1
|
Musket A, Davern S, Elam BM, Musich PR, Moorman JP, Jiang Y. The application of radionuclide therapy for breast cancer. FRONTIERS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE (LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 3:1323514. [PMID: 39355029 PMCID: PMC11440853 DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2023.1323514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2024]
Abstract
Radionuclide-mediated diagnosis and therapy have emerged as effective and low-risk approaches to treating breast cancer. Compared to traditional anatomic imaging techniques, diagnostic radionuclide-based molecular imaging systems exhibit much greater sensitivity and ability to precisely illustrate the biodistribution and metabolic processes from a functional perspective in breast cancer; this transitions diagnosis from an invasive visualization to a noninvasive visualization, potentially ensuring earlier diagnosis and on-time treatment. Radionuclide therapy is a newly developed modality for the treatment of breast cancer in which radionuclides are delivered to tumors and/or tumor-associated targets either directly or using delivery vehicles. Radionuclide therapy has been proven to be eminently effective and to exhibit low toxicity when eliminating both primary tumors and metastases and even undetected tumors. In addition, the specific interaction between the surface modules of the delivery vehicles and the targets on the surface of tumor cells enables radionuclide targeting therapy, and this represents an exceptional potential for this treatment in breast cancer. This article reviews the development of radionuclide molecular imaging techniques that are currently employed for early breast cancer diagnosis and both the progress and challenges of radionuclide therapy employed in breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Musket
- Department of Internal Medicine, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
- Center of Excellence in Inflammation, Infectious Disease and Immunity, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
| | - Sandra Davern
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
| | - Brianna M Elam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
- Center of Excellence in Inflammation, Infectious Disease and Immunity, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
| | - Philip R Musich
- Department of Biomedical Science, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
| | - Jonathan P Moorman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
- Center of Excellence in Inflammation, Infectious Disease and Immunity, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
| | - Yong Jiang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
- Center of Excellence in Inflammation, Infectious Disease and Immunity, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Emergence of a captivating phenomenon aggregation induced emission (AIE) in the early years of 21st century attracted worldwide researchers. In the last two decades various novel AIE active biocompatible small molecules, macromolecules and polymers have been developed for diverse biomedical applications. Imaging of specific organelle such as mitochondria, ribosomes, nuclei and many others play important in the controlling and successful treatment of various diseases. Conventional luminescent probe molecules used in the imaging at cellular or subcellular level exhibit very weak emission on dispersion or on aggregation in aqueous media. AIE luminogens development is indispensable to overcome the notorious aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) issue inherited by conventional fluorophores. In the present chapter we mostly highlighted over one decade development of various AIE active luminogens utilized for imaging of cell nucleus, nucleon and nucleic acids. The development of those AIE luminogens exhibits promising results in the early diagnosis of cancer diseases.
Collapse
|
3
|
Alwadani B, Dall'Angelo S, Fleming IN. Clinical value of 3'-deoxy-3'-[ 18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography for diagnosis, staging and assessing therapy response in lung cancer. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:90. [PMID: 34213667 PMCID: PMC8253862 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01026-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate of any tumour type. The main driver of lung tumour growth and development is uncontrolled cellular proliferation. Poor patient outcomes are partly the result of the limited range of effective anti-cancer therapies available and partly due to the limited accuracy of biomarkers to report on cell proliferation rates in patients. Accordingly, accurate methods of diagnosing, staging and assessing response to therapy are crucial to improve patient outcomes. One effective way of assessing cell proliferation is to employ non-invasive evaluation using 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT) positron emission tomography [18F]FLT-PET. [18F]FLT, unlike the most commonly used PET tracer [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG), can specifically report on cell proliferation and does not accumulate in inflammatory cells. Therefore, this radiotracer could exhibit higher specificity in diagnosis and staging, along with more accurate monitoring of therapy response at early stages in the treatment cycle. This review summarises and evaluates published studies on the clinical use of [18F]FLT to diagnose, stage and assess response to therapy in lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bandar Alwadani
