Capacity of type I and II ligands to confer to estrogen receptor alpha an appropriate conformation for the recruitment of coactivators containing a LxxLL motif-Relationship with the regulation of receptor level and ERE-dependent transcription in MCF-7 cells

Pathological Maintenance and Evolution of Breast Cancer: The Convergence of Irreversible Biological Actions of ER Alpha

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) is a modulator of breast cancer maintenance and evolution. Hence, analysis of underlying mechanisms by which ERα operates is of importance for the improvement of the hormonal therapy of the disease. This review focuses on the irreversible character of the mechanism of action of ERα, which also concerns other members of the steroid hormones receptors family. ERα moves in permanence between targets localized especially at the chromatin level to accomplish gene transcriptions imposed by the estrogenic ligands and specific antagonists. Receptor association as at the plasma membrane, where it interacts with other recruitment sites, extends its regulatory potency to growth factors and related peptides through activation of signal transductions pathways. If the latter procedure is suitable for the transcriptions in which the receptor operates as a coregulator of another transcription factor, it is of marginal influence with regard to the direct estrogenic regulation procedure, especially in the context of the present review. Irreversibility of the successive steps of the underlying transcription cycle guarantees maintenance of homeostasis and evolution according to vital necessities. To justify this statement, reported data are essentially described in a holistic view rather than in the context of exhaustive analysis of a molecular event contributing to a specific function as well as in a complementary perspective to elaborate new therapeutic approaches with antagonistic potencies against those tumors promoting ERα properties.

Demethylbelamcandaquinone B (Dmcq B) Is the Active Compound of Marantodes pumilum var. alata (Blume) Kuntze with Osteoanabolic Activities

Phytoestrogens have attracted considerable attention for their potential in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Recently, a phytoestrogen-rich herbal plant, Marantodes pumilum var. alata (Blume) Kuntze was reported to protect against bone loss in ovariectomized rat. However, the bioactive compound responsible for these effects and the underlying mechanism were not known. Through bioassay-guided isolation, demethylbelamcandaquinone B (Dmcq B) was isolated and identified from Marantodes pumilum var. alata leaf extract. In terms of its bone anabolic effects, Dmcq B was at par with 17β-estradiol (E2), in promoting the proliferation, differentiation and mineralization of osteoblast cells. Dmcq-B increased early differentiation markers, collagen content and enzymatic ALP activity. It was demonstrated to regulate BMP2 signaling pathway which further activated the transcription factor, osterix. Subsequently, Dmcq B was able to increase the osteocalcin expression which promoted matrix mineralization as evidenced by the increase in calcium deposition. Dmcq B also reduced the protein level of receptor activator of NF-κβ ligand (RANKL) and promoted osteoprotegerin (OPG) protein expression by osteoblast cells, therefore hastening bone formation rate by decreasing RANKL/OPG ratio. Moreover, Dmcq B was able to increase ER expression, postulating its phytoestrogen property. As the conclusion, Dmcq B is the active compound isolated from Marantodes pumilum var. alata leaves, regulating osteoanabolic activities potentially through the BMP2 and ER signaling pathways.

ERE-dependent transcription and cell proliferation: Independency of these two processes mediated by the introduction of a sulfone function into the weak estrogen estrothiazine

