1
|
Blacker SN, Woody N, Abate Shiferaw A, Burbridge M, Bustillo MA, Hazard SW, Heller BJ, Lamperti M, Mejia-Mantilla J, Nadler JW, Rath GP, Robba C, Vincent A, Admasu AK, Awraris M, Lele AV. Differences in Perioperative Management of Patients Undergoing Complex Spine Surgery: A Global Perspective. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2024; 36:218-227. [PMID: 37192477 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this survey was to understand institutional spine surgery practices and their concordance with published best practices/recommendations. METHODS Using a global internet-based survey examining perioperative spine surgery practice, reported institutional spine pathway elements (n=139) were compared with the level of evidence published in guideline recommendations. The concordance of clinical practice with guidelines was categorized as poor (≤20%), fair (21%-40%), moderate (41%-60%), good (61%-80%), or very good (81%-100%). RESULTS Seventy-two of 409 (17.6%) institutional contacts started the survey, of which 31 (7.6%) completed the survey. Six (19.4%) of the completed surveys were from respondents in low/middle-income countries, and 25 (80.6%) were from respondents in high-income countries. Forty-one incomplete surveys were not included in the final analysis, as most were less than 40% complete. Five of 139 (3.6%) reported elements had very good concordance for the entire cohort; hospitals with spine surgery pathways reported 18 elements with very good concordance, whereas institutions without spine surgery pathways reported only 1 element with very good concordance. Reported spine pathways included between 7 and 47 separate pathway elements. There were 87 unique elements in the reviewed pathways. Only 3 of 87 (3.4%) elements with high-quality evidence demonstrated very good practice concordance. CONCLUSIONS This global survey-based study identified practice variation and low adoption rates of high-quality evidence in the care of patients undergoing complex spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel N Blacker
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Nathan Woody
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Mark Burbridge
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Management, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Maria A Bustillo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY
| | - Sprague W Hazard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Penn State Health, PA
| | - Benjamin J Heller
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Massimo Lamperti
- Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Jorge Mejia-Mantilla
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Jacob W Nadler
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | | | - Chiara Robba
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | | | - Azarias K Admasu
- Department of Neurology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Meron Awraris
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fundación Valle Del Lili, Cali, Colombia
| | - Abhijit V Lele
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muthu S, Viswanathan VK, Annamalai S, Thabrez M. Bilateral erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant updated systematic review & meta-analysis. World Neurosurg X 2024; 23:100360. [PMID: 38511162 PMCID: PMC10950749 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Study design Systematic review. Objective Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is growing in popularity over the recent past as an adjuvant modality in multimodal analgesic management following lumbar spine surgery (LSS). The current updated meta-analysis was performed to analyze the efficacy of ESPB for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing LSS. Methods We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library till June 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing the efficacy of bilateral ESPB for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgeries. Post-operative pain scores, total analgesic consumption, first analgesic requirement time, length of stay and complications were the outcomes evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 17 software. Results 32 RCTs including 1464 patients (ESPB/Control = 1077/1069) were included in the analysis. There was a significant pain relief in ESPB group, as compared to placebo across all timelines such as during immediate post-operative period (p < 0.001), 4 h (p < 0.001), 8 h (p < 0.001), 12 h (p < 0.001), 24 h (p = 0.001) post-surgery. Similarly, ESPB group showed a significant reduction in analgesic requirement at 8 h (p < 0.001), 12 h (p = 0.001), and 24 h (p < 0.001). However, no difference was noted in the first analgesic requirement time, time to ambulate or total length of stay in the hospital. ESPB demonstrated significantly improved overall satisfaction score for the analgesic management (p < 0.001), reduced intensive care stay (p < 0.05) with significantly reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting (p < 0.001) compared to controls. Conclusion ESPB offers prolonged post-operative pain relief compared to controls, thereby reducing the need for opioid consumption and its related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sathish Muthu
- Orthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore, India
- Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, India
- Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Karur, India
| | - Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan
- Orthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore, India
- Department of Orthopaedics, Devadoss Multispecialty Hospital, Madurai, India
