Adult human dermal fibroblasts exposed to nanosecond electrical pulses exhibit genetic biomarkers of mechanical stress

Effect of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on coronavirus survival

Previous work demonstrated inactivation of influenza virus by GHz frequency electromagnetic fields. Despite theoretical and experimental results, the underlying mechanism driving this inactivation remains unknown. One hypothesis is that the electromagnetic field is causing damage to the virion membrane (and therefore changing spike protein orientation) rendering the virus unable to attach and infect host cells. Towards examining this hypothesis, our group employed nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) as a surrogate to radiofrequency (RF) exposure to enable exploration of dose response thresholds of electric field-induced viral membrane damage. In summary, Bovine coronavirus (BCoV) was exposed, in suspension, to mono and bipolar 600-ns pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) at two amplitudes (12.5 and 25 kV/cm) and pulse numbers [0 (sham), 1, 5, 10, 100, and 1000] at a 1 Hz (Hz) repetition rate. The temperature rise immediately after exposure(s) was measured using thermocouples to differentiate effects of the electric field (E-field) and heating (i.e., the thermal gradient). Inactivation of BCoV was evaluated by infecting HRT-18G host cells and assessing differences in virus infectivity days after exposure. Our results show that 600 nsPEFs, both bipolar and monopolar, can reduce the infectivity of coronaviruses at various amplitudes, pulse numbers, and pulse polarity. Interestingly, we observed that bipolar exposures appeared to be more efficient at lower exposure intensities than monopolar pulses. Future work should focus on experiments to identify the mechanism underlying nsPEF-induced viral inactivation.

Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field Only Transiently Affects the Cellular and Molecular Processes of Leydig Cells

The purpose of this study was to verify whether the nanosecond pulsed electric field, not eliciting thermal effects, permanently changes the molecular processes and gene expression of Leydig TM3 cells. The cells were exposed to a moderate electric field (80 quasi-rectangular shape pulses, 60 ns pulse width, and an electric field of 14 kV/cm). The putative disturbances were recorded over 24 h. After exposure to the nanosecond pulsed electric field, a 19% increase in cell diameter, a loss of microvilli, and a 70% reduction in cell adhesion were observed. Some cells showed the nonapoptotic externalization of phosphatidylserine through the pores in the plasma membrane. The cell proportion in the subG1 phase increased by 8% at the expense of the S and G2/M phases, and the DNA was fragmented in a small proportion of the cells. The membrane mitochondrial potential and superoxide content decreased by 37% and 23%, respectively. Microarray’s transcriptome analysis demonstrated a negative transient effect on the expression of genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation, DNA repair, cell proliferation, and the overexpression of plasma membrane proteins. We conclude that nanosecond pulsed electric field affected the physiology and gene expression of TM3 cells transiently, with a noticeable heterogeneity of cellular responses.

Caveolin-1 is Involved in Regulating the Biological Response of Cells to Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields

Nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) induce changes in the plasma membrane (PM), including PM permeabilization (termed nanoporation), allowing free passage of ions into the cell and, in certain cases, cell death. Recent studies from our laboratory show that the composition of the PM is a critical determinant of PM nanoporation. Thus, we hypothesized that the biological response to nsPEF exposure could be influenced by lipid microdomains, including caveolae, which are specialized invaginations of the PM that are enriched in cholesterol and contain aggregates of important cell signaling proteins, such as caveolin-1 (Cav1). Caveolae play a significant role in cellular signal transduction, including control of calcium influx and cell death by interaction of Cav1 with regulatory signaling proteins. Present results show that depletion of Cav1 increased the influx of calcium, while Cav1 overexpression produced the opposite effect. Additionally, Cav1 is known to bind and sequester important cell signaling proteins within caveolae, rendering the binding partners inactive. Imaging of the PM after nsPEF exposure showed localized depletion of PM Cav1 and results of co-immunoprecipitation studies showed dissociation of two critical Cav1 binding partners (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C1 (TRPC₁) and inositol trisphosphate receptor (IP₃R)) after exposure to nsPEFs. Release of TRPC₁ and IP₃R from Cav1 would activate downstream signaling cascades, including store-operated calcium entry, which could explain the influx in calcium after nsPEF exposure. Results of the current study establish a significant relationship between Cav1 and the activation of cell signaling pathways in response to nsPEFs.

Nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure does not induce the unfolded protein response in adult human dermal fibroblasts

Cell-circuit models have suggested that nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) can disrupt intracellular membranes including endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria, and/or nucleus thereby inducing intrinsic apoptotic pathways. Therefore, we hypothesized that the unfolded protein response (UPR) would be activated, due to the fluctuations of ionic concentrations, upon poration of the ER membrane. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was utilized to measure changes in messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of specific ER stress genes in adult human dermal fibroblast (HDFa) cells treated with tunicamycin (TM) (known ER stress inducer) and cells exposed to nsPEFs (100, 10-ns pulses at 150 kV/cm delivered at a repetition rate of 1 Hz). For HDFa cells, results showed time-dependent UPR activation to TM; however, when HDFa cells were exposed to nsPEFs, no significant changes in mRNA expression of ER stress genes, and/or caspase gene were observed. These results indicate that although cell death can be observed under these exposure parameters, it is most likely not initiated through activation of the UPR. Bioelectromagnetics. 2018;39:491-499, 2018. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

nsPEF-induced PIP2 depletion, PLC activity and actin cytoskeletal cortex remodeling are responsible for post-exposure cellular swelling and blebbing

Cell swelling and blebbing has been commonly observed following nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) exposure. The hypothesized origin of these effects is nanoporation of the plasma membrane (PM) followed by transmembrane diffusion of extracellular fluid and disassembly of cortical actin structures. This investigation will provide evidence that shows passive movement of fluid into the cell through nanopores and increase of intracellular osmotic pressure are not solely responsible for this observed phenomena. We demonstrate that phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂) depletion and hydrolysis are critical steps in the chain reaction leading to cellular blebbing and swelling. PIP₂ is heavily involved in osmoregulation by modulation of ion channels and also serves as an intracellular membrane anchor to cortical actin and phospholipase C (PLC). Given the rather critical role that PIP₂ depletion appears to play in the response of cells to nsPEF exposure, it remains unclear how its downstream effects and, specifically, ion channel regulation may contribute to cellular swelling, blebbing, and unknown mechanisms of the lasting “permeabilization” of the PM.

•

Nanosecond electric pulses (nsEPs) of high amplitude induce hydrolysis of PIP2.

•

PLC activation is leading to post-exposure cellular swelling and blebbing.

•

Ion channels modulation and nanoporation are responsible for cellular swelling.

•

Cortical actin dissociation after PIP2 depletion is critical for cellular blebbing.