Allotransplants for Patients 65 Years or Older with High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Flow cytometry-based measurable residual disease (MRD) analysis identifies AML patients who may benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring independently predicts long-term outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Of the various modalities available, multiparameter flow cytometry-based MRD analysis is widely used and relevant for patients without molecular targets. In the transplant (HCT) setting, the presence of MRD pre-HCT is associated with adverse outcomes. MRD-negative remission status pre-HCT was also associated with longer overall (OS) and progression-free survival and a lower risk of relapse. We hypothesize that the combination of disease risk and MRD at the time of first complete remission (CR1) could identify patients according to the benefit gained from HCT, especially for intermediate-risk patients. We performed a retrospective analysis comparing the outcomes of HCT versus non-HCT therapies based on MRD status in AML patients who achieved CR1. Time-dependent analysis was applied considering time-to-HCT as a time-dependent covariate and compared HCT versus non-HCT outcomes according to MRD status at CR1. Among 336 patients assessed at CR1, 35.1% were MRD positive (MRDpos) post-induction. MRDpos patients benefitted from HCT with improved OS and relapse-free survival (RFS), while no benefit was observed in MRDneg patients. In adverse-risk patients, HCT improved OS (HR for OS 0.55; p = 0.05). In intermediate-risk patients, HCT benefit was not significant for OS and RFS. Intermediate-risk MRDpos patients were found to have benefit from HCT with improved OS (HR 0.45, p = 0.04), RFS (HR 0.46, p = 0.02), and CIR (HR 0.41, p = 0.02). Our data underscore the benefit of HCT in adverse risk and MRDpos intermediate-risk AML patients.

MRD-directed and risk-adapted individualized stratified treatment of AML

Measurable residual disease (MRD) has been widely recognized as a biomarker for deeply evaluating complete remission (CR), predicting relapse, guiding pre-emptive interventions, and serving as an endpoint surrogate for drug testing. However, despite the emergence of new technologies, there remains a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the proper techniques, sample materials, and optimal time points for MRD assessment. In this review, we summarized the MRD methods, sample sources, and evaluation frequency according to the risk category of the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of properly utilizing and combining these technologies. We have also refined the flowchart outlining each time point for pre-emptive interventions and intervention paths. The evaluation of MRD in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is sophisticated, clinically applicable, and technology-dependent, and necessitates standardized approaches and further research.

Utilization of Serial Next-Generation Sequencing Among Patients Receiving CPX-351 for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

The phase III trial that led to the approval of CPX-351 for treating secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) in 2017 did not study the effect of specific mutations on outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study was done to evaluate the effect of next-generation sequencing (NGS) results at the time of best response and before allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) in patients treated with CPX-351 as frontline therapy for sAML between 2017 and 2021.

RESULTS

The most common mutations seen were DNMT3A (n = 17, 29.8%), SRSF2 (n = 13, 22.8%), RUNX1 (n = 13, 22.8%), TET2 (n = 9, 15.8%), ASXL1 (n = 9, 15.8%), and BCOR (n = 9, 15.8%). Median OS (mOS) for the entire cohort was 47 months. Though 64.7% patients cleared the DNMT3A mutation, only 44.4% and 22.2% of patients cleared the TET2 and ASXL1 mutations, respectively. The mOS for patients who cleared their mutations vs. for those who did not was not significantly longer (46 vs. 30 months; P = .991). The relapse-free survival (RFS) for patients who cleared mutations was numerically longer compared to those who had persistent mutations; however, this did not reach statistical significance (44 months vs. 26 months; P = .786).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study reporting NGS at best response and before alloSCT and its effect on OS and RFS. We found that OS and RFS were numerically longer among patients who cleared mutations; however, this did not reach statistical significance. In addition, alloSCT led to improved RFS irrespective of mutational clearance.

