Reproductive advantage of the winners of male-male competition in Drosophila prolongata

Learning from fights: Males' social dominance status impact reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster

In animals, the access to vital resources often relies on individuals' behavioural personality, strength, motivation, past experiences and dominance status. Dominant individuals would be more territorial, providing them with a better access to food resources and mate. The so-called winner and loser effects induce individuals' behavioural changes after experiencing a victory or a defeat, and lead to an individual persistent state influencing the outcome of subsequent fights. However, whether and how development of winner and loser effects affect individuals' fitness is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate how individuals' fitness can be influenced by previous fighting experience in Drosophila melanogaster. In this study, we assess various behavioural performances as indicators for dominant and subordinate fitness. Our results show that subordinates are less territorial than dominants although their locomotor abilities are not affected. We also demonstrate that in a non-competitive context, experiencing a defeat reduces males' motivation to court females but not the reproductive success while in a competitive context, it negatively affects males' reproductive success. However, we found no impact upon either males' ability to distinguish potential mates nor on females' choice of a specific mating partner. Overall, these results indicate that previous defeats reduce reproductive success, a commonly used estimate of individual fitness.

Highly Contiguous Genome Assembly of Drosophila prolongata - a Model for Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism and Male-specific Innovations

Drosophila prolongata is a member of the melanogaster species group and rhopaloa subgroup native to the subtropical highlands of southeast Asia. This species exhibits an array of recently evolved male-specific morphological, physiological, and behavioral traits that distinguish it from its closest relatives, making it an attractive model for studying the evolution of sexual dimorphism and testing theories of sexual selection. The lack of genomic resources has impeded the dissection of the molecular basis of sex-specific development and behavior in this species. To address this, we assembled the genome of D. prolongata using long-read sequencing and Hi-C scaffolding, resulting in a highly complete and contiguous (scaffold N50 2.2Mb) genome assembly of 220Mb. The repetitive content of the genome is 24.6%, the plurality of which are LTR retrotransposons (33.2%). Annotations based on RNA-seq data and homology to related species revealed a total of 19,330 genes, of which 16,170 are protein-coding. The assembly includes 98.5% of Diptera BUSCO genes, including 93.8% present as a single copy. Despite some likely regional duplications, the completeness of this genome suggests that it can be readily used for gene expression, GWAS, and other genomic analyses.

Fight outcome influences male mating success in Drosophila prolongata

The outcomes of preceding fights can influence the probability of winning a subsequent fight, known as the winner/loser effect. However, we know relatively little about how the experience of a preceding fight influences subsequent mating success. Here, we investigated the influence of preceding fight outcomes on subsequent mating behavior in a fruit fly Drosophila prolongata. Subordinate males mated less in two-choice mating assays, showing that the fight outcome predicts male mating success in this species. This tendency remained in a no-choice mating assay where direct interaction between the dominant and subordinate males was eliminated, suggesting that the mating disadvantage of the subordinate males was dependent on the experience of the previous fight rather than the direct interference by the dominant male. When a no-choice mating assay was performed before the fight, the prospective subordinate males mated at the same rate as the dominant males, confirming that the intrinsic male qualities in fighting and mating performances were independent of each other in our experiments. These results indicated that the experience-dependent changes in the subordinate males led to the reduced mating success.