Fine mapping of interactions between eEF1alpha protein and 3'UTR of metallothionein-1 mRNA

On the Need to Tell Apart Fraternal Twins eEF1A1 and eEF1A2, and Their Respective Outfits

eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 are paralogous proteins whose presence in most normal eukaryotic cells is mutually exclusive and developmentally regulated. Often described in the scientific literature under the collective name eEF1A, which stands for eukaryotic elongation factor 1A, their best known activity (in a monomeric, GTP-bound conformation) is to bind aminoacyl-tRNAs and deliver them to the A-site of the 80S ribosome. However, both eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 are endowed with multitasking abilities (sometimes performed by homo- and heterodimers) and can be located in different subcellular compartments, from the plasma membrane to the nucleus. Given the high sequence identity of these two sister proteins and the large number of post-translational modifications they can undergo, we are often confronted with the dilemma of discerning which is the particular proteoform that is actually responsible for the ascribed biochemical or cellular effects. We argue in this review that acquiring this knowledge is essential to help clarify, in molecular and structural terms, the mechanistic involvement of these two ancestral and abundant G proteins in a variety of fundamental cellular processes other than translation elongation. Of particular importance for this special issue is the fact that several de novo heterozygous missense mutations in the human EEF1A2 gene are associated with a subset of rare but severe neurological syndromes and cardiomyopathies.

An eEF1A1 truncation encoded by PTI-1 exerts its oncogenic effect inside the nucleus

Background

The oncogene PTI-1 was originally isolated from a prostate cancer cell line by its capability to transform rat fibroblasts. The PTI-1 mRNA has a very eccentric structure as the 5′UTR is similar to prokaryotic 23S rRNA, while the major open reading frame and the 3′UTR corresponds to a part of the mRNA encoding human translation elongation factor eEF1A1. Thus, the largest open reading frame encodes a truncated version of eEF1A1 lacking the first 67 amino acids, while having three unique N-terminal amino acids. Previously, the UTRs were shown to be a prerequisite for the transforming capacity of the PTI-1 transcript. In this study, we have investigated the possible role of the UTRs in regulating protein expression and localization.

Methods

The protein expression profiles of a number of PTI-1 mRNA variants were studied in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the oncogenic potentials of the same PTI-1 mRNAs were determined by monitoring the capacities of stably transfected cells expressing these mRNAs to induce tumors in nude mice and form foci in cell culture. Finally, the cellular localizations of PTI-1 proteins expressed from these mRNAs were determined by fluorescence microscopy.

Results

The PTI-1 mRNA was found to give rise to multiple protein products that potentially originate from translation initiation at downstream, inframe AUGs within the major open reading frame. At least one of the truncated protein variants was also found to be oncogenic. However, the UTRs did not appear to influence the amount and identities of these truncated protein products. In contrast, our localization studies showed that the UTRs of the transcript promote a nuclear localization of the encoded protein(s).

Conclusions

Translation of the PTI-1 mRNA results in multiple protein products of which (a) truncated variant(s) may play a predominant role during cellular transformation. The PTI-1 UTRs did not seem to play a role in translation regulation, but appeared to contribute to a nuclear localization of the PTI-1 protein(s). This indicates that the PTI-1 protein(s) exert(s) its/their oncogenic function inside the nucleus.

From global phosphoproteomics to individual proteins: the case of translation elongation factor eEF1A

Phosphoproteomics is often aimed at deciphering the modified components of signaling pathways in certain organisms, tissues and pathologies. Phosphorylation of housekeeping proteins, albeit important, usually attracts less attention. Here, we provide targeted analysis of eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), which is the main element of peptide elongation machinery. There are 97% homologous A1 and A2 isoforms of eEF1A; their expression in mammalian tissues is mutually exclusive and differentially regulated in development. The A2 isoform reveals proto-oncogenic properties and specifically interacts with some cellular proteins. Several tyrosine residues shown experimentally to be phosphorylated in eEF1A1 are hardly solution accessible, so their phosphorylation could be linked with structural rearrangement of the protein molecule. The possible role of tyrosine phosphorylation in providing the background for structural differences between the 'extended' A1 isoform and the compact oncogenic A2 isoform is discussed. The 'road map' for targeted analysis of any protein of interest using phosphoproteomics data is presented.

Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of mammalian translation elongation factor eEF1A2

Translation elongation factor eEF1A2 was purified to homogeneity from rabbit muscle by two consecutive ion-exchange column-chromatography steps and this mammalian eEF1A2 was successfully crystallized for the first time. Protein crystals obtained using ammonium sulfate as precipitant diffracted to 2.5 Å resolution and belonged to space group P6(1)22 or P6(3)22 (unit-cell parameters a = b = 135.4, c = 304.6 Å). A complete native data set was collected to 2.7 Å resolution.