Responsivity of lateral septum-mPFC connections in alloxan-induced hyperglycemia

Insulin and fluoxetine produce opposite actions on lateral septal nucleus-infralimbic region connection responsivity

Some diabetes patients develop depression, the main treatment for which is antidepressants. Pharmacological interactions between insulin and antidepressants (e.g., fluoxetine) are controversial in the literature. Some authors reported hypoglycemic actions of fluoxetine, whereas others reported antidepressant-like actions. In healthy rats, insulin produces an antidespair-like action in rats through an increase in locomotor and exploratory activity, but differences in actions of insulin and fluoxetine on neuronal activity are unknown. The present study evaluated Wistar healthy rats that were treated with saline, insulin, fluoxetine, or fluoxetine + insulin for 3 days (short-term) or 21 days (long-term). The model consisted of electrical stimulation of the lateral septal nucleus (LSN) while we performed single-unit extracellular response recordings in the prelimbic cortex (PL) and infralimbic cortex (IL) subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Stimulation of the LSN produced an initial brief excitatory paucisynaptic response and then a long-lasting inhibitory afterdischarge in the PL and IL. Treatment with saline and fluoxetine, but not insulin, minimally affected the paucisynaptic response. Differences were found in LSN-IL responsivity. The inhibitory afterdischarge was clearly enhanced in the long-term fluoxetine group but not by insulin alone or fluoxetine + insulin. These findings suggest that insulin produces some actions that are opposite to fluoxetine on LSN-mPFC connection responsivity, with no synergistic actions between the actions of insulin and fluoxetine.

The levels of nitrite, nitrate and lipid peroxidation in diabetic mouse brain: the effect of melatonin and pentoxifylline

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the relationship between diabetes (DM) and nitrite, nitrate and MDA levels and effect of melatonin and pentoxifylline.

METHODS

Sixty mice were randomly divided into four groups. Control: no action; Diabetes group (DM): after fasting-blood-glucose (FBG) was measured, 150 mg/kg alloxane was applied intraperitoneally three-times every other day; Diabetes + Melatonin (DM + MLT) and Diabetes + Pentoxifylline groups (DM + PTX): following the same procedures with DM, 10 mg/kg melatonin and 50 mg/kg pentoxifylline were administered subcutaneously six days, respectively. Following FBG analysis, brain tissues were taken under the anaesthesia. Nitrite, nitrate and MDA levels were measured.

RESULTS

In the all groups with alloxane, FBG were higher than in before application (p < .05). Also, FBG, nitrite, nitrate and MDA levels in the DM + MLT and DM + PTX groups were lower than in the DM (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Nitrite and nitrate may be related to etiopathogenesis of DM, and pentoxifylline and especially melatonin relatively decrease nitrite, nitrate and lipid peroxidation.

Putative Anti-Immobility Action of Acute Insulin Is Attributable to an Increase in Locomotor Activity in Healthy Wistar Rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Anti-immobility actions of insulin in diabetic rats that are subjected to the forced swim test (FST) have been reported. In this test, low doses of antidepressants exert actions after long-term treatment, without affecting locomotor activity in healthy rats. Few studies have compared acute and chronic actions of insulin with antidepressants in healthy rats.

METHODS

We hypothesized that if insulin exerts a true anti-immobility action, then its effects must be comparable to fluoxetine in both a 1-day treatment regimen and a 21-day treatment regimen in healthy, gonadally intact female Wistar rats.

RESULTS

The results showed that low levels of glycemia were produced by all treatments, including fluoxetine, and glycemia was lower in proestrus-estrus than in diestrus-metestrus. None of the treatments or regimens produced actions on indicators of anxiety in the elevated plus maze. Insulin in the 1-day regimen increased the number of crossings and rearings in the open field test and caused a low cumulative immobility time in the FST. These actions disappeared in the 21-day regimen. Compared with the other treatments, fluoxetine treatment alone or combined with insulin produced a longer latency to the first period of immobility and a shorter immobility time in the chronic regimen in the FST, without affecting locomotor activity, and more pronounced actions were observed in proestrus-estrus (i.e., a true anti-immobility effect).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that insulin does not produce a true antidepressant action in healthy rats. The purported antidepressant effects that were observed were instead attributable to an increase in locomotor activity only in the 1-day regimen.