Treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma

Advances in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Marginal Zone Lymphoma

OPINION STATEMENT

The management of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), an indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, requires a personalized and adaptive approach due to its clinical and prognostic heterogeneity. We believe treatment should emphasize a balanced strategy considering the subtype, disease burden, symptoms, and actionable genetic or environmental factors, such as infections or autoimmune diseases. For asymptomatic patients with low tumor burden or disseminated disease, a watch-and-wait approach remains appropriate, given MZL's indolent nature and the risks of overtreatment. Conversely, for symptomatic or high-burden cases, early intervention with chemoimmunotherapy is recommended for effective disease control. Surgery remains essential for both diagnosis and the treatment of localized disease. Incorporating molecular profiling and prognostic models, such as MZL-IPI and POD24, is crucial for decision-making and risk stratification. Testing for infectious agents like Helicobacter pylori or Hepatitis C virus should be standard practice, as eradication therapy offers a targeted, less toxic, and effective option in select patients. With ongoing advancements in understanding dysregulated signaling pathways and the tumor microenvironment, we anticipate novel targeted therapies and combination regimens will further improve outcomes. We advocate for molecular testing at diagnosis to identify actionable biomarkers, particularly for patients with refractory or relapsed disease. Finally, MZL management requires vigilant follow-up with adjustments based on evolving disease features. Treatment decisions should integrate patient preferences, clinical context, and the latest evidence to maximize survival while preserving quality of life.

Optimal Rituximab Monotherapy in Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL): A Case Report and Brief Review

INTRODUCTION

Splenic marginal zone Lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare, chronic B lymphocyte proliferative disease. Generally, SMZL is accompanied by circulating atypical villous lymphocytes, known as SMZL with villous lymphocytes. Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody to CD20; recent but limited studies have confirmed its effectiveness in treating SMZL. Given the low incidence and selection of treatment, statistical comparisons of rituximab monotherapy with other available treatment options with the full range of data from previous clinical studies remain sparse. Here, we report a case of SMZL with villous lymphocytes treated by rituximab monotherapy, which is especially infrequently reported.

CASE REPORT

A 63-year-old Chinese female was presented to the hospital with complaints of splenomegaly and pain in the spleen area. Immunohistochemistry analysis was positive for IGH, IGK, and IGL clonal rearrangement. Villous lymphocytes were found in peripheral blood and bone marrow, along with further immunotyping results. The case was considered as SMZL with villous lymphocytes. Based on the SMZLSG prognosis assessment, we applied rituximab monotherapy. After eight cycles of rituximab treatment, the patient's condition improved markedly, with blood constituent and size of the spleen returning to normal levels, achieving complete response, with no significant side effect observed.

DISCUSSION

The patient provides a typical SMZL with villous lymphocytes case treated with rituximab monotherapy. Currently, the main treatment options include splenectomy and rituximab. After synthesizing a series of current views, we put forward our opinion about the selection of therapy for SMZL patients in order to gain maximum benefits for patients in need of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis found no statistically significant difference between rituximab monotherapy and rituximab combined with chemotherapy, while rituximab treatments resulted in better therapeutic effects than chemotherapy. Rituximab monotherapy has favorable therapeutic effects and minor adverse effects (AEs) in treating SMZL.

Marginal zone lymphoma: 2023 update on diagnosis and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) are collectively the second most common type of indolent lymphoma.

DIAGNOSIS

Three subtypes of MZL are recognized: splenic, extranodal, and nodal. The diagnosis is secured following biopsy of an involved nodal or extranodal site demonstrating a clonal B-cell infiltrate with CD5 and CD10 negative immunophenotype most common. Some cases will features IgM paraprotein, but MYD88 L256P mutations are less frequent than in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Prognostication Several prognostic models have been developed, including the MALT-IPI and the MZL-IPI. The latter is broadly applicable across MZL subtypes and incorporates elevated serum LDH, anemia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and nodal or disseminated subtypes as independent predictors of outcome.

TREATMENT

We discuss suggested approach to therapy for both early and advanced-stage disease, with reference to chemo-immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and emerging treatments in relapsed/refractory disease such as BTK inhibitors.

