1
|
Martinez ES, Redding D. An osteopathic orientation to interprofessional education. J Osteopath Med 2024; 124:379-385. [PMID: 38712700 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2022-0237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT The osteopathic tenets may serve as a useful guideline for an interprofessional program. There is an alignment between the osteopathic tenets and the concept of interprofessional education (IPE). IPE occurs when students from two or more professions work with each other to collaborate or improve healthcare outcomes. Holistic treatment is fundamental in both instances, and the interrelatedness of structure and function requires acknowledgment of all healthcare professionals' roles in treating a patient. IPE allows students to gain a better understanding of their own professional roles and the roles of their fellow healthcare providers in treating patients more effectively. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this analysis are to evaluate the ability of an interprofessional summer workshop/lecture utilizing an osteopathic focus to educate students from different healthcare colleges about the interconnectedness of the systems of the human body and how working with a team-based approach will ultimately benefit their collective patients. A secondary objective was to determine the students' perceptions before and after the lecture/workshop to see if there were any perceived differences among students in different healthcare professions at either time. METHODS This was a retrospective data analysis conducted on pretest/posttest surveys completed by 73 incoming students from six different healthcare colleges participating in the Summer Preparedness and Readiness Course (SPaRC), held annually at Western University of Health Sciences (WUHS) in Pomona, California. Analysis was conducted on responses collected during the SPaRC programs of 2013, 2016, and 2019. Participants were given surveys containing five questions scored on a five-point Likert scale. The surveys were given before and after an integrated lecture/hands-on workshop presented at SPaRC that reviewed multiple studies showing the utility of connecting the healthcare professions to best treat a patient. RESULTS A total of 73 students responded to both the prelecture and postlecture surveys. When the number of positive scores were totaled from students from all colleges, there was an increase in positive responses from 190 (52.2 %) in prelecture surveys when compared to 336 (92.3 %) in postlecture surveys. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test suggested that the lecture workshop elicited a significant improvement in scores from prelecture to postlecture for all students (Z=-6.976, p=0.000). Median scores improved from 3.60 at baseline to 4.40 after the lecture/workshop. Secondary analysis conducted utilizing Kruskal-Wallis H to examine the differences between the responses of the different colleges prelecture and postlecture showed no significant differences prelecture (H [6]=7.58, p=0.271) and a significant difference between postlecture answers (H [6]=14.04, p=0.029). A series of post hoc independent Kruskal-Wallis H analyses was conducted to identify where differences were, and the only identifiable difference after Bonferroni corrections was between students from the Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine college and the Physician Assistant's college after the lecture/survey (p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS An interprofessional program with the osteopathic principles of focusing on body unity and relatedness of structure and function may serve as a helpful tool for uniting healthcare professionals in their ultimate goal of better serving their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S Martinez
- Department of Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine/Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific at Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA
| | - David Redding
- Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peranson J, Weis CA, Slater M, Plener J, Kopansky-Giles D. An interprofessional approach to collaborative management of low-back pain in primary care: A scholarly analysis of a successful educational module for prelicensure learners. THE JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC EDUCATION 2024; 38:30-37. [PMID: 38329313 PMCID: PMC11097224 DOI: 10.7899/jce-22-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In 2008, an interprofessional education (IPE) working group was formed to develop a module on interdisciplinary low-back pain management to fill a curricular gap at our institution. This article describes the program evaluation outcomes and highlights factors contributing to its successful implementation over 8 years through reference to Brigg's Presage-Process-Product (3-P) Model of Teaching and Learning. METHODS Program evaluation occurred through administration of a pre- and postmodule Health Professional Collaborative Competency Perception Scale, with scores compared using paired t tests. Descriptive statistics were analyzed from 5-point Likert scales for module session components. RESULTS A total of 853 students from 9 health care occupations (medicine, chiropractic, physiotherapy, pharmacy, nursing, nurse practitioner, occupational therapy, physiotherapy assistants, and