1
|
Curtin M, Dickerson SS. An Evolutionary Concept Analysis of Precision Medicine, and Its Contribution to a Precision Health Model for Nursing Practice. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2024; 47:E1-E19. [PMID: 36728719 DOI: 10.1097/ans.0000000000000473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Precision medicine is a new concept that has been routinely encountered in the literature for little more than a decade. With increasing use, it becomes crucial to understand the meaning of this concept as it is applied in various settings. An evolutionary concept analysis was conducted to develop an understanding of the essential features of precision medicine and its use. The analysis led to a comprehensive list of the antecedents, attributes, and consequences of precision medicine in multiple settings. With this understanding, precision medicine becomes part of the broader practice of precision health, an important process proposed by nursing scholars to provide complete, holistic care to our patients. A model for precision health is presented as a framework for care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Curtin
- School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, State University of New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Ramadan Y, Joubran E, Jacobs RJ. Ethical Perspectives of Therapeutic Human Genome Editing From Multiple and Diverse Viewpoints: A Scoping Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e31927. [PMID: 36582559 PMCID: PMC9793437 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Human genome editing has been increasingly explored to determine if it can be used to eradicate genetic diseases like sickle cell disease, but it has also been surrounded by a wide variety of ethical dilemmas. The purpose of this review was to conduct a scoping review of the ethics of therapeutic human genome editing in terms of philosophy, theology, public perspectives, and research ethics. A systemized search of PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science was conducted. The initial search resulted in 4,445 articles, and after removing 1,750 duplicates and screening the remaining 2,695 articles, 27 final articles were selected for the final analysis. From a philosophical and theological standpoint, therapeutic human genome editing was generally ethically acceptable. Worldwide public perspectives were also in agreement except for the Oceanic region, which disagreed mainly due to the possible effects on future generations. Lastly, human research ethics revealed that women were not always included in informed consent, and that child autonomy needs to be preserved. Further research is needed to determine adverse effects on the mother, fetus, and future generations.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cable J, Ronald PC, Voytas D, Zhang F, Levy AA, Takatsuka A, Arimura SI, Jacobsen SE, Toki S, Toda E, Gao C, Zhu JK, Boch J, Van Eck J, Mahfouz M, Andersson M, Fridman E, Weiss T, Wang K, Qi Y, Jores T, Adams T, Bagchi R. Plant genome engineering from lab to field-a Keystone Symposia report. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2021; 1506:35-54. [PMID: 34435370 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Facing the challenges of the world's food sources posed by a growing global population and a warming climate will require improvements in plant breeding and technology. Enhancing crop resiliency and yield via genome engineering will undoubtedly be a key part of the solution. The advent of new tools, such as CRIPSR/Cas, has ushered in significant advances in plant genome engineering. However, several serious challenges remain in achieving this goal. Among them are efficient transformation and plant regeneration for most crop species, low frequency of some editing applications, and high attrition rates. On March 8 and 9, 2021, experts in plant genome engineering and breeding from academia and industry met virtually for the Keystone eSymposium "Plant Genome Engineering: From Lab to Field" to discuss advances in genome editing tools, plant transformation, plant breeding, and crop trait development, all vital for transferring the benefits of novel technologies to the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pamela C Ronald
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, and the Joint BioEnergy Institute, Davis, California
| | - Daniel Voytas
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development; Center for Precision Plant Genomics; and Center for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
| | - Feng Zhang
- College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
| | - Avraham A Levy
- Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Ayumu Takatsuka
- Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Arimura
- Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Steven E Jacobsen
- Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research; Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology; and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Seiichi Toki
- Division of Applied Genetics, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Erika Toda
- Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Caixia Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-Kang Zhu
- Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Jens Boch
- Department of Plant Biotechnology, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Joyce Van Eck
- The Boyce Thompson Institute, Ithaca, New York, and Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Magdy Mahfouz
- Laboratory for Genome Engineering and Synthetic Biology, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mariette Andersson
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Eyal Fridman
- Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
| | - Trevor Weiss
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development; Center for Precision Plant Genomics; and Center for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
| | - Kan Wang
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
| | - Yiping Qi
- Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, and Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Tobias Jores
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Rammyani Bagchi
- Department of Nanoscience, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|