Pre-clinical development of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy: Implications of design for efficacy and safety

Bayesian network analysis of risk classification strategies in the regulation of cellular products

Cell therapy, a burgeoning therapeutic strategy, necessitates a scientific regulatory framework but faces challenges in risk-based regulation due to the lack of a global consensus on risk classification. This study applies Bayesian network analysis to compare and evaluate the risk classification strategies for cellular products proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), and World Health Organization (WHO), using real-world data to validate the models. The appropriateness of key risk factors is assessed within the three regulatory frameworks, along with their implications for clinical safety. The results indicate several directions for refining risk classification approaches. Additionally, a substudy focuses on a specific type of cell and gene therapy (CGT), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. It underscores the importance of considering CAR targets, tumor types, and costimulatory domains when assessing the safety risks of CAR T cell products. Overall, there is currently a lack of a regulatory framework based on real-world data for cellular products and a lack of risk-based classification review methods. This study aims to improve the regulatory system for cellular products, emphasizing risk-based classification. Furthermore, the study advocates for leveraging machine learning in regulatory science to enhance the assessment of cellular product safety, illustrating the role of Bayesian networks in aiding regulatory decision-making for the risk classification of cellular products.

The current landscape of CAR T-cell therapy for solid tumors: Mechanisms, research progress, challenges, and counterstrategies

The successful outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in treating hematologic cancers have increased the previously unprecedented excitement to use this innovative approach in treating various forms of human cancers. Although researchers have put a lot of work into maximizing the effectiveness of these cells in the context of solid tumors, few studies have discussed challenges and potential strategies to overcome them. Restricted trafficking and infiltration into the tumor site, hypoxic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), antigen escape and heterogeneity, CAR T-cell exhaustion, and severe life-threatening toxicities are a few of the major obstacles facing CAR T-cells. CAR designs will need to go beyond the traditional architectures in order to get over these limitations and broaden their applicability to a larger range of malignancies. To enhance the safety, effectiveness, and applicability of this treatment modality, researchers are addressing the present challenges with a wide variety of engineering strategies as well as integrating several therapeutic tactics. In this study, we reviewed the antigens that CAR T-cells have been clinically trained to recognize, as well as counterstrategies to overcome the limitations of CAR T-cell therapy, such as recent advances in CAR T-cell engineering and the use of several therapies in combination to optimize their clinical efficacy in solid tumors.

Quality Assessment of Pre-Clinical Studies of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Products: A Point of Focus On Safety

BACKGROUND

Serious adverse reactions have been reported with the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in clinical setting despite the success of these products in pre-clinical stages of development.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the quality of available pre-clinical safety data of CAR T-cell therapy products.

METHODS

A 21 items safety-checklist was designed specifically for CAR T-cell. Literature was searched using search/MeSH terms in PubMed (October 2019 - February 2020). Studies were screened from title and abstract. Original pre-clinical researches related to CAR T-cell anti-cancer therapy were included.

RESULTS

Of the search results, 152 studies (3 in vivo, 39 in vitro, and 110 combined) were included. Only 7.9% studies were specifically designed to evaluate/ improve product safety. Eleven studies included target antigen(s) and no study included co-stimulatory molecule(s) expressed exclusively by tumor tissue and/or CAR T-cells. One study used CRISPR-Cas9 for CAR gene insertion. The use of switch-off mechanism and purity assessment of CAR T-cell products were reported in 13.2% and 8.6% studies respectively. Of the 149 studies with in vivo component, immuno-competent animal models were used in 24.8%. Measurement of blood pressure, temperature, body weight and serum cytokines were reported in 0, 2.7, 29.2 and 27.4% studies respectively. The tissue distribution and CAR T-cells persistence were reported in 26.5% studies.

CONCLUSION

Majority of the checklist parameters were not reported in the pre-clinical publications to be adequately predictive of the safety of CAR T-cells in a clinical setting.