The synthetic coumestrol derivative 6,12-dihydro-3-methoxy-1-benzopyrano[3,4-b][1,4]benzothiazin-6-one (estrothiazine, ESTZ) has been identified as a weak estrogen receptor α (ERα) ligand unable to compete with tritiated estradiol. The biological activity of this compound, supported by a methoxy group in position 3, seems mainly to result from its capacity to activate ERα dimerization without any participation of coactivators. In support of this view and referring to conventional estrogens, an ESTZ metabolism study conducted with hepatic human microsomes failed to provide any argument in favour of an estrogenic activity dependent on a metabolic conversion of the compound into hydroxylated metabolites with strong receptor activation ability. Interestingly, we failed to detect any oxidation of the sulfur atom of the compound. In the light of pharmacological literature data concerning sulfonylation, we assessed ERα-mediated activities generated by two sulfonylated ESTZ derivatives in which the methoxy group that plays a key role in its mechanism of action was maintained or removed. Sulfonylated ESTZ, even in its demethoxylated form, induced ERE-mediated transcriptions in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, without affecting the ERα turnover rate. In contrast to ESTZ, this compound failed to enhance the proliferation of ERα-positive breast cancer cells, suggesting that its sulfone function confers upon the receptor a capacity to elicit some of the known characteristics associated with estrogenic responses. Moreover, we demonstrated that this sulfone may contribute to ERα dimerization without any requirement of the methoxy group. Nevertheless, it seems to cooperate with this group, as reflected by a weak ability of the sulfonylated form of ESTZ to compete with tritiated estradiol for ERα-binding. Assessment of the docking of this compound within the ligand-binding domain of the receptor by molecular dynamics provided an explanation for this observation since the sulfone is engulfed in a small hydrophobic pocket involving the residues Leu-346, Leu-349, Ala-350 and Leu-384, also known to recruit coactivators. This work not only reports the sulfone functional group as a pharmacophore for estrogenic activity, but also opens new perspectives for the development of estrogenic molecules with therapeutic purpose and devoid of proliferative side effects.

ERα dimerization: a key factor for the weak estrogenic activity of an ERα modulator unable to compete with estradiol in binding assays

Estrothiazine (ESTZ) is a weak estrogen sharing structural similarities with coumestrol. ESTZ failed to compete with [³H]17β-estradiol ([³H]17β-E₂) for binding to the estrogen receptor α (ERα), questioning its ability to interact with the receptor. However, detection by atomic force spectroscopy (AFS) of an ESTZ-induced ERα dimerization has eliminated any remaining doubts. The effect of the compound on the proliferation of ERα-positive and negative breast cancer cells confirmed the requirement of the receptor. The efficiency of ESTZ in MCF-7 cells was weak without any potency to modify the proliferation profile of estradiol and coumestrol. Growth enhancement was associated with a proteasomal degradation of ERα without substantial recruitment of LxxLL coactivators. This may be related to an unusual delay between the acquisition by the receptor of an ERE-binding capacity and the subsequent estrogen-dependent transcription. A complementary ability to enhance TPA-induced AP-1 transcription was observed, even at concentrations insufficient to activate the ERα, suggesting a partly independent mechanism. ESTZ also rapidly and transiently activated ERK1/2 likely through membrane estrogenic pathways provoking a reorganization of the actin network. Finally, the systematic absence of biological responses with an ESTZ derivative unable to induce ERα dimerization stresses the importance of this step in the action of the compound, as reported for conventional estrogens. In view of the existence of many other ERα modulators (endocrine disruptors such as, for example, pesticides, environmental contaminants or phytoestrogens) with extremely weak or similar apparent lack of binding ability, our work may appear as pilot investigation for assessing their mechanism of action.

Differences in the rate of oestrogen-induced apoptosis in breast cancer by oestradiol and the triphenylethylene bisphenol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Triphenylethylene (TPE)-like compounds were the first agents to be used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Although structurally related to the anti-oestrogen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, TPEs possess oestrogenic properties in fully oestrogenized breast cancer cells but do not induce apoptosis with short-term treatment in long-term oestrogen-deprived breast cancer cells. This study determined the differential effects of bisphenol, a TPE, on growth and apoptosis based on the modulation of the shape of the ligand-oestrogen receptor complex.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Apoptotic flow cytometric studies were used to evaluate apoptosis over time. Proliferation of the breast cancer cells was assessed using DNA quantification and cell cycle analysis. Real-time PCR was performed to quantify mRNA levels of apoptotic genes. Regulation of cell cycle and apoptotic genes was determined using PCR-based arrays.

KEY RESULTS

Bisphenol induced an up-regulation of cell cycle genes similar to those induced by 17β oestradiol (E2 ). Unlike the changes induced by E2 that occur after 24 h, the apoptosis evoked by bisphenol occurred after 4 days, with quantifiable apoptotic changes noted at 6 days. A prolonged up-regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammatory stress response genes was observed with subsequent activation of apoptosis-related genes in the second week of treatment with bisphenol.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The bisphenol: ERα complex induces delayed biological effects on the growth and apoptosis of breast cancer cells. Both the shape of the complex and the duration of treatment control the initiation of apoptosis.

