Disruptive effect of amphetamines on Pavlovian to instrumental transfer

Prior chronic alcohol exposure enhances Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer

Alcohol dependence is associated with aberrant decision-making processes, particularly in the presence of alcohol-related environmental cues. For instance, alcohol cues can trigger alcohol seeking, consumption, and even relapse behavior. Recently, works have suggested that alcohol dependence may induce more general alterations in cued processes that support adaptive behavior, including enhanced cue control of volitional behavior unrelated to alcohol use. Here we examine this hypothesis by combining prior exposure to chronic intermittent ethanol and repeated withdrawal (CIE) procedures with a Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) task in mice. The PIT task entails training a Pavlovian association, separately training an instrumental contingency, and a final test during which the Pavlovian cue and instrumental action are combined for the first time. We first tested two variants of the PIT procedure in ethanol-naïve mice, differing in part in the duration of Pavlovian conditioned cues (short or long). We found in the PIT test that the short cue procedure produced negative transfer, whereas the long cue procedure produced positive transfer. We then used the long cue variant to examine PIT behavior in mice previously exposed to either CIE or air vapor. We found that prior CIE exposure strengthened PIT behavior, with enhanced instrumental responding during presentation of the food-associated cue. We further found that this enhancement in CIE mice persisted even after devaluation of the food outcome. Our findings suggest that ethanol dependence can enhance the influence of reward-predictive cues on ongoing behavior. Greater non-alcohol cue control of behavior may reflect the effect of chronic ethanol exposure on neural circuitry critical for cue-guided behavior in general.

Repeated cocaine exposure dysregulates cognitive control over cue-evoked reward-seeking behavior during Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer

Drug-paired cues acquire powerful motivational properties, but only lead to active drug-seeking behavior if they are potent enough to overwhelm the cognitive control processes that serve to suppress such urges. Studies using the Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) task have shown that rats pretreated with cocaine or amphetamine exhibit heightened levels of cue-motivated food-seeking behavior, suggesting that exposure to these drugs sensitizes the incentive motivational system. However, the PIT testing protocol can also create conflict between two competing behavioral responses to the reward-paired cue: active reward seeking (e.g., lever pressing) and passive conditioned food-cup approach behavior. We therefore investigated whether repeated cocaine exposure alters the way in which rats use cue-based reward expectations to resolve such conflict. In-depth analysis of previously published and new research confirmed that when drug-naïve rats are given a cue that signals the timing of a delayed noncontingent reward, they adaptively transition from reward seeking to conditioned approach behavior, facilitating efficient collection of the predicted reward. In contrast, cocaine-exposed rats exhibit pronounced behavioral dysregulation, increasing, rather than suppressing, their reward-seeking behavior over time, disrupting their ability to passively collect reward. Such findings speak to the important and sometimes overlooked role that cognitive control plays in determining the motivational impact of cues associated with drug and nondrug rewards.

Chronic alcohol alters rewarded behaviors and striatal plasticity

Chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) alters neural functions and behaviors mediated by the dorsolateral striatum (DLS) and prefrontal cortex. Here, we examined the effects of prolonged (16-bout) CIE on DLS plasticity and DLS-mediated behaviors. Ex vivo electrophysiological recordings revealed loss in efficacy of DLS synaptically induced activation and absent long-term depression after CIE. CIE increased two-bottle choice drinking and impaired Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer but not discriminated approach. These data suggest prolonged CIE impaired DLS plasticity, to produce associated changes in drinking and cue-controlled reward-seeking. Given recent evidence that less-prolonged CIE can promote certain dorsal striatal-mediated behaviors, CIE may drive chronicity-dependent adaptations in corticostriatal systems regulating behavior.

The effects of amphetamine sensitization on conditioned inhibition during a Pavlovian-instrumental transfer task in rats

RATIONALE

Psychostimulant sensitization heightens behavioral and motivational responses to reward-associated stimuli; however, its effects on stimuli associated with reward absence are less understood.

OBJECTIVES

We examined whether amphetamine sensitization alters performance during Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT) to conditioned excitors and inhibitors. We further sought to characterize the effects of amphetamine sensitization on learning versus performance by exposing rats to amphetamine prior to Pavlovian training or between training and test.

METHODS

Adult male Long-Evans rats were given conditioned inhibition (A+/AX-) and Pavlovian (B+) training, followed by variable-interval instrumental conditioning. Rats were sensitized to D-amphetamine (2 mg/kg daily injections for 7 days) or served as non-exposed controls. Rats were given a PIT test, in which they were presented with stimulus B alone or in compound with the conditioned inhibitor (BX).

RESULTS

During the PIT test, control rats significantly reduced instrumental responding on BX trials (to approximately 50 % of responding to B). Amphetamine sensitization prior to Pavlovian conditioning increased lever pressing on BX trials and reduced lever pressing on B trials compared to controls. Amphetamine sensitization between training and test increased lever pressing on B and BX trials compared to controls. No effects of sensitization were observed on conditioned food cup approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Amphetamine sensitization increases instrumental responding during PIT to a conditioned inhibitor by enhancing the excitation of conditioned stimuli and reducing the inhibition of conditioned inhibitors.

The effects of amphetamine exposure on outcome-selective Pavlovian-instrumental transfer in rats

RATIONALE

Repeated exposure to psychostimulants alters behavioral responses to reward-related cues; however, the motivational underpinnings of this effect have not been fully characterized.

OBJECTIVES

The following study was designed to examine how amphetamine sensitization affects performance in rats on a series of Pavlovian and operant tasks that distinguish between general-incentive and outcome-selective forms of conditioned responses.

METHODS

Adult male rats underwent Pavlovian and instrumental training for food pellet rewards. Following training, rats were sensitized to D-amphetamine (2 mg/kg for 7 days). Rats were subsequently tested on an outcome-selective Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT) task, an outcome-reinstatement task, and an outcome devaluation task. Additionally, in a separate experiment, PIT was assessed in amphetamine-sensitized and control rats using a Pavlovian backward-conditioned stimulus.

RESULTS

Repeated amphetamine exposure sensitized locomotor activity to acute amphetamine challenge. Amphetamine altered responses to CS presentations by increasing conditioned approach. During tests of PIT, amphetamine-treated rats showed no outcome-selectivity in their responding, responding to a CS whether or not it shared a common outcome with the instrumental response. No effect of amphetamine sensitization was observed on tests of outcome-selective reinstatement by outcome delivery or action selection based on outcome value. Amphetamine-sensitized rats showed impaired outcome-selective PIT to a backward CS but were unaltered in conditioned approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Amphetamine sensitization prevents outcome-selective responding during PIT, which is dissociable from amphetamine's effects on conditioned approach. These data suggest fundamental alterations in how stimuli motivate action in addiction.