCl, the median duration of hospitalization (p = 0.06) and the mean duration of diarrhea (p = 0.0009) longer, and the rate of infection was higher (p = 0.02). We show for the first time that Hb and CrCl represent important determinants of outcomes after FM140, suggesting that pharmacokinetic-directed dosing may be beneficial in achieving optimal outcomes.

Comparison of melphalan- And busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning in children undergoing allogeneic transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplasia

BACKGROUND

The optimal conditioning regimen for alloHCT in children with myeloid malignancies remains undefined.

PROCEDURE

We performed a retrospective review of children undergoing alloHCT for AML and MDS over a 10-year period (2008-2018) at our institution, comparing the outcomes of recipients of either a myeloablative busulfan- or reduced toxicity mel/thio-based conditioning regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients underwent alloHCT for AML/MDS (mel/thio, N = 21; busulfan, N = 28). Mel/thio recipients were selected due to pretransplant comorbidities. Recipients of mel/thio were more likely to have t-AML, and less likely to have MRD <0.1% at the time of alloHCT (57.1% vs 82.1%). Graft failure was more common in busulfan recipients; engraftment kinetics were similar between groups. Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome was diagnosed in 21% of busulfan and no mel/thio recipients (P = .03). One patient in each group died from TRM. Relapse incidence was comparable (mel/thio-29% vs busulfan-32%); however, relapse occurred significantly later in recipients of mel/thio conditioning (median d + 396 vs d + 137; P = .01). As a result, there was a trend toward improved OS at 1 and 3 years in mel/thio recipients (95% vs 74%, P = .06; and 75% vs 50%, P = .11; respectively).

CONCLUSION

In our single institution, when compared to myeloablative busulfan-based conditioning, use of a mel/thio-based reduced toxicity regimen resulted in comparable outcomes, despite higher risk patient and disease characteristics. Mel/thio recipients had both more comorbidities and higher risk disease profile, which did not translate into higher rates of either TRM or relapse.

Reduced-Intensity Conditioning with Busulfan and Fludarabine for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

PURPOSE

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with optimal conditioning has helped better long-term survival in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This study investigated the efficacy and safety of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) with busulfan and fludarabine in adult ALL patients unfit for myeloablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records of 78 patients who underwent HSCT with RIC consisting of 3.2 mg/kg/day of busulfan for 2 or 3 days and 30 mg/m²/day of fludarabine for 5 or 6 days were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 49 years. Over a median follow-up of 22 months, 2-year estimates of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were 57.4% and 68.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a trend of improved RFS in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.08; p=0.080). The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 42.9% and 19.6%, respectively and one case of central nervous system relapse was noted. No hepatic veno-occlusive disease was reported. Grade II-IV acute GVHD and any grade chronic GVHD occurred in 21.1% and 41.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

RIC with busulfan and fludarabine is an effective and safe conditioning regimen for adult ALL patients unfit for myeloablation.

Long-Term Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant with Fludarabine and Melphalan Conditioning and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with poor survival in older adults, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has been an increasingly used strategy in this population. At City of Hope we conducted a retrospective analysis of 72 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT with fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel) as the conditioning regimen between 2005 and 2018, from either a matched sibling or fully matched unrelated donor while in complete remission. Tacrolimus and sirolimus (T/S) were used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 4 years post-HCT were 58% and 44%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse/progression and nonrelapse mortality at 4 years were 34% and 22%, respectively. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (20% versus 48% for patients with Ph-negative status, P = .007). In conclusion, RIC HCT with FluMel conditioning and T/S GVHD prophylaxis was associated with favorable outcomes in patients with Ph+ ALL and should be considered as a viable consolidative therapy for adult patients with ALL.

Reduced-intensity fludarabine/melphalan confers similar survival to busulfan/fludarabine myeloablative regimens for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia

Optimal conditioning chemotherapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains uncertain. Myeloablative regimens such as fludarabine/busulfan are favored over reduced-intensity fludarabine/melphalan (Flu/Mel); however, it is not known if Flu/Mel is inferior. We analyzed hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with AML and MDS who received fludarabine with once-daily intravenous busulfan targeted to either area under the curve (AUC) 5300 µM*L/min (Flu/Bu 5300) (n = 246) or AUC 3500 µM*L/min (Flu/Bu 3500) (n = 81), or Flu/Mel (n = 69). Flu/Bu regimens were compared separately to Flu/Mel. After 2-year follow-up, no differences in overall or relapse-free survival were found between Flu/Bu 5300 or 3500 versus Flu/Mel though relapse rates were significantly higher; 33.1% (p = 0.024), 44.6% (p = 0.002), versus 19.4%, respectively. Flu/Bu 5300 (p = 0.008) and Flu/Bu 3500 (p < 0.001) groups were prognostic for relapse compared to Flu/Mel. Flu/Mel yields lower relapse rates and similar survival benefit when compared to Flu/Bu 3500 or 5300 µM*L/min.