The new biology of estrogen-induced apoptosis applied to treat and prevent breast cancer

The successful use of high-dose synthetic estrogens to treat postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer is the first effective 'chemical therapy' proven in clinical trial to treat any cancer. This review documents the clinical use of estrogen for breast cancer treatment or estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in postmenopausal hysterectomized women, which can either result in breast cancer cell growth or breast cancer regression. This has remained a paradox since the 1950s until the discovery of the new biology of estrogen-induced apoptosis at the end of the 20th century. The key to triggering apoptosis with estrogen is the selection of breast cancer cell populations that are resistant to long-term estrogen deprivation. However, estrogen-independent growth occurs through trial and error. At the cellular level, estrogen-induced apoptosis is dependent upon the presence of the estrogen receptor (ER), which can be blocked by nonsteroidal or steroidal antiestrogens. The shape of an estrogenic ligand programs the conformation of the ER complex, which, in turn, can modulate estrogen-induced apoptosis: class I planar estrogens (e.g., estradiol) trigger apoptosis after 24 h, whereas class II angular estrogens (e.g., bisphenol triphenylethylene) delay the process until after 72 h. This contrasts with paclitaxel, which causes G2 blockade with immediate apoptosis. The process is complete within 24 h. Estrogen-induced apoptosis is modulated by glucocorticoids and cSrc inhibitors, but the target mechanism for estrogen action is genomic and not through a nongenomic pathway. The process is stepwise through the creation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammatory responses, which then initiate an unfolded protein response. This, in turn, initiates apoptosis through the intrinsic pathway (mitochondrial) with the subsequent recruitment of the extrinsic pathway (death receptor) to complete the process. The symmetry of the clinical and laboratory studies now permits the creation of rules for the future clinical application of ERT or phytoestrogen supplements: a 5-year gap is necessary after menopause to permit the selection of estrogen-deprived breast cancer cell populations to cause them to become vulnerable to apoptotic cell death. Earlier treatment with estrogen around menopause encourages growth of ER-positive tumor cells, as the cells are still dependent on estrogen to maintain replication within the expanding population. An awareness of the evidence that the molecular events associated with estrogen-induced apoptosis can be orchestrated in the laboratory in estrogen-deprived breast cancers now supports the clinical findings regarding the treatment of metastatic breast cancer following estrogen deprivation, decreases in mortality following long-term antihormonal adjuvant therapy, and the results of treatment with ERT and ERT plus progestin in the Women's Health Initiative for women over the age of 60. Principles have emerged for understanding and applying physiological estrogen therapy appropriately by targeting the correct patient populations.

Selective estrogen-induced apoptosis in breast cancer

Antihormone therapy remains the gold standard of care in the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. However, development of acquired long term antihormone resistance exposes a vulnerability to estrogen that induces apoptosis. Laboratory and clinical studies indicate that successful therapy with estrogens is dependent on the duration of estrogen withdrawal and menopausal status of a woman. Interrogation of estradiol (E2) induced apoptosis using molecular studies indicate treatment of long term estrogen deprived MCF-7 breast cancer cells with estrogen causes an endoplasmic reticulum stress response that induces an unfolded protein response signal to inhibit protein translation. E2 binds to the ER and mediates apoptosis through the classical genomic pathway. Furthermore, the induction of apoptosis by estrogens is dependent on the conformation of the estrogen-ER complex. In this review, we explore the mechanism and the processes involved in the paradox of estrogen induced apoptosis and the new selectivity of estrogen action on different cell populations that is correctly been deciphered for clinical practice.

