Management of patients with suspected placenta accreta spectrum

Managing Placenta Accreta and Massive Hemorrhage: A Case Report on Anesthetic and Surgical Interventions

Obstetric haemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality and is a common reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in the postpartum. Primary postpartum obstetric haemorrhage is associated with four main causes: tone, thrombin, trauma, and tissue. Regarding the last one, placenta accreta is an abnormal invasion of the placenta into the myometrium. Early diagnosis of placenta accreta allows for better perioperative management; however, it is sometimes only identified during caesarean delivery when the placenta cannot be removed. We report a case of a 37-year-old woman with a history of caesarean section due to placenta previa, who was admitted at 36 weeks and 1 day for an urgent caesarean section (c-section) due to cord presentation. A subarachnoid block (SAB) was used for anaesthesia. It was chosen over general anaesthesia because it allows the patient to experience the birth of her children, enhances pain control, and avoids complications associated with general anaesthesia. Besides our centre has expertise in neuraxial anaesthesia. During the procedure, placental accretism and massive haemorrhage occurred, and a life-saving abdominal hysterectomy was needed. The patient experienced hypotension, partially responsive to volume replacement and vasopressors, leading to norepinephrine infusion and conversion to general anaesthesia. The surgery lasted 2.5 hours with a blood loss of 3500 ml. The patient was extubated without complications and transferred to the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) include previous surgery and placenta previa with a prior c-section. Antenatal diagnosis is crucial, and women with risk factors should undergo imaging at experienced centres. Delivery centres must have protocols for unexpected PAS and major obstetric haemorrhage. Both general and neuraxial anaesthesia can be suitable for managing PAS, and caesarean hysterectomy is often required to control haemorrhage. Postoperatively, adequate monitoring and care is essential. PAS management should involve excellent communication between a multidisciplinary team in specialised centres.

Treatment of intrauterine adhesions and subsequent pregnancy outcomes in an in vitro fertilization population

BACKGROUND

Asherman syndrome refers to the presence of intrauterine adhesions, which have clinical implications, including infertility. There are few studies assessing the effect of serial hysteroscopies for adhesiolysis on reproductive and pregnancy outcomes among women who subsequently undergo in vitro fertilization, and none have looked at maternal, neonatal, or placental pregnancy complications.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the effect of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis among a cohort of patients who subsequently undergo in vitro fertilization.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for intrauterine adhesions at our center between 2005-2020 and subsequently attempted conception by in vitro fertilization. A control group of patients who underwent in vitro fertilization for nonuterine factor infertility and had no history of intrauterine adhesions was chosen for comparison.

RESULTS

There were 691 patients included in this study, of whom 168 were intrauterine adhesion cases. The implantation rate (41.3% in both groups) and live birth rate (adjusted relative risk, 0.93 [95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.14]) were not statistically different between cases and controls. When grouped by number of previous adhesiolysis surgeries, patients who underwent ≥2 adhesiolysis surgeries had a lower live birth rate than controls (adjusted relative risk, 0.53 [95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.99]). Endometrial thickness before the transfer was significantly reduced in cases vs controls (8.23 vs 10.25 mm; adjusted relative risk, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.90]). Adverse placental outcomes, including placenta accreta spectrum, placenta previa, or vasa previa, were significantly more likely to occur in cases than controls (adjusted relative risk, 2.08 [95% confidence interval, 1.25-3.46]). When grouped by the number of adhesiolysis surgeries, the risk appeared to increase as the number of prior surgeries increased. This is likely because of the increased severity of these adhesions.

CONCLUSION

Overall, patients with a history of treated intrauterine adhesions have the same live birth rate as patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for nonuterine factor indications. However, the subgroup of patients who require multiple surgeries for correction of intrauterine adhesions had a lower live birth rate after in vitro fertilization than controls. Patients with a history of treated intrauterine adhesions are at significantly greater risk of placenta accreta syndrome disorder than control patients who underwent in vitro fertilization for nonuterine factor indications.

Anesthesia and postpartum pain management for placenta accreta spectrum: The healthcare provider perspective

OBJECTIVE

To explore the management and experiences of healthcare providers around anesthetic care in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).

METHODS

This descriptive survey study was carried out over a 6-week period between January and March 2023. Healthcare providers, both anesthesiologists and those involved in operative care for women with PAS, were invited to participate. Questions invited both quantitative and qualitative responses. Qualitative responses were analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 171 healthcare providers responded to the survey, the majority of whom were working in tertiary PAS referral centers (153; 89%) and 116 (70%) had more than 10 years of clinical experience. There was variation in the preferred primary mode of anesthesia for PAS cases; 69 (42%) used neuraxial only, but 58 (35%) used a combined approach of neuraxial and general anesthesia, with only 12 (8%) preferring general anesthesia. Ninety-nine (61%) were offering a routine antenatal anesthesia consultation. Content analysis of qualitative data identified three main themes, which were "variation in approach to primary mode of anesthesia", "perspectives of patient preferences", and "importance of multidisciplinary team care". These findings led to the development of a decision aid provided as part of this paper, which may assist clinicians in counseling women on their options for care to come to an informed decision.

CONCLUSIONS

Approach to anesthesia for PAS varied between healthcare providers. The final decision for anesthesia should take into consideration the clinical care needs as well as the preferences of the patient.

Comparison of uterine preservation versus hysterectomy in women with placenta accreta: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a major cause of obstetric bleeding in third trimester of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of uterine preservation surgery vs. hysterectomy in women with PAS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, the records of 68 women with PAS referred to the Imam Khomeini hospital in Ahvaz, Iran, between March 2015 and February 2020 were included. The women were divided into 2 groups according to surgical approach: hysterectomy vs. uterine preservation (including just removing the lower segment, removing the lower segment with uterine artery ligation, or removing the lower segment with hypogastric artery ligation during cesarean section). The need for blood components transfusion (whole blood, packed cells, and fresh frozen plasma), maternal mortality, duration of surgery, and length of hospitalization were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In total, we investigated 68 women between the ages of 24-45 yr (mean age of 32.88 ± 5.08 yr). All participants were multiparous and underwent cesarean section. Furthermore, 28 women (41.2%) had a history of curettage. In total, 24 women (35.3%) underwent a hysterectomy, and 44 (64.7%) underwent uterine preservative surgeries. There were no significant differences between groups of hysterectomy and uterine preservative surgeries in terms of the need for blood components transfusion, maternal mortality, duration of surgery, and length of hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed no significant difference between groups regarding the studied outcomes. Therefore, conservative surgeries could be used to preserve the uterus instead of hysterectomy in women with PAS.