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Al Maarefah Rd, POB 114, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia.,Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Sergio Dall'Angelo
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Ian N Fleming
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aloj L, Attili B, Lau D, Caraco C, Lechermann LM, Mendichovszky IA, Harper I, Cheow H, Casey RT, Sala E, Gilbert FJ, Gallagher FA. The emerging role of cell surface receptor and protein binding radiopharmaceuticals in cancer diagnostics and therapy. Nucl Med Biol 2021; 92:53-64. [PMID: 32563612 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Targeting specific cell membrane markers for both diagnostic imaging and radionuclide therapy is a rapidly evolving field in cancer research. Some of these applications have now found a role in routine clinical practice and have been shown to have a significant impact on patient management. Several molecular targets are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials and show promise for future implementation. Advancements in molecular biology have facilitated the identification of new cancer-specific targets for radiopharmaceutical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Aloj
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Bala Attili
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Doreen Lau
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Corradina Caraco
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Laura M Lechermann
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ines Harper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth T Casey
- Department of Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ferdia A Gallagher
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Advanced PET imaging in oncology: status and developments with current and future relevance to lung cancer care. Curr Opin Oncol 2019; 30:77-83. [PMID: 29251666 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review highlights the status and developments of PET imaging in oncology, with particular emphasis on lung cancer. We discuss the significance of PET for diagnosis, staging, decision-making, monitoring of treatment response, and drug development. The PET key advantage, the noninvasive assessment of functional and molecular tumor characteristics including tumor heterogeneity, as well as PET trends relevant to cancer care are exemplified. RECENT FINDINGS Advances of PET and radiotracer technology are encouraging for multiple fields of oncological research and clinical application, including in-depth assessment of PET images by texture analysis (radiomics). Whole body PET imaging and novel PET tracers allow assessing characteristics of most types of cancer. However, only few PET tracers in addition to F-fluorodeoxyglucose have sufficiently been validated, approved, and are reimbursed for a limited number of indications. Therefore, validation and standardization of PET parameters including tracer dosage, image acquisition, post processing, and reading are required to expand PET imaging as clinically applicable approach. SUMMARY Considering the potential of PET imaging for precision medicine and drug development in lung and other types of cancer, increasing efforts are warranted to standardize PET technology and to provide evidence for PET imaging as a guiding biomarker in nearly all areas of cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mellhammar E, Dahlbom M, Evans-Axelsson S, Strand SE. Preserving Preclinical PET Quality During Intratherapeutic Imaging in Radionuclide Therapy with Rose Metal Shielding Reducing Photon Flux. J Nucl Med 2018; 60:710-715. [PMID: 30389819 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Performing PET imaging during ongoing radionuclide therapy can be a promising method to follow tumor response in vivo. However, the high therapeutic activity can interfere with the PET camera performance and degrade both image quality and quantitative capabilities. As a solution, low-energy photon emissions from the therapeutic radionuclide can be highly attenuated, still allowing sufficient detection of annihilation photons in coincidence. Methods: Hollow Rose metal cylinders with walls 2-4 mm thick were used to shield a 22Na point source and a uniform phantom filled with 18F as they were imaged on a preclinical PET camera with increasing activities of 177Lu. A mouse with a subcutaneous tumor was injected with 18F-FDG and imaged with an additional 120 MBq of 177Lu and repeated with shields surrounding the animal. Results: The addition of 177Lu to the volume imaged continuously degraded the image quality with increasing activity. The image quality was improved when shielding was introduced. The shields showed a high ability to produce stable and reproducible results for both spatial resolution and quantification of up to 120 MBq of 177Lu activity (maximum activity tested). Conclusion: Without shielding, the activity quantification will be inaccurate for time points at which therapeutic activities are high. The suggested method shows that the shields reduce the noise induced by the 177Lu and therefore enable longitudinal quantitative intratherapeutic imaging studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Mellhammar
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Magnus Dahlbom
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Susan Evans-Axelsson
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Sven-Erik Strand
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|