Molecular mechanism of action of bisphenol and bisphenol A mediated by oestrogen receptor alpha in growth and apoptosis of breast cancer cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Oestrogen receptor alpha (ERα) binds to different ligand which can function as complete/partial oestrogen-agonist or antagonist. This depends on the chemical structure of the ligands which modulates the transcriptional activity of the oestrogen-responsive genes by altering the conformation of the liganded-ERα complex. This study determined the molecular mechanism of oestrogen-agonistic/antagonistic action of structurally similar ligands, bisphenol (BP) and bisphenol A (BPA) on cell proliferation and apoptosis of ERα + ve breast cancer cells.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

DNA was measured to assess the proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells. RT-PCR and ChIP assays were performed to quantify the transcripts of TFF1 gene and recruitment of ERα and SRC3 at the promoter of TFF1 gene respectively. Molecular docking was used to delineate the binding modes of BP and BPA with the ERα. PCR-based arrays were used to study the regulation of the apoptotic genes.

KEY RESULTS

BP and BPA induced the proliferation of breast cancer cells; however, unlike BPA, BP failed to induce apoptosis. BPA consistently acted as an agonist in our studies but BP exhibited mixed agonistic/antagonistic properties. Molecular docking revealed agonistic and antagonistic mode of binding for BPA and BP respectively. BPA treatment resembled E2 treatment in terms of PCR-based regulation of apoptotic genes whereas BP was similar to 4OHT treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The chemical structure of ERα ligand determines the agonistic or antagonistic biological responses by the virtue of their binding mode, conformation of the liganded-ERα complex and the context of the cellular function.

Defining the conformation of the estrogen receptor complex that controls estrogen-induced apoptosis in breast cancer

Development of acquired antihormone resistance exposes a vulnerability in breast cancer: estrogen-induced apoptosis. Triphenylethylenes (TPEs), which are structurally similar to 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT), were used for mechanistic studies of estrogen-induced apoptosis. These TPEs all stimulate growth in MCF-7 cells, but unlike the planar estrogens they block estrogen-induced apoptosis in the long-term estrogen-deprived MCF7:5C cells. To define the conformation of the TPE:estrogen receptor (ER) complex, we employed a previously validated assay using the induction of transforming growth factor α (TGFα) mRNA in situ in MDA-MB 231 cells stably transfected with wild-type ER (MC2) or D351G ER mutant (JM6). The assays discriminate ligand fit in the ER based on the extremes of published crystallography of planar estrogens or TPE antiestrogens. We classified the conformation of planar estrogens or angular TPE complexes as "estrogen-like" or "antiestrogen-like" complexes, respectively. The TPE:ER complexes did not readily recruit the coactivator steroid receptor coactivator-3 (SRC3) or ER to the PS2 promoter in MCF-7 and MCF7:5C cells, and molecular modeling showed that they prefer to bind to the ER in an antagonistic fashion, i.e., helix 12 not sealing the ligand binding domain (LBD) effectively, and therefore reduce critical SRC3 binding. The fully activated ER complex with helix 12 sealing the LBD is suggested to be the appropriate trigger to initiate rapid estrogen-induced apoptosis.

Interactions of isoflavones and other plant derived estrogens with estrogen receptors for prevention and treatment of breast cancer-considerations concerning related efficacy and safety

Phytoestrogens are natural endocrine disruptors that interfere with estrogenic pathways. They insert directly within the hormone-binding domain of ERα and β, with a preference for the β isoform of which the concentration predominates in the normal mammary epithelium. Since ERβ antagonizes the growth promoting effect of ERα, which is mainly expressed in estrogen-sensitive tumor cells, a potential protective action against breast cancer incidence has been ascribed to phytoestrogens. The fact that Asian women living in far-east countries who consume isoflavone-rich food are less subjected to breast cancer emergence than their congeners in the USA as well as Caucasian women has been advocated to justify such a concept. Overview of data concerning the mechanism of action phytoestrogens reveals that such a view is an oversimplification: Such compounds interfere with a huge panel of regulatory proteins, giving rise to both promoting and antagonizing carcinogenic effects. Moreover, various physiological and pathological factors able to amplify these effects are not often sufficiently taken into account, which increases the difficulty to interpret data. Nevertheless, this overview of data established that chemical structures and concentrations modulate such effects: at the micromolar level, isoflavones activate ERα-mediated transcription and breast cancer cell proliferation while flavones fail to induce any significant promoting effects. At higher doses, both classes of compounds may display an antitumor activity. Reasons for such distinct behaviors as well as their potential impact in therapeutic applications are analyzed here. Ability of isoflavones and flavones to antagonize the association of calmodulin to ERα, which is required for its enhanced transcriptional activity is evoked to justify the antitumor activity ascribed to some flavones. Finally, a suspicion that peculiar classes of phytoestrogens may adopt a SERM-like conformation is addressed in a context of selection and synthesis of compounds with non-equivocal therapeutic value. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Phytoestrogens".

