How is the Ph-like signature being incorporated into ALL therapy?

Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia with concomitant rearrangements of CRLF2 and ABL1: a pediatric case report

BACKGROUND

BCR::ABL1-like or Philadelphia chromosome-like (Ph-like) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was first reported in 2009. Ph-like ALL is characterized by gene signature similar to Philadelphia chromosome ALL, but without BCR::ABL1 fusions. Molecularly, Ph-like ALL is divided into seven categories, with CRLF2 and ABL-class rearrangements being the two most common subtypes, exhibiting alterations in distinct downstream signaling cascades.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a rare case of pediatric Ph-like ALL with concomitant CRLF2 and ABL1 rearrangements. CRLF2 was fused with P2RY8, its most common fusion partner, whereas ABL1 was fused with MYO18B, a novel fusion partner that has not been previously reported. The 4-year-old female patient was treated using the national multicenter CCCG-ALL-2020 protocol with the addition of dasatinib at the end of induction when ABL1 rearrangement was confirmed by RNA-seq. Morphologically and molecularly, the patient remained in continuous remission until the last follow-up. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of Ph-like ALL harboring two distinct rearrangement categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results identified that ABL1 rearrangement and CRLF2 rearrangement can coexist. The application of FISH, whole transcription sequencing, PCR can help us to have a more comprehensive understanding of ALL cytogenetics and molecular biology. Further studies are needed to explore the role of targeted therapies in such rare clinical scenarios.

Treatment for a primary multidrug-resistant B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient carrying a SSBP2-CSF1R fusion gene: a case report

SSBP2-CSF1R is an important biomarker for clinical diagnosis and prognosis of Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL). This case report presents a pediatric Ph-like ALL patient carrying the SSBP2-CSF1R fusion gene. The patient was resistant to most conventional chemotherapy regimens and to dasatinib, an inhibitor that has been reported to have a therapeutic effect on SSBP2-CSF1R fusion Ph-like ALL, as she remained minimal residual disease (MRD) positive (detection by flow cytometry) and SSBP2-CSF1R fusion gene (detection by RT-PCR) positive after five rounds of such regimens. We thus conducted a large-scale in vitro screening to assess the sensitivity of the patient's leukemic cells to anti-cancer drugs. Based on the susceptibility results, we chose to combine cytarabine, homoharringtonine, dexamethasone, fludarabine, vindesine, and epirubicin for treatment. Clinical results showed that after a course of treatment, both MRD and SSBP2-CSF1R fusion gene turned negative, and there was no recurrence during an 18-month follow-up. In conclusion, our study suggests that the SSBP2-CSF1R fusion gene may be an important biomarker of primary drug resistance in Ph-like ALL, and indicate that the combination of cytarabine, homoharringtonine, dexamethasone, fludarabine, vindesine, and epirubicin can achieve optimal therapeutic results in this category of patients.

New developments in ALL in AYA

The outcome for adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved, mostly based on the use of pediatric-inspired intensive protocols. Due to increasing disease resistance and treatment-related toxicity with age, further improvements are now expected from the expanding knowledge of ALL biology, more accurate risk stratification, and the early introduction of targeted small molecules and immunotherapy. In the last decade, the rate of AYA with B-cell precursor ALL with undetermined genetic drivers ("B-other") has shrunk from 40% to fewer than 10%. The high-risk subgroup of Philadelphia-like ALL is the most frequent entity diagnosed in this age range, offering a multitude of potentially actionable targets. The timely and accurate identification of these targets remains challenging, however. Early minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has become a standard of care for the risk stratification and identification of patients likely to benefit from an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Recently approved immunotherapies are moving frontline to eradicate MRD, to improve the outcome of high-risk patients, and, eventually, to reduce treatment burden. Comprehensive care programs dedicated to AYA with cancer aim at improving inclusion in specific clinical trials and at giving access to appropriate psychosocial support, fertility preservation, and survivorship programs.

