Occlusal stresses in beveled versus non-beveled tooth preparation

Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Various Bevel Designs Using Direct Composite Restoration in Fractured Anterior Teeth: An In Vitro Study

Background and objective Resin-based restorative materials are the backbone of modern restorative dentistry. But in spite of being an excellent material, there are many shortcomings with direct resin restorative materials such as polymerization shrinkage and microleakage that complicate the rate of clinical success. Hence, the aim of the present study is to compare the microleakage caused by composite restorations using two different bevels, primary and zigzag bevels, while restoring fractured anterior teeth. Materials and methodology Thirty non-carious maxillary central incisors were split into two divisions wherein Group I received the primary bevel and Group II received the zigzag bevel. After receiving the bevel, the samples are restored with direct filling composite material (Neo Spectra ST, Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA). The restored samples underwent thermocycling (Holmarc, Kochi, India) and were assessed for microleakage under a stereomicroscope (Leica M205, Wetzlar, Germany). For the statistical analysis, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, V. 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used. Descriptive statistics were expressed in mean and standard deviation. Analytical statistics including the independent Student t-test was used to assess the difference derived from both groups at p<0.05. The normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Results In the primary bevel, 53.3% of the samples showed first-degree microleakage, and 46.7% showed second-degree microleakage, respectively, and in samples restored using the zigzag bevel, 66.7% of the samples had no microleakage, and 33.3% of the samples had first-degree microleakage. The independent t-test revealed that the microleakage of the zigzag bevel showed a significant difference, being superior to the primary bevel at p<0.01. Conclusion Acknowledging the limitations of the study conducted, both bevel designs had a certain degree of microleakage when restored with composite material in anterior fractured teeth. However, the zigzag bevel produced significantly lesser microleakage as compared to the primary bevel restorations.

Comparison of the stress distribution in base materials and thicknesses in composite resin restorations

Resin-based composite materials are commonly used for restorations, but their dimensional changes during the polymerization could cause various clinical problems. This study evaluated the influence of a base of different materials and thicknesses on the stress magnitude and distribution in a second maxillary premolar with an MOD resin composite restoration using three-dimensional finite element analysis. A sound tooth without cavity was considered as the control group (ST), and another group was restored with composite resin without applying a base material in a MOD cavity (CR). The other three groups were restored with composite resin along with the following base materials: glass ionomer cement, low-viscosity resin, and tricalcium silicate, respectively (CR-GIC, CR-LR, and CR-TS). These three groups were further divided into two subgroups according to the thickness of the base layer: thin (0.5 mm) and thick (1.0 mm). The stress distribution was compared using the maximum principal stress after polymerization shrinkage and vertical loading with 600 N on the occlusal surface. Group ST showed the lowest stress value, and its stress propagation was confined to outer enamel surfaces only. Group CR demonstrated the highest stress distribution in the tooth-restoration interface with increased failure risk on marginal areas. The thin and thick subgroups of the three groups with a base layer had lower stress levels than Group CR. The base materials reduced the marginal stress caused by polymerization shrinkage of composite resin in MOD cavities. Different base materials and thicknesses did not affect the stress distribution.

In Vitro Microleakage and Fracture Resistance of "Infinity Edge" and Cusp Reduction Preparation Designs for Moderate-sized Class II Composites

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the marginal microleakage and maximum occlusal fracture loads and fracture modes of two novel class II preparation designs, "infinity edge" and the "2.5 mm cusp reduction" preparations as compared to a traditional class II preparation without cuspal involvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty extracted human mandibular molars were prepared for moderate-sized class II restorations with extensions into all occlusal grooves. Of these, ten class II preparations served as control. Ten were modified for a 2.5 mm even reduction of the cusps adjacent to the interproximal box. An additional 10 preparations were modified with an "infinity edge" bevel on the interproximal and occlusal portions. All teeth were restored utilizing a flowable bulk-fill composite in the apical portion of the interproximal box and 2-4 mm of heated bulk-fill composite in one increment for the remainder. All groups were cyclic loaded and thermocycled, then imaged with microcomputed tomography (µCT) before and after infiltration with a silver nitrate solution. Images were subtracted to obtain volumetric measurements of microleakage and reported as a percentage of the total volume from the apical extent of the proximal box. All groups were loaded to failure and fracture load and mode were recorded.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in microleakage volume as a percentage of total tooth volume; however, the "infinity edge" group had significantly greater microleakage in the proximal box compared to the traditional class II group. No significant differences were found in fracture load or mode between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Traditional class II, 2.5 mm cuspal reduction, and "infinity edge" preparation designs have similar fracture loads as well as volumes of microleakage; however, an "infinity edge" preparation has a higher ratio of microleakage in the proximal box.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Clinicians should carefully consider the use of "infinity edge" margins, particularly on dentin in the apical extent of the proximal box. How to cite this article: Watson JC, Lien W, Raimondi JC, et al. In Vitro Microleakage and Fracture Resistance of "Infinity Edge" and Cusp Reduction Preparation Designs for Moderate-sized Class II Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(1):3-9.

Biomechanical performance of resin composite on dental tissue restoration: A finite element analysis

This study investigates the biomechanical performance of various dental materials when filled in different cavity designs and their effects on surrounding dental tissues. Finite element models of three infected teeth with different cavity designs, Class I (occlusal), Class II mesial-occlusal (MO), and Class II mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) were constructed. These cavities were filled with amalgam, composites (Young's moduli of 10, 14, 18, 22, and 26 GPa), and glass carbomer cement (GCC). An occlusal load of 600 N was distributed on the top surface of the teeth to carry out simulations. The findings revealed that von Mises stress was higher in GCC material, with cavity Class I (46.01 MPa in the enamel, 23.61 MPa in the dentin), and for cavity Class II MO von Mises stress was 43.64 MPa, 39.18 MPa in enamel and dentin respectively, while in case of cavity Class II MOD von Mises stress was 44.67 MPa in enamel, 27.5 in the dentin. The results showed that higher stresses were generated in the non-restored tooth compared to the restored one, and increasing Young's modulus of restorative composite material decreases stresses in enamel and dentin. The use of composite material showed excellent performance which can be a good viable option for restorative material compared to other restorative materials.

Explore the most recent advancements in the domain of self-healing intelligent composites specifically designed for use in dentistry

Dental composites are commonly utilized in dental treatments because they have the ability to preserve the natural appearance of teeth, are minimally invasive and conservative, and enhance the overall physical and mechanical attributes. Dental composites can experience damage, like small cracks, due to factors like temperature changes and physical strain, which can reduce their effectiveness. Detecting these tiny cracks in dental composites can be quite challenging, and in certain situations, it may even be impossible. In addition, it is not possible to repair these damages in situ by using conventional materials and methods. Therefore, the self-healing ability in dental composites is necessary. In recent years, the spontaneous repair of damages such as micro-cracking in dental composite materials has been developed without any type of human intervention and the replacement of new components. The most widely used approach to create self-healing dental composites involves encapsulating a healing agent within polymer shells and dispersing these microcapsules within the acrylate matrix of the dental composite. To assess the self-healing abilities of these composites, researchers can examine changes in their fracture toughness before and after the healing process using a test called the Single Edge V-notch beam test. In the present article we reviewed the latest findings in the field of self-healing intelligent composites for application in dentistry, and also in the present study, the studies on self-healing smart dental composites will be reviewed.