1
|
Carmichael RE, Schrader M. Determinants of Peroxisome Membrane Dynamics. Front Physiol 2022; 13:834411. [PMID: 35185625 PMCID: PMC8853631 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.834411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Organelles within the cell are highly dynamic entities, requiring dramatic morphological changes to support their function and maintenance. As a result, organelle membranes are also highly dynamic, adapting to a range of topologies as the organelle changes shape. In particular, peroxisomes—small, ubiquitous organelles involved in lipid metabolism and reactive oxygen species homeostasis—display a striking plasticity, for example, during the growth and division process by which they proliferate. During this process, the membrane of an existing peroxisome elongates to form a tubule, which then constricts and ultimately undergoes scission to generate new peroxisomes. Dysfunction of this plasticity leads to diseases with developmental and neurological phenotypes, highlighting the importance of peroxisome dynamics for healthy cell function. What controls the dynamics of peroxisomal membranes, and how this influences the dynamics of the peroxisomes themselves, is just beginning to be understood. In this review, we consider how the composition, biophysical properties, and protein-lipid interactions of peroxisomal membranes impacts on their dynamics, and in turn on the biogenesis and function of peroxisomes. In particular, we focus on the effect of the peroxin PEX11 on the peroxisome membrane, and its function as a major regulator of growth and division. Understanding the roles and regulation of peroxisomal membrane dynamics necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, encompassing knowledge across a range of model species and a number of fields including lipid biochemistry, biophysics and computational biology. Here, we present an integrated overview of our current understanding of the determinants of peroxisome membrane dynamics, and reflect on the outstanding questions still remaining to be solved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth E Carmichael
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Schrader
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen L, Ma WL, Cheng WC, Yang JC, Wang HC, Su YT, Ahmad A, Hung YC, Chang WC. Targeting lipid droplet lysophosphatidylcholine for cisplatin chemotherapy. J Cell Mol Med 2020; 24:7187-7200. [PMID: 32543783 PMCID: PMC7339169 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aims to explore lipidic mechanism towards low‐density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)‐mediated platinum chemotherapy resistance. By using the lipid profiling technology, LDLR knockdown was found to increase lysosomal lipids and decrease membranous lipid levels in EOC cells. LDLR knockdown also down‐regulated ether‐linked phosphatidylethanolamine (PE‐O, lysosomes or peroxisomes) and up‐regulated lysophosphatidylcholine [LPC, lipid droplet (LD)]. This implies that the manner of using Lands cycle (conversion of lysophospholipids) for LDs might affect cisplatin sensitivity. The bioinformatics analyses illustrated that LDLR‐related lipid entry into LD, rather than an endogenous lipid resource (eg Kennedy pathway), controls the EOC prognosis of platinum chemotherapy patients. Moreover, LDLR knockdown increased the number of platinum‐DNA adducts and reduced the LD platinum amount. By using a manufactured LPC‐liposome‐cisplatin (LLC) drug, the number of platinum‐DNA adducts increased significantly in LLC‐treated insensitive cells. Moreover, the cisplatin content in LDs increased upon LLC treatment. Furthermore, lipid profiles of 22 carcinoma cells with differential cisplatin sensitivity (9 sensitive vs 13 insensitive) were acquired. These profiles revealed low storage lipid levels in insensitive cells. This result recommends that LD lipidome might be a common pathway in multiple cancers for platinum sensitivity in EOC. Finally, LLC suppressed both cisplatin‐insensitive human carcinoma cell training and testing sets. Thus, LDLR‐platinum insensitivity can be due to a defective Lands cycle that hinders LPC production in LDs. Using lipidome assessment with the newly formulated LLC can be a promising cancer chemotherapy method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lumin Chen
- Department of OBS & GYN, BenQ Medical Center, Suzhou, China.,Department of OBS & GYN, Sex Hormone Research Center, Research Center for Tumor Medicine, Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Lung Ma
- Department of OBS & GYN, Sex Hormone Research Center, Research Center for Tumor Medicine, Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate Institution of Cancer Biology, Graduate Institute of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Nursing, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chung Cheng
- Department of OBS & GYN, Sex Hormone Research Center, Research Center for Tumor Medicine, Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate Institution of Cancer Biology, Graduate Institute of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Juan-Cheng Yang
- Department of OBS & GYN, Sex Hormone Research Center, Research Center for Tumor Medicine, Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate Institution of Cancer Biology, Graduate Institute of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Ching Wang
- Department of OBS & GYN, Sex Hormone Research Center, Research Center for Tumor Medicine, Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Ting Su
- Department of OBS & GYN, Sex Hormone Research Center, Research Center for Tumor Medicine, Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate Institution of Cancer Biology, Graduate Institute of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Azaj Ahmad
- Department of OBS & GYN, Sex Hormone Research Center, Research Center for Tumor Medicine, Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate Institution of Cancer Biology, Graduate Institute of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Ching Hung
- Department of OBS & GYN, Sex Hormone Research Center, Research Center for Tumor Medicine, Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate Institution of Cancer Biology, Graduate Institute of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chun Chang
- Department of OBS & GYN, Sex Hormone Research Center, Research Center for Tumor Medicine, Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate Institution of Cancer Biology, Graduate Institute of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Su J, Thomas AS, Grabietz T, Landgraf C, Volkmer R, Marrink SJ, Williams C, Melo MN. The N-terminal amphipathic helix of Pex11p self-interacts to induce membrane remodelling during peroxisome fission. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES 2018; 1860:1292-1300. [PMID: 29501607 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Pex11p plays a crucial role in peroxisome fission. Previously, it was shown that a conserved N-terminal amphipathic helix in Pex11p, termed Pex11-Amph, was necessary for peroxisomal fission in vivo while in vitro studies revealed that this region alone was sufficient to bring about tubulation of liposomes with a lipid consistency resembling the peroxisomal membrane. However, molecular details of how Pex11-Amph remodels the peroxisomal membrane remain unknown. Here we have combined in silico, in vitro and in vivo approaches to gain insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying Pex11-Amph activity. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we observe that Pex11-Amph peptides form linear aggregates on a model membrane. Furthermore, we identify mutations that disrupted this aggregation in silico, which also abolished the peptide's ability to remodel liposomes in vitro, establishing that Pex11p oligomerisation plays a direct role in membrane remodelling. In vivo studies revealed that these mutations resulted in a strong reduction in Pex11 protein levels, indicating that these residues are important for Pex11p function. Taken together, our data demonstrate the power of combining in silico techniques with experimental approaches to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying Pex11p-dependent membrane remodelling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juanjuan Su
- Molecular Dynamics, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ann S Thomas
- Molecular Cell Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tanja Grabietz
- Molecular Cell Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Christiane Landgraf
- Institut für Medizinische Immunologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - Rudolf Volkmer
- Institut für Medizinische Immunologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Leibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Siewert J Marrink
- Molecular Dynamics, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Chris Williams
- Molecular Cell Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuel N Melo
- Molecular Dynamics, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands; Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Av. da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|