Most patients undergoing phaeochromocytoma removal could be safely discharged from the post-anaesthesia care unit to the ward after three hours monitoring

Surgery for phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas: Current practice in the United Kingdom

INTRODUCTION

There is wide variability in the perioperative management of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) in different centres. This study aimed to summarise the management of PPGLs as reported in the United Kingdom Registry for Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery (UKRETS) database and to determine current perioperative management of PPGLs by surveying UK clinicians.

METHODS

Data recorded on UKRETS from 2005 to 2021 were subjected to descriptive analyses. British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons members were invited to participate in an open survey relating to the perioperative management of patients with PPGLs.

RESULTS

A total of 2,007 operations for PPGL from 49 participating centres were included. The median annual workload in each centre was four cases. Operations were performed predominantly laparoscopically (69%). The median length of stay (4 days) was the same in groups of surgeons stratified by volume. The survey had 29 respondents from 22 centres across the UK, and a formal protocol for perioperative management exists in 48% of the centres. Phenoxybenzamine (72%) was preferred for alpha-blockade. The practice of admitting patients for optimisation from 1 to 7 days before the day of surgery was common (62%). Central venous pressure and blood glucose monitoring were mentioned as routine intraoperative adjuncts by 72% of the responders.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variation in the workload and perioperative management of PPGLs in the UK. This is potentially detrimental to patient outcomes and a consensus document might be beneficial to harmonise practice across the UK.

Perioperative outcomes of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma surgery preceded by Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas can induce severe cardiovascular manifestations such as Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy. What the perioperative outcomes are of patients presenting with pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas preceded by Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy remains an unresolved question.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2019, all patients who underwent surgery for pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas preceded by Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy were included from 3 high-volume centers, with specific attention to perioperative hemodynamic instability and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 37 patients were included, with a median age of 45 years. Patients were operated on 2 months (1-4) after a Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy episode; 33 (89%) had a laparoscopic approach. All those who underwent surgery presented in a hemodynamically stable situation. All except 1 of the pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas patients had at least 1 antihypertensive treatment at the time of surgery. The median preoperative systolic blood pressure in the Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy group was 120 mm Hg (95-132). Overall, 27/34 (79%) of patients required vasoactive drugs during surgery with nicardipine (n = 22), esmolol (n = 12), and/or norepinephrine (n = 8). No patient presented a catecholamine-induced life-threatening complication such as hypertensive crisis, cardiac arrhythmias, pulmonary edema, cardiac ischemia, or Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy in the perioperative period. Severe morbi-mortality was nil. The systematic review identified 5 studies including 38 pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas patients with at least 1 episode of acute heart failure considered as Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy before surgery, of which 28 patients had delayed surgery with 1 postoperative death.

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamically stabilized patients with pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas preceded by Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy can be safely scheduled for an elective pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas surgery, with similar intra and postoperative outcomes as those without Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy.

Incidence, risk factors and clinical significance of postoperative haemodynamic instability after adrenalectomy for phaeochromocytoma

Background

Due to risk of haemodynamic instability (HDI), it has been recommended that patients undergoing adrenalectomy for phaeochromocytoma should be monitored in an intensive care facility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of postoperative HDI in these patients. Retrospective cohort study of 46 consecutive patients who underwent open (OA, N=26) or laparoscopic (LA, N=20) adrenalectomy for phaeochromocytoma at a single centre [2007-2017].

Methods

HDI was defined as systolic BP >200 or <90 mmHg, heart rate >120 or <50 bpm or vasopressor therapy within 24 hours. Risk factors for intraoperative and postoperative HDI were evaluated by univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results

Intraoperative hypertension occurred in 25/42 patients (60%). Preoperative plasma normetanephrine levels ≥3,500 pmol/L were significantly associated with intraoperative hypertension on multivariable analysis [odds ratio (OR) 42; 95% CI: 4-429; P=0.002). Postoperative hypotension occurred in 21/45 patients (47%), and 13 (29%) required vasopressor therapy. Preoperative beta-blockade therapy was the only independent risk factor for postoperative hypotension on multivariable analysis (OR 4.0; 95% CI: 1.2-13.9, P=0.029). No patients (0/9) with tumours <5 cm treated by LA needed postoperative vasopressor therapy, compared to 39% (7/18) treated by OA (P=0.059). Complications developed in 9 patients (20%), and were less likely in those with intraoperative hypertension (8% vs. 41%; P=0.019). There was one postoperative death.

Conclusions

Preoperative beta-blockade therapy is an independent risk factor for postoperative HDI after adrenalectomy for phaeochromocytoma. Patients who undergo laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for phaeochromocytomas <5 cm are unlikely to need postoperative vasopressor therapy, and may not require intensive care monitoring.

The determination of real fluid requirements in laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma using minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: a prospectively designed trial

Background

Hemodynamic instability is frequently observed during adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma (PCC). Guidelines recommend liberal preoperative volume administration. However, it is unclear whether fluid deficiency or vasoplegia causes shifting hemodynamics and whether minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring with esophageal Doppler (EDM) can help visualize intraoperative changes avoiding volume overload and complications.

Methods

Ten patients with biochemically verified PCC and five patients with hormonally inactive adrenal tumors (HIAT; control group) were treated following a strict protocol. During laparoscopic adrenalectomy, goal-directed fluid therapy was performed using EDM. Hemodynamic and biochemical data were documented. The primary outcome variables were fluid requirement and hemodynamic parameters.

Results

Applying EDM, total intraoperative fluid administration was slightly higher in PCC patients than in patients with HIAT (2100 ± 516 vs. 1550 ± 622 ml, p = 0.097; 12.9 ± 4.8 vs. 8.3 ± 0.7 ml kg⁻¹ h⁻¹, p = 0.014). Hemodynamics varied considerably within the PCC group and was associated with type and level of secreted catecholamines. Arterial blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance index reached their minimum in the 10-min period after resection of PCC. Without liberal fluid administration, an increase in cardiac index was observed in both groups comparing baseline measurements to end of surgery. This increase was statistically significant only in PCC patients (PCC: 2.31 vs. 3.15 l min⁻¹ m⁻², p = 0.005; HIAT: 2.08 vs. 2.56 l min⁻¹ m⁻², p = 0.225).

Conclusions

As vasoplegia, but not hypovolemia, was documented after tumor resection, there is no evidence that PCC patients profit from liberal fluid administration during laparoscopic adrenalectomy. To avoid volume overload, noninvasive techniques such as EDM should be routinely used to visualize the variable intraoperative course.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01425710.