Low-risk HPLLs/ABC score patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma can be safely managed without treatment: Results from a prospective Spanish study

The aims of our study were to analyse compliance with the 2014 GELTAMO SMZL Guidelines, in patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), and to evaluate the outcome according to the HPLLs/ABC-adapted therapeutic strategy. Observational prospective multicenter study of 181 SMZL patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2020. Lymphoma-specific survival (LSS), composite event-free survival (CEFS) and response rates were assessed. 57% of the 168 patients included in the analysis followed the Guidelines. The overall response rate was higher in the rituximab chemotherapy and in the rituximab arms compared with the splenectomy arm (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival was 77% and the 5-year LSS of 93%. There were no differences in the 5-year LSS according to the treatment received (p = 0.68). The 5-year CEFS in the overall series was 45%, and there were significant differences between scores A and B (p = 0.036). There were no significant differences when comparing LSS and progression-free survival in patients treated with rituximab or rituximab chemotherapy at diagnosis or after observation. Our data support HPLLs/ABC score as a practical tool for the management of SMZL, observation as the best approach for patients in group A and rituximab as the best treatment for group B.

Presentation of an extraordinary colic: abdominal pain as the first and only utterance of an acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency

C1-inhibitor deficiency is a rare disease which incorporates acute self-limiting intermittent swelling of the subcutaneous tissue and mucous membranes. Attacks most frequently affect the face and/or the upper airway. Isolated angioedema of the small bowel is an uncommon manifestation and often accompanied by diagnostic delay. In the present case, abdominal pain turned out to be the first and only utterance of an acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency, secondary to a splenic marginal zone lymphoma. Imaging showed wall thickening of the small intestine, ascites and splenomegaly. The abdominal pain and intestinal wall thickening with surrounding ascites on imaging spontaneously resolved each episode within 2-3 days. Gastrointestinal manifestations of angioedema may mimic an acute abdomen, and subsequently one-third of these patients undergo unnecessary surgery prior to a definite diagnosis. This emphasises the importance of considering the diagnosis in case of an 'extraordinary colic'.

Refractory Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma Responsive to Combination Venetoclax and Bortezomib (Velcade) (V2) Therapy

Standard treatment regimens for the management of patients with refractory splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) are currently unavailable. Here, we report a case of SMZL, which, after failing multiple therapeutics, demonstrated an impressive clinical response to combined Venetoclax and Velcade (V²), a treatment combination currently being investigated in the setting of refractory multiple myeloma. We also report a unique histopathology and mutational profile that may have important implications for the characterization and prognosis of SMZL.

The Diagnostic Utility of Splenectomy in Idiopathic Splenomegaly

INTRODUCTION

With increasing frequency, patients with idiopathic splenomegaly are referred to surgeons for splenectomy. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of splenectomy and feasibility of a minimally invasive approach in the face of idiopathic splenomegaly.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients who underwent splenectomy for idiopathic splenomegaly. The primary endpoint was the rate of definitive diagnosis based on final surgical pathology of the removed spleen.

RESULTS

Preoperative workup included a bone marrow biopsy and peripheral blood smear in 93% and 100% of patients, respectively, with none having lymphadenopathy warranting biopsy. Splenectomy provided a definitive diagnosis for 44 (64.7%) patients. Of these, 34 (50%) patients had an underlying malignancy, of which more than half were splenic marginal zone lymphoma. There were 33 (48.5%) laparoscopic, 23 (33.8%) open, 10 (14.7%) laparoscopic converted to open, and two (2.9%) laparoscopic hand-assist cases. Conversion to open was due to splenic size [median craniocaudal length 21.8 cm (cm)] in eight and staple line bleeding at the splenic hilum in two patients. Overall, the laparoscopic approach was completed in patients with a smaller splenic size compared to open (median craniocaudal length 15.2 vs. 26.0 cm, p < 0.0001). The open group had one (1.5%) intra-operative mortality due to uncontrollable hemorrhage. Thirty-day complication rates were similar for laparoscopic and open approaches (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSION

Splenectomy is an effective diagnostic modality in determining a pathologic cause for splenomegaly in this patient population. Laparoscopic splenectomy can be performed safely in appropriate cases with craniocaudal splenic size having the largest influence on surgical approach.

Changes in splenic uptake pattern associated with X-ray irradiation

Purpose

To evaluate the splenic uptake function after irradiation with high-energy X-rays.

Materials and methods

Fourteen male Wistar rats were distributed into three groups. Group 1 (n = 6) – control, non-irradiated; Group 2 (n = 4) – animals that were irradiated and studied 24 h after irradiation; and Group 3 (n = 4) – animals that were irradiated and studied 48 h after irradiation. The animals were irradiated with 8 Gy X-rays in the abdominal region. According with the groups, after 24 or 48 h, 1 ml/kg of a 50% colloidal carbon solution was injected in the left internal jugular vein. After 40 min, the spleens were removed for histological studies. Macrophages containing carbon pigments in their cytoplasms were counted in 16 consecutive microscopic fields, and their means were considered as the uptake pattern of each animal.