| | | | - Mohammed Thabrez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Aster Medcity Hospital, Kochi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jolly S, Paliwal S, Gadepalli A, Chaudhary S, Bhagat H, Avitsian R. Designing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Neurosurgery: A Contemporary Narrative Review. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2024; 36:201-210. [PMID: 38011868 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized the approach to perioperative care in various surgical specialties. They reduce complications, improve patient outcomes, and shorten hospital lengths of stay. Implementation of ERAS protocols for neurosurgical procedures has been relatively underexplored and underutilized due to the unique challenges and complexities of neurosurgery. This narrative review explores the barriers to, and pioneering strategies of, standardized procedure-specific ERAS protocols, and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in neurosurgery and neuroanesthsia, patient-centered approaches, and continuous quality improvement initiatives, to achieve better patient outcomes. It also discusses initiatives to guide future clinical practice, research, and guideline creation, to foster the development of tailored ERAS protocols in neurosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sagar Jolly
- Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, OH
| | | | - Aditya Gadepalli
- Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sheena Chaudhary
- Department of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, HR, India
| | - Hemant Bhagat
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rafi Avitsian
- Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, OH
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bendinelli C, D'Angelo M, Leonardi F, Verdier N, Cozzi F, Lombardo R, Portela DA. Erector spinae plane block in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Vet Anaesth Analg 2024; 51:279-287. [PMID: 38553382 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the perioperative cumulative opioid consumption and the incidence of cardiovascular complications in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy in which either an erector spinae plane (ESP) block or systemic opioids were administered. STUDY DESIGN Prospective randomized clinical trial. ANIMALS A total of 60 client-owned dogs. METHODS Dogs were randomized to one of three groups: an ESP block (group ESP), a constant rate infusion of fentanyl (group FNT, positive control) or a single dose of methadone as premedication (group MTD, negative control). Intraoperative nociceptive response was treated with fentanyl [1 μg kg-1, intravenously (IV)] boli. Before closure of the surgical site, morphine (0.1 mg kg-1) was applied to the dura mater. The cumulative dose of opioids was recorded and compared between groups. The incidence of intraoperative bradycardia and/or hypotension and the time to extubation were compared between groups. The short form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (SF-GCPS) was used to score nociception before anaesthetic induction and 1, 2, 6, 12,18 and 24 hours postoperatively. Methadone 0.2 mg kg-1 was administered IV if the SF-GCPS score was ≥ 5. RESULTS Group MTD required more intraoperative rescue analgesia than groups ESP (p = 0.008) and FNT (p = 0.001). The total cumulative intraoperative dose of fentanyl was higher in groups FNT (p < 0.0001) and MTD (p = 0.002) than in group ESP. The incidence of cardiovascular complications was similar between groups. Extubation time was longer in group MTD (p = 0.03). Postoperatively, the time to first rescue analgesia was longer in group ESP than in group MTD (p = 0.03). The cumulative postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The ESP block resulted in a reduced intraoperative opioid consumption compared with the control positive and negative groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marianna D'Angelo
- Clinica Veterinaria NVA (Neurologi Veterinari Associati), MIlan, Italy
| | - Fabio Leonardi
- Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Natali Verdier
- Clinical Unit of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive-Care Medicine, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesca Cozzi
- Clinica Veterinaria NVA (Neurologi Veterinari Associati), MIlan, Italy
| | - Rocco Lombardo
- Clinica Veterinaria NVA (Neurologi Veterinari Associati), MIlan, Italy
| | - Diego A Portela
- Department of Comparative, Diagnostic, and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nunn KP, Velazquez AA, Bebawy JF, Ma K, Sinedino BE, Goel A, Pereira SM. Perioperative Methadone for Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2024:00008506-990000000-00106. [PMID: 38624227 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Complex spine surgery is associated with significant acute postoperative pain. Methadone possesses pharmacological properties that make it an attractive analgesic modality for major surgeries. This scoping review aimed to summarize the evidence for the perioperative use of methadone in adults undergoing complex spine surgery. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A search was performed using MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Joanna Briggs between January 1946 and April 2023. The initial search identified 317 citations, of which 12 met the criteria for inclusion in the review. There was significant heterogeneity in the doses, routes of administration, and timing of perioperative methadone administration in the included studies. On the basis of the available literature, methadone has been associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and reduced postoperative opioid consumption. Though safety concerns have been raised by observational studies, these have not been confirmed by prospective randomized studies. Further research is required to explore optimal methadone dosing regimens, the potential synergistic relationships between methadone and other pharmacological adjuncts, as well as the potential long-term antinociceptive benefits of perioperative methadone administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran P Nunn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ahida A Velazquez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John F Bebawy