occupational therapist assistants) participated in 51 iterations of the module from 2011 to 2019, averaging 16 participants each session. All Health Professional Collaborative Competency Perception Scale items significantly improved from pre- to postintervention (p < .001) for learners from 6 health professions. Module components were rated highly, with the majority of learners rating these as 4 (helpful) or 5 (very helpful) for their learning. Participants also improved their scores in perceived history and physical exam comfort, knowledge of pharmacotherapy, management options, and attitudes regarding an interprofessional approach to back pain (p < .001). CONCLUSION This article describes the presage, process factors, and products of this model IPE program that provides learners from various health care professions with an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the interdisciplinary management of low-back pain, as demonstrated through improvement in collaborative competencies.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cunningham J, Doyle F, Ryan JM, Clyne B, Cadogan C, Cottrell E, Murphy P, Smith SM, French HP. Primary care-based models of care for osteoarthritis; a scoping review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2023; 61:152221. [PMID: 37327762 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and describe the extent, nature, characteristics, and impact of primary care-based models of care (MoCs) for osteoarthritis (OA) that have been developed and/or evaluated. DESIGN Six electronic databases were searched from 2010 to May 2022. Relevant data were extracted and collated for narrative synthesis. RESULTS Sixty-three studies pertaining to 37 discrete MoCs from 13 countries were included, of which 23 (62%) could be classified as OA management programmes (OAMPs) comprising a self-management intervention to be delivered as a discrete package. Four models (11%) focussed on enhancing the initial consultation between a patient presenting with OA at the first point of contact into a local health system and the clinician. Emphasis was placed on educational training for general practitioners (GPs) and allied healthcare professionals delivering this initial consultation. The remaining 10 MoCs (27%) detailed integrated care pathways of onward referral to specialist secondary orthopaedic and rheumatology care within local healthcare systems. The majority (35/37; 95%) were developed in high-income countries and 32/37 (87%) targeted hip/and or knee OA. Frequently identified model components included GP-led care, referral to primary care services and multidisciplinary care. The models were predominantly 'one-size fits all' and lacked individualised care approaches. A minority of MoCs, 5/37 (14%) were developed using underlying frameworks, three (8%) of which incorporated behaviour change theories, while 13/37 (35%) incorporated provider training. Thirty-four of the 37 models (92%) were evaluated. Outcome domains most frequently reported included clinical outcomes, followed by system- and provider-level outcomes. While there was evidence of improved quality of OA care associated with the models, effects on clinical outcomes were mixed. CONCLUSION There are emerging efforts internationally to develop evidence-based models focused on non-surgical primary care OA management. Notwithstanding variations in healthcare systems and resources, future research should focus on model development alignment with implementation science frameworks and theories, key stakeholder involvement including patient and public representation, provision of training and education for providers, treatment individualisation, integration and coordination of services across the care continuum and incorporation of behaviour change strategies to foster long-term adherence and self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joice Cunningham
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Frank Doyle
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jennifer M Ryan
- Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Barbara Clyne
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cathal Cadogan
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Paul Murphy
- RCSI Library, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susan M Smith
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helen P French
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Akselrod S, Collins TE, Hoe C, Seyer J, Tulenko K, Ortenzi F, Berlina D, Sobel H. Building an interdisciplinary workforce for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases: the role of e-learning. BMJ 2023; 381:e071071. [PMID: 37220940 PMCID: PMC10203826 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Téa E Collins
- Global NCD Platform, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Connie Hoe
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Julia Seyer
- World Medical Association, Ferney-Voltaire, France
| | - Kate Tulenko
- Global NCD Platform, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Flaminia Ortenzi
- Global NCD Platform, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daria Berlina
- Global NCD Platform, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Howard Sobel