Results

In the control groups, carbon pigments were captured by macrophages in the red and white pulps, while in the irradiated groups, the uptake in the marginal zone, around the white pulp, was enhanced. There was no disorder on the splenic parenchyma or necrosis in histological analyzes. Qualitatively rare apoptotic events were observed, with no difference between control and irradiated animals.

Conclusion

The high-energy X-ray, used in radiotherapy, modifies the splenic clearance, enhancing the amount of marginal zone macrophages containing colloid particles. This radiation was not associated with morphological changes, nor with necrosis or apoptosis of splenic tissue.

B-cell neoplasms and Hodgkin lymphoma in the spleen

B-cell lymphoma of spleen may be primary (most commonly splenic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma) or secondary (typically low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma). Depending on the specific lymphoma subtype, there may be a predominantly white pulp pattern of involvement, a predominantly red pulp pattern or a focal nodular pattern. Splenectomy is the ideal specimen for a multiparametric integrative diagnosis of splenic lymphoma, as it allows for a combined study of morphology, immunohistology, flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and molecular genetic techniques. This review article describes the clinicopathologic characteristics of all the relevant B-cell neoplasms that may be encountered in a splenic biopsy or a splenectomy specimen.

Use of anti-CD20 therapy in follicular and marginal zone lymphoma: a review of the literature

The identification of the CD20 antigen in 1979 was the first step in what would become a therapeutic milestone opening the use of immunotherapy in hematological diseases. This protein is expressed on the surface of developing B cells, but not the early progenitors or mature plasma cells. In 1997, rituximab was approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and since then it has revolutionized the treatment of B-cell malignancies. It is used as a monotherapy and in combination, at induction, at relapsed, and also in maintenance. Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas are characterized by a long and non-aggressive course. In this group of lymphomas, rituximab represented a great therapeutic improvement, achieving lasting responses with few adverse effects. Nowadays, second-generation molecules are emerging that may have important advantages compared to rituximab, as well as biosimilars that represent an important cost-effective option.

Front-line management of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Australia. Part 2: mantle cell lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and the marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) subtypes (nodal MZL, extra-nodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) and splenic MZL) are uncommon lymphoma subtypes, accounting for less than 5-10% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The evidence base for therapy is therefore limited and enrolment into clinical trials is preferred. Outcomes for patients with MCL have been steadily improving mainly due to the adoption of more intense strategies in younger patients, the use of rituximab maintenance and the recent introduction of bendamustine in older patients. MZL is a more heterogeneous group of cancer with both nodal, extra-nodal and splenic subtypes. Extranodal MZL may be associated with autoimmune or infectious aetiologies, and can respond to eradication of the causative pathogen. Proton pump inhibitor plus dual antibiotics in Helicobacter pylori positive gastric MALT lymphoma is curative in many patients. Watchful waiting is appropriate in most patients with asymptomatic advanced stage disease, which tends to behave in a particularly indolent manner. Other options for symptomatic disease include splenectomy, chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab and, more recently, targeted therapies.

Successful rechallenge of rituximab following severe rituximab-induced acute thrombocytopenia in a patient with splenic marginal zone lymphoma

Rituximab-induced acute thrombocytopenia (RIAT) is a relatively rare complication of rituximab treatment that has been infrequently reported in a number of patients with malignant lymphoma. Most commonly encountered in mantle cell lymphoma, the extent to which RIAT occurs in splenic marginal zone lymphoma is unknown. In this report, we describe a case of RIAT in a patient with splenic marginal zone lymphoma. Rituximab was safely rechallenged with increased premedications and slowed infusion rate. While the exact mechanism of this phenomenon has yet to be elucidated, diligent monitoring of platelet counts following rituximab infusion can be considered in high-risk patients to avoid potential adverse events. Split dose rituximab for high-risk patients may provide an alternative approach to improve patient safety.

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma treated with laparoscopic splenectomy: A case report

•

The authors present a case of splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), which was successfully treated with laparoscopic splenectomy.

•

SMZL is a rare subtype of indolent B cell lymphoma, and good prognosis is expected by splenectomy alone.

•

Laparoscopic splenectomy is safe and feasible with splenic artery embolization preoperatively, especially in cases with large splenomegaly as seen in our case.

•

Careful postoperative follow-up is required since some patients develop aggressive transformation, and result in worse prognosis.

Introduction

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is rare subtype of malignant lymphoma that is classified as a low-grade B cell lymphoma. Splenectomy is usually chosen for both diagnosis and treatment, which often leads to the resolution of abdominal symptoms and cytopenia.