- Anesthesiology & Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Kan Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bruno Erick Sinedino
- Discipline of Anesthesiology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Akash Goel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sergio M Pereira
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abouarab AH, Brülle R, Aboukilila MY, Weibel S, Schnabel A. Efficacy and safety of perioperative ketamine for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: A meta-analysis. Pain Pract 2024; 24:553-566. [PMID: 37971167 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Assessment of the efficacy and safety of perioperative intravenous ketamine in reducing incidence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES The following data sources were systematically searched: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE (till 02/2021). PATIENTS Adult patients undergoing any surgery. INTERVENTIONS Perioperative use of intravenous ketamine as an additive analgesic drug compared to placebo, no active control treatment, and other additive drugs. MEASUREMENTS Primary outcomes were number of patients with chronic postsurgical pain after 6 months and ketamine related adverse effects. Secondary outcomes were chronic postsurgical pain incidence after 3 and 12 months, chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain incidence, chronic postsurgical moderate to severe pain incidence, intensity of chronic postsurgical pain at rest, and during movement, oral morphine consumption after 3, 6, and 12 months and incidence of opioid-related adverse effects. MAIN RESULTS Thirty-six RCTs were included with a total of 3572 patients. Ketamine compared to placebo may result in no difference in the number of patients with chronic postsurgical pain after 6 months (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.05; I2 = 34%; 16 studies; low-certainty evidence). Ketamine may reduce the incidence of chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain after 3 months in comparison to placebo (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99, I2 = 31%, seven trials, low-certainty evidence). Ketamine compared to placebo may increase the risk for postoperative nystagmus (RR 9.04, 95% CI 1.15-70.90, I2 30%, two trials, low-certainty evidence) and postoperative visual disturbances (RR 2.29, 95% CI 1.05-4.99, I2 10%, seven trials, low-certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS There is low-certainty evidence that perioperative ketamine has no effect on chronic postsurgical pain in adult patients. Low-certainty evidence suggests that ketamine compared to placebo may reduce incidence of chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain after 3 months. Questions like ideal dosing, treatment duration and more patient-related outcome measures remain unanswered, which warrants further studies. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION Prospero CRD42021223625, 07.01.2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed H Abouarab
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Rebecca Brülle
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | | | - Stephanie Weibel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Schnabel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bao R, Zhang WS, Zha YF, Zhao ZZ, Huang J, Li JL, Wang T, Guo Y, Bian JJ, Wang JF. Effects of opioid-free anaesthesia compared with balanced general anaesthesia on nausea and vomiting after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079544. [PMID: 38431299 PMCID: PMC10910406 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) has emerged as a promising approach for mitigating the adverse effects associated with opioids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of OFA on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following video-assisted thoracic surgery. DESIGN Single-centre randomised controlled trial. SETTING Tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. PARTICIPANTS Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery were recruited from September 2021 to June 2022. INTERVENTION Patients were randomly allocated to OFA or traditional general anaesthesia with a 1:1 allocation ratio. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the incidence of PONV within 48 hours post-surgery, and the secondary outcomes included PONV severity, postoperative pain, haemodynamic changes during anaesthesia, and length of stay (LOS) in the recovery ward and hospital. RESULTS A total of 86 and 88 patients were included in the OFA and control groups, respectively. Two patients were excluded because of severe adverse events including extreme bradycardia and epilepsy-like convulsion. The incidence and severity of PONV did not significantly differ between the two groups (29 patients (33.0%) in the control group and 22 patients (25.6%) in the OFA group; relative risk 0.78, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.23; p=0.285). Notably, the OFA approach used was associated with an increase in heart rate (89±17 vs 77±15 beats/min, t-test: p<0.001; U test: p<0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (87±17 vs 80±13 mm Hg, t-test: p=0.003; U test: p=0.004) after trachea intubation. Conversely, the control group exhibited more median hypotensive events per patient (mean 0.5±0.8 vs 1.0±2.0, t-test: p=0.02; median 0 (0-4) vs 0 (0-15), U test: p=0.02) during surgery. Postoperative pain scores, and LOS in the recovery ward and hospital did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study findings suggest that the implementation of OFA does not effectively reduce the incidence of PONV following thoracic surgery when compared with traditional total intravenous anaesthesia. The opioid-free strategy used in our study may be associated with severe adverse cardiovascular events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ChiCTR2100050738.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Bao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Shi Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Feng Zha
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen-Zhen Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Lin Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tong Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin-Jun Bian
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Feng Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kose G, Şirin K. Effects of Pain Beliefs on Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption in Spine Surgery Patients. J Neurosci Nurs 2023; 55:228-234. [PMID: 37931086 DOI: 10.1097/jnn.0000000000000730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT PURPOSE: This study evaluates the impact of pain belief on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in patients undergoing spine surgery. METHODS: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted on 71 patients undergoing spine surgery, who were admitted to the neurosurgery department of a university hospital between January 2021 and April 2022. Descriptive information form, Pain Beliefs Questionnaire, visual analog scale, pain evaluation form, and verbal category scale were used for data collection. RESULTS: Participant mean age was 53 years, and 40.8% underwent spinal disc surgery. A total of 60.2% of the participants experienced moderate postoperative pain, and severe pain was noted during the second postoperative hour, after rest and coughing, which decreased significantly during consecutive hours. Besides, 70.4% of the participants expressed that the level of pain decreased, 43.7% had pain as they expected, 69.0% had intermittent pain, and 53.5% experienced pain at the surgical site. The mean scores obtained from the Organic and Psychological Beliefs subscales of the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire were 4.25 and 4.21, respectively. There was a statistically significant relationship between the Psychological Beliefs and visual analog scale scores after coughing measured in the postoperative 24th and 36th hours. There was also a significant relationship between organic beliefs and working status. There was no statistically significant relationship between analgesic consumption and pain belief. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing spine surgery experienced moderate pain and had a relatively high level of pain beliefs. Regular evaluation of pain levels and beliefs is required for effective pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulsah Kose
- Keziban Şirin, RN, is Chief Nurse, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang Y, Xia R, Pericic TP, Bekkering GE, Hou L, Bala MM, Gao Y, Wu M, Gloss D, Siemieniuk RA, Fei Y, Rochwerg B, Guyatt G, Brignardello-Petersen R. How do network meta-analyses address intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence: a systematic survey. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075212. [PMID: 38035750 PMCID: PMC10689416 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe how systematic reviews with network meta-analyses (NMAs) that used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) NMA approach addressed intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence. DESIGN Systematic survey. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from September 2014 to October 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials with aggregate data NMAs that used the GRADE NMA approach for assessing certainty of evidence. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS We documented how reviewers described methods for addressing intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence, how often they rated down for intransitivity and their explanations for rating down. RESULTS Of the 268 eligible systematic reviews, 44.8% (120/268) mentioned intransitivity when describing methods for assessing the certainty of evidence. Of these, 28.3% (34/120) considered effect modifiers and from this subset, 67.6% (23/34) specified the effect modifiers; however, no systematic review noted how they chose the effect modifiers. 15.0% (18/120) mentioned looking for differences between the direct comparisons that inform the indirect estimate. No review specified a threshold for difference in effect modifiers between the direct comparisons that would lead to rating down for intransitivity. Reviewers noted rating down indirect evidence for intransitivity in 33.1% of systematic reviews, and noted intransitivity for network estimates in 23.0% of reviews. Authors provided an explanation for rating down for intransitivity in 59.6% (31/52) of the cases in which they rated down. Of the 31 in which they provided an explanation, 74.2% (23/31) noted they detected differences in effect modifiers and 67.7% (21/31) specified in what effect modifiers they detected differences. CONCLUSIONS A third of systematic reviews with NMAs using the GRADE approach rated down for intransitivity. Limitations in reporting of methods to address intransitivity proved considerable. Whether the problem is that reviewers neglected to address rating down for transitivity at all, or whether they did consider but not report, is not clear. At minimum systematic reviews with NMAs need to improve their reporting practices regarding intransitivity; it may well be that they need to improve their practice in transitivity assessment. How to best address intransitivity may remain unclear for many reviewers thus additional GRADE guidance providing practical instructions for addressing intransitivity may be desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Wang
