Comparison of the preventive efficacy of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in post-contrast acute kidney injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on dysfunctional coronary circulation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

Evidence of therapy for dysfunctional coronary circulation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is limited. This study was performed to compare the effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on dysfunctional coronary circulation.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 597 consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent pPCI in 3 centers from June 2016 to December 2019. Dysfunctional coronary circulation was defined by the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade and the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG). Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of different statin types on dysfunctional coronary circulation.

RESULTS

The incidence of TIMI no/slow reflow did not differ between the two groups, but the incidence of TMPG no/slow reflow was significantly lower in the atorvastatin than rosuvastatin group (44.58% vs. 57.69%, respectively). After multivariate adjustment, the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval of rosuvastatin was 1.72 (1.17-2.52) for after pretreatment TMPG no/slow reflow and 1.73 (1.16-2.58) for after stenting TMPG no/slow reflow. Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes during hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with rosuvastatin, atorvastatin was associated with better coronary microcirculatory perfusion in patients with STEMI who underwent pPCI.

[The atorvastatin effects on the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury during computed tomography with contrast media]

AIM

To assess the role of atorvastatin to the frequency of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) undergoing computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast media.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients with CVD undergoing CT with with intravenous contrast media administration were included in prospective observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04666389). Patients were divided into 3 groups 16 (15.8%) patients receiving atorvastatin at a dose of 80 mg 24 hours and 40 mg before the CT and 40 mg after; 33 (32.7%) patients 40 mg before the CT and 40 mg after; 52 (51.5%) people not receiving statin therapy. The primary endpoint was CI-AKI according to KDIGO criteria: the 25% rise (or 0.5 mg/dl) of serum creatinine from baseline assessed 4872 hours after administration of contrast media. There were 51% of men. The average age was 59.7714.4. The most frequent cardiovascular disease was hypertension 86%.

RESULTS

CI-AKI was diagnosed in 4 (3.96%) patients. At the same time, it was not possible to establish statistically significant relationships (p0.05) between risk factors and the development of CI-AKI. Statins can be a successful way to prevent this complication.

CONCLUSION

Cardiovascular diseases may increase the risk of CI-AKI after computed tomography with intravenous contrast media administration. Therefore, it is recommended to evaluate the serum creatinine concentration in such patients.