Why gender matters in the operating room: recommendations for a research agenda

Association of surgeon-patient sex concordance with postoperative outcomes following complex cancer surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sex concordance may impact the therapeutic relationship and provider-patient interactions. We sought to define the association of surgeon-patient sex concordance on postoperative patient outcomes following complex cancer surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for lung, breast, hepato-pancreato-biliary, or colorectal cancer between 2014 and 2020 were identified from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files. The impact of surgeon-patient sex concordance or discordance on achieving an optimal postoperative textbook outcome (TO) was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 495 628 patients, 241 938 (48.8%) patients were sex concordant with their surgeon while 253 690 (51.2%) patients were sex discordant. Sex discordance between surgeon and patient was associated with a decreased likelihood to achieve a postoperative TO (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.97; p < 0.001). Sex discordance was associated with a higher risk of complications (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.07; p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09; p = 0.011). Of note, male patients treated by female surgeons (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99; p = 0.017) had a similar lower likelihood to achieve a TO as female patients treated by male surgeons (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86-0.93; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex discordance was associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving an "optimal" postoperative course following complex cancer surgery.

Gender Matters: Understanding Transitions in Surgical Education

Introduction

Diverse transitions are elemental to medical career trajectories. The effective navigation of such transitions influences a sense of belonging and wellbeing, positive relationships, and good engagement and attainment within new contexts. Using Multiple and Multidimensional Transitions (MMT) theory as an analytical lens, this paper aims to answer the research question: “What gendered transitions do female surgeons experience, and how do these gendered transitions impact them?”

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study drawing on narrative inquiry, with face-to-face and online semi-structured interviews with 29 female surgeons across nine surgical specialities in Ireland and Scotland. This paper is part of a larger study including male surgeons, other colleagues and patients of female surgeons. The female surgeons in this paper were purposively sampled using maximum variation sampling across several levels (consultants, trainees and middle-grade doctors), as well as six who had transitioned out of surgery. Framework analysis was employed to interrogate the interview data.

Results

Five overarching types of transitions were identified across surgical education but only three of these transitions—work, culture and health—were primarily experienced by female surgeons (not male surgeons so were considered gendered), thereby impacting social, academic, and psychological domains. The remaining two types of transition—education and geography—were seemingly experienced equally by female and male surgeons, so are beyond the scope of this paper focused on female surgeons’ gendered experiences.

Conclusion

This novel qualitative study drawing on MMT theory illustrates how multiple gendered transitions interact and impact female surgeons across the surgical education continuum. Aligned with MMT theory, family members and others are also purportedly affected by female surgeons’ transitions. Healthcare educators, leaders and policymakers need to better understand gendered transitions and their impacts to improve support for female surgical trainees on their educational journeys.

Factors influencing sustainability and scale-up of rural primary healthcare memory clinics: perspectives of clinic team members

Background

The aging of rural populations contributes to growing numbers of people with dementia in rural areas. Despite the key role of primary healthcare in rural settings there is limited research on effective models for dementia care, or evidence on sustaining and scaling them. The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing sustainability and scale-up of rural primary care based memory clinics from the perspective of healthcare providers involved in their design and delivery.

Methods

Participants were members of four interdisciplinary rural memory clinic teams in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan. A qualitative cross-sectional and retrospective study design was conducted. Data were collected via 6 focus groups (n = 40) and 16 workgroup meetings held with teams over 1 year post-implementation (n = 100). An inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes.

Results

Eleven themes were identified (five that influenced both sustainability and scale-up, three related to sustainability, and three related to scale-up), encompassing team, organizational, and intervention-based factors. Factors that influenced both sustainability and scale-up were positive outcomes for patients and families, access to well-developed clinic processes and tools, a confident clinic leader-champion, facilitation by local facilitators and the researchers, and organizational and leadership support. Study findings revealed the importance of particular factors in the rural context, including facilitation to support team activities, a proven ready-to-use model, continuity of team members, and mentoring.

Conclusions

Interdisciplinary models of dementia care are feasible in rural settings if the right conditions and supports are maintained. Team-based factors were key to sustaining and scaling the innovation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07550-0.

Impact of physician's sex/gender on processes of care, and clinical outcomes in cardiac operative care: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to assess the role of physician's sex and gender in relation to processes of care and/or clinical outcomes within the context of cardiac operative care.

DESIGN

A systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted in PsycINFO, Embase and Medline from inception to 6 September 2018. The reference lists of relevant systematic reviews and included studies were also searched.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Quantitative studies of any design were included if they were published in English or French, involved patients of any age undergoing a cardiac surgical procedure and specifically assessed differences in processes of care or clinical patient outcomes by physician's sex or gender. Studies were screened in duplicate by two pairs of independent reviewers.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Processes of care, patient morbidity and patient mortality.

RESULTS

The search yielded 2095 publications after duplicate removal, of which two were ultimately included. These studies involved various types of surgery, including cardiac. One study found that patients treated by female surgeons compared with male surgeons had a lower 30-day mortality. The other study, however, found no differences in patient outcomes by surgeon's sex. There were no studies that investigated anaesthesiologist's sex/gender. There were also no studies investing physician's sex or gender exclusively in the cardiac operating room.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited data surrounding the impact of physician's sex/gender on the outcomes of cardiac surgery inhibits drawing a robust conclusion at this time. Results highlight the need for primary research to determine how these factors may influence cardiac operative practice, in order to optimise provider's performance and improve outcomes in this high-risk patient group.

Sex/gender and additional equity characteristics of providers and patients in perioperative anesthesia trials: a cross-sectional analysis of the literature

Sex and gender, among other equity-related characteristics, influence the process of care and patients’ outcomes. Currently, the extent to which these characteristics are considered in the anesthesia literature remains unknown. This study assesses their incorporation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on anesthesia-related interventions, for both patients and healthcare providers. This is a cross-sectional analysis using an existing dataset derived from the anesthesia literature. The dataset originated from a scoping review searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews. RCTs investigating the effect of anesthesia-related interventions on mortality for adults undergoing surgery were included. Equity outcome measures were recorded for both patients and providers and assessed for inclusion in the study design, reporting of results, and analysis of intervention effects. Three-hundred sixty-one RCTs (n = 144,674) were included. Most RCTs (91%) reported patient sex/gender, with 58% of patients identified as male. There were 139 studies (39%), where 70% or more of the sample was male, compared to just 14 studies (4%), where 70% or more of the sample was female. Only 10 studies (3%) analyzed results by patient sex/gender, with one reporting a significant effect. There was substantial variation in how age was reported, although nearly all studies (98%) reported some measure of age. For healthcare providers, equity-related information was never available. Better consideration of sex/gender and additional health equity parameters for both patients and providers in RCTs is needed to improve evidence quality, and ultimately, patient care and outcome.