Evaluation of prognostic factors in AML. Preface

Venetoclax-containing regimens in acute myeloid leukemia

Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) has demonstrated exceptional activity in elderly and unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Notably, the safety profile of venetoclax-based induction regimens was favorable, with a low rate of early treatment-related mortality, even in frail study participants. Thus, the introduction of venetoclax has transformed the landscape of AML therapy in elderly patients. Given these promising results, venetoclax in combination with other agents is now being studied as a frontline therapy in younger patients with AML, as well as in relapsed/refractory AML patients. Here, we review clinical data for venetoclax-based therapy in AML, both from prospective as well as retrospective studies, and highlight ongoing novel studies of venetoclax-containing regimens and discuss future research directions.

A phase 2 study of belinostat (PXD101) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia or patients over the age of 60 with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a California Cancer Consortium Study

We performed a phase II study of belinostat in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this open label phase II study (NCT00357032), patients with relapsed/refractory AML, or newly diagnosed patients with AML over the age of 60, were eligible. Belinostat was administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) daily on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate, with secondary endpoints of overall response rate (CR + partial response [PR]), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival and safety. Twelve eligible patients with AML were enrolled, of whom six had received at least one prior line of therapy. No CR or PR was seen. Four patients had stable disease for at least five cycles. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicities occurred in four patients. Belinostat as monotherapy has minimal single-agent effect in AML on this dosing schedule.

Is minimal residual disease monitoring clinically relevant in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia?

In the past year, there has been increasing attention towards understanding the clinical relevance of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. The monitoring of MRD levels at various stages of therapy has considerable potential to impact the guidance of treatment for AML patients and improve outcomes. Thus, efforts have increased to address important concerns regarding MRD measurements. These concerns include: (1) what should be monitored; (2) what methodologies should be used; (3) whether such methodologies are standardized across laboratories; (4) how prognostic levels are defined; (5) when MRD should be monitored; and (6) what treatment options are available for MRD positive patients. In this review, we will discuss the methodologies available for MRD and the studies available to date aiming to address the concerns around the use of MRD measurements for AML patients.