Reversal of dabigatran by intraosseous or intravenous idarucizumab in a porcine polytrauma model

The Use of Large Animal Models in Trauma and Bleeding Studies

BACKGROUND

 Major trauma often results in significant bleeding and coagulopathy, posing a substantial clinical burden. To understand the underlying pathophysiology and to refine clinical strategies to overcome coagulopathy, preclinical large animal models are often used. This review scrutinizes the clinical relevance of large animal models in hemostasis research, emphasizing challenges in translating findings into clinical therapies.

METHODS

 We conducted a thorough search of PubMed and EMBASE databases from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2022. We used specific keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria centered on large animal models.

RESULTS

 Our review analyzed 84 pertinent articles, including four animal species: pigs, sheep, dogs, and nonhuman primates (NHPs). Eighty-five percent of the studies predominantly utilized porcine models. Meanwhile, sheep and dogs were less represented, making up only 2.5% of the total studies. Models with NHP were 10%. The most frequently used trauma models involved a combination of liver injury and femur fractures (eight studies), arterial hemorrhage (seven studies), and a combination of hemodilution and liver injury (seven studies). A wide array of coagulation parameters were employed to assess the efficacy of interventions in hemostasis and bleeding control.

CONCLUSIONS

 Recognizing the diverse strengths and weaknesses of large animal models is critical for trauma and hemorrhage research. Each model is unique and should be chosen based on how well it aligns with the specific scientific objectives of the study. By strategically considering each model's advantages and limitations, we can enhance our understanding of trauma and hemorrhage pathophysiology and further advance the development of effective treatments.

"In Less than No Time": Feasibility of Rotational Thromboelastometry to Detect Anticoagulant Drugs Activity and to Guide Reversal Therapy

Anticoagulant drugs (i.e., unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, vitamin K antagonists, and direct oral anticoagulants) are widely employed in preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE), in preventing arterial thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and in treating acute coronary diseases early. In certain situations, such as bleeding, urgent invasive procedures, and surgical settings, the evaluation of anticoagulant levels and the monitoring of reversal therapy appear essential. Standard coagulation tests (i.e., activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT)) can be normal, and the turnaround time can be long. While the role of viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs), such as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), has successfully increased over the years in the management of bleeding and thrombotic complications, its usefulness in detecting anticoagulants and their reversal still appears unclear.

ROTEM Testing for Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used worldwide for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and to prevent or treat venous thromboembolism. In situations such as serious bleeding, the need for urgent surgery/intervention or the management of a thromboembolic event, the laboratory measurement of DOACs levels or anticoagulant activity may be required. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a viscoelastic hemostatic assay (VHA) which has been used in emergencies (trauma and obstetrics), and surgical procedures (cardiac surgery and liver transplants), but experience with this assay in DOACs-treated patients is still limited. This article reviews the use of ROTEM in the setting of DOACs therapy, focusing on DOACs-associated bleeding and the use of this VHA for the management of reversal strategies for DOACs-associated anticoagulation.

Specific Point-of-Care Testing of Coagulation in Patients Treated with Dabigatran

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 Accurate and rapid assessment of coagulation status is necessary to guide thrombolysis or reversal of anticoagulation in stroke patients, but commercially available point-of-care (POC) assays are not suited for coagulation testing in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed to evaluate the direct thrombin monitoring (DTM) test card by Helena Laboratories (Texas, United States) for anti-IIa-specific POC coagulation testing, hypothesizing that its POC-ecarin clotting time (POC-ECT) accurately reflects dabigatran plasma concentrations.

METHODS

 A prospective single-center diagnostic study (ClinicalTrials.gov-identifier: NCT02825394) was conducted enrolling patients receiving a first dose of dabigatran and patients already on dabigatran treatment. Blood samples were collected before drug intake and 0.5, 1, 2, 8, and 12 hours after intake. POC-ECT was performed using whole blood (WB), citrated blood (CB), and citrated plasma (CP). Dabigatran plasma concentrations were determined by mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

 In total, 240 blood samples from 40 patients contained 0 to 275 ng/mL of dabigatran. POC-ECT with WB/CB/CP ranged from 20 to 186/184/316 seconds. Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a strong correlation between dabigatran concentrations and POC-ECT with WB/CB/CP (R2  = 0.78/0.90/0.92). Dabigatran concentrations >30 and >50 ng/mL (thresholds for thrombolysis, surgery, and reversal therapy according to clinical guidelines) were detected by POC-ECT with WB/CB/CP (>36/35/45 and >43/45/59 seconds) with 95/97/97 and 96/98/97% sensitivity, and 81/87/94 and 74/60/91% specificity.

CONCLUSION

 This first study evaluating DOAC-specific POC coagulation testing revealed an excellent correlation of POC-ECT with actual dabigatran concentrations. Detecting clinically relevant dabigatran levels with high sensitivity/specificity, the DTM assay represents a suitable diagnostic tool in acute stroke, hemorrhage, and urgent surgery.

