1
|
Uppal V, Russell R, Sondekoppam RV, Ansari J, Baber Z, Chen Y, DelPizzo K, Dirzu DS, Kalagara H, Kissoon NR, Kranz PG, Leffert L, Lim G, Lobo C, Lucas DN, Moka E, Rodriguez SE, Sehmbi H, Vallejo MC, Volk T, Narouze S. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: a consensus report from a multisociety international working group. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024; 49:471-501. [PMID: 37582578 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis or management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. This multisociety guidance aims to fill this void and provide practitioners with comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with PDPH. METHODS Based on input from committee members and stakeholders, the committee cochairs developed 10 review questions deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid) on 2 March 2022. The results from each search were imported into separate Covidence projects for deduplication and screening, followed by data extraction. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for the development of guidelines and shared with contributors. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations graded according to the US Preventative Services Task Force grading of evidence. The interim draft was shared electronically, with each collaborator requested to vote anonymously on each recommendation using two rounds of a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS Based on contemporary evidence and consensus, the multidisciplinary panel generated 50 recommendations to provide guidance regarding risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH, along with their strength and certainty of evidence. After two rounds of voting, we achieved a high level of consensus for all statements and recommendations. Several recommendations had moderate-to-low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS These clinical practice guidelines for PDPH provide a framework to improve identification, evaluation and delivery of evidence-based care by physicians performing neuraxial procedures to improve the quality of care and align with patients' interests. Uncertainty remains regarding best practice for the majority of management approaches for PDPH due to the paucity of evidence. Additionally, opportunities for future research are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Uppal
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management & Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Robin Russell
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rakesh V Sondekoppam
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jessica Ansari
- Anesthesia Department, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Zafeer Baber
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yian Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kathryn DelPizzo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dan Sebastian Dirzu
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Hari Kalagara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Narayan R Kissoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Peter G Kranz
- Depatement of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa Leffert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale New Haven Health System; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Grace Lim
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Clara Lobo
- Anesthesiology Institute, Interventional Pain Medicine Department, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Dominique Nuala Lucas
- Department of Anaesthesia, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Eleni Moka
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Creta Interclinic Hospital - Hellenic Healthcare Group (HHG), Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Stephen E Rodriguez
- Department of Anesthesia, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Herman Sehmbi
- Department of Anesthesia, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manuel C Vallejo
- Departments of Medical Education, Anesthesiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Thomas Volk
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Samer Narouze
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA
- Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Castillo-Álvarez F, Hernando de la Bárcena I, Marzo-Sola ME. Greater occipital nerve block in the treatment of headaches. Review of evidence. Med Clin (Barc) 2023:S0025-7753(23)00177-X. [PMID: 37100680 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peripheral nerve blocks have been a common treatment for multiple headaches. By far, the greater occipital nerve block is the most used and with the stronger body of evidence in routine clinical practice. METHODS We searched Pubmed Meta-Analysis/Systematic Review, in the last 10 years. Of these results, meta-analyses, and in the absence of these systematic reviews, assessing Greater Occipital Nerve Block in headache has been selected for review. RESULTS We identified 95 studies in Pubmed, 13 that met the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION Greater occipital block is an effective and safe technique, easy to perform and which has shown its usefulness in migraine, cluster headache, cervicogenic headache and Post-dural puncture headache. However, more studies are needed to clarify its long-term efficacy, its place in clinical treatment, the possible difference between different anaesthetics, the most convenient dosage and the role of concomitant use of corticosteroids.