1
|
Ebo DG, Bahri R, Tontini C, Van Gasse AL, Mertens C, Hagendorens MM, Sabato V, Elst J. Mast cell versus basophil activation test in allergy: Current status. Clin Exp Allergy 2024; 54:378-387. [PMID: 38686464 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
In the past two decades, we witnessed the evolution of the basophil activation test (BAT) from mainly research applications to a potential complementary diagnostic tool to document IgE-dependent allergies. However, BAT presents some technical weaknesses. Around 10%-15% of tested patients are non-responders, BAT can be negative immediately post-reaction and the use of fresh basophils, ideally analysed within 4 h of collection, restricts the number of tests that can be performed per sample. The need for fresh basophils is especially limiting when conducting batch analyses and interlaboratory comparisons to harmonize BAT methodology. These limitations significantly hinder the wider application of BAT and urge the development of alternative testing, such as the mast cell activation test (MAT). The essential difference between BAT and MAT is the heterogeneity of the starting material used to perform the assays. Mast cells are tissue-resident, so cannot be easily accessed. Current alternative sources for functional studies are generating primary human mast cells, differentiated from donor progenitor cells, or using immortalized mast cell lines. Hence, the methodological approaches for MAT are not only vastly different from BAT, but also different among MAT protocols. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of BAT and MAT assays, dedicating special attention to elucidating the key differences between the cellular sources used and provides an overview of studies hitherto performed comparing BAT and MAT in the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food and drug allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didier G Ebo
- Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital and Infla-Med Centre of Excellence Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Immunology - Allergology AZ Jan Palfijn, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rajia Bahri
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, Division of Musculo-skeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Core Technology Facility, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chiara Tontini
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, Division of Musculo-skeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Core Technology Facility, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Athina L Van Gasse
- Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital and Infla-Med Centre of Excellence Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital and Infla-Med Centre of Excellence Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Christel Mertens
- Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital and Infla-Med Centre of Excellence Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Margo M Hagendorens
- Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital and Infla-Med Centre of Excellence Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital and Infla-Med Centre of Excellence Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Vito Sabato
- Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital and Infla-Med Centre of Excellence Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Jessy Elst
- Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital and Infla-Med Centre of Excellence Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elst J, Van Houdt M, van der Poorten MLM, Van Gasse AL, Mertens C, Toscano A, Beyens M, De Boeck E, Sabato V, Ebo DG. Comparison of the passive mast cell activation test with the basophil activation test for diagnosis of perioperative rocuronium hypersensitivity. Br J Anaesth 2024; 132:483-490. [PMID: 37031026 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rocuronium is a major cause of perioperative hypersensitivity (POH). Skin tests (STs) and quantification of specific immunoglobulin E antibodies (sIgEs) can yield incongruent results. In such difficult cases, the basophil activation test (BAT) can be helpful. Here, we evaluated the passive mast cell activation test (pMAT) as a substitute of BAT as part of the diagnostic tests for rocuronium allergy. METHODS Sera from patients with a suspected POH reaction potentially related to rocuronium were included. All patients had a complete diagnostic investigation, including STs, quantification of sIgEs to morphine and rocuronium, and BAT. For execution of pMAT, human mast cells were generated from healthy donor peripheral blood CD34+ progenitor cells and sensitised overnight with patient sera. RESULTS In total, 90 sera were studied: 41 from ST+sIgE+ patients, 13 from ST-sIgE- patients, 20 from ST+sIgE- patients, and 16 from ST-sIgE+ patients. According to BAT results, patients were further allocated into subgroups. Of the 38 BAT+ patients, 25 (66%) showed a positive pMAT as well. Of the 44 BAT- patients, 43 (98%) also showed a negative pMAT. Mast cells that were not passively sensitised did not respond to rocuronium. CONCLUSIONS We show that the pMAT, in many cases, can substitute for BAT in the diagnosis of rocuronium hypersensitivity and advance diagnosis in difficult cases with uncertain ST or sIgE results when BAT is not locally available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessy Elst
- Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Michel Van Houdt
- Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marie-Line M van der Poorten
- Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Paediatrics and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Paediatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Athina L Van Gasse
- Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Paediatrics and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Paediatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Christel Mertens
- Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Toscano
- Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Michiel Beyens
- Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Evelien De Boeck
- Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vito Sabato
- Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Immunology and Allergology, AZ Jan Palfijn Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Didier G Ebo
- Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology and the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Immunology and Allergology, AZ Jan Palfijn Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|