Is there an optimal conditioning for older patients with AML receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation?

The optimal conditioning regimen for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unclear. In this study, we compared outcomes of AML patients >60 years of age undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at our institution. All 404 consecutively treated patients received 1 of the following conditioning regimens: (1) fludarabine+melphalan 100 mg/m2 (FM100), (2) fludarabine+melphalan 140 mg/m2 (FM140), (3) fludarabine+IV busulfan AUC ≥ 5000/d × 4 d (Bu≥20000), and (4) fludarabine+IV busulfan AUC 4000/d × 4 d (Bu16000). A propensity score analysis (PSA) was used to compare outcomes between these 4 groups. Among the 4 conditioning regimens, the FM100 group had a significantly better long-term survival with 5-year progression-free survival of 49% vs 30%, 34%, and 23%, respectively. The benefit of the FM100 regimen resulted primarily from the lower nonrelapse mortality associated with this regimen, an effect more pronounced in patients with lower performance status. The PSA confirmed that FM100 was associated with better posttransplantation survival, whereas no significant differences were seen between the other regimen groups. In summary, older patients with AML benefited from a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with lower melphalan doses (FM100), which was associated with better survival, even though it was primarily used in patients who could not receive a more intense conditioning regimen.

Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Elderly Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens, improved HLA matching, and better supportive care allow allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) to be offered to older patients. Only a small percentage of eligible patients between ages 65 and 74 years actually undergo alloSCT, and comprehensive outcome data from the aging population are still lacking. We examined the outcome of older patients who underwent alloSCT using melphalan-based RIC for hematologic malignancies at our institution. We identified 125 patients older than 65 years (median, 69; range, 66 to 77) who underwent matched related donor, matched unrelated donor, or combined haploidentical/umbilical cord alloSCT between 2012 through November, 2017. Among them, 52 (41.6%) and 70 (56%) had, respectively, intermediate and high/very high Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) disease risk index (DRI). One hundred six patients (85%) received fludarabine/melphalan-based RIC regimen with either antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 13 days (range, 8 to 37) and platelet engraftment 17 days (range, 9 to 169). The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 11.5% at 100 days and 30.1% and 34.8% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 35% and 40% at 1 and 2 years. The cumulative incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day 100 and 6 months was 29.5% and 34.5%, and chronic GVHD at 6, 12, and 24 months was 2.5%, 5.2%, and 6.3%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 34.6%, 24.4%, and 16.5%, respectively. The graft GVHD-free survival was 24.6%, 16.1%, and 9.3%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) was 44.5%, 30.7%, and 26.5%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, low albumin was predictive of poor PFS and OS and high hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index, and CIBMTR DRI was predictive of worse graft GVHD-free survival. Among long-term survivors the median Karnofsky performance status was 80. Older patients, even when referred with advanced disease, can benefit from melphalan-based alloSCT with HLA-matched or alternative donor sources without discernible impact of donor source on outcome. Using alemtuzumab- or ATG-based in vivo T cell depletion, the incidence of chronic GVHD is extremely low. Performance status in survivors is excellent. Better predictors for outcome in this patient population need to be identified.

Haploidentical transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia patients with minimal/measurable residual disease at transplantation

There have been conflicting results regarding the impact of minimal/measurable disease at transplant on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) outcomes after haploidentical transplantation (haplo-SCT). We assessed the impact of pre-transplant disease status on post-transplant outcomes of 143 patients treated with haplo-SCT using fludarabine-melphalan (FM) conditioning and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). With a median follow-up of 29 months, the two-year PFS for all patients was 41%. Compared to patients in complete remission (CR) at transplant, those with active disease (n = 29) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (n = 39) had worse PFS. They had hazard ratios (HR) of 3.5 (95% CI: 2.05-6.1; P < .001) and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.3-3.9; P = .002), respectively. Among patients who were in CR at transplant, there were no differences in PFS between those who had minimal residual disease (MRD) positive (n = 24), and MRD negative (n = 41) (HR 1.85, 95%CI: 0.9-4.0; P = .1). In multivariable analysis for patients in CR, only age was predictive for outcomes, while MRD status at transplant did not influence the treatment outcomes. Our findings suggest that haplo-SCT with FM conditioning regimen and PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis has a protective effect, and may potentially abrogate the inferior outcomes of MRD positivity for patients with AML. Patients with positive MRD may benefit from proceeding urgently to a haplo-SCT, as this does not appear to negatively impact transplant outcomes.

