Dissociation between binge eating behavior and incentive motivation

Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement

Progressive ratio (PR) schedules have been widely used to study motivation to work for a reinforcer. After a post-reinforcer pause, subjects engage in pressing a lever until a reinforcer is obtained. However, the discrete nature of lever presses allows alternative behaviors during inter-response time and has led to several behavioral explanations of pauses and work time. A progressive hold-down (PH) is incompatible with alternative responses and may allow a precise estimation of work time. Performance of rats trained in both PR and PH that received sucrose or intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) as reinforcer were compared. We observed that rats mastered the PR and PH schedules. Post-reinforcer pauses (PS^RP), work time and inter-reinforcer time increased as a function of the response or hold requirement. However, rats' performance suggested that the PH progression may be experienced by the rats as easier that the PR progression. Elimination of consummatory behavior with ICSS reduced post-reinforcer pause in accordance with predictions of explanatory models of fixed and variable schedules of reinforcement. In the case of PH performance, pauses showed little variation across intermediate requirements but increased rapidly on later requirements; since rats controlled their pause length and work time was close to the hold requirement, time allocation between PR and PH schedules diverged. Finally, the Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement model of Bradshaw and Killeen (Psychopharmacology 2012, 222: 549) rendered a good description of the performance in both PR and PH schedules.

Binge eating behavior and incentive motivation with a cafeteria diet

Binge-like eating behavior (BLE) has been characterized as an eating disorder in which subjects have an enhanced intake of food, mainly fats. However, intake of fats and carbohydrates may have differential effects on motivation. Previously it was shown that BLE produces an increase in operant responding for vegetable shortening, but others were unable to replicate the finding using sucrose as the reinforcer. Our aim was to determine if BLE behavior induced with a cafeteria-like diet (CaLD) with several options with fat content would produce an increment in performance. Male Wistar rats were trained under an exponential progressive ratio schedule of sucrose reinforcement; thereafter, the limited access model was used to induce BLE using CaLD options. Finally, subjects were tested for increments in break points (BPs) in the progressive ratio schedule. Rats with intermittent access to CaLD options showed a clear BLE with an escalation in their intake; however they showed compensatory decrements of chow intake that rendered a similar body weight gain to a continuous access group. Although we were unable to observe an increase in BPs after BLE we were able to observe a protection against the decrements of BP previously observed with sugar. Different mechanisms for processing high fat and high carbohydrate reinforcers are variables worth exploring to gain a better understanding of BLE behavior in rodent models.