Sex differences in rat decision-making: The confounding role of extraneous feeder sampling between trials

Chronic unpredictable stress shifts rat behavior from exploration to exploitation

Chronic stress evokes wide-ranging behavioral alterations, including risk avoidance, increased motoric output, and reduced consummatory behaviors. These are often interpreted as dysfunctions, but they may subserve adaptations for coping with existential threats. We tested this in a cohort of rats previously exposed to mild unpredictable stress for 5 weeks. Previously stressed rats exhibited the typically increased avoidance of open field and altered responses to predator odor, suggesting enhanced sensitivity to threatening contexts and cues. Interestingly, these animals collected rewards at a higher rate than controls, because they locomoted faster, spent less time in off-task (exploratory) behavior, and committed fewer licks at feeders. Further, they were not impaired in flexibly shifting choice as reward probabilities changed among feeders, suggesting that behavioral adaptations are not simply of transference to behavioral control to neural systems insensitive to reward (e.g. habits). These data add to a small but growing body of evidence indicating that stress shifts responses away from exploration and toward exploitation of resources, possibly to reduce threat exposure.HighlightsRats with a history of stress collected reward at a higher rate than controls on an operant task, owing to increase locomotion speed, reduced off-task behavior, and reduced time licking at feeders.Previously stressed rats exhibited increased win-stay responses than controls, suggesting the involvement of neural circuits related to goal-directed responding.Previously stressed rats performed equally to controls on a task requiring a shift of preferences based on reward probability, suggesting that they are not simply relying more on habit-based neural systems.

Distributed Encoding of Reinforcement in Rat Cortico-Striatal-Limbic Networks

Decision-making in the mammalian brain typically involves multiple brain structures within the midbrain, thalamus, striatum, limbic system, and cortex. Although task specific contributions of each brain region have been identified, neurons responding to reinforcement have been found throughout these structures. We sought to determine if any brain area, or cluster of areas, are the source of information, and if the fidelity of information varies among the areas. We recorded simultaneous field potentials (FPs) in rats from seven brain regions as they completed a binary choice task. The FPs of a 0.5 s window following reinforcement were given as input to a classifier that attempted to predict whether or not the rat received reward on each trial. The classifier correctly categorized reward on 77% of trials. Any region-specific signal could be omitted without lowering accuracy. Frequencies above 40 Hz and signals recorded later than 0.25 s following reinforcement were necessary to achieve this accuracy. Further, the classifier was able to predict reinforcement outcome above chance levels when using FPs from any single recorded brain region. Some combinations of structures, however, were more predictive than others. Analysis of FPs prior to reward revealed most regions reflected the prior probability of reward. Lastly, analyses of information flow suggested reinforcement information does not originate within a single structure of the network, within the resolution afforded by FP recordings. These data suggest reward delivery information is rapidly distributed non-uniformly across the network, and there is no canonical flow of information about reward events in the recorded structures.