A mouse's spontaneous eating repertoire aids performance on laboratory skilled reaching tasks: A motoric example of instinctual drift with an ethological description of the withdraw movements in freely-moving and head-fixed mice

Information-theory analysis of mouse string-pulling agrees with Fitts's Law: Increasing task difficulty engages multiple sensorimotor modalities in a dual oscillator behavior

Mouse string pulling, in which a mouse reels in a string with hand-over-hand movements, can provide insights into skilled motor behavior, neurological status, and cognitive function. The task involves two oscillatory movements connected by a string. The snout oscillates to track the pendulum movement of the string produced by hand-over-hand oscillations of pulling, and so the snout guides the hands to grasp the string. The present study examines the allocation of time required to pull strings of varying diameter. Movement is also described with end-point measures, string-pulling topography with 2D markerless pose estimates based on transfer learning with deep neural networks, and Mat-lab image-segmentation and heuristic algorithms for object tracking. With reduced string diameter, mice took longer to pull 60 cm long strings. They also made more pulling cycles, misses, and mouth engagements, and displayed changes in the amplitude and frequency of pull cycles. The time measures agree with Fitts's law in showing that increased task difficulty slows behavior and engages multiple compensatory sensorimotor modalities. The analysis reveals that time is a valuable resource in skilled motor behavior and information-theory can serve as a measure of its effective use.

Water-Reaching Platform for Longitudinal Assessment of Cortical Activity and Fine Motor Coordination Defects in a Huntington Disease Mouse Model

Huntington disease (HD), caused by dominantly inherited expansions of a CAG repeat results in characteristic motor dysfunction. Although gross motor defects have been extensively characterized in multiple HD mouse models using tasks such as rotarod and beam walking, less is known about forelimb deficits. We develop a high-throughput alternating reward/nonreward water-reaching task and training protocol conducted daily over approximately two months to simultaneously monitor forelimb impairment and mesoscale cortical changes in GCaMP activity, comparing female zQ175 (HD) and wild-type (WT) littermate mice, starting at ∼5.5 months. Behavioral analysis of the water-reaching task reveals that HD mice, despite learning the water-reaching task as proficiently as wild-type mice, take longer to learn the alternating event sequence as evident by impulsive (noncued) reaches and initially display reduced cortical activity associated with successful reaches. At this age gross motor defects determined by tapered beam assessment were not apparent. Although wild-type mice displayed no significant changes in cortical activity and reaching trajectory throughout the testing period, HD mice exhibited an increase in cortical activity, especially in the secondary motor and retrosplenial cortices, over time, as well as longer and more variable reaching trajectories by approximately seven months. HD mice also experienced a progressive reduction in successful performance. Tapered beam and rotarod tests as well as reduced DARPP-32 expression (striatal medium spiny neuron marker) after water-reaching assessment confirmed HD pathology. The water-reaching task can be used to inform on a daily basis, HD and other movement disorder onset and manifestation, therapeutic intervention windows, and test drug efficacy.

Cholinergic upregulation by optogenetic stimulation of nucleus basalis after photothrombotic stroke in forelimb somatosensory cortex improves endpoint and motor but not sensory control of skilled reaching in mice

A network of cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain innerve the forebrain and are proposed to contribute to a variety of functions including cortical plasticity, attention, and sensorimotor behavior. This study examined the contribution of the nucleus basalis cholinergic projection to the sensorimotor cortex on recovery on a skilled reach-to-eat task following photothrombotic stroke in the forelimb region of the somatosensory cortex. Mice were trained to perform a single pellet skilled reaching task and their pre and poststroke performance, from Day 4 to Day 28 poststroke, was assessed frame-by-frame by video analysis with endpoint, movement and sensorimotor integration measures. Somatosensory forelimb lesions produced impairments in endpoint and movement component measures of reaching and increased the incidence of fictive eating, a sensory impairment in mistaking a missed reach for a successful reach. Upregulated acetylcholine (ACh) release, as measured by local field potential recording, elicited via optogenetic stimulation of the nucleus basalis improved recovery of reaching and improved movement scores but did not affect sensorimotor integration impairment poststroke. The results show that the mouse cortical forelimb somatosensory region contributes to forelimb motor behavior and suggest that ACh upregulation could serve as an adjunct to behavioral therapy for acute treatment of stroke.

