Sleep deprivation affects the sensitivity of proactive and reactive action monitoring: a behavioural and ERP analysis

Why is there an error negativity on correct trials? A reappraisal

In healthy subjects, the Error Negativity (Ne) was initially reported on errors and on partial errors, only. Later on, application of the Laplacian transformation to EEG data unmasked a Ne-like wave (Nc) that shares a main generator with the Ne, suggesting that the Nc is just a small Ne. However, the reason why a small Ne would persist on correct responses remains unclear. Now, sometimes, subthreshold EMG activations in the muscles corresponding to correct responses (not strong enough to reach the response threshold) can precede full-blown correct responses. These "partially correct" activities seem to correspond to (force) execution errors, as they evoke a sizeable Ne. Within the frames of the Reward Value and Prediction Model or of the Predicted Response-Outcome model we propose that the action monitoring system evokes a Ne/Nc on correct responses because, even when a correct choice has been made, the accuracy of response (force) execution cannot be fully predicted. If this interpretation is correct, it can be assumed that, once these execution errors have been corrected, the correctness of the (full-blown) correcting response is highly predictable. Consequently, they should evoke a smaller Nc/Ne than "pure" correct responses. We show, that for the response thresholds set in the present experiment, the correcting response of the trials containing a partially correct activation evoke no identifiable Nc at all. Therefore it seems that there usually is an Error Negativity on correct trials because the correctness of response (force) execution cannot be fully predicted.

An Electromyographic Analysis of the Effects of Cognitive Fatigue on Online and Anticipatory Action Control

Cognitive fatigue is a problem for the safety of critical systems (e.g., aircraft) as it can lead to accidents, especially during unexpected events. In order to determine the extent to which it disrupts adaptive capabilities, we evaluated its effect on online and anticipatory control. Despite numerous studies conducted to determine its effects, the exact mechanism(s) affected by fatigue remains to be clarified. In this study, we used distribution and electromyographic analysis to assess whether cognitive fatigue increases the capture of the incorrect automatic response or if it impairs its suppression (online control), and whether the conflict adaptation effect is reduced (anticipatory control). To this end, we evaluated the evolution of the performance over time during the Simon task, a classic conflict task that elicits incorrect automatic responses. To accentuate the presence of fatigue during the Simon task, two groups previously performed a dual-task with two different cognitive load levels to create two different levels of fatigue. The results revealed that time on task impaired online control by disrupting the capacity to suppress the incorrect response but leaving unaffected the expression of the automatic response. Furthermore, participants emphasized speed rather than accuracy with time on task, with in addition more fast guesses, suggesting that they opted for a less effortful response strategy. As the implementation of the suppression mechanism requires cognitive effort, the conjunction of these results suggests that the deficits observed may be due to disengagement of effort over time rather than reflecting an incapacity to make an effort.

Errors and Action Monitoring: Errare Humanum Est Sed Corrigere Possibile

It was recognized long ago by Seneca through his famous "errare humanum est." that the human information processing system is intrinsically fallible. What is newer is the fact that, at least in sensorimotor information processing realized under time pressure, errors are largely dealt with by several (psycho)physiological-specific mechanisms: prevention, detection, inhibition, correction, and, if these mechanisms finally fail, strategic behavioral adjustments following errors. In this article, we review several datasets from laboratory experiments, showing that the human information processing system is well equipped not only to detect and correct errors when they occur but also to detect, inhibit, and correct them even before they fully develop. We argue that these (psycho)physiological mechanisms are important to consider when the brain works in everyday settings in order to render work systems more resilient to human errors and, thus, safer.

Dopamine precursors depletion impairs impulse control in healthy volunteers

The aim of the present study was to decipher the role of the dopamine system in impulse control. Impulsive actions entail (i) activation of the motor system by an impulse, which is an urge to act and (ii) a failure to suppress that impulse, when inappropriate, in order to prevent an error. These two aspects of action impulsivity can be experimentally disentangled in conflict reaction time tasks such as the Simon task, which measures susceptibility to acting on spontaneous impulses (as well as the proficiency of suppressing these impulses). In 12 healthy volunteers performing a Simon task, dopamine availability was reduced with an amino acid drink deficient in the dopamine precursors, phenylalanine and tyrosine. Classic behavioral measures were augmented with an analysis of the electromyographic activity of the response effectors. Electromyography allows one to detect covert activations undetectable with strictly behavioral measures and further reveals the participants' ability to quickly suppress covert activations before they result in an overt movement. Following dopamine depletion, compared with a placebo condition, participants displayed comparable impulse activation but were less proficient at suppressing the interference from this activation. These results provide evidence that the dopamine system is directly involved in the suppression of maladaptive response impulses.