Identification of polyproline II regions derived from the proline-rich nuclear receptor coactivators PNRC and PNRC2: new insights for ERα coactivator interactions

Protein-protein interactions are crucial for signal transductions required for cell differentiation and proliferation. Their modulation is therefore key to the development of therapeutic alternatives, particularly in the context of cancer. According to literature data, the polyproline-rich nuclear receptor coactivators PNRC and PNRC2 interact with estrogen receptor (ERα) through their PxxP SH3-binding motifs. In a search to identify the molecular features governing this interaction, we explored using electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectroscopy and molecular dynamics (MD) calculations, the capacity of a range of putative biologically active peptides derived from these proteins and containing this PxxP motif(s) to form polyproline II (PPII) domains. An additional more exhaustive structural study on a lead PPII peptide was also performed using 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. With the exception of one of all the investigated peptides (PNRC-D), binding assays failed to detect any affinity for Grb2 SH3 domains, suggesting that PPII motifs issued from Grb2 antagonists have a binding mode distinct from those derived from Grb2 agonists. Instead, the peptides revealed a competitive binding ability against a synthetic peptide (ERα17p) with a putative PPII-cognate domain located within a coregulator recruitment region of ERα (AF-2 site). Our work, which constitutes the first structure-related interaction study concerning PNRC and PNRC2, supports not only the existence of PxxP-induced PPII sequences in these coregulators, but also confirms the presence of a PPII recognition site in the AF-2 of the steroid receptor ERα, a region important for transcription regulation.

Electronic effects of 11β substituted 17β-estradiol derivatives and instrumental effects on the relative gas phase acidity

Numerous studies have highlighted the role of the proton donor characteristics of the phenol group of 17β-estradiol (E(2)) in its association with the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). Since the substitutions at position C((11)) have been reported to modulate this association, we hypothesized that such substitutions may modify the phenol acidity. Hence, phenol gas-phase acidity of nine C((11))-substituted E(2)-derivatives were evaluated using the extended Cooks' kinetic method, which is a method widely used to determine thermochemical properties by mass spectrometry. To enhance accuracy in data collection we recorded data from several instruments, including quadrupole ion trap, triple quadrupole, and hybrid QqTOF. Indeed, we report for the first time the use of the QqTOF instrument to provide a novel means to improve data accuracy by giving access to an intermediate effective temperature range. All experimental gas-phase acidity values were supported by theoretical calculations. Our results confirmed the ability of distant substituents at C((11)) to modulate the phenol acidity through electrostatic interactions, electron withdrawing inductive effects, and mesomeric effects. However, no relationship was found between the phenol gas-phase acidity of investigated steroids and their binding affinity for ERα assessed in solution. Thus, our results highlight that the intrinsic properties of the hormone do not influence sufficiently the stabilization of the hormone/ERα complex. It is more likely that such stabilization would be more related to factors depending on the environment within the binding pocket such as hydrophobic, steric as well as direct intermolecular electrostatic effects between ERα residues and the substituted steroidal estrogens.

The St. Gallen Prize Lecture 2011: evolution of long-term adjuvant anti-hormone therapy: consequences and opportunities