- Maternal Child Health and Quality Safety, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A Framework to Guide the Development of Health Care Professional Education and Training in Best Evidence Osteoarthritis Care. Clin Geriatr Med 2022; 38:361-384. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
6
|
Yadav L, Gill TK, Taylor A, De Young J, Chehade MJ. Identifying Opportunities, and Motivation to Enhance Capabilities, Influencing the Development of a Personalized Digital Health Hub Model of Care for Hip Fractures: Mixed Methods Exploratory Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e26886. [PMID: 34709183 PMCID: PMC8587193 DOI: 10.2196/26886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Most older people after a hip fracture injury never return to their prefracture status, and some are admitted to residential aged care facilities. Advancement of digital technology has helped in optimizing health care including self-management and telerehabilitation. Objective This study aims to understand the perspectives of older patients with hip fracture and their family members and residential aged caregivers on the feasibility of developing a model of care using a personalized digital health hub. Methods We conducted a mixed methods study in South Australia involving patients aged 50 years and older, their family members, and residential aged caregivers. Quantitative data analysis included basic demographic characteristics, and access to digital devices was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to examine correlations between the perceived role of a personalized digital health hub in improving health and the likelihood of subsequent use. Findings from qualitative analysis were interpreted using constructs of capability, opportunity, and motivation to help understand the factors influencing the likelihood of potential personalized digital health hub use. Results This study recruited 100 participants—55 patients, 13 family members, and 32 residential aged caregivers. The mean age of the patients was 76.4 (SD 8.4, range 54-88) years, and 60% (33/55) of the patients were female. Approximately 50% (34/68) of the patients and their family members had access to digital devices, despite less than one-third using computers as part of their occupation. Approximately 72% (72/100) of the respondents thought that personalized digital health hub could improve health outcomes in patients. However, a moderate negative correlation existed with increasing age and likelihood of personalized digital health hub use (Spearman ρ=–0.50; P<.001), and the perceived role of the personalized digital health hub in improving health had a strong positive correlation with the likelihood of personalized digital health hub use by self (Spearman ρ=0.71; P<.001) and by society, including friends and family members (Spearman ρ=0.75; P<.001). Most patients (54/55, 98%) believed they had a family member, friend, or caregiver who would be able to help them use a personalized digital health hub. Qualitative analysis explored capability by understanding aspects of existing knowledge, including willingness to advance digital navigation skills. Access could be improved through supporting opportunities, and factors influencing intrinsic motivation were considered crucial for designing a personalized digital health hub–enabled model of care. Conclusions This study emphasized the complex relationship between capabilities, motivation, and opportunities for patients, their family members, and formal caregivers as a patient networked unit. The next stage of research will continue to involve a cocreation approach followed by iterative processes and understand the factors influencing the development and successful integration of complex digital health care interventions in real-world scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Yadav
- NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.,Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Tiffany K Gill
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Anita Taylor
- Department of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jennifer De Young
- Department of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Mellick J Chehade
- NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith N, Foster HE, Jandial S. A mixed methods evaluation of the Paediatric Musculoskeletal Matters (PMM) online portfolio. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2021; 19:85. [PMID: 34108019 PMCID: PMC8188761 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-021-00567-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PMM Portfolio is comprised of the Paediatric Musculoskeletal Matters (PMM) website, the paediatric Gait, Arms, Legs and Spine (pGALS) app and e-learning modules (ELM). The target audiences are non-specialists in paediatric musculoskeletal medicine. Our study aimed to evaluate impact on learning and clinical practice. METHODS Mixed methods (analytics, online survey, interviews) were used with PMM and ELM registered users and purposive sampling of users using international contacts within paediatrics and paediatric rheumatology. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative techniques. A Paired T-Test compared self-rated confidence before and after use of the PMM Portfolio. RESULTS There has been wide reach for all the e-resources; PMM website (662,827 hits, 262,476 users, 214 countries, data 31st July 2020); pGALS app (12,670 downloads, 70 countries, data 31st July 2020); ELM (150 users, 30 countries, data 30th May 2019). There were 164 responses (students, trainees and health care professionals) to the survey from 25 countries. Most responders deemed the PMM Portfolio useful / very useful for their learning with significantly increased self-rated confidence in their clinical examination and reasoning skills following access to the PMM website, p = < 0.01, pGALS app, p = < 0.01 and ELM, p = < 0.01. The most popular PMM website pages related to clinical assessment techniques (especially pGALS). There was high uptake of the pGALS app and pGALS ELM especially from trainees and allied health professionals. Many clinicians reported the PMM Portfolio to be useful when used to teach others. User feedback reported that easy navigation, open access, clinical images and cases were the most valued features. User feedback highlighted need to increase awareness of the e-resources through training programmes. CONCLUSIONS The PMM Portfolio was developed to aid learning for clinicians who are not specialists in paediatric MSK medicine. Our evaluation demonstrates wide international reach and positive feedback on learning. The PMM Portfolio is a highly useful e-resource for paediatric rheumatologists in their teaching of others to raise awareness, facilitate early diagnosis and referral of children with suspected disease. The wide user engagement informed future PMM Portfolio development and the mixed method of evaluation is transferable to other e-resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Smith
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Helen E. Foster
- grid.1006.70000 0001 0462 7212Population and Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK ,grid.459561.a0000 0004 4904 7256Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children’s Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sharmila Jandial
- grid.1006.70000 0001 0462 7212Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK ,grid.459561.a0000 0004 4904 7256Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children’s Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Widdifield J, Bernatsky S, Pope JE, Kuriya B, Barber CEH, Eder L, Ahluwalia V, Ling V, Gozdyra P, Hofstetter C, Lyddiatt A, Paterson JM, Thorne C. Evaluation of Rheumatology Workforce Supply Changes in Ontario, Canada, from 2000 to 2030. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 16:119-134. [PMID: 33720829 PMCID: PMC7957360 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Rheumatology workforces are increasingly challenged by too few physicians in face of the growing burden of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Rheumatology is one of the most frequent non-surgical specialty referrals and has the longest wait times for subspecialists. We used a population-based approach to describe changes in the rheumatology workforce, patient volumes and geographic variation in the supply of and access to rheumatologists, in Ontario, Canada, between 2000 and 2019, and projected changes in supply by 2030. Over time, we observed greater feminization of the workforce and increasing age of workforce members. We identified a large regional variation in rheumatology supply. Fewer new patients are seen annually, which likely contributes to increasing wait times and reduced access to care. Strategies and policies to raise the critical mass and improve regional distribution of supply to effectively provide rheumatology care and support the healthcare delivery of patients with RMDs are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Widdifield
- Scientist, Sunnybrook Research Institute Holland Bone & Joint Program; Assistant Professor, University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation Toronto, ON; Scientist, ICES Toronto, ON
| | - Sasha Bernatsky
- Rheumatologist and Scientist, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - Janet E Pope
- Rheumatologist, St Joseph's Health Care London; Professor of Medicine Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University London, ON
| | - Bindee Kuriya
- Rheumatologist, Sinai Health System; Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Claire E H Barber
- Rheumatologist, Assistant Professor, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB; Research Scientist, Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC
| | - Lihi Eder
- Rheumatologist, Clinician Scientist, Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON
| | | | | | | | | | | | - J Michael Paterson
- Scientist, ICES, Toronto, ON; Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; Assistant Professor, University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, Toronto, ON
| | - Carter Thorne
