What we have learned from crystal structures of proteins to receptor function

The binding orientations of structurally-related ligands can differ; A cautionary note

Crystal structures can identify ligand-receptor interactions and assist the development of novel therapeutics, but experimental challenges sometimes necessitate the use of homologous proteins. Tropisetron is an orthosteric ligand at both 5-HT₃ and α7 nACh receptors and its binding orientation has been determined in the structural homologue AChBP (pdbid: 2WNC). Co-crystallisation with a structurally-related ligand, granisetron, reveals an almost identical orientation (pdbid; 2YME). However, there is a >1000-fold difference in the affinity of tropisetron at 5-HT₃ versus α7 nACh receptors, and α7 nACh receptors do not bind granisetron. These striking pharmacological differences prompt questions about which receptor the crystal structures most closely represent and whether the ligand orientations are correct. Here we probe the binding orientation of tropisetron and granisetron at 5-HT₃ receptors by in silico modelling and docking, radioligand binding on cysteine-substituted 5-HT₃ receptor mutants transiently expressed in HEK 293 cells, and synthetic modification of the ligands. For 15 of the 23 cysteine substitutions, the effects on tropisetron and granisetron were different. Structure-activity relationships on synthesised derivatives of both ligands were also consistent with different orientations, revealing that contrary to the crystallographic evidence from AChBP, the two ligands adopt different orientations in the 5-HT₃ receptor binding site. Our results show that even quite structurally similar molecules can adopt different orientations in the same binding site, and that caution may be needed when using homologous proteins to predict ligand binding.

•

The drugs granisetron and tropisetron are structurally similar.

•

Crystals of them bound to AChBP suggest they have similar binding orientations.

•

At 5-HT₃R, the effects of mutagenesis indicate that their orientations differ.

•

SAR on both of these drugs also supports different orientations.

Comparative study on the use of docking and Bayesian categorization to predict ligand binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) subtypes

We have carried out a comparative study between docking into homology models and Bayesian categorization, as applied to virtual screening of nicotinic ligands for binding at various nAChRs subtypes (human and rat α4β2, α7, α3β4, and α6β2β3). We found that although results vary with receptor subtype, Bayesian categorization exhibits higher accuracy and enrichment than unconstrained docking into homology models. However, docking accuracy is improved when one sets up a hydrogen-bond (HB) constraint between the cationic center of the ligand and the main-chain carbonyl group of the conserved Trp-149 or its homologue (a residue involved in cation-π interactions with the ligand basic nitrogen atom). This finding suggests that this HB is a hallmark of nicotinic ligands binding to nAChRs. Best predictions using either docking or Bayesian were obtained with the human α7 nAChR, when 100 nM was used as cutoff for biological activity. We also found that ligand-based Bayesian-derived enrichment factors and structure-based docking-derived enrichment factors highly correlate to each other. Moreover, they correlate with the mean molecular fractional polar surface area of actives ligands and the fractional hydrophobic/hydrophilic surface area of the binding site, respectively. This result is in agreement with the fact that hydrophobicity strongly contributes in promoting nicotinic ligands binding to their cognate nAChRs.

Exploring chemical space for drug discovery using the chemical universe database

Herein we review our recent efforts in searching for bioactive ligands by enumeration and virtual screening of the unknown chemical space of small molecules. Enumeration from first principles shows that almost all small molecules (>99.9%) have never been synthesized and are still available to be prepared and tested. We discuss open access sources of molecules, the classification and representation of chemical space using molecular quantum numbers (MQN), its exhaustive enumeration in form of the chemical universe generated databases (GDB), and examples of using these databases for prospective drug discovery. MQN-searchable GDB, PubChem, and DrugBank are freely accessible at www.gdb.unibe.ch.

Differential immediate and sustained memory enhancing effects of alpha7 nicotinic receptor agonists and allosteric modulators in rats

The α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is a potential target for the treatment of cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia, ADHD and Alzheimer's disease. Here we test the hypothesis that upregulation of α7 nAChR levels underlies the enhanced and sustained procognitive effect of repeated administration of α7 nAChR agonists. We further compare the effect of agonists to that of α7 nAChR positive allosteric modulators (PAMs), which do not induce upregulation of the α7 nAChR. Using the social discrimination test as a measure of short-term memory, we show that the α7 nAChR agonist A-582941 improves short-term memory immediately after repeated (7× daily), but not a single administration. The α7 nAChR PAMs PNU-120596 and AVL-3288 do not affect short-term memory immediately after a single or repeated administration. This demonstrates a fundamental difference in the behavioral effects of agonists and PAMs that may be relevant for clinical development. Importantly, A-582941 and AVL-3288 increase short-term memory 24 hrs after repeated, but not a single, administration, suggesting that repeated administration of both agonists and PAMs may produce sustained effects on cognitive performance. Subsequent [¹²⁵I]-bungarotoxin autoradiography revealed no direct correlation between α7 nAChR levels in frontal cortical or hippocampal brain regions and short-term memory with either compound. Additionally, repeated treatment with A-582941 did not affect mRNA expression of RIC-3 or the lynx-like gene products lynx1, lynx2, PSCA, or Ly6H, which are known to affect nAChR function. In conclusion, both α7 nAChR agonists and PAMs exhibit sustained pro-cognitive effects after repeated administration, and altered levels of the α7 nAChR per se, or that of endogenous regulators of nAChR function, are likely not the major cause of this effect.