The successful translation of the scientific principles of targeting the breast tumour oestrogen receptor (ER) with the nonsteroidal anti-oestrogen tamoxifen and using extended durations (at least 5 years) of adjuvant therapy, dramatically increased patient survivorship and significantly enhanced a drop in national mortality rates from breast cancer. The principles are the same for the validation of aromatase inhibitors to treat post-menopausal patients but tamoxifen remains a cheap, life-saving medicine for the pre-menopausal patient. Results from the Oxford Overview Analysis illustrate the scientific principle of "longer is better" for adjuvant therapy in pre-menopausal patients. One year of adjuvant therapy is ineffective at preventing disease recurrence or reducing mortality, whereas five years of adjuvant tamoxifen reduces recurrence by 50% which is maintained for a further ten years after treatment stops. Mortality is reduced but the magnitude continues to increase to 30% over a 15-year period. With this clinical database, it is now possible to implement simple solutions to enhance survivorship. Compliance with long-term anti-hormone adjuvant therapy is critical. In this regard, the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to reduce severe menopausal side effects may be inappropriate. It is known that SSRIs block the CYP2D6 enzyme that metabolically activates tamoxifen to its potent anti-oestrogenic metabolite, endoxifen. The selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, venlafaxine, does not block CYP2D6, and may be a better choice. Nevertheless, even with perfect compliance, the relentless drive of the breast cancer cell to acquire resistance to therapy persists. The clinical application of long-term anti-hormonal therapy for the early treatment and prevention of breast cancer, focused laboratory research on the discovery of mechanisms involved in acquired anti-hormone resistance. Decades of laboratory study to reproduce clinical experience described not only the unique mechanism of selective ER modulator (SERM)-stimulated breast cancer growth, but also a new apoptotic biology of oestradiol action in breast cancer, following 5 years of anti-hormonal treatment. Oestradiol-induced apoptotic therapy is currently shown to be successful for the short-term treatment of metastatic ER positive breast cancer following exhaustive treatment with anti-hormones. The "oestrogen purge" concept is now being integrated into trials of long-term adjuvant anti-hormone therapy. The Study of Letrazole Extension (SOLE) trial employs "anti-hormonal drug holidays" so that a woman's own oestrogen may periodically purge and kill the nascent sensitized breast cancer cells that are developing. This is the translation of an idea first proposed at the 1992 St. Gallen Conference. Although tamoxifen is the first successful targeted therapy in cancer, the pioneering medicine is more than that. A study of the pharmacology of tamoxifen opened the door for a pioneering application in cancer chemoprevention and created a new drug group: the SERMs, with group members (raloxifene and lasofoxifene) approved for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis with a simultaneous reduction of breast cancer risk. Thus, the combined strategies of long-term anti-hormone adjuvant therapy, targeted to the breast tumour ER, coupled with the expanding use of SERMs to prevent osteoporosis and prevent breast cancer as a beneficial side effect, have advanced patient survivorship significantly and promise to reduce breast cancer incidence.

The Conformation of the Estrogen Receptor Directs Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Breast Cancer: A Hypothesis

BACKGROUND: Estrogens are classified as type I (planar) and type II (angular) based on their structures. In this study we have used triphenylethylenes (TPEs) compounds related to 4OHT to address the hypothesis that the conformation of the liganded estrogen receptor (ERα) may dictate the E2-induced apoptosis of the ER+ breast cancer cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ERα positive MCF7:5C cells were used to study the apoptosis induced by E2, 4OHT and TPEs. Growth and apoptosis assay were used to evaluate apoptosis and the ability to reverse the E2-induced apoptosis. ERα protein were measured by western blotting to investigate the destruction of ERα by TPEs in MCF7 cells. ChIP assay were performed to study the in-vivo recruitment of ERα and SRC3 at classical E2-responsive promoter TFF1 (PS2) by TPEs. Molecular modeling was used to predict the binding mode of the TPE to the ERα. RESULTS: TPEs were not only unable to induce efficient apoptosis in MCF7:5C cells but also reversed the E2-induced apoptosis similar to 4OHT. Furthermore, the TPEs and 4OHT did not reduce the ERα protein levels unlike E2. ChIP assay confirmed very weak recruitment of SRC3 despite modest recruitment of ERα in the presence of TPEs. Molecular modeling suggested the TPE would bind in antagonistic mode with the ERα. CONCLUSION: Our results advances the hypothesis that the TPE liganded ERα complex structurally resembles the 4OHT bound ERα and cannot efficiently recruit co-activator SRC3. As a result, the TPE complex cannot induce apoptosis of ER+ breast cancer cells although it may cause growth of the breast cancer cells. The conformation of the estrogen-ER complex differentially controls growth and apoptosis.