Cathodic reduction of coenzyme Q10 on glassy carbon electrode in acetic acid–acetonitrile solutions

Analytical problems with the determination of coenzyme Q10 in biological samples

The article discusses analytical problems related to the determination of coenzyme Q10 in biological samples. The assaying of coenzyme Q10 in complex samples, such as plasma, tissues, or food items requires meticulous sample preparation prior to final quantification. The process typically consists of the following steps: deproteinization, extraction, and ultimately reduction of extract volumes. At times drying under a gentle stream of neutral gas is applied. In the case of solid samples, a careful homogenization is also required. Each step of the sample preparation process can be a source of analytical errors that may lead to inaccurate results. The main aim of this work is to point to sources of analytical errors in the preparation process and their relation to physicochemical properties of coenzyme Q10. The article also discusses ways of avoiding and reducing the errors.

6-Vinyl coenzyme Q0: Electropolymerization and electrocatalysis of NADH oxidation exploiting poly-p-quinone-modified electrode surfaces

6-Vinyl coenzyme Q(0) serves as a convenient starting material for the formation of electropolymerized coenzyme Q(0) on glassy carbon electrodes and the modified electrodes displays electrocatalytic activity toward NADH (β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) oxidation. The detection of NADH was measured by differential pulse voltammetry, which reveals that the peak current is linear to the concentration of NADH within the range of 10-100μM. This would be helpful for the understanding of the interaction between coenzyme Q(0) and NADH in the biological process.

Substrate redox potential controls superoxide production kinetics in the cytochrome bc complex

The Q-cycle mechanism of the cytochrome bc(1) complex maximizes energy conversion during the transport of electrons from ubiquinol to cytochrome c (or alternate physiological acceptors), yet important steps in the Q-cycle are still hotly debated, including bifurcated electron transport, the high yield and specificity of the Q-cycle despite possible short-circuits and bypass reactions, and the rarity of observable intermediates in the oxidation of quinol. Mounting evidence shows that some bypass reactions producing superoxide during oxidation of quinol at the Q(o) site diverge from the Q-cycle rather late in the bifurcated reaction and provide an additional means of studying initial reactions of the Q-cycle. Bypass reactions offer more scope for controlling and manipulating reaction conditions, e.g., redox potential, because they effectively isolate or decouple the Q-cycle initial reactions from later steps, preventing many complications and interactions. We examine the dependence of oxidation rate on substrate redox potential in the yeast cytochrome bc(1) complex and find that the rate limitation occurs at the level of direct one-electron oxidation of quinol to semiquinone by the Rieske protein. Oxidation of semiquinone and reduction of cyt b or O(2) are subsequent, distinct steps. These experimental results are incompatible with models in which the transfer of electrons to the Rieske protein is not a distinct step preceding transfer of electrons to cytochrome b, and with conformational gating models that produce superoxide by different rate-limiting reactions from the normal Q-cycle.