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ruyu Xia
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | - Liangying Hou
- Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Malgorzata M Bala
- Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Ya Gao
- Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Michael Wu
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Gloss
- Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| | - Reed Alexander Siemieniuk
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yutong Fei
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hong B, Baek S, Kang H, Oh C, Jo Y, Lee S, Park S. Regional analgesia techniques for lumbar spine surgery: a frequentist network meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1728-1741. [PMID: 36912781 PMCID: PMC10389589 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Traditionally, wound infiltration (WI) with local anesthetics has been widely used by surgeons. Recently, other regional analgesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block, are being used for multimodal analgesia. The authors aimed to determine the relative efficacy of these using a network meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Library, and Google Scholar databases to identify all randomized controlled trials that compared the analgesic efficacy of the following interventions: ESPB, TLIP block, WI technique, and controls. The primary endpoint was postoperative opioid consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery, while the pain score, estimated postoperatively at three different time periods, was the secondary objective. RESULTS The authors included 34 randomized controlled trials with data from 2365 patients. TLIP showed the greatest reduction in opioid consumption compared to controls [mean difference (MD) =-15.0 mg; 95% CI: -18.8 to -11.2]. In pain scores, TLIP had the greatest effect during all time periods compared to controls (MD=-1.9 in early, -1.4 in middle, -0.9 in late). The injection level of ESPB was different in each study. When only surgical site injection of ESPB was included in the network meta-analysis, there was no difference compared with TLIP (MD=1.0 mg; 95% CI: -3.6 to 5.6). CONCLUSIONS TLIP showed the greatest analgesic efficacy after lumbar spine surgery, in terms of postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores, while ESPB and WI are also alternative analgesic options for these surgeries. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal method of providing regional analgesia after lumbar spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boohwi Hong
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University
- Biomedical Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Sujin Baek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University
| | - Hyemin Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University
| | - Chahyun Oh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University
| | - Yumin Jo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University
| | - Soomin Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University
| | - Seyeon Park
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195628. [PMID: 36233497 PMCID: PMC9572852 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The influence of pharmacotherapy regimens on surgical patient outcomes is increasingly appreciated in the era of enhanced recovery protocols and institutional focus on reducing postoperative complications. Specifics related to medication selection, dosing, frequency of administration, and duration of therapy are evolving to optimize pharmacotherapeutic regimens for many enhanced recovery protocolized elements. This review provides a summary of recent pharmacotherapeutic strategies, including those configured within electronic health record (EHR) applications and functionalities, that are associated with the minimization of the frequency and severity of postoperative complications (POCs), shortened hospital length of stay (LOS), reduced readmission rates, and cost or revenue impacts. Further, it will highlight preventive pharmacotherapy regimens that are correlated with improved patient preparation, especially those related to surgical site infection (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus (POI), and emergence delirium (PoD) as well as less commonly encountered POCs such as acute kidney injury (AKI) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The importance of interprofessional collaboration in all periprocedural phases, focusing on medication management through shared responsibilities for drug therapy outcomes, will be emphasized. Finally, examples of collaborative care through shared mental models of drug stewardship and non-medical practice agreements to improve operative throughput, reduce operative stress, and increase patient satisfaction are illustrated.