Real-time detection and differentiation of direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban and dabigatran) using modified thromboelastometric reagents

INTRODUCTION

Timely measurement of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is challenging, though clinically important. We tested the hypotheses, that thromboelastometry is able to detect dabigatran and rivaroxaban and discriminates between dabigatran and rivaroxaban as representatives of the two groups of DOACs.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a prospective-observational study: In-vitro dose-effect-curves for rivaroxaban and dabigatran were performed (n = 10). Ex-vivo: Patients with indication of DOAC treatment (stroke; dabigatran/rivaroxaban) were included (n = 21). Blood samples were analyzed before first intake, at first estimated peak level and at 24 h after first but before following intake and 3 h after 24 h-intake. Standard and modified thromboelastometric-assays, using low tissue factor concentrations (TFTEM) or ecarin (ECATEM) were used. Receiver-operating-characteristics-curve-analysis (ROC), regression-analysis and two-way-ANOVA were performed.

RESULTS

In-vitro: TFTEM detected dabigatran and rivaroxaban (ROC_AUC: 0.99; sensitivity/specificity: 100%/98%) but could not discriminate. Dabigatran prolongs CT_ECATEM whereas rivaroxaban did not. Clotting Time (CT)-ratio TFTEM/ECATEM discriminated highly sensitive (100%) and specific (100%) between dabigatran and rivaroxaban even at very low concentrations (ROC_AUC:1.0). CT_ECATEM correlated with dabigatran spiked concentrations (r = 0.9985; p < 0.001) and CT_TFTEM (r = 0.9363; p = 0.006) with rivaroxaban. Similarly results could be demonstrated with patient data: We confirmed the performance for the differentiation of CT-ratio TFTEM/ECATEM (sensitivity 100%/specificity 100%) at any time after first intake of either DOAC.

CONCLUSION

The thromboelastometric tests TFTEM and ECATEM detect and differentiate rivaroxaban and dabigatran. Further investigations evaluate the other DOACs and the differentiation to phenprocoumon. However, results need to be confirmed in a larger study, and especially cut off values for differentiation need to be calculated from a larger sample size.

Transient or extended reversal of apixaban anticoagulation by andexanet alfa is equally effective in a porcine polytrauma model

BACKGROUND

Andexanet alfa (andexanet) reverses the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors, but it has not been assessed in clinical studies for apixaban reversal in trauma. This study evaluated andexanet for reversing apixaban anticoagulation in a porcine polytrauma model.

METHODS

Oral apixaban (20 mg q.d., n=21) or placebo (n=7; sham group) was administered to male pigs for 4 days before blunt liver injury and bi-lateral femur fracture. After trauma, animals were randomised 1:1:1 to a single andexanet bolus (1000 mg), a bolus (1000 mg) plus infusion (1200 mg over 2 h), or vehicle (control). Haemodynamic and coagulation variables were monitored for 5 h or until death. The primary endpoint was blood loss.

RESULTS

Mean blood loss in sham animals was 472 (standard deviation, 58) ml 12 min after injury and 658 (98) ml at 300 min, with 100% survival. Anticoagulation with apixaban significantly increased blood loss 12 min after injury [888 (133) ml, P<0.01]. Controls exhibited total blood loss of 3403 (766) ml, with 100% mortality. Andexanet bolus or bolus plus infusion significantly reduced blood loss to 1264 (205) and 1202 (95) ml, respectively), and increased survival to 100%. Haemodynamic parameters and markers of shock recovered to pre-trauma levels in andexanet-treated animals.

CONCLUSION

Andexanet effectively reversed apixaban anticoagulation and reduced blood loss induced by severe trauma. Andexanet bolus alone had a similar impact on survival and blood loss as bolus plus infusion. Therefore, a 2 h andexanet infusion after the bolus may not be necessary to restore normal haemostatic mechanisms.

Comparison of ROTEM parameters from venous and intraosseous blood

Rotational thromboelastometry is recommended to guide haemostatic therapy in trauma-related coagulopathy. In the case of unsuccessful venepuncture, intraosseous access allows immediate administration of drugs and volume replacement. Feasibility of rotational thromboelastometry from intraosseous blood has not yet been investigated in humans. We performed rotational thromboelastometry and standard coagulation assays from intraosseous and intravenous blood samples in 19 volunteers and 4 patients undergoing general anaesthesia. Intraosseous access was performed either at the tibial bone or the proximal humerus. We observed visible clotting in the majority of the intraosseous samples. Only 13% of the probes allowed realization of rotational thromboelastometry. ROTEM parameters are reported as follows: shorter median clotting time (CT) in EXTEM, INTEM, and APTEM (53 vs. 68 s; 140 vs. 154 s; 54 vs. 62.5 s) and smaller median maximal clot firmness (MCF) in EXTEM and APTEM (56 vs. 63 mm; 55 vs. 62 mm) in intraosseous samples. We found no relevant differences in median MCF values in FIBTEM and INTEM (12 vs. 13 mm; 60 vs. 59 mm). Given the difficulties we faced during IO blood sampling in a study setting, we advise against ROTEM measurements out of IO blood for guidance of procoagulant therapy in emergency situations.