- Rheumatologist, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON; Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yadav L, Gill TK, Taylor A, deYoung J, Visvanathan R, Chehade MJ. "Context, content, and system" supporting digital health hub (DHH)-enabled models of care (MoCs) for fragility hip fractures: perspectives of diverse multidisciplinary stakeholders in South Australia from qualitative in-depth interviews. Arch Osteoporos 2021; 16:167. [PMID: 34741200 PMCID: PMC8571011 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-01031-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Combining thematic analysis and a human-computer persuasive systems framework suggests that hip fracture recovery among older people can be enhanced through person-centered digital health hub models of care focused on behavior change education and integrated care. The findings intend to guide settings involving comorbid conditions and low- and middle-income countries in developing innovative digital health solutions. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to understand stakeholders' perspectives on the development of a digital health-enabled model of care for fragility hip fractures and to map out factors that could influence the design and implementation of such a model. METHODS Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders from various clinical disciplines, allied health, and computer science. A hybrid process involving thematic analysis of the raw data using inductive coding was the first step. In the second step, the tenets of a theoretical framework (health behavior change supporting systems) were deductively applied to the thematic constructs generated as part of the first step of the analysis. RESULTS In total, 24 in-depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders. We identified 18 thematic constructs presented under the categories of context, content, and system. Context covered patient characteristics such as frailty, digital literacy, and patient or carer participation, whereas healthcare delivery aspects included the structure and culture of existing practice and the need for innovative holistic models of care. Content outlines the active ingredients and approach in developing a digital health hub, and it highlights the importance of targeted education and behavior change. The system is a complicated matrix crossing different aspects of healthcare and offering a value proposition design through personalization across modes of content delivery. This must foster trust, ensure adequate financing, and support ownership and privacy by establishing appropriate mechanisms for embedding change. CONCLUSION The findings from this study provide insights around potential factors related to patients, community support, and healthcare delivery influencing the design and next-stage implementation of a digital health hub model of care for fragility hip fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Yadav
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide Medical School, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Discipline of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Level 5G, 581, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Tiffany K. Gill
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Anita Taylor
- Discipline of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Level 5G, 581, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia
| | - Jennifer deYoung
- Discipline of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Level 5G, 581, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia
| | - Renuka Visvanathan
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide Medical School, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Aged and Extended Care, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Mellick J. Chehade
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide Medical School, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Discipline of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Level 5G, 581, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Speerin R, Needs C, Chua J, Woodhouse LJ, Nordin M, McGlasson R, Briggs AM. Implementing models of care for musculoskeletal conditions in health systems to support value-based care. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2020; 34:101548. [PMID: 32723576 PMCID: PMC7382572 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Models of Care (MoCs), and their local Models of Service Delivery, for people with musculoskeletal conditions are becoming an acceptable way of supporting effective implementation of value-based care. MoCs can support the quadruple aim of value-based care through providing people with musculoskeletal disease improved access to health services, better health outcomes and satisfactory experience of their healthcare; ensure the health professionals involved are experiencing satisfaction in delivering such care and health system resources are better utilised. Implementation of MoCs is relevant at the levels of clinical practice (micro), service delivery organisations (meso) and health system (macro) levels. The development, implementation and evaluation of MoCs has evolved over the last decade to more purposively engage people with lived experience of their condition, to operationalise the Chronic Care Model and to employ innovative solutions. This paper explores how MoCs have evolved and are supporting the delivery of value-based care in health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Speerin
- The Sydney University, Level 7, Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, ST LEONARDS, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Christopher Needs
- Department of Rheumatology, Level 4, QEII Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, 59 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Jason Chua
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
| | - Linda J Woodhouse
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Rhona McGlasson
- Bone & Joint Canada, P.O. Box 1036, Toronto, ON, M5K 1P2, Canada.
| | - Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chehade MJ, Yadav L, Jayatilaka A, Gill TK, Palmer E. Personal digital health hubs for multiple conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2020; 98:569-575. [PMID: 32773902 PMCID: PMC7411320 DOI: 10.2471/blt.19.249136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Multimorbidity is the presence of more than one chronic disease condition in an individual. Health-related, socioeconomic, cultural and environmental factors, as well as patient behaviour, all influence the outcomes of multimorbidity. Addressing these complex and often interacting biopsychosocial factors therefore requires a shift in treatment from a physical damage model towards person-centred integrated care with increased patient agency. Education influences behaviour and can be used to empower patients and their carers with greater agency, thus allowing greater responsibility for and control over the management of patient care. In this paper we reflect on our own learning as a community of health practitioners from different disciplines. Recognizing the increasing importance of patient agency in driving the evolution of health care, we describe the concept of a web-based personal digital health hub for integrated patient care. Informed by collaboration between patient, health and education communities, we share our early experience in the implementation of a health hub around a cohort of patients with hip fractures. We also describe a vision for future health care based on the co-creation of digital health hubs centred on patients' and carers' needs. The health hub could allow important advances and efficiencies to be achieved in workforce practice and education; patient and carer engagement in self-care; and the collection of patient-reported health data required for ongoing research and improvements in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mellick J Chehade
- Discipline of Orthopaedics & Trauma, University of Adelaide, Level 5G 584, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road Adelaide, South Australia, Australia 5000
| | - Lalit Yadav
- Discipline of Orthopaedics & Trauma, University of Adelaide, Level 5G 584, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road Adelaide, South Australia, Australia 5000
| | - Asangi Jayatilaka
- School of Computer Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Tiffany K Gill
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Edward Palmer
- School of Education, Faculty of Arts, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Development of a core capability framework for qualified health professionals to optimise care for people with osteoarthritis: an OARSI initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2020; 28:154-166. [PMID: 31838047 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Develop a generic trans-disciplinary, skills-based capability framework for health professionals providing care for people with OA. DESIGN e-Delphi survey. An international inter-professional Delphi Panel (researchers; clinicians; consumer representatives) considered a draft framework (adapted from elsewhere) of 131 specific capabilities mapped to 14 broader capability areas across four domains (A: person-centred approaches; B: assessment, investigation and diagnosis; C: management, interventions and prevention; D: service and professional development). Over three rounds, the Panel rated their agreement (Likert or numerical rating scales) on whether each specific capability in Domains B and C was essential (core) for all health professionals when providing care for all people with OA. Those achieving consensus (≥80% of Panel) rating of ≥ seven out of ten (Round 3) were retained. Generic domains (A and D) were included in the final framework and amended based on Panel comments. RESULTS 173 people from 31 countries, spanning 18 disciplines and including 26 consumer representatives, participated. The final framework comprised 70 specific capabilities across 13 broad areas i) communication; ii) person-centred care; iii) history-taking; iv) physical assessment; v) investigations and diagnosis; vi) interventions and care planning; vii) prevention and lifestyle interventions; viii) self-management and behaviour change; ix) rehabilitative interventions; x) pharmacotherapy; xi) surgical interventions; xii) referrals and collaborative working; and xiii) evidence-based practice and service development). CONCLUSION Experts agree that health professionals require an array of skills in person-centred approaches; assessment, investigation and diagnosis; management, interventions and prevention; and service and professional development to provide optimal care for people with OA.
Collapse
|
13
|
Eyles JP, Hunter DJ, Bennell KL, Dziedzic KS, Hinman RS, van der Esch M, Holden MA, Bowden JL. Priorities for the effective implementation of osteoarthritis management programs: an OARSI international consensus exercise. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2019; 27:1270-1279. [PMID: 31163271 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Joint Effort Initiative was endorsed by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) in 2018 as a collaboration between international researchers and clinicians with an interest in the implementation of osteoarthritis management programs (OAMPs). This study aimed to identify and prioritise activities for future work of the Joint Effort Initiative. DESIGN A survey was emailed to delegates of the 2018 OARSI World Congress attending a pre-conference workshop or with a known interest in OAMPs (n = 115). Delegates were asked about the most important issues regarding OAMP implementation. The top 20 issues were synthesised into 17 action statements, and respondents were invited to participate in a priority ranking exercise to determine the order of importance of the statements. RESULTS Survey respondents (n = 51, 44%) were most commonly female (71%), with an allied health background (57%), affiliated with universities (73%) from Oceania (37%), and Europe/UK (45%). The five highest ranked action statements were: CONCLUSION: Prioritising statements will bring focus to the future work of the Joint Effort Initiative in the future and provide a basis for longer-term actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian P Eyles
