Point mutation of a conserved aspartate, D69, in the muscarinic M 2 receptor does not modify voltage-sensitive agonist potency

Voltage Sensors Embedded in G Protein-Coupled Receptors

Some signaling processes mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are modulated by membrane potential. In recent years, increasing evidence that GPCRs are intrinsically voltage-dependent has accumulated. A recent publication challenged the view that voltage sensors are embedded in muscarinic receptors. Herein, we briefly discuss the evidence that supports the notion that GPCRs themselves are voltage-sensitive proteins and an alternative mechanism that suggests that voltage-gated sodium channels are the voltage-sensing molecules involved in such processes.

Differential interaction patterns of opioid analgesics with µ opioid receptors correlate with ligand-specific voltage sensitivity

The µ opioid receptor (MOR) is the key target for analgesia, but the application of opioids is accompanied by several issues. There is a wide range of opioid analgesics, differing in their chemical structure and their properties of receptor activation and subsequent effects. A better understanding of ligand-receptor interactions and the resulting effects is important. Here, we calculated the respective binding poses for several opioids and analyzed interaction fingerprints between ligand and receptor. We further corroborated the interactions experimentally by cellular assays. As MOR was observed to display ligand-induced modulation of activity due to changes in membrane potential, we further analyzed the effects of voltage sensitivity on this receptor. Combining in silico and in vitro approaches, we defined discriminating interaction patterns responsible for ligand-specific voltage sensitivity and present new insights into their specific effects on activation of the MOR.

Allosteric Regulation of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: From Diversity of Molecular Mechanisms to Multiple Allosteric Sites and Their Ligands

Allosteric regulation is critical for the functioning of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their signaling pathways. Endogenous allosteric regulators of GPCRs are simple ions, various biomolecules, and protein components of GPCR signaling (G proteins and β-arrestins). The stability and functional activity of GPCR complexes is also due to multicenter allosteric interactions between protomers. The complexity of allosteric effects caused by numerous regulators differing in structure, availability, and mechanisms of action predetermines the multiplicity and different topology of allosteric sites in GPCRs. These sites can be localized in extracellular loops; inside the transmembrane tunnel and in its upper and lower vestibules; in cytoplasmic loops; and on the outer, membrane-contacting surface of the transmembrane domain. They are involved in the regulation of basal and orthosteric agonist-stimulated receptor activity, biased agonism, GPCR-complex formation, and endocytosis. They are targets for a large number of synthetic allosteric regulators and modulators, including those constructed using molecular docking. The review is devoted to the principles and mechanisms of GPCRs allosteric regulation, the multiplicity of allosteric sites and their topology, and the endogenous and synthetic allosteric regulators, including autoantibodies and pepducins. The allosteric regulation of chemokine receptors, proteinase-activated receptors, thyroid-stimulating and luteinizing hormone receptors, and beta-adrenergic receptors are described in more detail.

G Protein-Coupled Receptors Regulated by Membrane Potential

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in a vast majority of signal transduction processes. Although they span the cell membrane, they have not been considered to be regulated by the membrane potential. Numerous studies over the last two decades have demonstrated that several GPCRs, including muscarinic, adrenergic, dopaminergic, and glutamatergic receptors, are voltage regulated. Following these observations, an effort was made to elucidate the molecular basis for this regulatory effect. In this review, we will describe the advances in understanding the voltage dependence of GPCRs, the suggested molecular mechanisms that underlie this phenomenon, and the possible physiological roles that it may play.

Voltage dependence of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor

Cannabinoids produce their characteristic effects mainly by binding to two types of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), the CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors. The CB1 receptor is the main cannabinoid receptor in the central nervous system, and it participates in many brain functions. Recent studies showed that membrane potential may serve as a novel modulatory modality of many GPCRs. Here, we used Xenopus oocytes as an expression system to examine whether membrane potential modulates the activity of the CB1 receptor. We found that the potencies of the endocannabinoid 2-AG and the phytocannabinoid THC in activating the receptor are voltage dependent; depolarization enhanced the potency of these agonists and decreased their dissociation from the receptor. This voltage dependence appears to be agonist dependent as the potency of the endocannabinoid anandamide (AEA) was voltage independent. The finding of this agonist-specific modulatory factor for the CB1 receptor may contribute to our future understanding of various physiological functions mediated by the endocannabinoid system.

The activity of the serotonergic 5-HT1A receptor is modulated by voltage and sodium levels

G protein–coupled receptors are known to play a key role in many cellular signal transduction processes, including those mediating serotonergic signaling in the nervous system. Several factors have been shown to regulate the activity of these receptors, including membrane potential and the concentration of sodium ions. Whether voltage and sodium regulate the activity of serotonergic receptors is unknown. Here, we used Xenopus oocytes as an expression system to examine the effects of voltage and of sodium ions on the potency of one subtype of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]) receptor, the 5-HT_1A receptor. We found that the potency of 5-HT in activating the receptor is voltage dependent and that it is higher at resting potential than under depolarized conditions. Furthermore, we found that removal of extracellular Na⁺ resulted in a decrease of 5-HT potency toward the 5-HT_1A receptor and that a conserved aspartate in transmembrane domain 2 is crucial for this effect. Our results suggest that this allosteric effect of Na⁺ does not underlie the voltage dependence of this receptor. We propose that the characterization of modulatory factors that regulate this receptor may contribute to our future understanding of various physiological functions mediated by serotonergic transmission.