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This manuscript aims to review the risks and the current treatments for postdural puncture headache (PDPH). RECENT FINDINGS PDPH is a relatively frequent complication after neuraxial blocks. It is typically orthostatic in nature, presenting as a positional and dull aching or throbbing headache, with added dysregulation of auditory and/or visual signals. Certain characteristics, such as female sex and young age, may predispose patients to the development of PDPH, as may factors such as previous PDPH, bearing down during the second stage of labor, and the neuraxial technique itself. Long-term complications including chronic headache for years following dural puncture have brought into question of the historical classification of PDPH as a self-limiting headache. So far, the underlying mechanism governing PDPH remains under investigation, while a wide variety of prophylactic and therapeutic measures have been explored with various degree of success. In case of mild PDPH, conservative management involving bed rest and pharmacological management should be used as first-line treatment. Nerve blocks are highly efficient alternatives for PDPH patients who do not respond well to conservative treatment. In case of moderate-to-severe PDPH, epidural blood patch remains the therapy of choice. An interdisciplinary approach to care for patients with PDPH is recommended to achieve optimal outcomes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chang YJ, Hung KC, Chen IW, Kuo CL, Teng IC, Lin MC, Yew M, Liao SW, Wu CY, Yu CH, Lan KM, Sun CK. Efficacy of greater occipital nerve block for pain relief in patients with postdural puncture headache: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28438. [PMID: 34941197 PMCID: PMC8701447 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed at assessing the therapeutic effectiveness of greater occipital nerve block (GONB) against postdural puncture headache (PDPH). METHODS Studies investigating analgesic effects of GONB against PDPH in adults were retrieved from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google scholar, and Cochrane central databases from their inception dates to May, 2021. Pain score at postprocedural 24 hours was the primary endpoint, while secondary endpoints were pain score at postprocedural 1 hour and 12 hours as well as the risk of intervention failure. RESULTS Of the 7 studies (randomized controlled trials [RCTs], n = 4; non-RCTs, n = 3) that recruited 275 patients, 2 investigated female patients undergoing cesarean section and the other 5 were conducted in both obstetric and nonobstetric settings. Pooled results showed a lower mean pain score at 24 hours (i.e., primary outcome) (mean difference [MD] = -2.66, 95%: CI: -3.98 to -1.33, P < .001; I2 = 97%, 6 studies), 1 hour (MD = -4.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.08 to -3.37, P < .00001; I2 = 86%, 5 studies), and 6 hours (MD = -2.78, 95% CI: -4.99 to -0.57, P = .01; I2 = 98%, 4 studies) in patients with GONB compared to those without. Trial sequential analysis supported the robustness of evidence at postprocedural 24 hours. The use of GONB also decreased the risk of intervention failure (relative ratio [RR] = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.82, P = .01; I2 = 96%, 6 studies, 277 patients). CONCLUSION Our results suggested a therapeutic effect of greater occipital nerve block against postdural puncture headache up to postprocedural 24 hours. Further large-scale studies are warranted to evaluate its therapeutic benefit beyond the acute stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Jen Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
- Department of Recreation and Health-Care Management, College of Recreation and Health Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Chuan Hung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - I-Wen Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Lin Kuo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - I-Chia Teng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chung Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Ming Yew
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Wei Liao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Yi Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hung Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Mao Lan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Cheuk-Kwan Sun
- Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine for International Students, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Effectiveness of nebulized dexmedetomidine for treatment of post-dural puncture headache in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled study. J Anesth 2021; 35:515-524. [PMID: 33993346 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-021-02944-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The need for effective treatment for post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a growing research entity. This study aimed to test the effectiveness of additional dexmedetomidine (DEX) to PDPH conservative management and evaluate its cerebral hemodynamic effects trans-cranial Doppler. METHODS This prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted on 43 post-partum females suffering from PDPH with visual analog score (VAS) ≥ 4 and Lybecker score ≥ 2. The study subjects were allocated into control group [n = 22] received nebulization of 4 mL 0.9% saline and DEX group [n = 21] received nebulization of 1 µg/kg DEX diluted in 4 mL 0.9% saline twice daily that was continued until achieving VAS score ≤ 3 and Lybecker score < 2 and/or for a maximum of 72 h. Both groups received routine conservative management. The primary outcome was the VAS and Lybecker scores and the secondary results were the DEX effects on cerebral vessels and the occurrence of any adverse effects. RESULTS VAS and Lybecker scores were significantly lower in DEX group. The middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity was significantly lower, and the pulsatility index was considerably higher after DEX nebulization compared to placebo. Two patients in the control group were indicated for epidural blood patch. CONCLUSION The addition of DEX nebulization (1 µg/kg twice daily) to the PDPH conservative care effectively relieved the symptoms and lowered pain scores which could be due to its analgesic and cerebral vasoconstrictive effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was approved by the research ethical committee of Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University with the reference number (ZU-IRB#: 6075/26-4-2020) and it was registered under clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04327726).
