Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire as a predecessor of the epigenetic concept of evolution

"The Logic of Monsters:" Pere Alberch and the Evolutionary Significance of Experimental Teratology

This paper offers an historical introduction to Pere Alberch's evolutionary thought and his contributions to Evo-Devo, based on his unique approach to experimental teratology. We will take as our point of reference the teratogenic experiments developed by Alberch and Emily A. Gale during the 1980s, aimed at producing monstrous variants of frogs and salamanders. We will analyze his interpretation of the results of these experiments within the framework of the emergence of evolutionary developmental biology (or "Evo-Devo"). The aim is understand how Alberch interpreted teratological anomalies as highly revealing objects of study for understanding the development of organic form, not only in an ontogenetic sense-throughout embryonic development-but also phylogenetically-throughout the evolution of species. Alberch's interpretation of monsters reflects the influence of a long tradition of non-Darwinian evolutionary thought, which began in the nineteenth century and was continued in the twentieth century by people such as Richard Goldschmidt, Conrad H. Waddington, and Stephen Jay Gould. They all proposed various non-gradualist models of evolution, in which embryonic development played a central role. Following this tradition, Alberch argued that, in order to attain a correct understanding of the role of embryological development in evolution, it was necessary to renounce the gradualist paradigm associated with the Darwinian interpretation of evolution, which understood nature as a continuum. According to Alberch, the study of monstrous abnormalities was of great value in understanding how certain epigenetic restrictions in development could give rise to discontinuities and directionality in morphological transformations throughout evolution.

Macroevolution, differentiation trees, and the growth of coding systems

An open process of evolution of multicellular organisms is based on the rearrangement and growth of the program of differentiation that underlies biological morphogenesis. The maintenance of the final (adult) stable non-equilibrium state (stasis) of a developmental system determines the direction of the evolutionary process. This state is achieved via the sequence of differentiation events representable as differentiation trees. A special type of morphogenetic code, acting as a metacode governing gene expression, may include electromechanical signals appearing as differentiation waves. The excessive energy due to the incorporation of mitochondria in eukaryotic cells resulted not only in more active metabolism but also in establishing the differentiation code for interconnecting cells and forming tissues, which fueled the evolutionary process. The "invention" of "continuing differentiation" distinguishes multicellular eukaryotes from other organisms. The Janus-faced control, involving both top-down control by differentiation waves and bottom-up control via the mechanical consequences of cell differentiations, underlies the process of morphogenesis and results in the achievement of functional stable final states. Duplications of branches of the differentiation tree may be the basis for continuing differentiation and macroevolution, analogous to gene duplication permitting divergence of genes. Metamorphoses, if they are proven to be fusions of disparate species, may be classified according to the topology of fusions of two differentiation trees. In the process of unfolding of morphogenetic structures, microevolution can be defined as changes of the differentiation tree that preserve topology of the tree, while macroevolution represents any change that alters the topology of the differentiation tree.

The reversibility of cellular determination: An evolutive pattern of epigenetic plasticity

Until the middle of the 20th century, embryogenesis patterns were considered as based on a rigid, unidirectional ontogenetic development, whose nuclear programming yields an irreversibility feature for cellular determination. Further empirical pieces of evidence have provided new insights about a certain reversibility to cellular determination, finding new biomolecular mechanisms (nuclear reprogramming, dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation) which have clearly shown that such a reversibility exists, warranting a certain cellular plasticity inside cell cycle; moreover, they seem mainly ruled by epigenetic factors. In this framework, evolution can be viewed as a systemic transformation of the spatiotemporal epigenetic organization, and the maintenance of the stable final adult stage includes a possibility of dedifferentiation at the particular points of ontogenetic development leading to the achievement of the final stage though the alternate sets of epigenetic trajectories. This paper is aimed to briefly outline historically the main aspects which have led to define the mechanisms of cellular plasticity, highlighting the chief empirical facts supporting it and the related still unresolved problematic issues.

Overcoming the limits of natural computation in biological evolution toward the maximization of system efficiency

The goal-directedness of biological evolution is realized via the anticipatory achievement of the final state of the system that corresponds to the condition of its perfection in self-maintenance and in adaptability. In the course of individual development, a biological system maximizes its power via synergistic effects and becomes able to perform external work most efficiently. In this state, defined as stasis, robust self-maintaining configurations act as attractors resistant to external and internal perturbations. This corresponds to the local energy–time constraints that most efficiently fit the integral optimization of the whole system. In evolution, major evolutionary transitions that establish new states of stasis are achieved via codepoiesis, a process in which the undecided statements of existing coding systems form the basis for the evolutionary unfolding of the system by assigning new values to them. The genetic fixation of this macroevolutionary process leads to new programmes of individual development representing the process of natural computation. The phenomenon of complexification in evolution represents a metasystem transition that results in maximization of a system’s power and in the ability to increase external work performed by the system.