The effect of melphalan dose and total body irradiation as reduced-intensity conditioning for acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

To evaluate the prognostic impact of melphalan dose and total body irradiation (TBI) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients undergoing reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation, we retrospectively compared the outcomes between higher-dose melphalan (120-140 mg/m²) with (HDM/TBI+, n = 118) or without 2-4 Gy TBI (HDM/TBI-, n = 152) and lower-dose melphalan (80-110 mg/m²) with TBI (LDM/TBI+, n = 237). At 3 years, the overall survival was 49.6% in the HDM/TBI+, 51.7% in the HDM/TBI-, and 47.3% in the LDM/TBI + groups (p = .67). The relapse rate and non-relapse mortality were comparable among the three groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that conditioning regimen was not associated with overall survival, relapse, and non-relapse mortality; however, central nervous system complication was less frequent with LDM/TBI + than with HDM/TBI+. Our findings suggest reduced-intensity conditioning with LDM/TBI + might be a reasonable option, especially in vulnerable ALL patients, with similar transplant outcomes to HDM with or without TBI.

Prognostic impact of melphalan dose and total body irradiation use in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning

To evaluate the prognostic impact of melphalan dose and total body irradiation (TBI) use in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation, we retrospectively compared outcomes of patients receiving a higher-dose (120-140 mg/m², n = 379) or lower-dose melphalan (80-110 mg/m², n = 128) with or without TBI of ≤4 Gy. At 3 years, overall survival was 48.9% in the higher-dose group versus 40.3% in the lower-dose group (p = .013). This survival benefit was attributed to lower tumor-related mortality (23.9% vs. 31.7%; p = .049). Non-relapse mortality did not differ (24.8% vs. 23.5%, p = .59). The beneficial effect of a higher-dose melphalan was more evident when combined with TBI in younger patients, those not in complete remission, and those with good performance status. Our findings support the use of a higher-dose melphalan in combination with TBI for reduced-intensity conditioning in physically fit patients.

Preconditioning with fludarabine, busulfan and cytarabine versus standard BuCy2 for patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a prospective, randomized phase II study

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of a novel regimen called FBA, consisting of fludarabine, busulfan, and cytarabine, with the standard BuCy2 regimen for younger adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia, we conducted a prospective randomized phase II study. Patients in complete remission were randomly assigned to receive either the FBA (n = 56) or the BuCy2 regimen (n = 55). The difference in 100-day transplant-related mortality (TRM) was not statistically significant between the two arms (1.79% for FBA versus 5.45% for BuCy2, P = 0.260), as were the cumulative incidences of relapse, TRM, overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years. However, the 100-day cumulative incidences of grades II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) were lower in the FBA group [(8.93% versus 21.86%, P = 0.032) (1.79% versus 9.09%, P = 0.025)]. The 3-year GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 31.20% for the FBA group and 14.96% for the BuCy2 group (P = 0.004). The incidences of diarrhea and severe oral mucositis within the first 30 days post-transplantation were lower in the FBA group [(28.57% versus 65.45%; P < 0.001) (51.79% versus 70.91%; P = 0.039)]. In conclusion, allogenic transplantation with the FBA regimen achieved similar TRM, relapse rate, OS and EFS, as that with the BuCy2 regimen but with less frequent and less severe complications in early stage after transplantation and a trend toward higher GRFS.

Comparison of reduced intensity conditioning regimens used in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for myelofibrosis with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) using either Busulfan Fludarabine (BuFlu), Fludarabine Bis-chlorethyl-nitroso-urea/ carmustine Melphalan (FBM) or Fludarabine Melphalan (FluMel) regimens. Sixty-one patients were identified who underwent HCT with one of these RIC regimens. Overall survival (OS) was not different in the 3 groups. However, 100% donor chimerism was seen in more frequently at day +30 and day +100 in patients who received FBM or FluMel than BuFlu, in both CD3 and CD33 fractions. For instance, 100% donor chimerism in CD33 fraction was present in 100% patients in FBM cohort, 90% in FluMel cohort while 44% in BuFlu cohort at day +100. Acute graft-versus host disease, grade 2-4 and grade 3-4, was not statistically different in the 3 groups (BuFlu 47 and 35%, FBM 68 and 27%, FluMel 68 and 46%; p = 0.31 and 0.45). Relapses and non-relapse mortality was also not statistically significantly different. Our study shows similar OS with these 3 RIC regimens in myelofibrosis; although donor chimerism at day +30 and day +100 was better in patients who received FBM and FluMel.