Collapse
|
6
|
Xavier J, Pinho S, Silva J, Nunes CS, Cabido H, Fortuna R, Araújo R, Lemos P, Machado H. Postdural puncture headache in the obstetric population: a new approach? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45:373-376. [DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectivesThe gold standard for the treatment of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is the epidural blood patch (EBP). Regional techniques—sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB), greater occipital nerve block (GONB) and trigger point infiltration (TPI)—can also be used for the treatment of PDPH. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of these peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) in the treatment of PDPH.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted including all patients with PDPH in the obstetrics department of our institution between April 2016 and December 2017. Data were retrieved from clinical records regarding anesthetic technique, symptoms, treatment, Numeric Pain Score (NPS) before and after treatment, among others.ResultsWe observed 50 cases of PDPH: 25 following spinal anesthesia, 19 following epidural block and 6 following combined spinal-epidural. Of these, seven were managed conservatively and one received EBP as first-line treatment. The remaining 42 patients received PNB as first-line treatment. Of these, 27 received only 1 course of PNB, while 15 received 2 courses. We observed a statistically significant improvement in the NPS after the first course of blocks (n=42), with a reduction of the median NPS by 6.0 (IQR 4.0–7.5; p<0.001). Improvement was also observed after the second course of blocks (n=15), with a reduction of the median NPS of 3.5 (IQR 1.5–5.0; p=0.02). Due to treatment failure, 9 of the 42 patients treated with PNB required EBP. None of these were cases following spinal anesthesia.ConclusionSPGB, GONB and TPI can be safe and effective options for treatment of PDPH, but do not completely eliminate the need for EBP. Prospective studies designed to identify factors associated with unsuccessful treatment are required.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Headache disorders attributed to low and high intracranial pressure are commonly encountered in specialty headache practices and may occur more frequently than realized. While the headaches resulting from intracranial pressure disorders have what are conventionally thought of as defining characteristics, a substantial minority of patients do not manifest the "typical" features. Moreover, patients with intracranial pressure disorders may also have a preexisting primary headache disorder. Heightening the complexity of the presentation, the headaches of intracranial pressure disorders can resemble the phenotype of a primary disorder. Lastly, patients with so-called intracranial "hypotension" often have normal CSF pressure and neuroimaging studies. Thus, a high index of suspicion is needed. The published literature has inherent bias as many types of specialists evaluate and treat these conditions. This article reviews the key points to emphasize the history, examination, and laboratory evaluation of patients with intracranial pressure disorders from a neurologist's perspective. RECENT FINDINGS Lumbar puncture opening pressure in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension was low enough to meet diagnostic criteria (≤60 mm CSF) in only 34% of patients in one study. Most patients had an opening pressure in the low normal to normal range, and 5% had an opening pressure of 200 mm CSF or more. Diskogenic microspurs are a common cause of this syndrome. The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial found that most participants had a headache phenotype resembling migraine or tension-type headache. No "typical" or characteristic headache phenotype was found, and headache-related disability was severe at baseline. Headache disability did not correlate with the lumbar puncture opening pressure at baseline or at the 6-month primary outcome period. Although participants who were randomly assigned to acetazolamide had a lower mean CSF opening pressure at 6 months, headache disability in that group was similar to the group who received placebo. SUMMARY Significant overlap is seen in the symptoms of high and low CSF pressure disorders and in those of primary headache disorders. Neurologists are frequently challenged by patients with headaches who lack the typical clinical signs or imaging features of the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome or spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Even when characteristic symptoms and signs are initially present, the typical features of both syndromes tend to lessen or resolve over time; consider these diagnoses in patients with long-standing "chronic migraine" who do not improve with conventional headache treatment. While the diagnostic criteria for pseudotumor cerebri syndrome accurately identify most patients with the disorder, at least 25% of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension have normal imaging and over half have a normal lumbar puncture opening pressure. Detailed history taking will often give clues that suggest a CSF pressure disorder. That said, misdiagnosis can lead to significant patient morbidity and inappropriate therapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang CJ, Chen T, Ni X, Yu WY, Wang W. Effect of pre-administration with aminophylline on the occurrence of post-dural puncture headache in women undergoing caesarean section by combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. J Int Med Res 2018; 47:420-426. [PMID: 30270800 PMCID: PMC6384488 DOI: 10.1177/0300060518803231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effect of the pre-administration with aminophylline