There is (probably) no (meaningful) difference in (most) outcomes between 'spinal' and 'general' anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: time to move forward

A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery

Background

Careful administration of either spinal (intrathecal) or general anaesthesia probably has a greater impact on outcomes after hip fracture surgery than which method is used per se. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with poorer outcomes, but appears less prevalent using lower doses of spinal anaesthesia.

Methods

In this observational single-centre study, intraoperative noninvasive blood pressure data were analysed from 280 patients undergoing unilateral hip fracture surgery after the administration of hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine 0.5%, 1.3 ml (0.65 mg).

Results

Mean cohort mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained within 10% of baseline (spinal injection) MAP for 97/98 (99.0%) subsequent aggregated 1-min recording intervals. The prevalences of lowest MAP <70 mm Hg and <55 mm Hg were significantly lower than historical equivalents (Anaesthesia Sprint Audit of Practice 1 and 2) (52.9% and 10.4% vs 71.9% and 23.8%, respectively, both <0.0001). The proportions of 10 551 MAP readings <70 mm Hg and <55 mm Hg were 6.7% and 0.4%, respectively. Forty-five (16.1%) patients had relatively persistent hypotension (MAP ≤70 mm Hg for five or more intraoperative readings), and were statistically more likely to be frail (Nottingham Hip Fracture Score ≥7/10, 37.8% vs 19.6%, P=0.0109) and be taking alpha-/beta-blockers (44.4% vs 24.3%, P=0.0099) than the remaining 'normotensive' cohort. Surgical anaesthesia remained effective for up to 190 min, with only one patient requiring supplemental local anaesthesia during skin closure.

Conclusions

Low doses of hyperbaric spinal 0.5% bupivacaine (1.3 ml, 6.5 mg) are associated with minimal reductions in blood pressure during surgery and provide adequate duration of surgical anaesthesia. Randomised comparisons of lower vs higher/standard doses of spinal anaesthesia are now required to confirm outcome benefits in this vulnerable patient group.

Clinical trial registration

NCT05799300.

Improved outcomes for spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a retrospective cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus in the literature as to whether anesthetic modality influences perioperative complications in hip fracture surgery. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent hip fracture surgery using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP).

METHODS

We used the ACS NSQIP to identify patients aged 50 and older who received either spinal or general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery from 2016 to 2019. Propensity-score matching was performed to control for clinically relevant covariates. The primary outcome of interest was the combined incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay and operative time.

RESULTS

Among the 40 527 patients aged 50 and over who received either spinal or general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery from 2016 to 2019, 7358 spinal anesthesia cases were matched to general anesthesia cases. General anesthesia was associated with a higher incidence of combined 30-day stroke, MI or death compared with spinal anesthesia (OR 1.219 (95% CI 1.076 to 1.381); p=0.002). General anesthesia was also associated with a higher frequency of 30-day mortality (OR 1.276 (95% CI 1.099 to 1.481); p=0.001) and longer operative time (64.73 vs 60.28 min; p<0.001). Spinal anesthesia had a longer average hospital length of stay (6.29 vs 5.73 days; p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our propensity-matched analysis suggests that spinal anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia is associated with lower postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.