Probing the acidic residue within the integrin binding site of laminin-511 that interacts with the metal ion-dependent adhesion site of α6β1 integrin

Simultaneous binding of bFGF to both FGFR and integrin maintains properties of primed human induced pluripotent stem cells

Introduction

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF2) and integrin α6β1 are important for maintaining the pluripotency of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). Although bFGF-integrin binding contributes to biofunctions in cancer cells, the relationship in hPSCs remains unclear.

Methods

To investigate the relationship between bFGF and integrin in human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), we generated recombinant human bFGF wild-type and mutant proteins, that do not bind to integrin, FGFR, or both. We then cultured hiPSCs with these recombinant bFGF proteins. To evaluate the abilities of recombinant bFGF proteins in maintaining hPSC properties, pluripotent markers, ERK activity, and focal adhesion structure were analyzed through flow cytometry, immunofluorescence (IF), and immunoblotting (IB).

Result

We identified an interaction between bFGF and integrin α6β1 in vitro and in hiPSCs. The integrin non-binding mutant was incapable of inducing the hPSC properties, such as proliferation, ERK activity, and large focal adhesions at the edges of hiPSC colonies. Signaling induced by bFGF-FGFR binding was essential during the first 24 h after cell seeding for maintaining the properties of hPSCs, followed by a shift towards intracellular signaling via the bFGF-integrin interaction. The mixture of the two bFGF mutants also failed to maintain hPSC properties, indicating that bFGF binds to both FGFR and integrin.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that the integrin-bFGF-FGFR ternary complex maintains the properties of hPSCs via intracellular signaling, providing insights into the functional crosstalk between bFGF and integrins in hiPSCs.

Bipartite mechanism for laminin-integrin interactions: Identification of the integrin-binding site in LG domains of the laminin α chain

Laminins are major cell-adhesive proteins consisting of α, β, and γ chains, in which the three C-terminal globular domains of the α chain (LMα/LG1-3) and the C-terminal tail region of the γ1 chain (LMγ1-tail) are required for binding to integrin. Despite the recent progress on the role of LMγ1-tail in coordinating the metal ion-dependent adhesion site of the integrin β subunit, the mechanism by which LMα/LG1-3 interacts with integrin remains to be elucidated. We found that basic residues on the bottom face of LMα5/LG2 are required for binding laminin-511 to α6β1 integrin. Intermolecular cysteine scanning assays demonstrated that the basic residues in LMα5/LG2 were in contact with the acidic residues within the laminin-binding X1 region of the integrin α subunit in the laminin-integrin complex. These results indicate that LMα5/LG2 interacts directly with the integrin α subunit and comprises a bipartite integrin binding site of laminin-511 with the LMγ1-tail.

Laminin γ1 C-terminal Glu to Gln mutation induces early postimplantation lethality

Mouse embryos with an ablated ability of integrins to bind laminins are still able to form basement membranes, but die just after implantation because of deficient extraembryonic development.

Laminin–integrin interactions regulate various adhesion-dependent cellular processes. γ1C-Glu, the Glu residue in the laminin γ1 chain C-terminal tail, is crucial for the binding of γ1-laminins to several integrin isoforms. Here, we investigated the impact of γ1C Glu to Gln mutation on γ1-laminin binding to all possible integrin partners in vitro, and found that the mutation specifically ablated binding to α3, α6, and α7 integrins. To examine the physiological significance of γ1C-Glu, we generated a knock-in allele, Lamc1^EQ, in which the γ1C Glu to Gln mutation was introduced. Although Lamc1^EQ/EQ homozygotes developed into blastocysts and deposited laminins in their basement membranes, they died just after implantation because of disordered extraembryonic development. Given the impact of the Lamc1^EQ allele on embryonic development, we developed a knock-in mouse strain enabling on-demand introduction of the γ1C Glu to Gln mutation by the Cre-loxP system. The present study has revealed a crucial role of γ1C-Glu–mediated integrin binding in postimplantation development and provides useful animal models for investigating the physiological roles of laminin–integrin interactions in vivo.

Mechanistic basis for the recognition of laminin-511 by α6β1 integrin

Laminins regulate diverse cellular functions through interaction with integrins. Two regions of laminins-three laminin globular domains of the α chain (LG1-3) and the carboxyl-terminal tail of the γ chain (γ-tail)-are required for integrin binding, but it remains unclear how the γ-tail contributes to the binding. We determined the crystal structure of the integrin binding fragment of laminin-511, showing that the γ-tail extends to the bottom face of LG1-3. Electron microscopic imaging combined with biochemical analyses showed that integrin binds to the bottom face of LG1-3 with the γ1-tail apposed to the metal ion-dependent adhesion site (MIDAS) of integrin β1. These findings are consistent with a model in which the γ-tail coordinates the metal ion in the MIDAS through its Glu residue.