Online control of reach accuracy in mice

Reaching movements, as a basic yet complex motor behavior, are a foundational model system in neuroscience. In particular, there has been a significant recent expansion of investigation into the neural circuit mechanisms of reach behavior in mice. Nevertheless, quantification of mouse reach kinematics remains lacking, limiting comparison to the primate literature. In this study, we quantitatively demonstrate the homology of mouse reach kinematics to primate reach and also discover novel late-phase correlational structure that implies online control. Overall, our results highlight the decelerative phase of reach as important in driving successful outcome. Specifically, we develop and implement a novel statistical machine-learning algorithm to identify kinematic features associated with successful reaches and find that late-phase kinematics are most predictive of outcome, signifying online reach control as opposed to preplanning. Moreover, we identify and characterize late-phase kinematic adjustments that are yoked to midflight position and velocity of the limb, allowing for dynamic correction of initial variability, with head-fixed reaches being less dependent on position in comparison to freely behaving reaches. Furthermore, consecutive reaches exhibit positional error correction but not hot-handedness, implying opponent regulation of motor variability. Overall, our results establish foundational mouse reach kinematics in the context of neuroscientific investigation, characterizing mouse reach production as an active process that relies on dynamic online control mechanisms.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Mice use reaching movements to grasp and manipulate objects in their environment, similar to primates. To better establish mouse reach as a model for motor control, we implement several analytical frameworks, from basic kinematic relationships to statistical machine learning, to quantify mouse reach, finding many canonical features of primate reaches are conserved in mice, as well as evidence for midflight course corrections, expanding the utility of mouse reach paradigms for motor control studies.

Mouse Arm and hand movements in grooming are reaching movements: Evolution of reaching, handedness, and the thumbnail

Grooming in the mouse features hand licking and symmetric and asymmetric arm and hand "strokes" over the face and body to maintain pelage. Grooming is syntactically organized but the structure of individualized movements of the arm, hand, and tongue have not been examined. Here spontaneous and water-induced grooming was video recorded in free-moving and head-fixed mice and subject to frame-by-frame video inspection and kinematic analysis using Physics Tracker. All groom arm and hand movements had a structure similar to that described for reach-to-eat movements. The movement included the hand lifting from the floor to supinate with the digits flexing and closed to a collect position, an aim position directed to a groom target, an advance to the target during which the fingers extend and open and the hand pronates, a grasp of a target on the snout, nose, or vibrissae, and a withdraw to the mouth where licking occurs, or a return to the starting position. This structure was present in individual unilateral forelimb groom strokes, in bilateral symmetric, or asymmetric groom strokes, and comprised the individuated components of a sequence of groom movements. Reach-to-groom movements could feature an ulnar adduction that positions the ulnar portion of the hand including and the thumb across the eye and nose, a movement that aids Hardarian fluid spreading. It is proposed that the mouse thumb nail is an anatomical feature that minimizes damage to the eye or nose that might be incurred by a claw. This analysis of the reach-to-groom movement provides insights into the flexibility of hand use in adaptive behavior, the evolution of skilled reaching movements, the neural control of reaching movements and the presence of the thumb nail in the mouse.