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, And Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - David J Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, And Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kim L Bennell
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Krysia S Dziedzic
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
| | - Rana S Hinman
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Martin van der Esch
- Reade Centre for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology Amsterdam, University of Applied Sciences Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Melanie A Holden
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
| | - Jocelyn L Bowden
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, And Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
A global perspective on the challenges and opportunities in learning about rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in undergraduate medical education. Clin Rheumatol 2019; 39:627-642. [DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04544-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
15
|
Briggs AM, Hinman RS, Darlow B, Bennell KL, Leech M, Pizzari T, Greig AM, MacKay C, Bendrups A, Larmer PJ, Francis-Cracknell A, Houlding E, Desmond LA, Jordan JE, Minaee N, Slater H. Confidence and Attitudes Toward Osteoarthritis Care Among the Current and Emerging Health Workforce: A Multinational Interprofessional Study. ACR Open Rheumatol 2019; 1:219-235. [PMID: 31777798 PMCID: PMC6857979 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.1032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To measure confidence and attitudes of the current and emerging interprofessional workforce concerning osteoarthritis (OA) care. Methods Study design is a multinational (Australia, New Zealand, Canada) cross-sectional survey of clinicians (general practitioners [GPs], GP registrars, primary care nurses, and physiotherapists) and final-year medical and physiotherapy students. GPs and GP registrars were only sampled in Australia/New Zealand and Australia, respectively. The study outcomes are as follows: confidence in OA knowledge and skills (customized instrument), biomedical attitudes to care (Pain Attitudes Beliefs Scale [PABS]), attitudes toward high- and low-value care (customized items), attitudes toward exercise/physical activity (free-text responses). Results A total of 1886 clinicians and 1161 students responded. Although a number of interprofessional differences were identified, confidence in OA knowledge and skills was consistently greatest among physiotherapists and lowest among nurses (eg, the mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] for physiotherapist-nurse analyses were 9.3 [7.7-10.9] for knowledge [scale: 11-55] and 14.6 [12.3-17.0] for skills [scale: 16-80]). Similarly, biomedical attitudes were stronger in nurses compared with physiotherapists (6.9 [5.3-8.4]; scale 10-60) and in medical students compared with physiotherapy students (2.0 [1.3-2.7]). Some clinicians and students agreed that people with OA will ultimately require total joint replacement (7%-19% and 19%-22%, respectively), that arthroscopy is an appropriate intervention for knee OA (18%-36% and 35%-44%), and that magnetic resonance imaging is informative for diagnosis and clinical management of hip/knee OA (8%-61% and 21%-52%). Most agreed (90%-98% and 92%-97%) that exercise is indicated and strongly supported by qualitative data. Conclusion Workforce capacity building that de-emphasizes biomedical management and promotes high-value first-line care options is needed. Knowledge and skills among physiotherapists support leadership roles in OA care for this discipline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Curtin University Perth Australia
| | - Rana S Hinman
- Department of Physiotherapy University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
| | - Ben Darlow
- Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice University of Otago Wellington New Zealand
| | - Kim L Bennell
- Department of Physiotherapy University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
| | - Michelle Leech
- Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Tania Pizzari
- La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre La Trobe University Melbourne Australia
| | - Alison M Greig
- Department of Physical Therapy University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada
| | - Crystal MacKay
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute University Health Network Toronto Canada
| | - Andrea Bendrups
- Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital) University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
| | - Peter J Larmer
- School of Clinical Sciences Auckland University of Technology Auckland New Zealand
| | | | - Elizabeth Houlding
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Curtin University Perth Australia.,Faculty of Science University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada
| | - Lucy A Desmond
- Department of Medicine Western Health Melbourne Australia
| | | | - Novia Minaee
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Curtin University Perth Australia
| | - Helen Slater