on the occurrence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in women undergoing caesarean section by combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSEA). Methods The study enrolled women undergoing elective caesarean sections with CSEA and randomly allocated them into two groups; for 30 min immediately after the infant was delivered, group A received 250 mg aminophylline intravenously and group B received an equal volume of normal saline. Demographic data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion volume and the occurrence of PDPH during the first 7 days after the operation were recorded. Side-effects such as hypersensitivity, convulsion and arrhythmia were also recorded in the patients and infants in group A within 24 h after aminophylline administration. Results A total of 120 patients aged 24–38 years (pregnancy range, 38–42 weeks) were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 60). The incidence of PDPH in group A was significantly lower than group C (two of 59 [3.4%] versus 10 of 58 [17.2%], respectively). There were no related side-effects within 24 h after aminophylline administration in group A. Conclusions Intraoperative intravenous infusion of 250 mg aminophylline reduced the incidence of PDPH after caesarean section under CSEA with no side-effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Jie Yang
- 1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Yingshang County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuyang, Anhui Province, China
| | - Tao Chen
- 2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, Anhui Province, China
| | - Xin Ni
- 3 Department of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Jiading Central Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wan-You Yu
- 4 Department of Anaesthesiology, Jiangning Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Wei Wang
- 4 Department of Anaesthesiology, Jiangning Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nair AS, Kodisharapu PK, Anne P, Saifuddin MS, Asiel C, Rayani BK. Efficacy of bilateral greater occipital nerve block in postdural puncture headache: a narrative review. Korean J Pain 2018; 31:80-86. [PMID: 29686805 PMCID: PMC5904351 DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2018.31.2.80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Epidural blood patch is considered the gold standard for managing postdural puncture headache when supportive measures fail. However, it is a procedure which can lead to another inadvertent dural puncture. Other potential adverse events that could occur during a blood patch are meningitis, neurological deficits, and unconsciousness. The bilateral greater occipital nerve block has been used for treating chronic headaches in patients with PDPH with a single injection. This minimally invasive, simple procedure can be considered for patients early, along with other supportive treatment, and an epidural blood patch can be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijit S Nair
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Praveen Kumar Kodisharapu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Poornachand Anne
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Mohammad Salman Saifuddin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Christopher Asiel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Basanth Kumar Rayani
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Souza Neto EPD, Martinez JL, Dekoven K, Yung F, Lesage S. Bilateral greater occipital nerve block for headache after corrective spinal surgery: a case report. SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/22201181.2018.1429045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kathryn Dekoven
- Département d’anesthésie, Hôpital Sainte Justine, Montréal, Canada
| | - Francoise Yung
- Département d’anesthésie, Hôpital Sainte Justine, Montréal, Canada
| | - Sandra Lesage
- Département d’anesthésie, Hôpital Sainte Justine, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nair AS. Bilateral greater orbital nerve block: Efficacy in postdural puncture headache. Saudi J Anaesth 2018; 12:159-160. [PMID: 29416488 PMCID: PMC5789490 DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_350_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijit S Nair
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kwak KH. Postdural puncture headache. Korean J Anesthesiol 2017; 70:136-143. [PMID: 28367283 PMCID: PMC5370299 DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2016] [Revised: 11/24/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication after inadvertent dural puncture. Risks factors include female sex, young age, pregnancy, vaginal delivery, low body mass index, and being a non-smoker. Needle size, design, and the technique used also affect the risk. Because PDPH can be incapacitating, prompt diagnosis and treatment are mandatory. A diagnostic hallmark of PDPH is a postural headache that worsens with sitting or standing, and improves with lying down. Conservative therapies such as bed rest, hydration, and caffeine are commonly used as prophylaxis and treatment for this condition; however, no substantial evidence supports routine bed rest and aggressive hydration. An epidural blood patch is the most effective treatment option for patients with unsuccessful conservative management. Various other prophylactic and treatment interventions have been suggested. However, due to a lack of conclusive evidence supporting their use, the potential benefits of such interventions should be weighed carefully against the risks. This article reviews the current literature on the diagnosis, risk factors, pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of PDPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung-Hwa Kwak
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|