Efficacy of ruxolitinib in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A systematic review

Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) is a high-risk molecular subtype with a gene expression profile similar to Philadelphia-positive ALL, but not harboring the BCR-ABL1 gene fusion. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of target therapy with the Janus kinase inhibitor, ruxolitinib, in patients with Ph-like ALL and molecular signature of JAK-STAT signaling pathway. A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify reports concerning administration of ruxolitinib in Ph-like ALL patients. Additionally, Polish Pediatric ALL registries were searched for patients with Ph-like ALL treated with ruxolitinib. Extracted information included epidemiological background, somatic aberrations, treatment response, and patient outcome. After PubMed database search, twelve patients were identified, and one was identified in the Polish Pediatric ALL registry. In nine patients gene fusions affecting JAK2 (n = 7) and EPOR (n = 2) were detected. Surface overexpression of CRLF2 and IKZF1 deletions were observed in two and three patients, respectively. Induction failure occurred in all the patients. Therapy with ruxolitinib led to complete (n = 7) and partial (n = 2) remission, in three individuals no information was found. Based on the limited number of studies describing the efficacy of ruxolitinib as an additional compound administrated with standard ALL therapy, we conclude that this approach can be considered in patients with aberrations activating JAK-STAT pathway.

Clinical Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Monotherapy and Haploidentical Hematopoeitic Stem Cell Transplantation in a Child with Philadelphia Chromosome-like Relapsed/Refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

(Ph-like) ALL is a subset of leukemia which has a gene expression profile similar to Ph+disease, but without the presence of BCR-ABL1 translocation.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We reported an exceptional case of a child with relapsed Ph-like ALL with IKZF1 gene deletion treated with high-dose ruxolitinib as monotherapy, after multi-agent chemotherapy. He remains in continued MRD-negative leukemia remission with full donor chimerism at 12 months post-HSCT.

DISCUSSION

The circumstance that makes our case featured is the usage of ruxolitinib as monotherapy. This report, we believe, is a pioneering report for a frequent disease with a high risk of failure for the outcome.

Genomic landscape of B-other acute lymphoblastic leukemia in an adult retrospective cohort with a focus on BCR-ABL1-like subtype

INTRODUCTION

BCR-ABL1-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a high-risk disease with a complex genomic background. Though extensively studied, data on the frequency and mutual associations of present mutations are still incomplete in adult patients. This retrospective study aims to map the genomic landscape of B-other ALL in a cohort of adult patients with a focus on the BCR-ABL1-like ALL subtype.

METHODS

We analyzed bone marrow and peripheral blood samples of adult B-other ALL patients treated consecutively at three major Czech teaching hospitals. Samples were analyzed by cytogenetic methods, gene expression profiling, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and next-generation sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight B-other ALL patients (not BCR-ABL1, KMT2A-rearranged, ETV6-RUNX1, TCF3-PBX1, or iAMP21) were included in the study. Median follow-up was 23.8 months. Samples from 33 patients were available for a gene expression analysis, 48.9% identified as BCR-ABL1-like ALL. Of the BCR-ABL1-like ALL cases, 18.8% harbored IGH-CRLF2 and 12.5% P2RY8-CRLF2 fusion gene. We observed a higher MRD failure rate in BCR-ABL1-like than in non-BCR-ABL1-like ALL patients after the induction treatment (50.0 vs. 13.3%, p=.05). There was a trend to worse progression-free and overall survival in the BCR-ABL1-like group, though not statistically significant. Deletions in IKZF1 gene were found in 31.3% of BCR-ABL1-like cases. Patients with concurrent IKZF1 and CDKN2A/B, PAX5 or PAR1 region deletions (IKZF1^plus profile) had significantly worse progression-free survival than those with sole IKZF1 deletion or IKZF1 wild-type (p=.02). NGS analysis was performed in 54 patients and identified 99 short variants in TP53, JAK2, NRAS, PAX5, CREBBP, NF1, FLT3, ATM, KRAS, RUNX1, and other genes. Seventy-five of these gene variants have not yet been described in B-cell precursor ALL to date.