Validation of a 12-color flow cytometry assay for acute myeloid leukemia minimal/measurable residual disease detection

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) by multicolor flow cytometry is a complex laboratory developed test (LDT), challenging for implementation. We share our experience in the validation of a 12-color AML MRD flow cytometry assay to meet stringent regulatory requirements.

METHODS

We worked under the guidelines of the CLSI HL62 publication, illustrated the details of the validation process that was tailored to uniqueness of AML MRD, and tested its clinical validity in 61 patients. The "trueness" was determined by correlating with concurrent molecular genetic testing and follow-up bone marrow examinations.

RESULTS

Under assay specificity, we shared the details of panel design, analysis, and criteria for interpretation and reporting. The assay accuracy was assessed by testing known positive and negative samples and correlating with molecular genetic testing and follow-up bone marrow examination. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were validated to a level between 0.01% and 0.1%, varied from the leukemia-associated immunophenotypes (LAIP) and the numbers of events obtained for analysis. Assay linearity, precision and carry over studies all met acceptable criteria. In the clinical validity test, the concordance was 93%, specificity 98% and sensitivity 83%. The most challenging aspects of the assay were the discrimination of pre-leukemic cells (persistent clonal hematopoiesis) or underlying myelodysplastic clones from AML MRD with immunophenotypic switch or subclone selection.

CONCLUSION

The validation met all criteria and obtained FDA IDE (investigational device exemption) approval. This study provides ample technical and professional details in setting up the AML MRD flow cytometry assay and illustrates through the example of the "fit for purpose" validation process. We also highlight the need for further characterization of abnormal blasts bearing the potential for AML relapse.

How to improve the outcomes of elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients through allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

In recent years, with the gradual advancement of haploidentical transplantation technology, the availability of donors has increased significantly, along with the widespread use of reduced-intensity conditioning and the improvement of nursing techniques, giving more elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients the chance to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We have summarized the classic and recently proposed pre-transplant assessment methods and assessed the various sources of donors, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complication management based on the outcomes of large-scale clinical studies for elderly AML patients.

Measurable Residual Disease in High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Simple Summary

Assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) identifies small numbers of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells that may remain after initiating treatment. The achievement of MRD negativity (no detectable AML cells remaining) typically predicts better outcomes for patients with AML. Some patients with AML have disease characteristics that put them at a higher risk of treatment failure or relapse; while outcomes for patients with high-risk AML are historically poor with traditional chemotherapy regimens, newer chemotherapy formulations (i.e., CPX-351) and targeted therapies may be more effective in achieving MRD negativity in these patients. Currently, there is no agreement on the best method for determining whether a patient has achieved MRD negativity, and the use of several different methods makes it difficult to compare outcomes across studies. Despite these challenges, regular monitoring of patients for the achievement of MRD negativity will become increasingly important in the routine management of patients with high-risk AML.

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests measurable residual disease (MRD) assessments are prognostic in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High-risk AML encompasses a subset of AML with poor response to therapy and prognosis, with features such as therapy-related AML, an antecedent hematologic disorder, extramedullary disease (in adults), and selected mutations and cytogenetic abnormalities. Historically, few patients with high-risk AML achieved deep and durable remission with conventional chemotherapy; however, newer agents might be more effective in achieving MRD-negative remission. CPX-351 (dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin/cytarabine at a synergistic ratio) demonstrated MRD-negativity rates of 36–64% across retrospective studies in adults with newly diagnosed high-risk AML and 84% in pediatric patients with first-relapse AML. Venetoclax (BCL2 inhibitor) demonstrated MRD-negativity rates of 33–53% in combination with hypomethylating agents for high-risk subgroups in studies of older adults with newly diagnosed AML who were ineligible for intensive therapy and 65% in combination with chemotherapy in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory AML. However, there is no consensus on optimal MRD methodology in AML, and the use of different techniques, sample sources, sensitivity thresholds, and the timing of assessments limit comparisons across studies. Robust MRD analyses are needed in future clinical studies, and MRD monitoring should become a routine aspect of AML management.