Collapse
|
12
|
Avis G, Gricourt Y, Vialatte PB, Meunier V, Perin M, Simon N, Claret PG, El Fertit H, Lefrant JY, Bertrand M, Cuvillon P. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane blocks for lumbar spine surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2022; 47:rapm-2022-103737. [PMID: 35863786 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Erector spinae plane block has been proposed to reduce opioid use and improve pain relief with controversial results. This randomized clinical study aimed to assess the efficacy of erector spinae plane block in major spine surgery including multimodal and 'Enhance Recovery After Surgery' programs. METHOD After institutional review board approval, adult patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery with standardized general anesthesia, rehabilitation and multimodal analgesia protocols were randomly allocated to receive bilateral ultrasound-guided block with saline versus ropivacaine (3.75 mg/mL). Before surgery, a bilateral erector spinae plane block was performed at lumbar level (third vertebrae) with 20 mL of solution for each side. The primary outcome was morphine consumption after 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and side effects, from postanesthesia care unit to discharge, and questionnaires at 3 months on pain and quality of life (EQ-5D). RESULTS From November 2019 to July 2021, 50 patients were enrolled with similar characteristics and surgery for each group. After the first 24 hours, there was no statistical difference regarding cumulative intravenous morphine consumption between ropivacaine and saline groups: 7.3 mg (3.7-19) vs 12.5 mg (3.5-26) (p=0.51). Over the five postoperative days, opioid sparing, pain scores and side effects were similar between groups. At 3 months, pain relief, incidence of chronic pain and EQ-5D were similar between groups. DISCUSSION Erector spinae plane block used in conjunction with 'Enhance Recovery After Surgery' and multimodal analgesia protocols provides limited reduction in opioid consumption and no long-term benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER EudraCT 2019-001678-26.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey Avis
- Staff Anesthesiologists, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalo Universitaire Carémeau, Montpellier University 1, Montpellier, France
| | - Yann Gricourt
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France
| | - Pierre Baptiste Vialatte
- Staff Anesthesiologists, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalo Universitaire Carémeau, Montpellier University 1, Montpellier, France
| | - Victor Meunier
- Staff Anesthesiologists, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalo Universitaire Carémeau, Montpellier University 1, Montpellier, France
| | - Mikael Perin
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France
| | - Natacha Simon
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France
| | - Pierre-Geraud Claret
- Department of Emergency, Nîmes University Hospital, University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France
- Department of Digestive, Surgery Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), Nîmes, France
| | - Hassan El Fertit
- Department of Spine Surgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France
| | - Jean-Yves Lefrant
- Staff Anesthesiologists, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalo Universitaire Carémeau, Montpellier University 1, Montpellier, France
| | - Martin Bertrand
- Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalo Universitaire Carémeau, Montpellier University 1, Montpellier, France
- Department of Digestive, Surgery Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), Nîmes, France
- Département Chirurgie Digestive, France and Laboratory of Experimental Anatomy, Montpellier, France
| | - Philippe Cuvillon
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brogly N, Guasch E. Postoperative analgesia after spine surgery: towards a multimodal approach including regional anaesthesia for an enhanced recovery. Minerva Anestesiol 2022; 88:428-430. [PMID: 35416470 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.22.16628-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Brogly
- Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain - .,Servicio de Anestesia, Hospital Universitario La Zarzuela, Madrid, Spain -
| | - Emilia Guasch
- Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|