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Curtin University Perth Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The Global Spine Care Initiative: a narrative review of psychological and social issues in back pain in low- and middle-income communities. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2018; 27:828-837. [PMID: 29374779 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5434-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 12/16/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this review was to describe psychological and social factors associated with low back pain that could be applied in spine care programs in medically underserved areas and low- and middle-income countries. METHODS We performed a narrative review of cohort, cross-sectional, qualitative and mixed methods studies investigating adults with low back pain using Medline and PubMed were searched from January 2000 to June 2015. Eligible studies had at least one of the following outcomes: psychological, social, psychosocial, or cultural/ethnicity factors. Studies met the following criteria: (1) English language, (2) published in peer-reviewed journal, (3) adults with spinal disorders, (4) included treatment, symptom management or prevention. RESULTS Out of 58 studies, 29 were included in this review. There are few studies that have evaluated psychological and social factors associated with back pain in low- and middle-income communities, therefore, adapting recommendations from other regions may be needed until further studies can be achieved. CONCLUSION Psychological and social factors are important components to addressing low back pain and health care providers play an important role in empowering patients to take control of their spinal health outcomes. Patients should be included in negotiating their spinal treatment and establishing treatment goals through careful listening, reassurance, and information providing by the health care provider. Instruments need to be developed for people with low literacy in medically underserved areas and low- and middle-income countries, especially where psychological and social factors may be difficult to detect and are poorly addressed. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Collapse
|
17
|
Assessing Implementation Readiness and Success of an e-Resource to Improve Prelicensure Physical Therapy Workforce Capacity to Manage Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47:652-663. [PMID: 28859591 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Study Design Prospective within-subject, cross-sectional, between-group, nested qualitative designs within an implementation science framework. Background Physical therapy is recommended for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care, yet prelicensure RA curriculum time remains limited. Objectives To determine readiness for, and success of, implementing an e-learning tool, Rheumatoid Arthritis for Physiotherapists e-Learning (RAP-eL), within the prelicensure physical therapy curriculum. Methods All physical therapy students in a 1-year cohort in 2014 had RAP-eL embedded in their curriculum. Rheumatoid Arthritis for Physiotherapists e-Learning is an online platform that delivers RA disease information with translation to clinical practice. Implementation readiness, determined by acceptability of RAP-eL to students, was evaluated using focus groups (n = 23). Implementation success was measured using quantitative data from a previously validated questionnaire, including changes in students' self-reported confidence in knowledge (out of 45) and skills (out of 40) in managing RA after 4 weeks of access to RAP-eL, retention of learning over 14 months, and differences in workforce readiness between students in the cohort who had access to RAP-eL and a historical control cohort. Results Acceptability of RAP-eL was confirmed from qualitative data, demonstrating implementation readiness. Short-term improvements were observed in RA knowledge (mean difference, 16.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.7, 17.6) and RA skills (mean difference, 14.9; 95% CI: 13.9, 15.9; n = 137). Retention was demonstrated after 14 months (P<.001; n = 62). Students in the 1-year cohort who had RAP-eL embedded in the curriculum scored significantly higher on knowledge (mean difference, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.3, 5.9) and skills (mean difference, 3.3; 95% CI: 0.9, 5.7; n = 62) compared to those without RAP-eL (n = 36). Rheumatoid Arthritis for Physiotherapists e-Learning remains embedded in the curriculum. Conclusion This study demonstrated both readiness and success of the sustainable implementation of RAP-eL within a prelicensure physical therapy curriculum. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(9):652-663. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7281.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bernstein J. Not the Last Word: Rethinking the Resident Research Requirement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475:1948-1953. [PMID: 28560531 PMCID: PMC5498396 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-017-5392-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Bernstein
- 0000 0004 1936 8972grid.25879.31Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 424 Stemmler Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rehabilitation 2030: A Call to Action Relevant to Improving Musculoskeletal Health Care Globally. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47:297-300. [PMID: 28459192 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The profile of human health is changing across the globe such that the burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), particularly musculoskeletal conditions, is becoming more profound. Such change demands that health systems adapt to better support people in maintaining a functional health state and quality of life, as life expectancy continues to increase. In parallel to the rising burden of NCDs, in particular a disability burden, the need for rehabilitation services is increasing. The World Health Organization (WHO) responded recently with "Rehabilitation 2030: A Call for Action" (February 6-7, 2017, Geneva, Switzerland) and the publication of key recommendations for action. In this editorial, the authors reflect on Rehabilitation 2030 and consider its implications for health system reform in the context of rehabilitation for musculoskeletal health. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(5)297-300. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.0105.
Collapse
|