Next-generation sequencing and clinical histocompatibility testing

Histocompatibility testing is essential for donor identification and risk assessment in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Additionally, it is useful for identifying donor specific alleles for monitoring donor specific antibodies in post-transplant patients. Next-generation sequence (NGS) based human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing has improved many aspects of histocompatibility testing in hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant. HLA disease association testing and research has also benefited from the advent of NGS technologies. In this review we discuss the current impact and future applications of NGS typing on clinical histocompatibility testing for transplant and non-transplant purposes.

Comparable Outcomes After Alternative and Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and the Role of Molecular Measurable Residual Disease for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Elderly Patients

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the most effective postremission therapy conferring the chance of cure for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including elderly patients. Although the number of transplantations for elderly patients with AML (eAML) is increasing owing to greater availability of various graft sources together with the adoption of advanced supportive care and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen, there are relatively limited data on the impact of donor type in eAML compared to younger patients. In addition, few studies have evaluated the role of pretransplantation measurable residual disease (MRD) in the elderly population. Given the lack of prospective comparative study, we retrospectively compared transplantation outcomes of elderly patient with AML receiving allo-HSCT from matched sibling donor (MSD-HSCT), matched unrelated donor (MUD-HSCT) or haploidentical related donor (Haplo-HSCT), or autologous HSCT (Auto-HSCT). A total of 154 patients with a median age of 63 years (range 60-74) underwent MSD-HSCT (n = 41), MUD-HSCT (n = 36), Haplo-HSCT (n = 55), or Auto-HSCT (n = 22) for AML. RIC regimens were used in the majority of patients. In Haplo-HSCT, T-cell-replete peripheral blood stem cells with unique RIC regimens using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-based GVHD prophylaxis was used. In the analysis, adjustment for MRD status at the time of transplantation was performed. MRD was measured by the quantitative molecular assays of the targets, including RUNX1-RUNX1T1, CBFB-MYH11, and NPM1, or WT1 in the absence of abnormalities in the aforementioned targets. At a median follow-up of 48 months, survival rates were similar between different donor types, whereas nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was lower in MUD-HSCT compared to MSD-HSCT (P = .002). MSD-HSCT, in which the majority of patients received a conditioning regimen not including ATG, showed more frequent severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). The major causes of non-relapse deaths in MSD-HSCT were related to cGVHD (71%), whereas infectious complications were mainly related to NRM in Haplo-HSCT (50%) or Auto-HSCT (100%). In the MUD-HSCT, GVHD (57%) and infection (43%) contributed similarly to non-relapse death. Cytomegalovirus infection was more frequent in Haplo-HSCT. In multivariate models, pre-transplant MRD-positivity was an independent risk factor for relapse (P = .001), whereas older age (P = .002) and the hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index (P = .009) were useful in predicting NRM. The current study demonstrated comparable outcomes after alternative and matched sibling donor HSCT in eAML aged 60 years or older, and the results also suggest the necessity for more sophisticated strategies to reduce NRM or relapse according to each donor type. The usefulness of molecular MRD assays demonstrated herein will facilitate trials for MRD-driven decision-making or risk-adaptive approaches in eAML.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using fludarabine plus myeloablative busulfan and melphalan confers promising survival in high-risk hematopoietic neoplasms: a single-center retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

Optimal selection of pretransplant conditioning is crucially vital for improving survival and quality-of-life of patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), particularly in those with high-risk diseases. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of recently-developed reduced-toxicity myeloablative regimen that combines fludarabine, intravenous busulfan, and melphalan (FBM).