CONCLUSION

This study widens existing knowledge of the BCR-ABL1-like and B-other ALL genomic landscape in the adult population, supports previous findings, and identifies a number of novel gene variants.

Combination efficacy of ruxolitinib with standard-of-care drugs in CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) is a high-risk ALL subtype with high rates of relapse and poor patient outcome. Activating mutations affecting components of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway occur in the majority of Ph-like ALL cases. The use of JAK inhibitors represents a potential treatment option for Ph-like ALL, although we and others have shown that CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like ALL responds poorly to single-agent JAK inhibitors in the preclinical setting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify effective combination treatments against CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like ALL, and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of synergy. We carried out a series of high-throughput combination drug screenings and found that ruxolitinib exerted synergy with standard-of-care drugs used in the treatment of ALL. In addition, we investigated the molecular effects of ruxolitinib on Ph-like ALL by combining mass spectrometry phosphoproteomics with gene expression analysis. Based on these findings, we conducted preclinical in vivo drug testing and demonstrated that ruxolitinib enhanced the in vivo efficacy of an induction-type regimen consisting of vincristine, dexamethasone, and L-asparaginase in 2/3 CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like ALL xenografts. Overall, our findings support evaluating the addition of ruxolitinib to conventional induction regimens for the treatment of CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like ALL.

Adolescent and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Final results of the phase II pediatric-like GIMEMA LAL-1308 trial

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represent a unique patient population with specific characteristics and needs. Growing evidences suggest that pediatric-inspired approaches improve the outcome in AYA. These results prompted the design of a pediatric AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000-based regimen - the GIMEMA LAL-1308 protocol - for newly diagnosed AYA (range 18-35 years) with Philadelphia negative (Ph-) ALL. The protocol included minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis at two different time-points (TP), that is, at the end of induction IA and consolidation IB, and a modulation in post-consolidation intensity according to MRD. Seventy-six patients were eligible between September 2010 and October 2014. The regimen was well tolerated, with 2.7% induction deaths and no deaths in the post-consolidation phase. The complete response (CR) rate was 92%; the 48-month overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 60.3% and 60.4%. Both OS and DFS were significantly better in T-ALL than B-ALL. A molecular MRD <10^-3 at TP1 was associated with a significantly better OS and DFS (77% vs 39% and 71.9% vs 34.4%, respectively);similar results were documented at TP2 (OS and DFS 74.5% vs 30.6% and 71.5% vs 25.7%, respectively). The LAL-1308 results were compared to those from similar historic AYA populations undergoing the two previous GIMEMA LAL-2000 and LAL-0904 protocols. Both OS and DFS improved significantly compared to the two previous protocols. These results indicate that this pediatric-inspired and MRD-oriented protocol is feasible and effective for Ph- AYA ALL patients, and underline the prognostic value of MRD determinations at specific TPs.

Practical guidance for the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the adolescent and young adult population

The outstanding therapeutic progress achieved with modern pediatric regimens in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) led efforts to explore whether a similar treatment approach could be equally effective and safe in older patients, starting initially with older adolescents and young adults (AYA), variably defined in different studies by an age between 15–18 and 25–39 years. Several comparative and noncomparative trials of this type have been carried out during the last two decades, enrolling thousands of patients. Almost without exception, the new strategy improved patients’ outcomes compared with traditional adult treatments in B-lineage and T-lineage Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative B-ALL, while the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) led to comparative progress in Ph+ ALL, a former high-risk subset more typically observed in older age groups. At present, highly effective pediatric-based regimens warrant 5-year survival rates of 60–70% in AYA patients. In view of these data, the same approach was progressively extended to older patients, improving the results up to 55 years of age. Issues of treatment compliance and drug-related toxicity have thus far prevented a comparable therapeutic advancement in patients aged >55 years. This critical review updates and summarizes with pertinent examples this global, positive therapeutic change, and examines how to promote further progress with new targeted therapies that include novel immuno-therapeutics and other agents developed against the many molecular dysfunctions detectable in various ALL subsets. Substantial progress is expected to occur soon, bringing AYA survival figures very close to that of children, and also to improve the outcome of ALL at all ages.

