Sun Y, Fan H, Song XX, Zhang H. Comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults.
Eur J Med Res 2020;
25:45. [PMID:
33008485 PMCID:
PMC7532601 DOI:
10.1186/s40001-020-00446-x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The present study aimed to compare three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation.
METHODS
Through literature retrieval, the effects of the adhesive/twill tape method, fixator method, and adhesive/twill tape-fixator alternation method on patients with tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) were compared.
RESULTS
The fixator and alternation methods were more effective in protecting the tongue mucosa and teeth. The alternation method was superior to the other two methods in maintaining the position of the endotracheal intubation. However, the difference in facial and lip injuries between the three methods was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
The fixator method can significantly reduce intraoral injury and is more suitable for older people with weak tongue mucosa and loose teeth. These are worth popularizing among a wider group.
Collapse