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 39 patients (23 with myeloid neoplasms and 16 with lymphoid neoplasms), with a median age of 50 (range, 17-68) years, who underwent their first allo-HCT using the FBM regimen. Graft types were bone marrow in 11, peripheral blood in 11, and cord blood in 17 patients. Cyclosporine- or tacrolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was administered. The primary end point of the study was the overall survival rate at 2-year after transplantation.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 910 days for the surviving patients, 2-year overall survival was 62% for the entire cohort; 73% in the low-to-intermediate-risk group and 44% in the high-to-very high-risk group classified by the refined CIBMTR Disease Risk Index. Cumulative incidences of engraftment, grade II-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, relapse, and non-relapse mortality were 95%, 56%, 56%, 31%, and 17%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that our FBM regimen can be applied to allo-HCT using various graft types and yields acceptable outcomes with relatively low non-relapse mortality in both myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms. Also, we observed a promising survival in the group of patients with high-risk diseases, warranting more accumulation of patients and longer follow-up.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia of the Elderly: Review of Literature and New Perspectives

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients over the age of 60 carries a poor prognosis, mainly due to unsatisfactory control of leukemia with chemotherapy alone. Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) would provide significant anti-leukemic effect but is associated with morbidity and mortality, especially in older patients with comorbidities. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning regimens have been designed and have led to improved outcomes in this older patient population. New targeted agents, such as Flt3 inhibitors, are currently being used to improve the control of AML further and may be incorporated in a transplant approach. The increasing knowledge of AML in the elderly is currently being associated with a multidimensional approach to identify eligibility and design tailored transplant platforms.

Using minimal (measurable) residual disease assessments to guide decision-making for timing of allogeneic transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review aims to highlight recent and important developments in the detection and value of minimal (measurable) residual disease (MRD) testing in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and the impact on the timing of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party recently published guidelines to help standardize testing, utilizing flow cytometry and molecular techniques. The timing of MRD assessments, choice of assay and cutoff of for reporting positive results are all important. Patients known to be MRD-positive pretransplantation have a poor prognosis and consideration should be given to selecting a myeloablative regimen over a reduced intensity regimen (if appropriate) and offering posttransplantation maintenance therapy.

SUMMARY

It may be best to think of MRD as a dynamic variable, where a rising MRD result is more specific and highly predictive of relapse. It is unclear how MRD results should impact the timing of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, if at all. There are currently no published randomized studies to help guide the practitioner in this situation, hence decision-making should be individualized.

Current Therapeutic Results and Treatment Options for Older Patients with Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Considerable progress has been made in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, current therapeutic results are still unsatisfactory in untreated high-risk patients and poorer in those with primary refractory or relapsed disease. In older patients, reluctance by clinicians to treat unfit patients, higher AML cell resistance related to more frequent adverse karyotype and/or precedent myelodysplastic syndrome, and preferential involvement of chemorefractory early hemopoietic precursors in the pathogenesis of the disease further account for poor prognosis, with median survival lower than six months. A general agreement exists concerning the administration of aggressive salvage therapy in young adults followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation; on the contrary, different therapeutic approaches varying in intensity, from conventional salvage chemotherapy based on intermediate⁻high-dose cytarabine to best supportive care, are currently considered in the relapsed, older AML patient population. Either patients' characteristics or physicians' attitudes count toward the process of clinical decision making. In addition, several new drugs with clinical activity described as "promising" in uncontrolled single-arm studies failed to improve long-term outcomes when tested in larger randomized clinical trials. Recently, new agents have been approved and are expected to consistently improve the clinical outcome for selected genomic subgroups, and research is in progress in other molecular settings. While relapsed AML remains a tremendous challenge to both patients and clinicians, knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of the disease is fast in progress, potentially leading to personalized therapy in most patients.

The Art of Transplantation: Conditioning Intensity for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The search for the optimal conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has been ongoing for decades. In this issue, Solh et al present an original analysis evaluating the impact of conditioning intensity on different disease risk index (DRI) groups of patients with AML and MDS. An impressive difference was observed in outcomes between reduced-intensity conditioning and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens in the low/intermediate-risk disease groups, supporting the use of MAC in this population. Further prospective trials in this population are encouraged.