The temporal choreography of the yo-yo movement of getting spaghetti into the mouth by the head-fixed mouse

There is debate over whether single-handed eating movements, reaching for food and withdrawing the hand to place the food in the mouth, originated in the primate lineage or whether they originated in phylogenetically-earlier Euarchontoglires. Most spontaneous hand use in eating by the laboratory mouse (Mus domestica) involves both hands, and a central question is the extent to which the movements are symmetric. Here we describe an asymmetry of spontaneous single hand use by the head-fixed mouse in making the yo-yo hand movement of removing and replacing a piece of pasta (spaghetti) in the mouth for eating. We also describe the problem/solution of placing into the mouth the end of a held item that protrudes at some distance from the hand. Pasta-eating proceeds in bouts, and a bout starts with raising the hands, which are holding a piece of pasta, to place one end of the pasta in the mouth for biting. A bout ends with lowering the hands, still holding the pasta stem, while the pasta morsel that has been bitten off is chewed. Hand-lowering after the pasta is removed from the mouth is slow, concurrent and symmetric, both when the pasta is held by both hands and when it is held in one hand. Hand-raising to place the pasta in the mouth is fast, consecutive and asymmetric, both when the pasta is held in both hands and when it is held in one hand. Frame-by-frame analyses of the video record combined with kinematic analyses show that a preferred single hand not only directs one end of the pasta to the mouth but also readjusts the trajectory of the pasta if it misses the mouth. The specialized use of a single hand by the mouse, even when the hands are bilaterally engaged, and the corrective asymmetric movements with which one hand adjusts the pasta's trajectory with the other hand playing a supporting role, is discussed in relation to the idea that hand preference, specialization, and dexterity have somatosensory and preprimate origins.

The structure of arm and hand movements in a spontaneous and food rewarded on-line string-pulling task by the mouse

Arm and hand use by the mouse have been studied in a variety of tasks in order to understand the structure of skilled movements and motor learning, the anatomy and function of neural pathways, and to develop animal models of neurological conditions. The present study describes string-pulling by the mouse, a behavior in which a mouse uses hand-over-hand movements to pull down a string that hangs from the top of a test cage. Mice both spontaneously string-pull and also string-pull to obtain cashew nuts tied to the end of the string as food reward. To string-pull, mice sat upright and tracked the string with their nose and then made hand-over-hand movements to reel in the string. A string-pull movement consists of four arm movements (Advance to make purchase, Pull, Push to draw the string down and Lift to return the hand for the next Advance) and four hand movements (Collect to aim the hand, Overgrasp to position the hand, and Grasp to make purchase, and Release). The kinematic profiles of the string-pull movement are distinctive with each hand making similar movements at a rate of 4 cycles per second and with the Lift and Advance movements occurring at a higher speed than Pull and Push movements. The results are discussed in relation to the antecedent repertoire of mouse behavior that lends itself to string-pulling, with respect to the utility of using string-pulling to investigate motor systems and adapting string-pulling to model neurological conditions in mice.

Tongue protrusions modify the syntax of skilled reaching for food by the mouse: Evidence for flexibility in action selection and shared hand/mouth central modulation of action

Skilled reaching for food by the laboratory mouse has the appearance of an action pattern with a distinctive syntax in which ten submovements occur in an orderly sequence. A mouse locates the food by Sniffing, Lifts, Aims, Advances, and Shapes the hand to Pronate it over a food target that it Grasps, Retracts, and Withdraws to Release to its mouth for eating. The structure of the individual actions in the chain are useful for the study of the mouse motor system and contribute to the use of the mouse as a model of human neurological conditions. The present study describes tongue protrusions that modify the syntax of reaching by occurring at the point of the reaching action at which the hand is at the Aim position. Tongue protrusions were not related to reaching success and were not influenced by training. Tongue protrusions were more likely to occur in the presence of a food target than with reaches made when food was absent. There were vast individual differences; some mice always make tongue protrusions while other mice never make tongue protrusions. That the syntax of reaching can be altered by the insertion of a surrogate (co-occurring) movement adds to a growing body of evidence that skilled reaching is assembled from a number of relatively independent actions, each with its own sensorimotor control that are subject to central modulation. That tongue and hand reaching movements can co-occur suggests a privileged relation between neural mechanisms that control movements of the tongue and hand.