Increased proportion and altered properties of intermediate monocytes in the peripheral blood of patients with lower risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Immune-monitoring of myelodysplastic neoplasms: Recommendations from the i4MDS consortium

Advancements in comprehending myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) have unfolded significantly in recent years, elucidating a myriad of cellular and molecular underpinnings integral to disease progression. While molecular inclusions into prognostic models have substantively advanced risk stratification, recent revelations have emphasized the pivotal role of immune dysregulation within the bone marrow milieu during MDS evolution. Nonetheless, immunotherapy for MDS has not experienced breakthroughs seen in other malignancies, partly attributable to the absence of an immune classification that could stratify patients toward optimally targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. A pivotal obstacle to establishing "immune classes" among MDS patients is the absence of validated accepted immune panels suitable for routine application in clinical laboratories. In response, we formed International Integrative Innovative Immunology for MDS (i4MDS), a consortium of multidisciplinary experts, and created the following recommendations for standardized methodologies to monitor immune responses in MDS. A central goal of i4MDS is the development of an immune score that could be incorporated into current clinical risk stratification models. This position paper first consolidates current knowledge on MDS immunology. Subsequently, in collaboration with clinical and laboratory specialists, we introduce flow cytometry panels and cytokine assays, meticulously devised for clinical laboratories, aiming to monitor the immune status of MDS patients, evaluating both immune fitness and identifying potential immune "risk factors." By amalgamating this immunological characterization data and molecular data, we aim to enhance patient stratification, identify predictive markers for treatment responsiveness, and accelerate the development of systems immunology tools and innovative immunotherapies.

Bone marrow macrophages are involved in the ineffective hematopoiesis of myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of heterogeneous myeloid clonal disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis. Accumulating evidence has shown that macrophages (MΦs) are important components in the regulation of tumor progression and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). However, the roles of bone marrow (BM) MΦs in regulating normal and malignant hematopoiesis in different clinical stages of MDS are largely unknown. Age-paired patients with lower-risk MDS (N = 15), higher-risk MDS (N = 15), de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (N = 15), and healthy donors (HDs) (N = 15) were enrolled. Flow cytometry analysis showed increased pro-inflammatory monocyte subsets and a decreased classically activated (M1) MΦs/alternatively activated (M2) MΦs ratio in the BM of patients with higher-risk MDS compared to lower-risk MDS. BM MФs from patients with higher-risk MDS and AML showed impaired phagocytosis activity but increased migration compared with lower-risk MDS group. AML BM MΦs showed markedly higher S100A8/A9 levels than lower-risk MDS BM MΦs. More importantly, coculture experiments suggested that the HSC supporting abilities of BM MΦs from patients with higher-risk MDS decreased, whereas the malignant cell supporting abilities increased compared with lower-risk MDS. Gene Ontology enrichment comparing BM MΦs from lower-risk MDS and higher-risk MDS for genes was involved in hematopoiesis- and immunity-related pathways. Our results suggest that BM MΦs are involved in ineffective hematopoiesis in patients with MDS, which indicates that repairing aberrant BM MΦs may represent a promising therapeutic approach for patients with MDS.

The Absolute Monocyte Count at Diagnosis Affects Prognosis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Independently of the IPSS-R Risk Score

The absolute monocyte count (AMC) is associated with mortality in a variety of medical conditions. Its prognostic impact in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) is less well studied. Therefore, we investigated its potential prognostic value in a cohort from the Düsseldorf MDS registry in relationship to the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R). An AMC below the population's median (<0.2 × 109/L) was associated with several adverse disease features such as lower haemoglobin levels, lower count of neutrophils and platelets, and a higher percentage of blasts in the bone marrow. MDS patients with an AMC < 0.2 × 109/L had a significantly higher risk of progression into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In a univariate, proportional hazards model the effect of the AMC as a continuous variable was modelled via p-splines. We found a U-shaped effect with the lowest hazard around 0.3 × 109/L. Accordingly, an AMC within the last quartile of the population (0.4 × 109/L) was associated with a reduced overall survival independently of IPSS-R, but not with the risk of secondary AML. Considering monocytopenia as a risk factor for AML progression in MDS may provide an additional argument for allogeneic transplantation or the use of hypomethylating agents in patients who are not clear candidates for those treatments according to current prognostic scoring systems and/or recommendations. Further studies are needed to assess the prognostic impact of the AMC in the context of prognostic scoring systems, considering the molecular risk profile, and to identify the mechanisms responsible for the higher mortality in MDS patients with a subtle monocytosis.

Optimization of monocyte gating to quantify monocyte subsets for the diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND

The presence of >94% classical monocytes (MO1, CD14++/CD16-) in peripheral blood (PB) has an excellent performance for the diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, the monocyte gating strategy is not well defined. The objective of the study was to compare monocyte gating strategies and propose an optimal one.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single center study assessing monocyte subsets in PB. First, we compared monocyte subsets using 13 monocyte gating strategies in 10 samples. Then we developed our own 10 color tube and tested it on 124 patients (normal white blood cell counts, reactive monocytosis, CMML and a spectrum of other myeloid malignancies). Both conventional and computational (FlowSOM) analyses were used.

RESULTS

Comparing different monocyte gating strategies, small but significant differences in %MO1 and percentually large differences in %MO3 (nonclassical monocytes) were found, suggesting that the monocyte gating strategy can impact monocyte subset quantification. Then, we designed a 10-color tube for this purpose (CD45/CD33/CD14/CD16/CD64/CD86/CD300/CD2/CD66c/CD56) and applied it to 124 patients. This tube allowed proper monocyte gating even in highly abnormal PB. Computational analysis found a higher %MO1 and lower %MO3 compared to conventional analysis. However, differences between conventional and computational analysis in both MO1 and MO3 were globally consistent and only minimal differences were observed when comparing the ranking of patients according to %MO1 or %MO3 obtained with the conventional versus the computational approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of monocyte gating strategy appears relevant for the monocyte subset distribution test. Our 10-color proposal allowed satisfactory monocyte gating even in highly abnormal PB. Computational analysis seems promising to increase reproducibility in monocyte subset quantification.