How I diagnose and manage Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Advances in our understanding of mechanisms of leukemogenesis and driver mutations in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) lead to a more precise and informative sub-classification, mainly of B-cell ALL. In parallel, in recent years, novel agents have been approved for the therapy of B-cell ALL, and many others are in active clinical research. Among the newly recognized disease subtypes, Philadelphia-chromosome-like ALL is the most heterogeneous and thus, diagnostically challenging. Given that this subtype of B-cell ALL is associated with a poorer prognosis, improvement of available therapeutic approaches and protocols is a burning issue. Herein, we summarize, in a clinically relevant manner, up-to-date information regarding diagnostic strategies developed for the identification of patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-like ALL. Common therapeutic dilemmas, presented as several case scenarios, are also discussed. It is currently acceptable that patients with B-cell ALL, treated with an aim of cure, irrespective of their age, be evaluated for a Philadelphia-chromosome-like signature as early as possible. Following Philadelphia-chromosome-like recognition, a higher risk of resistance or relapse must be realized and treatment should be modified based on the patient’s specific genetic driver and clinical features. However, while active targeted therapeutic options are limited, there is much more to do than just prescribe a matched inhibitor to the identified mutated driver genes. In this review, we present a comprehensive evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of Philadelphia-chromosome-like ALL at different time-points during the disease course.

Clinical utility of custom-designed NGS panel testing in pediatric tumors

Background

Somatic genetic testing is rapidly becoming the standard of care in many adult and pediatric cancers. Previously, the standard approach was single-gene or focused multigene testing, but many centers have moved towards broad-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Here, we report the laboratory validation and clinical utility of a large cohort of clinical NGS somatic sequencing results in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of a wide range of pediatric cancers.

Methods

Subjects were accrued retrospectively at a single pediatric quaternary-care hospital. Sequence analyses were performed on 367 pediatric cancer samples using custom-designed NGS panels over a 15-month period. Cases were profiled for mutations, copy number variations, and fusions identified through sequencing, and their clinical impact on diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy was assessed.

Results

NGS panel testing was incorporated meaningfully into clinical care in 88.7% of leukemia/lymphomas, 90.6% of central nervous system (CNS) tumors, and 62.6% of non-CNS solid tumors included in this cohort. A change in diagnosis as a result of testing occurred in 3.3% of cases. Additionally, 19.4% of all patients had variants requiring further evaluation for potential germline alteration.

Conclusions

Use of somatic NGS panel testing resulted in a significant impact on clinical care, including diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning in 78.7% of pediatric patients tested in our institution. Somatic NGS tumor testing should be implemented as part of the routine diagnostic workup of newly diagnosed and relapsed pediatric cancer patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13073-019-0644-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BCR-ABL1-like B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: Review of the entity and detection methodologies

BCR-ABL1-like B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (BCR-ABL1-like ALL or Ph-like ALL) is a neoplastic proliferation of lymphoblasts that has a gene expression profile similar to that of B-ALL with t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2) BCR-ABL1, but lacks that gene fusion. It is associated with poor prognosis and is seen in 10%-20% of pediatric cases and 20%-30% of adult cases of ALL. It is included as a provisional entity in the revised 4th edition of the WHO Classification. A variety of different genetic abnormalities are identified in this entity, but they all converge on pathways that are potentially responsive to the addition of targeted therapy to conventional chemotherapy. Thus, it is important to screen for BCR-ABL1-like ALL, particularly in adults and pediatric patients with high-risk clinical features. Here, we provide a brief overview of the genetic profile and clinical features of BCR-ABL1-like ALL and review laboratory methodologies for routine identification of this genetically heterogeneous entity.