Evidence for Two Modes of Binding of the Negative Allosteric Modulator SB269,652 to the Dopamine D2 Receptor

SB269,652 has been described as the first negative allosteric modulator (NAM) of the dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂R), however, the binding mode and allosteric mechanism of action of this ligand remain incompletely understood. SB269,652 comprises an orthosteric, primary pharmacophore and a secondary (or allosteric) pharmacophore joined by a hydrophilic cyclohexyl linker and is known to form corresponding interactions with the orthosteric binding site (OBS) and the secondary binding pocket (SBP) in the D₂R. Here, we observed a surprisingly low potency of SB269,652 to negatively modulate the D₂R-mediated activation of G protein-coupled inward-rectifier potassium channels (GIRK) and decided to perform a more detailed investigation of the interaction between dopamine and SB269,652. The results indicated that the SB269,652 inhibitory potency is increased 6.6-fold upon ligand pre-incubation, compared to the simultaneous co-application with dopamine. Mutagenesis experiments implicated both S193 in the OBS and E95 in the SBP in the effect of pre-application. The present findings extend previous knowledge about how SB269,652 competes with dopamine at the D₂R and may be useful for the development of novel D₂R ligands, such as antipsychotic drug candidates.

Voltage-Dependent Dopamine Potency at D1-Like Dopamine Receptors

In recent years, transmembrane voltage has been found to modify agonist potencies at several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Whereas the voltage sensitivities of the Gα_i/o-coupled dopamine D₂-like receptors (D₂R, D₃R, D₄R) have previously been investigated, the putative impact of transmembrane voltage on agonist potency at the mainly Gα_s/olf-coupled dopamine D₁-like receptors (D₁R, D₅R) has hitherto not been reported. Here, we assayed the potency of dopamine in activating G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium (GIRK) channels co-expressed with D₁R and D₅R in Xenopus oocytes, at -80 mV and at 0 mV. Furthermore, GIRK response deactivation rates upon dopamine washout were measured to estimate dopamine dissociation rate (k_off) constants. Depolarization from -80 to 0 mV was found to reduce dopamine potency by about 7-fold at both D₁R and D₅R. This potency reduction was accompanied by an increase in estimated dopamine k_offs at both receptors. While the GIRK response elicited via D₁R was insensitive to pertussis toxin (PTX), the response evoked via D₅R was reduced by 64% (-80 mV) and 71% (0 mV) in the presence of PTX. Injection of oocytes with Gα_s antisense oligonucleotide inhibited the D₁R-mediated response by 62% (-80 mV) and 76% (0 mV) and abolished the D₅R response when combined with PTX. Our results suggest that depolarization decreases dopamine affinity at D₁R and D₅R. The voltage-dependent affinities of dopamine at D₁R and D₅R may be relevant to the functions of these receptors in learning and memory.

Low-Resistance silver bromide electrodes for recording fast ion channel kinetics under voltage clamp conditions

BACKGROUND

Two-electrode voltage clamp is a widely used technique for studying ionic currents. However, fast activation kinetics of ion channels are disguised by the capacitive transient during voltage clamp of Xenopus oocytes. The limiting factors of clamp performance include, but are not limited to, amplifier gain, membrane capacitance, and micropipette resistance. Previous work has focused on increasing amplifier gain (e.g.; high performing two-electrode amplifiers) or reducing the membrane capacitance (e.g.; the cut-open technique).

NEW METHOD

The use of an Ag-AgBr electrode with saturated KBr solution to reduce micropipette resistance.

RESULTS

The conductivity of 4 M KBr was 37 % higher compared to 3 M KCl and the micropipette resistance was reduced by 19 % when 4 M KBr was used, compared to the standard 3 M KCl solution. Micropipette resistances correlated positively with capacitive transient durations. Neither the current-voltage relationship of the voltage-gated sodium channel, Nav1.7, nor Xenopus oocyte stability were affected by bromide ions.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

The de facto standard for two-electrode voltage clamp is 3 M KCl and Ag-AgCl electrodes, which are associated an unnecessarily high micropipette resistance. Elsewise, cut-open voltage clamp techniques are technically demanding and require manipulation of the intracellular environment.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an Ag-AgBr electrode with saturated KBr as micropipette solution reduces the capacitive transient in two-electrode voltage clamp recordings. Moreover, the exchange of chloride against bromide ions does not seem to affect oocyte physiology and ion channel kinetics.

Sodium ions allosterically modulate the M2 muscarinic receptor

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a key role in the vast majority of cellular signal transduction processes. Previous experimental evidence has shown that sodium ion (Na⁺) allosterically modulate several class A GPCRs and theoretical studies suggested that the same also holds true for muscarinic receptors. Here we examined, using Xenopus oocytes as an expression system, the effect of Na⁺ on a prototypical GPCR, the M2 muscarinic receptor (M2R). We found that removal of extracellular Na⁺ resulted in a decrease in the potency of ACh toward the M2R and that a conserved aspartate in transmembrane domain 2 is crucial for this effect. We further show that this allosteric effect of Na⁺ does not underlie the voltage-dependence of this receptor.