Desflurane and sevoflurane differentially affect activity of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease

Differential effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on frontal intraoperative electroencephalogram dynamics associated with postoperative delirium

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns associated with postoperative delirium (POD) development have been studied, but the differences in EEG recordings between sevoflurane- and desflurane-induced anesthesia have not been clarified. We aimed to distinguish the EEG characteristics of sevoflurane and desflurane in relation to POD development.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

We collected frontal four-channel EEG data during the maintenance of anesthesia from 148 elderly patients who received sevoflurane (n = 77) or desflurane (n = 71); 30 patients were diagnosed with delirium postoperatively. The patients were divided into four subgroups based on anesthetics and delirium status: sevoflurane delirium (n = 17), sevoflurane non-delirium (n = 60), desflurane delirium (n = 13), and desflurane non-delirium (n = 58). We compared spectral power, coherence, and pairwise phase consistency (PPC) between sevoflurane and desflurane, and between non-delirium and delirium groups for each anesthetic.

MAIN RESULTS

In patients without POD, the sevoflurane non-delirium group exhibited higher EEG spectral power across 8.5-35 Hz (99.5% CI bootstrap analysis) and higher PPC from alpha to gamma bands (p < 0.005) compared to the desflurane non-delirium group. Conversely, in patients with POD, no significant EEG differences were observed between the sevoflurane and desflurane delirium groups. For the sevoflurane-induced patients, the sevoflurane delirium group had significantly lower power within 7.5-31.5 Hz (99.5% CI bootstrap analysis), reduced coherence over 8.9-23.8 Hz (99.5% CI bootstrap analysis), and lower PPC values in the alpha band (p < 0.005) compared with the sevoflurane non-delirium group. For the desflurane-induced patients, there were no significant differences in the EEG patterns between delirium and non-delirium groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In normal patients without POD, sevoflurane demonstrates a higher power spectrum and prefrontal connectivity than desflurane. Furthermore, reduced frontal alpha power, coherence, and connectivity of intraoperative EEG could be associated with an increased risk of POD. These intraoperative EEG characteristics associated with POD are more noticeable in sevoflurane-induced anesthesia than in desflurane-induced anesthesia.

A Technique of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus Interna for Dystonia Under General Anesthesia With Sevoflurane

Background Globus pallidus interna (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established surgical procedure that confers a benefit in medication refractory dystonia. Patients with generalized dystonia require general anesthesia (GA) for the surgery as their movements may hinder the surgical procedure. General anesthetics tend to dampen the microelectrode recordings (MERs) from the GPi. Methods We describe our experience with a series of consecutive patients with dystonia who underwent bilateral GPi DBS using standard DBS and MER under GA using sevoflurane as the maintenance general anesthetic drug. All patients had Medtronic 3,387 leads implanted and connected to an RC battery. Patients underwent sequential programming of the DBS after the surgery. Results The mean age of the 13 patients who underwent DBS of the GPi for dystonia was 46.5 years with a range from 29 to 71 years. Every patient in our case series received various doses of (1.37% to 2.11%) inhaled sevoflurane for anesthesia maintenance. Sevoflurane provided adequate anesthesia and allowed accurate MERs from the GPi. No adverse effects were encountered. On follow-up and sequential DBS programming, patients had significant improvements in dystonia attesting to the accuracy of the electrode placements. Conclusions We report our experience using sevoflurane for maintenance of GA for bilateral GPi DBS for dystonia. The main benefits identified have been adequate anesthesia and reduction of dystonia-related movements to allow the performance of the DBS surgery. The MER signals from the GPi were not suppressed by sevoflurane. This allowed accurate mapping and placement of the DBS implants in the GPi.

β Oscillations of Dorsal STN as a Potential Biomarker in Parkinson's Disease Motor Subtypes: An Exploratory Study

Parkinson's disease (PD) can be divided into postural instability and difficult gait (PIGD) and tremor dominance (TD) subtypes. However, potential neural markers located in the dorsal ventral side of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for delineating the two subtypes of PIGD and TD have not been demonstrated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the spectral characteristics of PD on the dorsal ventral side. The differences in the β oscillation spectrum of the spike signal on the dorsal and ventral sides of the STN during deep brain stimulation (DBS) were investigated in 23 patients with PD, and coherence analysis was performed for both subtypes. Finally, each feature was associated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). The β power spectral density (PSD) in the dorsal STN was found to be the best predictor of the PD subtype, with 82.6% accuracy. The PSD of dorsal STN β oscillations was greater in the PIGD group than in the TD group (22.17% vs. 18.22%; p < 0.001). Compared with the PIGD group, the TD group showed greater consistency in the β and γ bands. In conclusion, dorsal STN β oscillations could be used as a biomarker to classify PIGD and TD subtypes, guide STN-DBS treatment, and relate to some motor symptoms.

Median Nerve Stimulation Facilitates the Identification of Somatotopy of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson’s Disease Patients under Inhalational Anesthesia

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves Parkinson’s disease (PD) symptoms by suppressing neuropathological oscillations. These oscillations are also modulated by inhalational anesthetics used during DBS surgery in some patients, influencing electrode placement accuracy. We sought to evaluate a method that could avoid these effects. We recorded subthalamic nucleus (STN) neuronal firings in 11 PD patients undergoing DBS under inhalational anesthesia. Microelectrode recording (MER) during DBS was collected under median nerve stimulation (MNS) delivered at 5, 20, and 90 Hz frequencies and without MNS. We analyzed the spike firing rate and neuronal activity with power spectral density (PSD), and assessed correlations between the neuronal oscillation parameters and clinical motor outcomes. No patient experienced adverse effects during or after DBS surgery. PSD analysis revealed that peripheral 20 Hz MNS produced significant differences in the dorsal and ventral subthalamic nucleus (STN) between the beta band oscillation (16.9 ± 7.0% versus 13.5 ± 4.8%, respectively) and gamma band oscillation (56.0 ± 13.7% versus 66.3 ± 9.4%, respectively) (p < 0.05). Moreover, 20-Hz MNS entrained neural oscillation over the dorsal STN, which correlated positively with motor disabilities. MNS allowed localization of the sensorimotor STN and identified neural characteristics under inhalational anesthesia. This paradigm may help identify an alternative method to facilitate STN identification and DBS surgery under inhalational anesthesia.

Anesthesia for deep brain stimulation: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a rapidly expanding surgical modality for the treatment of patients with movement disorders. Its ability to be adjusted, titrated, and optimized over time has given it a significant advantage over traditional more invasive surgical procedures. Therefore, the success and popularity of this procedure have led to the discovery of new indications and therapeutic targets as well as advances in surgical techniques. The aim of this review is to highlight the important updates in DBS surgery and to exam the anesthesiologist's role in providing optimal clinical management.

RECENT FINDINGS

New therapeutic indications have a significant implication on perioperative anesthesia management. In addition, new technologies like frameless stereotaxy and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to guide electrode placement have altered the need for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and hence increased the use of general anesthesia. With an expanding number of patients undergoing DBS implantation, patients with preexisting DBS increasingly require anesthesia for unrelated surgery and the anesthesiologist must be aware of the considerations for perioperative management of these devices and potential complications.

SUMMARY

DBS will continue to grow and evolve requiring adaptation and modification to the anesthetic management of these patients.