Case presentation

We presented the case of a 73-year-old woman who complained of spontaneous perspiration and fatigue. She was referred to our hospital for further treatment of enlarged intraabdominal lymph nodes and splenomegaly. The level of soluble Interleukin-2 receptor was elevated, and malignant lymphoma was suspected. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy of intraabdominal lymph node revealed B cell lymphoma. For a definitive diagnosis, as well as treatment, laparoscopic splenectomy was successfully performed. The histopathological finding was compatible with SMZL. The patient was discharged without any complications and observed to have no recurrence at eight months postoperatively.

Conclusion

Patients with SMZL is usually expected to have good prognosis with splenectomy. However, careful follow-up is required for aggressive transformation can occur and result in worse prognosis.

Recurrent autoimmune hemolytic anemia in splenic marginal zone lymphoma

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a condition associated with an extensive differential diagnosis that includes lymphoid malignancies. Although AIHA occurs in about 10–25% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, it is also reported to occur in all of the other lymphoid subtypes. In this article, we report a case of recurrent AIHA in a 67-year-old woman with two acute episodes of hemolysis separated by 3 years of hematologic remission. Both episodes were severe enough to require blood transfusion, oral steroids, and rituximab. Bone marrow biopsy and immunophenotyping using flow cytometry done during both admissions confirmed the presence of splenic marginal zone lymphoma.

Past, Present, and Future of Rituximab-The World's First Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Therapy

Rituximab is a chimeric mouse/human monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy with binding specificity to CD20. It was the first therapeutic antibody approved for oncology patients and was the top-selling oncology drug for nearly a decade with sales reaching $8.58 billion in 2016. Since its initial approval in 1997, it has improved outcomes in all B-cell malignancies, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Despite widespread use, most mechanistic data have been gathered from in vitro studies while the roles of the various response mechanisms in humans are still largely undetermined. Polymorphisms in Fc gamma receptor and complement protein genes have been implicated as potential predictors of differential response to rituximab, but have not yet shown sufficient influence to impact clinical decisions. Unlike most targeted therapies developed today, no known biomarkers to indicate target engagement/tumor response have been identified, aside from reduced tumor burden. The lack of companion biomarkers beyond CD20 itself has made it difficult to predict which patients will respond to any given anti-CD20 antibody. In the past decade, two new anti-CD20 antibodies have been approved: ofatumumab, which binds a distinct epitope of CD20, and obinutuzumab, a mAb derived from rituximab with modifications to the Fc portion and to its glycosylation. Both are fully humanized and have biological activity that is distinct from that of rituximab. In addition to these new anti-CD20 antibodies, another imminent change in targeted lymphoma treatment is the multitude of biosimilars that are becoming available as rituximab's patent expires. While the widespread use of rituximab itself will likely continue, its biosimilars will increase global access to the therapy. This review discusses current research into mechanisms and potential biomarkers of rituximab response, as well as its biosimilars and the newer CD20 binding mAb therapies. Increased ability to assess the effectiveness of rituximab in an individual patient, along with the availability of alternative anti-CD20 antibodies will likely lead to dramatic changes in how we use CD20 antibodies going forward.

Management of relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma: focus on ibrutinib

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) consist of a diverse family of malignancies, which are derived from B-cells. The disease subtypes are recognized extranodal, nodal, and splenic MZLs. The disease characteristics, clinical course, and treatment vary considerably based on the site of involvement. In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration approved ibrutinib, a first in class Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor that revolutionized the care of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients; for, the treatment of relapsed/refractory MZL based on pivotal open-label Phase II trial demonstrated an overall response rate of 48%, with a complete response rate of 3%, median progression-free survival of 14.2 months, and median overall survival not yet reached at a median follow-up of 19.4 months. In this review, we aim to summarize the current conundrums in the management of MZL and the evolving role of ibrutinib in the treatment of MZL.

Surgical management of splenic marginal zone lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare indolent B-cell lymphoma with variable prognosis. As a result, there is sparse knowledge on the role of splenectomy and best management approaches. We aim to explore management strategies and outcomes amongst the cohort of SMZL patients at our centre.

METHOD

A retrospective review of all splenectomies performed at a tertiary referral unit over a 23-year period was assessed. Immunohistochemical and pathological results of splenic samples, bone marrow biopsies, and peripheral blood were compiled. Operative management, surgical, and survival outcomes were assessed. Prognostic stratifications were applied and survival rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Eight cases of SMZL from a database of 693 splenectomies were identified. All patients had intermediate/high-risk disease. All patients underwent splenectomy with one patient receiving preoperative rituximab. All patients had progression-free survival and resolution of disease.

CONCLUSION

Based on the data obtained, current practice requires defined guidelines and centralised care.